Summary
Background
Housing First is increasingly implemented for homeless adults with mental illness in large urban centres, but little is known about its long-term effectiveness. The At Home/Chez Soi randomised controlled trial done in five cities in Canada showed that Housing First improved housing stability and other select health outcomes. We extended the At Home/Chez Soi trial at the Toronto site to evaluate the long-term effects of the Housing First intervention on housing and health outcomes of homeless adults with mental illness over 6 years.
Methods
The At Home/Chez Soi Toronto study was a randomised, controlled trial done in Toronto (ON, Canada). Here, we present the results of an extension study done at the same site. Participants were homeless adults (aged ≥18 years) with a serious mental disorder with or without co-occurring substance use disorder. In phase 1, participants were stratified by level of need for mental health support services (high vs moderate), and randomly assigned (1:1) using adaptive randomisation procedures to Housing First with assertive community treatment (HF-ACT), Housing First with intensive case management (HF-ICM), or to treatment as usual (TAU). Participants with moderate support needs were further stratified by ethnoracial status. Considering the nature of the Housing First intervention, study participants and study personnel were not masked to group assignment. Phase 1 participants could choose to enrol in the extension study (phase 2). The primary outcome was the rate of days stably housed per year analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned participants who had at least one assessment for the primary outcome. Participants contributed data to the study up to the point of their last interview. Multilevel multiple imputation was used to handle missing data. The trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN42520374.
Findings
Between Oct 1, 2009, and March 31, 2013, 575 individuals participated in phase 1 of the Toronto Site At Home/Chez Soi study (197 [34%] participants with high support needs and 378 [66%] with moderate support needs). Of the 378 participants with moderate support needs, 204 were randomly assigned to receive the HF intervention with ICM or with ethnoracial-specific ICM services (HF-ER-ICM; HF-ICM or HF-ER-ICM groups) and 174 were randomly assigned to TAU. Of the 197 participants with high support needs, 97 were randomly assigned to receive the HF intervention with ACT (HF-ACT treatment group) and 100 were randomly assigned to TAU group. Between Jan 1, 2014, and March 31, 2017, 414 (81%) of 575 phase 1 participants participated in the extended phase 2 study. The median duration of follow-up was 5·4 years (IQR 2·1–5·9). Among phase 2 participants, 141 had high support needs (79 participants in the HF-ACT group; 62 participants in the TAU group), and 273 had moderate support needs (160 participants in the HF-ICM or HF-ER-ICM group; 113 participants in the TAU group). 187 high support needs participants (93 participants in the HF-ACT group, 94 participants in the TAU group), and 361 moderate support needs participants (201 participants in the HF-ICM or HF-ER-ICM group, 160 participants in the TAU group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis for the primary outcome. The number of days spent stably housed was significantly higher among participants in the HF-ACT and HR-ICM or HF-ER-ICM groups than participants in the TAU groups at all timepoints. For participants with moderate support needs, the rate ratio (RR) of days stably housed in the Housing First group, compared with TAU, was 2·40 (95% CI 2·03–2·83) in year 1, which decreased to 1·13 (1·01–1·26) in year 6. The RR of days stably housed for participants with high support needs, compared with TAU, was 3·02 (2·43–3·75) in year 1 and 1·42 (1·19–1·69) in year 6. In year 6, high support needs participants in the Housing First group spent 85·51% of days stably housed compared with 60·33% for the TAU group, and moderate needs participants in the Housing First group spent 88·16% of days stably housed compared with 78·22% for the TAU group.
Interpretation
Rent supplements and mental health support services had an enduring positive effect on housing stability for homeless adults with mental illness in a large, resource-rich urban centre, with a larger impact on individuals with high support needs than moderate support needs.
Funding
Mental Health Commission of Canada, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, and the Canadian Institute of Health Research.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Access any 5 articles from the Lancet Family of journals
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The Lancet Psychiatry
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- 1.
Global Homeless Statistics.https://homelessworldcup.org/homelessness-statistics/Date accessed: August 19, 2019https://homelessworldcup.org/homelessness-statistics/Date accessed: April 28, 2019
- 2.
The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations.Lancet. 2014; 384: 1529-1540
- 3.
Subjective quality of life among individuals who are homeless: a review of current knowledge.Soc Indic Res. 2014; 115: 509-524
- 4.
Policy shift or program drift? Implementing Housing First in Australia.https://www.ahuri.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/2064/AHURI_Final_Report_No184_Policy_shift_or_program_drift_Implementing_Housing_First_in_Australia.pdfDate: 2012Date accessed: August 21, 2019
- 5.
Housing First Europe. Final Report.https://www.habitat.hu/files/FinalReportHousingFirstEurope.pdfDate: 2013Date accessed: August 21, 2019
- 6.
Housing First manual: the Pathways model to end homelessness for people with mental illness and addiction.Hazelden, Minneapolis2010
- 7.
Effects of Housing First approaches on health and well-being of adults who are homeless or at risk of homelessness: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019; 73: 379-387
- 8.
Effectiveness of interventions to reduce homelessness: a systematic review.Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo2016
- 9.
Exiting homelessness: perceived changes, barriers, and facilitators among formerly homeless adults with mental disorders.Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015; 38: 81-87
- 10.
The At Home/Chez Soi trial protocol: a pragmatic, multi-site, randomised controlled trial of a Housing First intervention for homeless individuals with mental illness in five Canadian cities.BMJ Open. 2011; 1e000323
- 11.
Costs of services for homeless people with mental illness in 5 Canadian cities: a large prospective follow-up study.CMAJ Open. 2017; 5: E576-E585
- 12.
Effectiveness of housing first with intensive case management in an ethnically diverse sample of homeless adults with mental illness: a randomized controlled trial.PLoS One. 2015; 10: 1-21
- 13.
How did a Housing First intervention improve health and social outcomes among homeless adults with mental illness in Toronto? Two-year outcomes from a randomised trial.BMJ Open. 2016; 6e010581
- 14.
A multiple-city RCT of Housing First with assertive community treatment for homeless Canadians with serious mental illness.Psychiatr Serv. 2016; 67: 275-281
- 15.
Effect of scattered-site housing using rent supplements and intensive case management on housing stability among homeless adults with mental illness: a randomized trial.JAMA. 2015; 313: 905-915
- 16.
Ending homelessness among people with mental illness: the At Home/Chez Soi randomized trial of a Housing First intervention in Toronto.BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 787
- 17.
The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.J Clin Psychiatry. 1998; 59: 22-23
- 18.
Measuring homelessness and residential stability: the residential time-line follow-back inventory.J Community Psychol. 2007; 35: 29-42
- 19.
Measures of quality of life among persons with severe and persistent mental disorders.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996; 31: 78-88
- 20.
Changes in quality of life from a homelessness intervention: true change, response shift, or random variation.Qual Life Res. 2017; 26: 1853-1864
- 21.
Graded response modeling of the Quality of Life Interview.Eval Program Plann. 1999; 22: 41-52
- 22.
EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.Health Policy. 1990; 16: 199-208
- 23.
A community ability scale for chronically mentally Ill consumers: Part II. Applications.Community Ment Health J. 1994; 30: 459-472
- 24.
Development and validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for internalizing, externalizing and substance use disorders and crime/violence problems among adolescents and adults.Am J Addict. 2006; 15: 80-91
- 25.
The pathways housing first fidelity scale for individuals with psychiatric disabilities.Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2013; 16: 240-261
- 26.
What happens after the demonstration phase? The sustainability of Canada's At Home/Chez Soi Housing First programs for homeless persons with mental illness.Am J Community Psychol. 2017; 59: 114-157
- 27.
The effectiveness of a Housing First adaptation for ethnic minority groups: findings of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 1-11
- 28.
Housing first for long-term shelter dwellers with psychiatric disabilities in a suburban county: A four-year study of housing access and retention.J Prim Prev. 2007; 28: 265-279
- 29.
Recovery and homeless services: new directions for the field.Open Health Serv Policy J. 2010; 3: 71-79
- 30.
The role of recovery housing: prioritizing choice in homeless services.J Dual Diagn. 2016; 12: 153-162
Article info
Publication history
Published: October 07, 2019
Identification
Copyright
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Articles
- Long-term effectiveness of housing and support services for homeless adults with mental illness
-
Homelessness is a persistent social issue that requires creative and effective solutions. In 2008, the Canadian Government allocated CAN$110 million for a revolutionary research demonstration project to evaluate a radical approach to address homelessness—the provision of housing and voluntary services without any prerequisites, commonly known as Housing First. The pragmatic At Home/Chez Soi randomised controlled trial is the world's largest study of the Housing First intervention to date, in which the effect of the intervention was compared with treatment as usual (TAU) in 2000 people across five Canadian cities.
- Full-Text
-