Another example: Stanley Kubrick's estate wishes to not ever lose the timestamp or digital data-set for a posthumous movie they want to publish in 2021 which is 2 GigaBytes in size. They place the entire movie into a UTXO set worth, say, $1,000. This would saddle mempool and other miners with 2 GigaBytes of info required to be stored inside a live UTXO. However, so long as the UTXO set is big enough, let's say $10,000, you'd rest easy knowing the Kubrick estate wouldn't want to waste $10,000 in BitCoin, especially if deflationary BSV goes up 1,000 in the next 50 years, such that the UTXO set is now worth $10 MILLION to the Kubrick estate. In 2070 the estate would simply spend the UTXO set, but then burn the 2 GB movie into another $10,000 UTXO set, linking it to the first one for time-stamp purposes, and voila! BitCoin Network gets a few fat transactions via data size, Kubrick estate gets a $9.99 mm profit on its old UTXO set PLUS still keeps it's copy, and everyone is happy. If lucky, the Kubrick estate even sets up it's main copy as the sole master copy, such that distributors need to pay a large fee to simply download it, thus multiple transactions collected thru the years. But if a less-than-dust UTXO set is used, then storing 2 GigaBytes might be cumbersome for the network. Thoughts?
Another example: Stanley Kubrick's estate wishes to not ever lose the timestamp or digital data-set for a posthumous movie they want to publish in 2021 which is 2 GigaBytes in size. They place the entire movie into a UTXO set worth, say, $1,000. This would saddle mempool and other miners with 2 GigaBytes of info required to be stored inside a live UTXO. However, so long as the UTXO set is big enough, let's say $10,000, you'd rest easy knowing the Kubrick estate wouldn't want to waste $10,000 in BitCoin, especially if deflationary BSV goes up 1,000 in the next 50 years, such that the UTXO set is now worth $10 MILLION to the Kubrick estate. In 2070 the estate would simply spend the UTXO set, but then burn the 2 GB movie into another $10,000 UTXO set, linking it to the first one for time-stamp purposes, and voila! BitCoin Network gets a few fat transactions via data size, Kubrick estate gets a $9.99 mm profit on its old UTXO set PLUS still keeps it's copy, and everyone is happy. If lucky, the Kubrick estate even sets up it's main copy as the sole master copy, such that distributors need to pay a large fee to simply download it, thus multiple transactions collected thru the years. But if a less-than-dust UTXO set is used, then storing 2 GigaBytes might be cumbersome for the network. Thoughts?