Your appeal to the language codes according to ISO-1,2,3 is meaningless, because it is quite possible to assume that within the framework of the "dictionary" project we can create bilingual indexes, or, more precisely, indexes for pairs of specific alphabets that are not in any ISO standards invested. We are talking only about the understandable values of the parameters of one specific template. '''But this technical issue is outside the scope of this RFC'''.
Your appeal to the language codes according to ISO-1,2,3 is meaningless, because it is quite possible to assume that within the framework of the "dictionary" project we can create bilingual indexes, or, more precisely, indexes for pairs of specific alphabets that are not in any ISO standards invested. We are talking only about the understandable values of the parameters of one specific template. '''But this technical issue is outside the scope of this RFC'''.