I think about this topic (not to gain agreement beforehand) a lot, lately, (similar to a lifelong internal back-and-forth on the Parable of the Talents' Servant #3) and just a few years ago I'd have been in the same camp. But the last 2 years has made me challenge everything I think I knew. Unsure of any answers, but have always run life as an experiment, and now is no different, so will let you know how it turns out someday. But what I can say is, having a lot in the tank creates nice buffer. Copy me and beat me, and I'll be flattered, then annoyed, then just move on to the next wide open thing with even MORE in the tank. Wisdom is like glyphosate, it accumulates, and so long as there's sanity it allows one to keep coming back as if was a reserve battery of storage.
Another way to look at it, there's so much to do in BitCoin, so much wide open space from here, the only way to lose is to stop and coast on success.
Experimental Evidence? People don't believe a word out of CSW's mouth 12 years after creating transformative BitCoin, that's almost evidence one can do and say almost anything one wants and get away with it. They can only copy and surpass you if you stop improving, and they'll always have a late start bc until success they won't believe what you're doing is worth a shit anyway, even when it's right in front of them. The guy won't sign the coins, to show his riches, so no one believes him. One of modern man's greatest experiments in human sociology. Wright Brothers same. Doubt all the way up until they flew in a stadium in front of a king-- and even then the Smithsonian was trying to give credit to a guy (Langley) with a sexier resume all the way thru 1948 and beyond. If the Wrights had pushed thru to airlines or some other business, they'd never have had to worry about whether their patent held up, or who got what credit.
Einstein's coolest papers are probably those in the 1930s, ER, ESR, the one in the article. If his doubts about Copenhagen interpretaton end up being correct, he'll still be the world's best LIVING Physicist in 2020 and beyond. Even if his 1930s stuff is wrong, he got to the heart of the matter like no one else. Went down swinging when everyone was saying he was a has-been.
Keep on Truckin?
Keep on Tweekin'
I think about this topic (not to gain agreement beforehand) a lot, lately, (similar to a lifelong internal back-and-forth on the Parable of the Talents' Servant #3) and just a few years ago I'd have been in the same camp. But the last 2 years has made me challenge everything I think I knew. Unsure of any answers, but have always run life as an experiment, and now is no different, so will let you know how it turns out someday. But what I can say is, having a lot in the tank creates nice buffer. Copy me and beat me, and I'll be flattered, then annoyed, then just move on to the next wide open thing with even MORE in the tank. Wisdom is like glyphosate, it accumulates, and so long as there's sanity it allows one to keep coming back as if was a reserve battery of storage.
Another way to look at it, there's so much to do in BitCoin, so much wide open space from here, the only way to lose is to stop and coast on success.
Experimental Evidence? People don't believe a word out of CSW's mouth 12 years after creating transformative BitCoin, that's almost evidence one can do and say almost anything one wants and get away with it. They can only copy and surpass you if you stop improving, and they'll always have a late start bc until success they won't believe what you're doing is worth a shit anyway, even when it's right in front of them. The guy won't sign the coins, to show his riches, so no one believes him. One of modern man's greatest experiments in human sociology. Wright Brothers same. Doubt all the way up until they flew in a stadium in front of a king-- and even then the Smithsonian was trying to give credit to a guy (Langley) with a sexier resume all the way thru 1948 and beyond. If the Wrights had pushed thru to airlines or some other business, they'd never have had to worry about whether their patent held up, or who got what credit.
Einstein's coolest papers are probably those in the 1930s, ER, ESR, the one in the article. If his doubts about Copenhagen interpretaton end up being correct, he'll still be the world's best LIVING Physicist in 2020 and beyond. Even if his 1930s stuff is wrong, he got to the heart of the matter like no one else. Went down swinging when everyone was saying he was a has-been.
Keep on Truckin?
Keep on Tweekin'