Good post. I&#39;ve had a hard time making it through the videos -- it&#39;s a struggle. But I&#39;ve watched enough to see refrains of the obsession w/ credit hours and degrees... yet the narrative in the interviews speaks to the underlying "educational" value. IRT Scronty -- the whole CSW et al supplanting him with another "Jamie Wilson" aspect was very odd when I read his interview with Bitcoin.com. The extent he goes into explaining Jamie in <a href='http://vu.hn/bitcoin%20origins.html'>http://vu.hn/bitcoin%20origins.html</a> was also odd. The determination it would take to go find another Jamie Wilson to swindle the &#39;real&#39; Jamie Wilson out of legitimacy... I also found it coincidental that he came out with his version after the Kleiman litigation made names like "Jamie Wilson" more known and tied to the inner-workings of W&K and Bitcoin story (at least per CSW). Do you address that aspect in the interview (will have to find a few hours to 2x through it some day!)? I didn&#39;t see any references to him in the court docs (not that I read every doc). Again though, not that negates anything as the parties are purportedly squabbling over their piece of the Satoshi pie -- why legitimize anyone that could dilute that? Again, if the whole Kleiman / CSW angle is legit...