The "Please" here is key. A very valid request. However, people will game any system set up, even if against the law (drug markets for instance) as all actions can be measured by risk-reward. Gaming the system includes things like early access, or the issuing entity reserving names for others. There are many strategies with domain names & so long as monopolies of communication can be created (AT&T, Finstagram, powping?) there can exist gaming of the system. Think about this: if "unwriter" had not been taken before system was open to all, would someone have taken it? Is "Ayn Rand" on Twetch really Ayn Rand, or even owned by her heirs? Complicated matters. I abide your request, but others won't. Maybe Twitter has done it best, there can be multiple "jack" monikers, but only one<a class="mention" href="/@jack">@jack</a> handle. Worth consideration too.
The "Please" here is key. A very valid request. However, people will game any system set up, even if against the law (drug markets for instance) as all actions can be measured by risk-reward. Gaming the system includes things like early access, or the issuing entity reserving names for others. There are many strategies with domain names & so long as monopolies of communication can be created (AT&T, Finstagram, powping?) there can exist gaming of the system. Think about this: if "unwriter" had not been taken before system was open to all, would someone have taken it? Is "Ayn Rand" on Twetch really Ayn Rand, or even owned by her heirs? Complicated matters. I abide your request, but others won't. Maybe Twitter has done it best, there can be multiple "jack" monikers, but only one<a class="mention" href="/@jack">@jack</a> handle. Worth consideration too.