This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
-
Bender, J.: 1989,The Current State of the Coherence Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
-
Bonjour, L.: 1976, ‘The Coherence Theory of Empirical Knowledge’,Philosophical Studies 30, 281–312.
-
Bonjour, L.: 1985,The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Harvard U.P., Cambridge, MA.
-
Bonjour, L.: 1989, ‘Replies and Clarifications’, in J. Bender (ed.),The Current State of the Coherence Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 276–92.
-
Cherniak, C.: 1986,Minimal Rationality, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Churchland, P.: 1989a, ‘On the Nature of Theories: A Neurocomputational Perspective’, inA Neurocomputational Perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Churchland, P.: 1989b, ‘On the Nature of Explanation: A PDP Approach’, inA Neurocomputational Perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Cummins, R.: 1983,The Nature of Psychological Explanation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Davidson, D.: 1980, ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, in Davidson (ed.),Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 1–19.
-
Dreyfus, H. and S. Dreyfus: 1986, ‘How to Stop Worrying about the Frame Problem Even though Its Computationally Insoluble’, in Z. Pylyshn (ed.),The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Ablex, pp. 95–111.
-
Dreyfus, H. and S. Dreyfus: 1988, ‘Making Mind versus Modelling the Brain: Artificial Intelligence Back at a Branch Point’, in S. Graubard (ed.),The Artificial Intelligence Debate, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 309–33.
-
Foley, R.: 1993,Working Without a Net: A Study of Egocentric Epistemology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
Harman, G.: 1986,Change in View, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Henderson, D. K.: 1993,Interpretation and Explanation in the Human Sciences, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
-
Henderson, D. K.: 1994, ‘Epistemic Competence and Contextualist Epistemology: Why Contextualism is Not Just the Poor Person's Coherentism’,Journal of Philosophy 91, 627–49.
-
Henderson, D. K.: 1995, ‘Epistemic Competence’, forthcomingPhilosophical Papers.
-
Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1989, ‘Representations without Rules’,Philosophical Topics 17, 27–43.
-
Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1990, ‘Soft Laws’,Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15, 256–79.
-
Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: forthcoming a, ‘Levels of Design in Neoclassical Cognitive Science’,Philosophy.
-
Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: forthcoming b, ‘A Neoclassical Framework for Cognitive Science’,Synthese.
-
Horgan, T. and Tienson, J.: forthcoming c,Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology: Representational Realism without Rules. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Kitcher, P.: 1992,The Naturalists Return, Philosophical Review 101, 53–114.
-
Kitcher, P.: 1993,The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
Kornblith, H.: 1989, ‘The Unattainability of Coherence’, in J. Bender (ed.),The Current State of the Coherence Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
-
Smolensky, P.: 1988, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 1–74.
-
Williams, M.: 1980, ‘Coherence, Justification, and Truth’,Review of Metaphysics 34, 243–72.
-
Williams, M.: 1977,Groundless Belief, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Author information
Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henderson, D.K. One naturalized epistemological argument against coherentist accounts of empirical knowledge. Erkenntnis 43, 199–227 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128196
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
Keywords
- Empirical Knowledge
- Coherentist Account
- Epistemological Argument