1. We have to move to other fee structure in the future. like data*1+op_checksig*200(sat/kb).
2. Those data should be saved by the miner but not necessary provided as a free service.
3. I think UTXO will be much more expensive to process than datacarrier, so we should encourage datacarrier usage by lowering the fees. We still got very good publicity and other advantages to put raw data in a transaction.
4. Dust limit is important as a security deposit for someone to collect it in the future and pay enough fees. incentives for miner to keep it. If we lower the dust limit, we(miner) may not save it for the future. Thus we should use data carrier.
5. More complicated calculations will emerge.
1. We have to move to other fee structure in the future. like data*1+op_checksig*200(sat/kb).
2. Those data should be saved by the miner but not necessary provided as a free service.
3. I think UTXO will be much more expensive to process than datacarrier, so we should encourage datacarrier usage by lowering the fees. We still got very good publicity and other advantages to put raw data in a transaction.
4. Dust limit is important as a security deposit for someone to collect it in the future and pay enough fees. incentives for miner to keep it. If we lower the dust limit, we(miner) may not save it for the future. Thus we should use data carrier.
5. More complicated calculations will emerge.