But seriously, think<a class="mention" href="/@glauce">@glauce</a> has it. It's a vinyl record (or jet black DVD?) which symbolizes a proof-of-work similar to BitCoin itself where the vinyl record itself has a cost to manufacture, but it's only a fraction of the value of the object because all the REAL value is on the song which is imprinted into the grooves. Similarly,<a class="mention" href="/@powping">@powping</a> doesn't write EVERYTHING to chain, but only that which proves its work, and thus is valuable (like the song in the grooves).
POWping. Do a proof of work (good writing), and get PINGed (with money) with data-on-chain.
But will OP_0/RETURN ALWAYS be "on-chain"? 🤔
But seriously, think<a class="mention" href="/@glauce">@glauce</a> has it. It's a vinyl record (or jet black DVD?) which symbolizes a proof-of-work similar to BitCoin itself where the vinyl record itself has a cost to manufacture, but it's only a fraction of the value of the object because all the REAL value is on the song which is imprinted into the grooves. Similarly,<a class="mention" href="/@powping">@powping</a> doesn't write EVERYTHING to chain, but only that which proves its work, and thus is valuable (like the song in the grooves).
POWping. Do a proof of work (good writing), and get PINGed (with money) with data-on-chain.
But will OP_0/RETURN ALWAYS be "on-chain"? 🤔