General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics

Taxonomy makes increasing use of significant results from many fields of research including the rapidly developing fields of micro– and macromolecular chemistry, ultrastructure and micromorphology in combination with macromorphology, anatomy, embryology, cytology, paleontology, biological interaction and distribution. Some of these results have contributed to make the current systems of classifications more concordant. Recent studies on Cretaceous fossils are related to present–day angiosperms and their floral types. It is concluded that pleiomerous flowers with helically arranged parts (corresponding to the Magnolia type, though probably less elaborate), on the basis of recent evidence can still be regarded as the probably earliest floral type in angiosperms. But the trimerous flowers must also have appeared very early, at least in the Albian. There is also evidence that the monocotyledons had differentiated as a separate group at that time. Similarities between certain extant monocotyledons and certain dicotyledons, in particular between some Dios–coreales and some Annonales–Aristolochiales, indicate that the monocotyledons had their roots in early Cretaceous pro–Magnoliiflorae. Fossil petaliferous flowers from Cenomanian layers, and later of a variety of flower types, such as the obdiplostemo–nous, petaliferous, epigynous Scandianthus (similar to extant saxifragaceous genera), or flowers with secondarily pleiomerous androecia of the theaceous type are discussed in relation to the distribution of corresponding floral types in extant dicotyledons. The main features of the author's classification of angiosperms are outlined with notes on important, though often neglected, aspects and critical problems. Finally, an updated table of classification down to family rank is presented.