The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20131021005704/http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)60140-3/abstract
Skip Main Navigation
outline goes here
The Lancet, Volume 381, Issue 9880, Pages 1827 - 1834, 25 May 2013
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60140-3Cite or Link Using DOI
This article can be found in the following collections: Oncology (Breast cancer)
Published Online: 30 April 2013

Selective oestrogen receptor modulators in prevention of breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of individual participant data

Prof Jack Cuzick PhD a Corresponding AuthorEmail Address, Ivana Sestak PhD a, Bernardo Bonanni MD b, Joseph P Costantino DrPH c, Steve Cummings MD d, Prof Andrea DeCensi MD e, Prof Mitch Dowsett PhD f, Prof John F Forbes MD g, Leslie Ford MD h, Prof Andrea Z LaCroix PhD i, John Mershon MD j, Bruce H Mitlak MD k, Prof Trevor Powles MD l, Prof Umberto Veronesi MD m, Prof Victor Vogel MD n, D Lawrence Wickerham MD o, for the SERM Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer Overview Group

Summary

Background

Tamoxifen and raloxifene reduce the risk of breast cancer in women at elevated risk of disease, but the duration of the effect is unknown. We assessed the effectiveness of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) on breast cancer incidence.

Methods

We did a meta-analysis with individual participant data from nine prevention trials comparing four selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs; tamoxifen, raloxifene, arzoxifene, and lasofoxifene) with placebo, or in one study with tamoxifen. Our primary endpoint was incidence of all breast cancer (including ductal carcinoma in situ) during a 10 year follow-up period. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results

We analysed data for 83 399 women with 306 617 women-years of follow-up. Median follow-up was 65 months (IQR 54—93). Overall, we noted a 38% reduction (hazard ratio [HR] 0·62, 95% CI 0·56—0·69) in breast cancer incidence, and 42 women would need to be treated to prevent one breast cancer event in the first 10 years of follow-up. The reduction was larger in the first 5 years of follow-up than in years 5—10 (42%, HR 0·58, 0·51—0·66; p<0·0001 vs 25%, 0·75, 0·61—0·93; p=0·007), but we noted no heterogeneity between time periods. Thromboembolic events were significantly increased with all SERMs (odds ratio 1·73, 95% CI 1·47—2·05; p<0·0001). We recorded a significant reduction of 34% in vertebral fractures (0·66, 0·59—0·73), but only a small effect for non-vertebral fractures (0·93, 0·87—0·99).

Interpretation

For all SERMs, incidence of invasive oestrogen (ER)-positive breast cancer was reduced both during treatment and for at least 5 years after completion. Similar to other preventive interventions, careful consideration of risks and benefits is needed to identify women who are most likely to benefit from these drugs.

Funding

Cancer Research UK.
This article is made available free of charge, as a service to our users.
Please login to access the full article, or register if you do not yet have a username and password.

Already Registered?  Please Login

New to TheLancet.com?

TheLancet.com is the online home of:
  • The Lancet
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • The Lancet Neurology
  • The Lancet Oncology
  • The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Please register to access selected articles for free, personalize and interact with this site. Registration is free, takes no more than two minutes, and offers you many benefits.
a Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
b European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
c National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Biostatistical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
d San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
e Division of Medical Oncology, EO Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy
f The Royal Marsden Hospital, Department of Academic Biochemistry, London, UK
g Department of Surgical Oncology, Newcastle Mater Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
h National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Bethesda, MD, USA
i Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
j Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA
k Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
l Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
m European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
n University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
o University of Pittsburgh, Department of Human Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Corresponding Author Information Correspondence to: Prof Jack Cuzick, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
Members of the steering committee are listed at the end of the paper
Access this article on ScienceDirect
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Article Options
Summary
Full Text
PDF (394 KB)
Cited by in Scopus (1)
Printer Friendly Version
Download images
Request permission
Export Citation
Create Citation Alert
Please login above or register to use this functionality. Registration is free, takes no more than two minutes, and offers you many benefits.
Bookmark