Background The use of knowledge brokers (KBs) has been recommended as a mechanism to facilitate the use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, little has been written regarding the practical implementation of the KB role.... more
Background The use of knowledge brokers (KBs) has been recommended as a mechanism to facilitate the use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, little has been written regarding the practical implementation of the KB role. Objectives This article (1) describes the brokering activities of 24 pediatric physical therapist KBs (in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia, Canada), and (2) reports KBs' perceptions of the utility of their role and their experiences with the brokering process. Design A mixed-methods research design was used in this investigation, which was part of a larger knowledge translation (KT) study that demonstrated the effectiveness of using KBs to implement a group of evidence-based measurement tools into practice. Methods The KBs completed weekly activity logs, which were summarized and described. Semi-structured telephone interviews with KBs were analyzed qualitatively to provide insight into their perceptions of their role and the brokering proces...
Research Interests:
Psychology, Perception, Knowledge Management, Evidence Based Practice, Knowledge Translation, and 11 moreMedicine, Physical Therapy, Humans, Needs Assessment, Role, Interpersonal Relations, Clinical Sciences, Information Dissemination, Clinical Competence, professional patient relations, and Physical therapy specialty
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of data obtained with 2 newly developed shuttle run tests (SRT-I and SRT-II) to measure aerobic power in children with cerebral palsy (CP) who were classified at level... more
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of data obtained with 2 newly developed shuttle run tests (SRT-I and SRT-II) to measure aerobic power in children with cerebral palsy (CP) who were classified at level I or II on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). The SRT-I was developed for children at GMFCS level I, and the SRT-II was developed for children at GMFCS level II. Twenty-five children and adolescents with CP (10 female, 15 male; mean age = 11.9 years, SD = 2.9), classified at GMFCS level I (n = 14) or level II (n = 11), participated in the study. To assess test-retest reliability of data for the 10-m shuttle run tests, the subjects performed the same test within 2 weeks. To examine validity, the shuttle run tests were compared with a GMFCS level-based treadmill test designed to measure peak oxygen uptake. Statistical analyses revealed test-retest reliability for exercise time (number of levels completed) (intraclass correlation coefficients of .97 for the SRT-I and .99 for the SRT-II) and reliability for peak heart rate attained during the final level (intraclass correlation coefficients of .87 for the SRT-I and .94 for the SRT-II). High correlations were found for the relationship between data for both shuttle run tests and data for the treadmill test (r = .96 for both). The results suggest that both 10-m shuttle run tests yield reliable and valid data. Moreover, the shuttle run tests have advantages over a treadmill test for children with CP who are able to walk and run (GMFCS level I or II).
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Psychology, Quality of life, Cerebral Palsy, Adolescent, Humans, and 13 moreChild, Communication Skill, Child Psychology, Child and Adolescent Psychology, Developmental disabilities, Physical disability, Systematic review, Disabled children, Public health systems and services research, Cognitive Ability, Motor Function, International Classification of Functioning, and Leisure Activities
Research Interests:
Child health, Quality of life, Adolescent, Humans, Child, and 13 moreHealth related Quality of Life, Follow-up studies, Disability and Health, Psychometric Properties, Health Status, Validity and Reliability, Public health systems and services research, World Health Organization, Indexation, Quality Life, International Classification of Functioning, Wounds and Injuries, and Functional Status
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Nonparametric Statistics, Child Development, Cerebral Palsy, Humans, Walking, and 13 moreFemale, Male, Infant Development, Mental processes, Developmental, School Children, International Classification of Diseases, Motor Function, Reproducibility of Results, Correlation coefficient, Cross Sectional Studies, Neurosciences, and Motor Skills
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
To assess the interobserver reliability of the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) in young children (age 1-5 years) with cerebral palsy. Interobserver reliability study. A cross-sectional study of a hospital-based population of... more
To assess the interobserver reliability of the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) in young children (age 1-5 years) with cerebral palsy. Interobserver reliability study. A cross-sectional study of a hospital-based population of children with cerebral palsy. Thirty children, 18 boys and 12 girls between 1 and 5 years of age (mean age 2.5 years +/- 14.2 SD, Gross Motor Function Classification System level I-IV). the children were classified by means of the MACS by two independent observers. Interobserver reliability was analysed using Cohen's kappa. Overall interobserver reliability of the MACS for children aged 1-5 years was moderate, with a linear weighted kappa (kappa) of 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.76). According to the generally accepted categories of agreement, reliability was moderate for children under 2 years of age (kappa = 0.55), and good for children between 2 and 5 years of age (kappa = 0.67). Classification of manual ability of young children with cerebral palsy is possible between 2 and 5 years of age. For children younger than 2 years old, it should be done with caution. Further development of the MACS for children under 5 years of age is recommended with an emphasis on age-appropriate descriptions of manual abilities.
Research Interests:
To assess construct validity, test-retest reliability and inter-interviewer reliability of the intensity dimension of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) for children with and without physical... more
To assess construct validity, test-retest reliability and inter-interviewer reliability of the intensity dimension of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) for children with and without physical disabilities in the Netherlands. In total, 232 children aged 6-18 years (110 male, 122 female) participated. Seventy-four children with various physical disabilities and 158 without a disability. Participants completed the CAPE and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. In addition, parents of 142 children were interviewed using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales and the Family Environment Scale. For 71 children test- retest reliability and for 60 children inter-interviewer reliability were assessed. Validity was examined by assessing differences in participation intensity in children with disabilities versus without a physical disability, boys versus girls, and younger versus older children. In addition, 13 hypotheses regarding participation, child and family variables were examined. Validity of the CAPE was supported by significant differences in participation for subgroups. Participation differed significantly in children with and without disabilities. Girls participated more in all activities. Older children participated more in social activities and self-improvement activities, younger children participated more in recreational activities. Validity of the CAPE was further supported with significant correlation coefficients in 8 out of 13 hypotheses. Both test-retest and inter-interviewer reliability were good to excellent. The findings indicate that the Dutch language version of the CAPE is a reliable and valid instrument to measure participation in recreation and leisure activities for children with and without physical disabilities aged 6-18 years.