Innovative animals are those able to solve novel problems or invent novel solutions to existing problems. Despite the important ecological and evolutionary consequences of innovation, we still know very little about the traits that vary among individuals within a species to make them more or less innovative. Here we examine innovative problem solving by spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) in their natural habitat, and demonstrate for the first time in a non-human animal that those individuals exhibiting a greater diversity of initial exploratory behaviours are more successful problem solvers. Additionally, as in earlier work, we found that neophobia was a critical inhibitor of problem-solving success. Interestingly, although juveniles and adults were equally successful in solving the problem, juveniles were significantly more diverse in their initial exploratory behaviours, more persistent and less neophobic than were adults. We found no significant effects of social rank or sex on success, the diversity of initial exploratory behaviours, behavioural persistence or neophobia. Our results suggest that the diversity of initial exploratory behaviours, akin to some measures of human creativity, is an important, but largely overlooked, determinant of problem-solving success in non-human animals.

References

1
Reader S. M.& Laland K. N. . 2003 Animal innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
2
Kummer H.& Goodall J. . 1985 Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 308, 203–214.doi: 10.1098/rstb.1985.0020 (doi:10.1098/rstb.1985.0020). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3
Morand-Ferron J.& Quinn J. L. . 2011 Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15 898–15 903.doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111560108 (doi:10.1073/pnas.1111560108). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4
Sol D., Duncan R. P., Blackburn T. M., Cassey P.& Lefebvre L. . 2005 Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5460–5465.doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408145102 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0408145102). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5
Nicolakakis N., Sol D.& Lefebvre L. . 2003 Behavioural flexibility predicts species richness in birds, but not extinction risk. Anim. Behav. 65, 445–452.doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2085 (doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2085). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6
Laland K. N.& Reader S. M. . 1999 Foraging innovation in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 57, 331–340.doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0967 (doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0967). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7
Van Schaik C. P., Van Noordwijk M. A.& Wich S. A. . 2006 Innovation in wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii). Behaviour 143, 839–876.doi: 10.1163/156853906778017944 (doi:10.1163/156853906778017944). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8
Webster S. J.& Lefebvre L. . 2001 Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform–passeriform assemblage in Barbados. Anim. Behav. 62, 23–32.doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1725 (doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1725). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9
Bouchard J., Goodyer W.& Lefebvre L. . 2007 Social learning and innovation are positively correlated in pigeons (Columba livia). Anim. Cogn. 10, 259–266.doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0064-1 (doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0064-1). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10
Lefebvre L.& Bolhuis J. J. . 2003 Positive and negative correlates of feeding innovations in birds: evidence for limited modularity. Animal innovation (eds , Reader S. M.& Laland K. N. ), pp. 39–61. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
11
Morand-Ferron J., Cole E. F., Rawles J. E. C.& Quinn J. L. . 2011 Who are the innovators? A field experiment with 2 passerine species. Behav. Ecol. 22, 1241–1248.doi: 10.1093/beheco/arr120 (doi:10.1093/beheco/arr120). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12
Liker A.& Bókony V. . 2009 Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7893–7898.doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900042106 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0900042106). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13
Overington S. E., Cauchard L., Côté K. A.& Lefebvre L. . 2011 Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: what characterizes an innovator? Behav. Processes 87, 274–285.doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.06.002 (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2011.06.002). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14
Cole E. F., Cram D. L.& Quinn J. L. . 2011 Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. Anim. Behav. 81, 491–498.doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.025 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.025). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15
Pfeffer K., Fritz J.& Kotrschal K. . 2002 Hormonal correlates of being an innovative greylag goose, Anser anser. Anim. Behav. 63, 687–695.doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1949 (doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1949). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16
Caruso D. A. . 1993 Dimensions of quality in infants’ exploratory behavior: relationships to problem-solving ability. Infant Behav. Dev. 16, 441–454.doi: 10.1016/0163-6383(93)80003-Q (doi:10.1016/0163-6383(93)80003-Q). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17
Skinner B. F. . 1981 Selection by consequences. Science 213, 501–504.doi: 10.1126/science.7244649 (doi:10.1126/science.7244649). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18
Parker C. E. . 1974 Behavioral diversity in ten species of nonhuman primates. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 87, 930–937.doi: 10.1037/h0037228 (doi:10.1037/h0037228). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19
Siegler R. S. . 1995 How does change occur: a microgenetic study of number conservation. Cogn. Psychol. 28, 225–273.doi: 10.1006/cogp.1995.1006 (doi:10.1006/cogp.1995.1006). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20
Tebbich S., Sterelny K.& Teschke I. . 2010 The tale of the finch: adaptive radiation and behavioural flexibility. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 1099–1109.doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0291 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0291). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21
Thornton A.& Samson J. . 2012 Innovative problem solving in wild meerkats. Anim. Behav. 83, 1459–1468.doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.018 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22
Tebbich S., Fessl B.& Blomqvist D. . 2009 Exploration and ecology in Darwin's finches. Evol. Ecol. 23, 591–605.doi: 10.1007/s10682-008-9257-1 (doi:10.1007/s10682-008-9257-1). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23
Bergman T. J.& Kitchen D. M. . 2009 Comparing responses to novel objects in wild baboons (Papio ursinus) and geladas (Theropithecus gelada). Anim. Cogn. 12, 63–73.doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0171-2 (doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0171-2). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24
Greenberg R. . 1983 The role of neophobia in determining the degree of foraging specialization in some migrant warblers. Am. Nat. 122, 444–453.doi: 10.1086/284148 (doi:10.1086/284148). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25
Greenberg R. . 1990 Feeding neophobia and ecological plasticity: a test of the hypothesis with captive sparrows. Anim. Behav. 39, 375–379.doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80884-X (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80884-X). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26
Seferta A., Guay P. J., Marzinotto E.& Lefebvre L. . 2001 Learning differences between feral pigeons and zenaida doves: the role of neophobia and human proximity. Ethology 107, 281–293.doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00658.x (doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00658.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27
Greenberg R. . 2003 The role of neophobia and neophilia in the development of innovative behaviour of birds. Animal innovation (eds , Reader S. M.& Laland K. N. ), pp. 175–196. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
28
Auersperg A. M. I., von Bayern A. M. P., Gajdon G. K., Huber L.& Kacelnik A. . 2011 Flexibility in problem solving and tool use of kea and New Caledonian crows in a multi access box paradigm. PLoS ONE 6, e20231.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020231 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020231). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29
Biondi L. M., Bó M. S.& Vassallo A. I. . 2010 Inter-individual and age differences in exploration, neophobia and problem-solving ability in a Neotropical raptor (Milvago chimango). Anim. Cogn. 13, 701–710.doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0319-8 (doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0319-8). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30
Mettke-Hofmann C., Winkler H.& Leisler B. . 2002 The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots. Ethology 108, 249–272.doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00773.x (doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00773.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31
Greenberg R. . 1984 Differences in feeding neophobia in the tropical migrant woodwarblers Dendroica castanea and D. pensylvanica. J. Comp. Psychol. 98, 131–136.doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.98.2.131 (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.98.2.131). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32
Drent P. J.& Marchetti C. . 1999 Individuality, exploration and foraging in hand raised juvenile Great Tits. International Ornithological Congress (eds , Adams N. J.& Slowtow R. H. ), pp. 896–914. Johannesburg, South Africa: BirdLife South Africa. Google Scholar
33
Kendal R. L., Coe R. L.& Laland K. N. . 2005 Age differences in neophilia, exploration, and innovation in family groups of callitrichid monkeys. Am. J. Primatol. 66, 167–188.doi: 10.1002/ajp.20136 (doi:10.1002/ajp.20136). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34
Wallach M. A.& Kogan N. . 1965 Modes of thinking in young children a study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York, NY: Holt, Runehart and Winston. Google Scholar
35
Bonk C. . 2003 Creativity tests: Guilford's alternative uses task (1967). Bloomington , IN : Department of Educational Psychology, School of Education, Indiana University. See http://wwwindianaedu/~bobweb/Handout/sub/Bob_CT_Uses.html. Google Scholar
36
Christensen P. R., Guilford J. P., Merrifleld P. R.& Wilson R. C. . 1960 Alternate uses. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Service. Google Scholar
37
Verbeek M. E. M., Drent P. J.& Wiepkema P. R. . 1994 Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behaviour of male great tits. Anim. Behav. 48, 1113–1121.doi: 10.1006/anbe.1994.1344 (doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1344). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38
Lefebvre L. . 2000 Feeding innovations and their cultural transmission in bird populations. The evolution of cognition (eds , Heyes C.& Huber L. ), pp. 311–328. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
39
Reader S. M.& Laland K. N. . 2001 Primate innovation: sex, age and social rank differences. Int. J. Primatol. 22, 787–805.doi: 10.1023/A:1012069500899 (doi:10.1023/A:1012069500899). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40
Russon A. E. . 2003 Innovation and creativity in forest-living rehabilitant orangutans. Animal innovation (eds , Reader S. M.& Laland K. N. ), pp. 279–306. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
41
Box H. O. . 2003 Characteristics and propensities of marmosets and tamarins: implications for studies of innovation. Animal innovation (eds , Reader S. M.& Laland K. N. ), pp. 197–219. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
42
Cooper S. M., Holekamp K. E.& Smale L. . 1999 A seasonal feast: long term analysis of feeding behaviour in the spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta). Afr. J. Ecol. 37, 149–160.doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2028.1999.00161.x (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2028.1999.00161.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43
Höner O. P., Wachter B., East M. L.& Hofer H. . 2002 The response of spotted hyaenas to long-term changes in prey populations: functional response and interspecific kleptoparasitism. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 236–246.doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00596.x (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00596.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
44
Henschel J.& Skinner J. . 1990 The diet of the spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta in Kruger National Park. Afr. J. Ecol. 28, 69–82.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1990.tb01138.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.1990.tb01138.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
45
Sol D., Timmermans S.& Lefebvre L. . 2002 Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim. Behav. 63, 495–502.doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1953 (doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1953). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
46
Sol D.& Lefebvre L. . 2000 Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos 90, 599–605.doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900317.x (doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900317.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
47
Holekamp K. E.& Dloniak S. M. . 2010 Intraspecific variation in the behavioral ecology of a tropical carnivore, the spotted hyena. Adv. Stud. Behav. 42, 189–229.doi: 10.1016/S0065-3454(10)42006-9 (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(10)42006-9). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
48
Funston P., et al. 2010 Substrate and species constraints on the use of track incidences to estimate African large carnivore abundance. J. Zool. 281, 56–65.doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00682.x (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00682.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
49
Engh A., Siebert E., Greenberg D.& Holekamp K. E. . 2005 Patterns of alliance formation and postconflict aggression indicate spotted hyaenas recognize third-party relationships. Anim. Behav. 69, 209–217.doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.04.013 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.04.013). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
50
Smith J. E., Van Horn R. C., Powning K. S., Cole A. R., Graham K. E., Memenis S. K.& Holekamp K. E. . 2010 Evolutionary forces favoring intragroup coalitions among spotted hyenas and other animals. Behav. Ecol. 21, 284–303.doi: 10.1093/beheco/arp181 (doi:10.1093/beheco/arp181). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
51
Wahaj S. A., Guse K. R.& Holekamp K. E. . 2002 Reconciliation in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Ethology 107, 1057–1074.doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00717.x (doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00717.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
52
Drea C. M.& Carter A. N. . 2009 Cooperative problem solving in a social carnivore. Anim. Behav. 78, 967–977.doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.030 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.030). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
53
Holekamp K. E., Smale L.& Szykman M. . 1996 Rank and reproduction in the female spotted hyaena. J. Reprod. Fertil. 108, 229–237.doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1080229 (doi:10.1530/jrf.0.1080229). Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
54
Crawley M. J. . 2007 The R book. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Crossref, Google Scholar
55
Hauser M. D. . 1999 Perseveration, inhibition and the prefrontal cortex: a new look. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 214–222.doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80030-0 (doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80030-0). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
56
Day R. L., Coe R. L., Kendal J. R.& Laland K. N. . 2003 Neophilia, innovation and social learning: a study of intergeneric differences in callitrichid monkeys. Anim. Behav. 65, 559–571.doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2074 (doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2074). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
57
Fragaszy D., Visalberghi E.& Galloway A. . 1997 Infant tufted capuchin monkeys’ behaviour with novel foods: opportunism, not selectivity. Anim. Behav. 53, 1337–1343.doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0368 (doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0368). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
58
Sigg H. . 1980 Differentiation of female positions in hamadryas one male units. Zeitsch. Tierpsychol. 53, 265–302.doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1980.tb01054.x (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1980.tb01054.x). Crossref, Google Scholar
59
Bunnell B. N.& Perkins M. N. . 1980 Performance correlates of social behavior and organization: social rank and complex problem solving in crab-eating macaques (M. fascicularis). Primates 21, 515–523.doi: 10.1007/BF02373840 (doi:10.1007/BF02373840). Crossref, Google Scholar
60
Boogert N. J., Reader S. M.& Laland K. N. . 2006 The relation between social rank, neophobia and individual learning in starlings. Anim. Behav. 72, 1229–1239.doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.021 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.021). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
61
Katzir G. . 1982 Relationships between social structure and response to novelty in captive jackdaws, Corvus monedula L. I. Response to novel space. Behaviour 81, 231–263.doi: 10.1163/156853982X00157 (doi:10.1163/156853982X00157). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
62
Katzir G. . 1983 Relationships between social structure and response to novelty in captive jackdaws, Corvus monedula L II. Response to novel palatable food. Behaviour 87, 183–208.doi: 10.1163/156853983X00426 (doi:10.1163/156853983X00426). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
63
Hauser M. D. . 1988 Invention and social transmission: new data from wild vervet monkeys. Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans (eds , Byrne R. W.& Whiten A. ), pp. 327–343. New York, NY: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
64
Holekamp K., Sakai S.& Lundrigan B. . 2007 The spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) as a model system for study of the evolution of intelligence. J. Mammal. 88, 545–554.doi: 10.1644/06-MAMM-S-361R1.1 (doi:10.1644/06-MAMM-S-361R1.1). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
65
Thorndike E. L. . 1911 Animal intelligence: experimental studies. New York, NY: Hafner Publishing Company. Crossref, Google Scholar
66
Werdenich D.& Huber L. . 2006 A case of quick problem solving in birds: string pulling in keas, Nestor notabilis. Anim. Behav. 71, 855–863.doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.018 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
67
van de Waal E.& Bshary R. . 2010 Contact with human facilities appears to enhance technical skills in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops). Folia Primatol. 81, 282–291.doi: 10.1159/000322628 (doi:10.1159/000322628). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
68
Cheney D. L.& Seyfarth R. M. . 2007 Baboon metaphysics: the evolution of a social mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
69
Timmermans S., Lefebvre L., Boire D.& Basu P. . 2000 Relative size of the hyperstriatum ventrale is the best predictor of feeding innovation rate in birds. Brain Behav. Evol. 56, 196–203.doi: 10.1159/000047204 (doi:10.1159/000047204). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
70
Nicolakakis N.& Lefebvre L. . 2000 Forebrain size and innovation rate in European birds: feeding, nesting and confounding variables. Behaviour 137, 1415–1429.doi: 10.1163/156853900502646 (doi:10.1163/156853900502646). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
71
Lefebvre L., Whittle P., Lascaris E.& Finkelstein A. . 1997 Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Anim. Behav. 53, 549–560.doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0330 (doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0330). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
72
Sol D., Lefebvre L.& Rodríguez-Teijeiro J. D. . 2005 Brain size, innovative propensity and migratory behaviour in temperate Palaearctic birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1433–1441.doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3099 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3099). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
73
Reader S. M.& Laland K. N. . 2002 Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 4436–4441.doi: 10.1073/pnas.062041299 (doi:10.1073/pnas.062041299). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar