I hear you, and thanks for the vision<a class="mention" href="/@unwriter">@unwriter</a>, looking forward to seeing what you have coming down the pike. I have my own idea of how data SHOULD be put on chain (clearly or I wouldn't have written this article: <a href='https://sym.re/oavobE'>https://sym.re/oavobE</a> on a perhaps non-standard view of OP_0 OP_RETURN methodology), and so far I think<a class="mention" href="/@powping">@powping</a> is the closest to what I'm envisioning of the future of BitCoin. AKA, not all data is chain-worthy, and that's a GOOD thing.
I hear you, and thanks for the vision<a class="mention" href="/@unwriter">@unwriter</a>, looking forward to seeing what you have coming down the pike. I have my own idea of how data SHOULD be put on chain (clearly or I wouldn't have written this article: <a href='https://sym.re/oavobE'>https://sym.re/oavobE</a> on a perhaps non-standard view of OP_0 OP_RETURN methodology), and so far I think<a class="mention" href="/@powping">@powping</a> is the closest to what I'm envisioning of the future of BitCoin. AKA, not all data is chain-worthy, and that's a GOOD thing.