Skip to main content
Log in

Breaking billboards: protest and a politics of play

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

Political protests involving clashes with police are often delegitimized by governments for using “uncivil” and “violent” means. Drawing on a creative video clip (“Breaking Billboards”) made by a group of Gezi protestors, this paper theorizes an alternative response, which refuses the dichotomy between peaceful and violent struggles and instead seeks to transform the field of judgement. The protestors in the clip, by echoing a verse originally written by poet Cemal Süreya, reconstruct destructive activity – breaking billboards – playfully and detached from its presumed ends. Placing their performances in conversation with Giorgio Agamben’s theory of mediality – means without end – I argue that the clip reconstructs political action in play-form, corroding the significance of the means-ends relationship. In doing so, it frustrates the usual grounds of judgement within which the meaning and value of protest activities are arbitrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (1993 [1978]) Infancy and History: Essays on the Destruction of Experience. Translated by L. Heron. London: Verso.

  • Agamben, G. (1993) The Coming Community (CC). Translated by M. Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (HS). Translated by D. Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Agamben, G. (1999) Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy (P). Translated by D. Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Agamben, G. (2000) Means without End: Notes on Politics (MWE). Translated by V. Binetti and C. Casarino. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Agamben, G. (2005) State of Exception (SE). Translated by K. Attell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Agamben, G. (2007) Profanations (Prof). Translated by J. Fort. New York: Zone.

  • Agamben, G. (2010) Hunger of an Ox: Considerations on the Sabbath, the Feast, and Inoperativity.” In: Nudities (N). Translated by D. Kishik and S. Pedatella. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Agamben, G. (2014). What is a Destituent Power? (WDP). Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (2016) The Use of Bodies (TUB). Translated by A. Kosko. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Alessandrini, A., Üstündağ, N. and Yıldız, E. (2013) Introduction by the Editors. In: “Resistance Everywhere:” The Gezi Protests and Dissident Visions of Turkey, Jadmag Pedagogy Publications 1(4): 4-8.

  • Arendt, H. (1961). [1954] What is Freedom? Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. New York: The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1999) Metaphysics. Translated by J. Sachs. Santa Fe: Green Lion Press.

  • Aytekin, A. (2017). A “Magic and Poetic” Moment of Dissensus: Aesthetics and Politics in the June 2013 (Gezi Park) Protests in Turkey. Space and Culture, 20(2), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1978 [1921]) Critique of Violence. In: P. Demetz (ed.) Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. New York: Schocken Books.

  • Agamben, G. (1968) H. Arendt (ed.) Illuminations. Edited by H. Arendt. Translated by H. Zohn. New York: Schocken.

  • Agamben, G. (1999 [1931]) Karl Kraus. In M. W. Jennings, H. Eiland, and G. Smith (eds.) Selected Writings vol. 2: 1927–1934. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.

  • Bezci, E. B., & Öztan, G. G. (2016). Anatomy of the Turkish Emergency State: A Continuous Reflection of Turkish Raison d’état between 1980 and 2002. Middle East Critique, 25(2), 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2002). At the Edge. Political Theory, 30(4), 556–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celikates, R. (2015). Learning from the Streets: Civil Disobedience in Theory and Practice. In P. Weibed (Ed.), Global Activism, Art and Conflict in the 21st Century. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celikates, R. (2016). Democratizing Civil Disobedience. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 42(10), 982–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çıdam, Ç. (2017). Unruly Practices: Gezi Protests and the Politics of Friendship. New Political Science, 39(3), 369–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çobanoğlu, Y. (2018) Gezi: Ve muğlaklığın reddiyle başlayacak her şey…Birgun 3 Hune 2018: https://www.birgun.net/haber-detay/gezi-ve-muglakligin-reddiyle-baslayacak-her-sey-218208.html.

  • Derrida, J. (2002) Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority.” In: G. Anidjar (ed.) Acts of Religion. Translated by M. Quaintance. New York: Routledge.

  • Ertür, B. (2016). Barricades: Resources and Residues of Resistance. In J. Butler, Z. Gambetti, & L. Sabsay (Eds.), Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. (2018). Poetic Justice: Rereading Plato’s Republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2009). Direct action: An ethnography. Edinburgh: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. E. (2012). The Politics of Incivility. Arizona Law Review, 54, 345–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. E. (2016). The Counterrevolution: How Our Government Went to War Against Its Own Citizens. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintz, L. (2016) “Adding Insult to Injury: Vilification as Counter-Mobilization in Turkey’s Gezi Protests,” paper presented to the workshop, “From Mobilization to Counter-Revolution: The Arab Spring in Comparative Perspective,” 3-4 May 2016, https://pomeps.org/2016/06/06/adding-insult-to-injury-vilification-as-counter-mobilization-in-turkeys-gezi-protests/#_ftnref12.

  • Hooker, J. (2016) Black Lives Matter and the Paradoxes of U.S. Black Politics: From Democratic Sacrifice to Democratic Repair. Political Theory 44(4): 448-469.

  • Karakayalı, S., & Yaka, Ö. (2016). Humor, Revolt, and Subjectivity. In A. Oberprantacher & A. Siclodi (Eds.), Subjectivation in Political Theory and Contemporary Practices. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, A. (2017). Between Means and Ends: Reconstructing Coercion in Dewey’s Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, 111(3), 522–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeckelbergh, M. (2009). The will of the many: How the alterglobalisation movement is changing the face of democracy. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. (2008). Playing with Law: Agamben and Derrida on Postjuridical Justice. South Atlantic Quarterly, 107(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (2012). Image, Space, Revolution: The Arts of Occupation. Critical Inquiry, 39(1), 8–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B. (2007). Undoing Legal Violence: Walter Benjamin’s and Giorgio Agamben’s Aesthetics of Pure Means. Journal of Law and Society, 34(1), 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineda, E. (2015). Civil Disobedience and Punishment: (Mis)Reading Justification and Strategy from SNCC to Snowden. History of the Present, 5(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelby, T. (2016) Impure Dissent. In: Dark Ghettos. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Tomba, M. (2017). Justice and Divine Violence: Walter Benjamin and the Time of Anticipation. Theory & Event, 20(3), 579–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedeen, L. (2013). Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes from Syria. Critical Inquiry, 39(4), 841–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, J. (2009). Particular Rights and Absolute Wrongs: Giorgio Agamben on Life and Politics. Law Critique, 20, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerilli, L. M. G. (2014). Against Civility: A Feminist Perspective. In A. Sarat (Ed.), Civility, Legality, and Justice in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am immensely grateful to Jill Frank for providing unwavering, generous support and invaluable comments on multiple versions of this article, as well as for our many conversations on politics and poetry, and to Alexander Livingston for his insightful guidance for this article and beyond on protest and refusal. For providing helpful feedback on earlier drafts, I owe thanks to Çiğdem Çıdam, Kevin Attell, Begüm Adalet, Patchen Markell, Inés Valdez, Richard Bensel, Christopher Way, Jimena Valdez; for reading countless iterations of the piece with me, thanks go to Jacob Swanson. This paper benefitted from discussions at the 26th Annual Critical Theory Roundtable and Cornell Political Theory Writing Colloquium. I also thank Karen Zivi and the anonymous reviewers at Contemporary Political Theory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazlı Konya.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konya, N. Breaking billboards: protest and a politics of play. Contemp Polit Theory 20, 250–271 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00428-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00428-y

Keywords

Navigation