more; <a href='https://twitter.com/AttilaAros/status/1325152107939340293'>https://twitter.com/AttilaAros/status/1325152107939340293</a><div class='embed' data-url='https://twitter.com/AttilaAros/status/1325152107939340293'></div> Attila<a class="mention" href="/@AttilaAros">@AttilaAros</a> · 1h I&#39;m going to keep hammering this hard. Bitcoin is SET IN STONE. BSV nodes are NOT Bitcoin. BSV nodes change, consensus rules upgraded, whatever. No UTXO and no Satoshi inflation please. Satoshi said so clearly and that&#39;s why I&#39;m bullish af on Bitcoin from the start. Quote Tweet Attila<a class="mention" href="/@AttilaAros">@AttilaAros</a> · 1h Replying to<a class="mention" href="/@shadders333">@shadders333</a><a class="mention" href="/@JacksonLaskey">@JacksonLaskey</a> and 4 others The protocol is SET IN STONE. It was set in stone when it was defined in the paper We all agree that nChain&#39;s node is NOT set in stone. Whether or not consensus rules are this or that, as we have seen change many times in past decade. Satoshi said predetermined number of coins Attila<a class="mention" href="/@AttilaAros">@AttilaAros</a> Replying to <a class="mention" href="/@AttilaAros">@AttilaAros</a> There is no supreme leader in Bitcoin. We thank Satoshi for his service and we will guide our actions by his words and our ability to make sense of it as clearly and honestly as possible. 0-valued Satoshi outputs violate the "predetermined number of coins" principle (2.1 Quad) 7:04 PM · Nov 7, 2020·Twitter Web App 1 Quote Tweet 1 Like Shadders<a class="mention" href="/@shadders333">@shadders333</a> · 1h Replying to <a class="mention" href="/@AttilaAros">@AttilaAros</a> "There is no supreme leader in Bitcoin" - correct. However your final statement is completely false. How can an output with 0-satoshis affect the supply of satoshis? Attila<a class="mention" href="/@AttilaAros">@AttilaAros</a> · 1h Because then the number of "coins" are no longer pre-determined. This is a trivially true corollary from the 2.1 quadrillion Satoshi limit and the definition of a "coin" being a chain of digital signatures. Then satoshi pointed out that corollary.