Advertisement
No access
Special Issue Perspective

Reproducible Research in Computational Science

Science
2 Dec 2011
Vol 334, Issue 6060
pp. 1226-1227

Abstract

Computational science has led to exciting new developments, but the nature of the work has exposed limitations in our ability to evaluate published findings. Reproducibility has the potential to serve as a minimum standard for judging scientific claims when full independent replication of a study is not possible.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1
Hanson B., Sugden A., Alberts B., Making data maximally available. Science 331, 649 (2011).
2
Peng R. D., Dominici F., Zeger S. L., Reproducible epidemiologic research. Am. J. Epidemiol. 163, 783 (2006).
3
J. P. Madrid, D. Macchetto, Bull. AAS, http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.4552 (2009).
4
Schwab M., Karrenbach N., Claerbout J., Making scientific computations reproducible. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2, 61 (2000).
5
Laine C., Goodman S. N., Griswold M. E., Sox H. C., Reproducible research: Moving toward research the public can really trust. Ann. Intern. Med. 146, 450 (2007).
6
King G., Replication, Replication. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. 28, 444 (1995).
7
R. Gentleman, Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4, article 2 (2005).
8
Yale Law School Roundtable on Data and Code Sharing, Comput. Sci. Eng. 12, 8 (2010).
9
Ioannidis J. P. A., et al., Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses. Nat. Genet. 41, 149 (2009).
10
Mesirov J. P., Computer science. Accessible reproducible research. Science 327, 415 (2010).
11
Peng R. D., Reproducible research and biostatistics. Biostatistics 10, 405 (2009).
12
McCullough B. D., McGeary K. A., Harrison T. D., Do economics journal archives promote replicable research? Can. J. Econ. 41, 1406 (2008).
13
Barnes N., Publish your computer code: It is good enough. Nature 467, 753 (2010).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 334 | Issue 6060
2 December 2011

Submission history

Published in print: 2 December 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Roger D. Peng
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore MD 21205, USA.

Notes

To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Reproducibility challenges in robotic surgery, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 10, (2023).https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1127972
    Crossref
  2. Maximizing the utility of public data, Frontiers in Genetics, 14, (2023).https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1106631
    Crossref
  3. K-span: Open and reproducible spatial analytics using scientific workflows, Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, (2023).https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1130262
    Crossref
  4. A mentorship and incubation program using project-based learning to build a professional bioinformatics pipeline in Kenya, PLOS Computational Biology, 19, 3, (e1010904), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010904
    Crossref
  5. An implementation framework to improve the transparency and reproducibility of computational models of infectious diseases, PLOS Computational Biology, 19, 3, (e1010856), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010856
    Crossref
  6. Lyrics and melodies: Do both affect emotions equally? A replication and extension of Ali and Peynircioğlu (2006), Musicae Scientiae, (102986492211491), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649221149109
    Crossref
  7. On Developing Better Practices for Reproducible Data Analysis in Laboratory Medicine, The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 8, 1, (229-231), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfac097
    Crossref
  8. The Case for Including Data and Code with ML Publications in Laboratory Medicine, The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 8, 1, (213-216), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfac088
    Crossref
  9. Open data policy and journal impacts: a synthetic difference-in-differences approach, Applied Economics Letters, (1-6), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2023.2187017
    Crossref
  10. Multi-level parallel multi-layer block reproducible summation algorithm, Parallel Computing, 115, (102996), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2023.102996
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media