Skip to main content
R. Ohrbach

    R. Ohrbach

    Objective: To test the hypothesis that during the day and night, masticatory muscle activities is greater in individuals with temporomandibular disorders. Method: MRI and Research Diagnostic Criteria were used to categorize 71 informed... more
    Objective: To test the hypothesis that during the day and night, masticatory muscle activities is greater in individuals with temporomandibular disorders. Method: MRI and Research Diagnostic Criteria were used to categorize 71 informed and consenting subjects according to TMJ disc position (+DD = disc displacement) and pain status (+P = presence of pain). Male (n= 28) and female (n=42) subjects (+DD/+Pain, n=18; +DD/-Pain, n =14; -DD/-Pain, n=38) participated in two laboratory EMG/bite-force calibrations to determine subject-specific masseter and temporalis muscle threshold activities per 20 N bite-force (RMS20N, µV). Over 3 days subjects recorded day and night masseter and temporalis muscle activities using portable EMG recorders. Masseter and temporalis Duty Factors (DF = duration of muscle activity/total recording time, %) were determined based on muscle-specific thresholds of magnitude (5% to 80% RMS20N). ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests were used to determine independent v...
    Objective: Numerical modeling predicts higher TMJ forces for those with disc displacement (DD) compared to healthy subjects (Iwasaki et al. 2009) and for increased muscle forces during jaw loading. Thus, this pilot study tested if... more
    Objective: Numerical modeling predicts higher TMJ forces for those with disc displacement (DD) compared to healthy subjects (Iwasaki et al. 2009) and for increased muscle forces during jaw loading. Thus, this pilot study tested if individuals with/without temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) use their masticatory muscles similarly during molar biting. Methods: Subjects recruited gave informed consent to participate in IRB-approved protocols. Calibrated examiners used Research Diagnostic Criteria and TMJ magnetic resonance images to classify 71 subjects based on presence (+) or absence (-) of DD and pain into 3 groups (n=females,males): +DD/+pain (n=14,4), +DD/-pain (n=10,4), -DD/-pain (n=19,20). At each of 2 sessions, subjects performed standardized static and dynamic molar bites, 25 right and 25 left, on a calibrated transducer while bite-forces and surface electromyography from right masseter and anterior temporalis muscles were recorded. Slopes of electromyography (μV) versus bite-...
    Objective: It is unknown if variations in masticatory muscle orientation explain predicted TMD diagnostic group differences in lateral pterygoid muscle forces during static biting (Kohlmeier et al., 2012, J Dent Res, 91(SI A):578).... more
    Objective: It is unknown if variations in masticatory muscle orientation explain predicted TMD diagnostic group differences in lateral pterygoid muscle forces during static biting (Kohlmeier et al., 2012, J Dent Res, 91(SI A):578). Method: Research Diagnostic Criteria and magnetic resonance TMJ images were used by calibrated examiners to classify 93 subjects into 4 diagnostic groups based on presence(+) or absence (-) of disc displacement(DD) and pain [group, n=females, males: -DD/-pain, n=15, 13; -DD/+pain, n=8, 8; +DD/-pain, n=16, 13; +DD/+pain, n=15, 13). Subjects gave informed consent to participate in IRB-approved protocols. Three-dimensional geometries described positions of masticatory muscles, dental arches, and mandibular condyles for all subjects from lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. The range of anteroposterior variations of masticatory muscle orientations represented (>1300 possible combinations) were used in 2 numerical models to identify key co...
    Objective: To determine TMD diagnostic group differences in TMJ disc mechanics due to the effects of normal (perpendicular) load. Method: In accordance with IRB oversight, fifty-two subjects (30 female; 22 male) participated. Research... more
    Objective: To determine TMD diagnostic group differences in TMJ disc mechanics due to the effects of normal (perpendicular) load. Method: In accordance with IRB oversight, fifty-two subjects (30 female; 22 male) participated. Research Diagnostic Criteria-calibrated investigators classified subjects based on signs of disc displacement (DD) and pain (+DD/+Pain, n=18; +DD/-Pain, n=17; -DD/-Pain, n=17). 3-D craniomandibular geometries were produced for each subject and used in validated numerical models to calculate normal TMJ loads during biting on canine teeth. To test load effects on TMJ disc mechanics, ex vivo data were used in the development and validation of a biphasic finite element model (bFEM) of the TMJ disc. Given the scarcity of mechanical data from healthy human tissue, 187 freshly extracted pig TMJ discs were subjected to a 7.6 N static normal load, followed by cyclic movement. Physical data in the form of aspect ratio and velocity of stress-field translation, compressive...
    AIMS To estimate the criterion validity of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I TMD diagnoses. METHODS A combined total of 614 TMD community and clinic cases and 91 controls were examined at 3... more
    AIMS To estimate the criterion validity of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I TMD diagnoses. METHODS A combined total of 614 TMD community and clinic cases and 91 controls were examined at 3 study ...
    The dilemma of scientific knowledge versus clinical management of TMD is discussed by focus on five questions; (1) What is scientific evidence and how is it transmitted? (2) What important evidence is lacking in the field of TMD? (3) What... more
    The dilemma of scientific knowledge versus clinical management of TMD is discussed by focus on five questions; (1) What is scientific evidence and how is it transmitted? (2) What important evidence is lacking in the field of TMD? (3) What clinical concepts have been challenged by the scientific evidence? (4) Why is there adherence to concepts that appear to conflict with the evidence? (5) How does the clinician provide patient care in the face of uncertainty while retaining scientific integrity? It is concluded that no fundamental reason for a dilemma between scientific evidence and clinical practice need exist provided that (1) clinical investigators use appropriate research protocols and report results in refereed scientific journals and (2) dentists are familiar with the requirements of sound scientific evidence, interpret this evidence and its clinical implications, and apply it to the care of TMD patients.
    ABSTRACT The authors tested the hypothesis that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) signs/symptoms are associated with the occurrence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD), using the OPPERA prospective cohort study of adults aged 18 to 44 years... more
    ABSTRACT The authors tested the hypothesis that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) signs/symptoms are associated with the occurrence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD), using the OPPERA prospective cohort study of adults aged 18 to 44 years at enrollment (n = 2,604) and the OPPERA case-control study of chronic TMD (n = 1,716). In both the OPPERA cohort and case-control studies, TMD was examiner determined according to established research diagnostic criteria. People were considered to have high likelihood of OSA if they reported a history of sleep apnea or ≥ 2 hallmarks of OSA: loud snoring, daytime sleepiness, witnessed apnea, and hypertension. Cox proportional hazards regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence limits (CL) for first-onset TMD. Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% CL for chronic TMD. In the cohort, 248 individuals developed first-onset TMD during the median 2.8-year follow-up. High likelihood of OSA was associated with greater incidence of first-onset TMD (adjusted HR = 1.73; 95% CL, 1.14, 2.62). In the case-control study, high likelihood of OSA was associated with higher odds of chronic TMD (adjusted OR = 3.63; 95% CL, 2.03, 6.52). Both studies supported a significant association of OSA symptoms and TMD, with prospective cohort evidence finding that OSA symptoms preceded first-onset TMD.
    A symposium was held in Toronto, 2008, in which research progress regarding the biobehavioural dimension of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) was presented. An extended workshop was held in April... more
    A symposium was held in Toronto, 2008, in which research progress regarding the biobehavioural dimension of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) was presented. An extended workshop was held in April 2009 in which further recommendations were made from an expert panel, using the 2008 symposium material as a base. This paper is a summary of the 2008 symposium proceedings with elaborations based on further developments. Seven studies were conducted between 2001 and 2008, in which the following were investigated: (i) basic properties of Axis II instruments, (ii) reliability and criterion validity of Axis II instruments, (iii) expansion of predictors, (iv) metric equivalence of the depression and non-specific physical symptoms subscales in the RDC/TMD, (v) laboratory investigation of oral behaviours, (vi) field data collection of oral behaviours, and (vii) functional limitation of the jaw. Methods and results for each of these studies are described. Based on the results of these studies that have been published, as well as the direction of interim results from the few studies that await completion and publication, the biobehavioural domain of the RDC/TMD, as published in 1992, is reliable and valid. These results also provide strong evidence supporting the future growth of the biobehavioural domain as the RDC/TMD matures into subsequent protocols for both clinical and research applications.
    Papers in this issue investigate when and how putative risk factors influence development of first-onset, painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD). The results represent first findings from the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and... more
    Papers in this issue investigate when and how putative risk factors influence development of first-onset, painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD). The results represent first findings from the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment (OPPERA) prospective cohort study that monitored 2,737 men and women aged 18 to 44 years recruited at 4 U.S. study sites. During a median 2.8-year follow-up period, 260 participants developed TMD. The average incidence rate of 4% per annum was influenced by a broad range of phenotypic risk factors including sociodemographic characteristics, health status, clinical orofacial factors, psychological functioning, pain sensitivity, and cardiac autonomic responses. A novel method of multivariable analysis used random forest models to simultaneously evaluate contributions of all 202 phenotypic variables. Variables from the health status domain made the greatest contribution to TMD incidence, followed closely by psychological and clinical orofacial domains. However, only a few measures of pain sensitivity and autonomic function contributed to TMD incidence, and their effects were modest. Meanwhile, age and study site were independent predictors of TMD incidence, even after controlling for other phenotypes. Separate analysis of 358 genes that regulate pain found several novel genetic associations with intermediate phenotypes that, themselves, are risk factors for TMD, suggesting new avenues to investigate biological pathways contributing to TMD. Collectively, the papers in this issue demonstrate that TMD is a complex disorder with multiple causes consistent with a biopsychosocial model of illness. It is a misnomer and no longer appropriate to regard TMD solely as a localized orofacial pain condition.
    We assessed and compared the diagnostic accuracy of two sets of diagnostic criteria for headache secondary to temporomandibular disorders (TMD). In 373 headache subjects with TMD, a TMD headache reference standard was defined as:... more
    We assessed and compared the diagnostic accuracy of two sets of diagnostic criteria for headache secondary to temporomandibular disorders (TMD). In 373 headache subjects with TMD, a TMD headache reference standard was defined as: self-reported temple headache, consensus diagnosis of painful TMD and replication of the temple headache using TMD-based provocation tests. Revised diagnostic criteria for Headache attributed to TMD were selected using the RPART (recursive partitioning and regression trees) procedure, and refined in half of the data set. Using the remaining half of the data, the diagnostic accuracy of the revised criteria was compared to that of the International Headache Society's International Classification of Headache Diseases (ICHD)-II criteria A to C for Headache or facial pain attributed to temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder. Relative to the TMD headache reference standard, ICHD-II criteria showed sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 33%. The revised criteria for Headache attributed to TMD had sensitivity of 89% with improved specificity of 87% (p < 0.001). These criteria are (1) temple area headache that is changed with jaw movement, function or parafunction and (2) provocation of that headache by temporalis muscle palpation or jaw movement. Having significantly better specificity than the ICHD-II criteria A to C, the revised criteria are recommended to diagnose headache secondary to TMD.
    Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's web applications. More information here... ...
    ABSTRACT To examine whether any signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders were significantly associated with masseter muscle activity levels during sleep. One hundred three healthy adult subjects (age range, 22 to 32 years)... more
    ABSTRACT To examine whether any signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders were significantly associated with masseter muscle activity levels during sleep. One hundred three healthy adult subjects (age range, 22 to 32 years) participated in the study. They were asked to fill out questionnaires, undergo a calibrated clinical examination of their jaws and teeth, and perform 6 consecutive nightly masseter electromyographic (EMG) recordings with a portable EMG recording system in their home. The EMG data were considered dependent variables, while the questionnaire and examination data were considered independent variables. Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis was utilized to assess possible associations between these variables. Both gender and joint sound scores were significantly related to the duration of EMG activity. None of the other independent variables were found to be related to any of the muscle activity variables. The results suggest that both gender and clicking are significantly related to duration of masseter EMG activity during sleep.
    ABSTRACT
    ABSTRACT
    We conducted this case-control study to determine the role of 2 neuropsychologic variables (sleep and depression) as possible risk indicators for the development of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Neuropsychologic tests, traditional... more
    We conducted this case-control study to determine the role of 2 neuropsychologic variables (sleep and depression) as possible risk indicators for the development of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Neuropsychologic tests, traditional signs and symptoms of TMD, and social and economic variables were analyzed. Seventy-two predominantly muscle-related TMD patients (Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD groups Ia, Ib, and IIIa) and 30 age- and sex-matched pain-free controls were included in the population. Overall, TMD patients had statistically significantly higher sleep and depression scores on the Sleep Assessment Questionnaire and on the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Beck Depression Inventory, with odds ratios of 5 and 1.6, respectively. These results remained unchanged even after controlling for 8 confounders in the logistic regression analysis. Spontaneous pain and pain on palpation (grade 2 or higher) were also statistically significantly worse in TMD patients. In the forward-step logistic regression analysis, we also found that the combination of our best TMD predictors (ie, sleep, cigarettes, alcohol) had a better predictive value (percent agreement = 78.69%) than when the variables were analyzed alone. Sleep and depression are considered important risk indicators for the development of TMD.
    Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a musculoskeletal condition characterized by pain and reduced function in the temporomandibular joint and/or associated masticatory musculature. Prevalence in the United States is 5% and twice as high... more
    Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a musculoskeletal condition characterized by pain and reduced function in the temporomandibular joint and/or associated masticatory musculature. Prevalence in the United States is 5% and twice as high among women as men. We conducted a discovery genome-wide association study (GWAS) of TMD in 10,153 participants (769 cases, 9,384 controls) of the US Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). The most promising single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were tested in meta-analysis of 4 independent cohorts. One replication cohort was from the United States, and the others were from Germany, Finland, and Brazil, totaling 1,911 TMD cases and 6,903 controls. A locus near the sarcoglycan alpha ( SGCA), rs4794106, was suggestive in the discovery analysis ( P = 2.6 × 106) and replicated (i.e., 1-tailed P = 0.016) in the Brazilian cohort. In the discovery cohort, sex-stratified analysis identified 2 additional genome-wide significant loci in ...
    In 2006, the OPPERA project (Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment) set out to identify risk factors for development of painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD). A decade later, this review summarizes its key... more
    In 2006, the OPPERA project (Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment) set out to identify risk factors for development of painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD). A decade later, this review summarizes its key findings. At 4 US study sites, OPPERA recruited and examined 3,258 community-based TMD-free adults assessing genetic and phenotypic measures of biological, psychosocial, clinical, and health status characteristics. During follow-up, 4% of participants per annum developed clinically verified TMD, although that was a “symptom iceberg” when compared with the 19% annual rate of facial pain symptoms. The most influential predictors of clinical TMD were simple checklists of comorbid health conditions and nonpainful orofacial symptoms. Self-reports of jaw parafunction were markedly stronger predictors than corresponding examiner assessments. The strongest psychosocial predictor was frequency of somatic symptoms, although not somatic reactivity. Pressure pain thres...
    Objective: To determine TMD diagnostic group differences in TMJ disc mechanics due to the effects of normal (perpendicular) load. Method: In accordance with IRB oversight, fifty-two subjects (30 female; 22 male) participated. Research... more
    Objective: To determine TMD diagnostic group differences in TMJ disc mechanics due to the effects of normal (perpendicular) load. Method: In accordance with IRB oversight, fifty-two subjects (30 female; 22 male) participated. Research Diagnostic Criteria-calibrated investigators classified subjects based on signs of disc displacement (DD) and pain (+DD/+Pain, n=18; +DD/-Pain, n=17; -DD/-Pain, n=17). 3-D craniomandibular geometries were produced for each subject and used in validated numerical models to calculate normal TMJ loads during biting on canine teeth. To test load effects on TMJ disc mechanics, ex vivo data were used in the development and validation of a biphasic finite element model (bFEM) of the TMJ disc. Given the scarcity of mechanical data from healthy human tissue, 187 freshly extracted pig TMJ discs were subjected to a 7.6 N static normal load, followed by cyclic movement. Physical data in the form of aspect ratio and velocity of stress-field translation, compressive...
    The likelihood of development of degenerative joint disease (DJD) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is related to the integrity of the TMJ disc. Predilection for mechanical failure of the TMJ disc may reflect inter-individual... more
    The likelihood of development of degenerative joint disease (DJD) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is related to the integrity of the TMJ disc. Predilection for mechanical failure of the TMJ disc may reflect inter-individual differences in TMJ loads. Nine females and eight males in each of normal TMJ disc position and bilateral disc displacement diagnostic groups consented to participate in our study. Disc position was determined by bilateral magnetic resonance images of the joints. Three-dimensional (3D) anatomical geometry of each subject was used in a validated computer-assisted numerical model to calculate ipsilateral and contralateral TMJ loads for a range of biting positions (incisor, canine, molar) and angles (1-13). Each TMJ load was a resultant vector at the anterosuperior-most mediolateral midpoint on the condyle and characterized in terms of magnitude and 3D orientation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for effects of biting position and angle on TMJ load...
    The psychosocial and functional consequences of chronic pain disorders have been well documented as having significant effects on the experience of pain, presentation to health care providers, responsiveness to and participation in... more
    The psychosocial and functional consequences of chronic pain disorders have been well documented as having significant effects on the experience of pain, presentation to health care providers, responsiveness to and participation in treatment, disability, and health-related quality of life. Thus, psychosocial and functional consequences have been incorporated as 1 of the 5 dimensions within the integrated Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION)-American Pain Society (APS) Pain Taxonomy (AAPT): 1) core diagnostic criteria; 2) common features; 3) common medical comorbidities; 4) neurobiological, psychosocial, and functional consequences; and 5) putative neurobiological and psychosocial mechanisms, risk factors, and protective factors. In this article we review the rationale for a biopsychosocial perspective, on the basis of current evidence, and describe a set of key psychosocial and behavioral factors (eg, mo...

    And 112 more