"You are boxing monetization underneath ownership. Monetization is not limited to the things that you own."
Dude what are you talking about? Nobody boxed monetization under ownership. It's actually talking about the opposite and saying people shouldn't try to box ownership under monetization. The funny part is, I agree with you and the article is also agreeing with you, yet you are just attacking for the sake of attacking. Can't you see the article doesn't disagree with you?
"You are boxing monetization underneath ownership. Monetization is not limited to the things that you own."
Dude what are you talking about? Nobody boxed monetization under ownership. It's actually talking about the opposite and saying people shouldn't try to box ownership under monetization. The funny part is, I agree with you and the article is also agreeing with you, yet you are just attacking for the sake of attacking. Can't you see the article doesn't disagree with you?