Thank you for the article. Peer review is good for science, but not for entrepreneurship. Science has to do with knowledge that we can all agree on. Entrepreneurship has to do with differential knowledge, ie what you know that others do not. When you form a business, you bet on your own knowledge. You do not submit your business model for peer review. There is no agreement on who your peers are. Some people will say that you are a nobody but you say that you are very important. In Bitcoin it is better to bet your business on the protocols you invent, not to gain agreement with others beforehand.
Interesting musings on physics and math, I don't know.
Thank you for the article. Peer review is good for science, but not for entrepreneurship. Science has to do with knowledge that we can all agree on. Entrepreneurship has to do with differential knowledge, ie what you know that others do not. When you form a business, you bet on your own knowledge. You do not submit your business model for peer review. There is no agreement on who your peers are. Some people will say that you are a nobody but you say that you are very important. In Bitcoin it is better to bet your business on the protocols you invent, not to gain agreement with others beforehand.
Interesting musings on physics and math, I don't know.