ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

A Versatile AuNP Synthetic Platform for Decoupled Control of Size and Surface Composition

Cite this: Langmuir 2018, 34, 23, 6820–6826
Publication Date (Web):May 16, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00353

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

4010

Altmetric

-

Citations

24
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (4 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

While a plethora of protocols exist for the synthesis of sub-10-nm gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), independent control over the size and surface composition remains restricted. This poses a particular challenge for systematic studies of AuNP structure–function relationships and the optimization of crucial design parameters. To this end, we report on a modular two-step approach based on the synthesis of AuNPs in oleylamine (OAm) followed by subsequent functionalization with thiol ligands and mixtures thereof. The synthesis of OAm-capped AuNPs enables fine-tuning of the core size in the range of 2–7 nm by varying the reaction temperature. The subsequent thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange allows a reliable generation of thiol-capped AuNPs with target surface functionality. The compatibility of this approach with a vast library of thiol ligands provides detailed control of the mixed ligand composition and solubility in a wide range of solvents ranging from water to hexane. This decoupled control over the AuNP core and ligand shell provides a powerful toolbox for the methodical screening of optimal design parameters and facile preparation of AuNPs with target properties.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Among all of the nanomaterial systems, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are one of the most widely studied material platforms. With distinct chemical and physical properties, AuNPs have become vital components in various optical, (1,2) catalytic, (3−5) chemical, and biomedical (6−9) applications. Sub-10-nm AuNPs are of particular interest for a number of reasons. Functionalization with a densely packed self-assembled monolayer of thiol ligands offers reliable core protection and long-term colloidal stability, provided by the strong interaction between gold and sulfur. (10,11) The broad library of available capping agents and its size range makes these types of AuNPs promising candidates as biomedical agents and as building blocks in constructing nanostructures with higher orders. (12−15)
The chemical nature of the stabilizing ligand shell structure is decisive for many NP properties, including solubility, chemical reactivity, and binding affinity. (16−20) It has been reported that the interrelationship between NP size and surface properties is key for controlling cellular uptake (21) and protein adsorption. (22,23) This demand poses challenges for existing preparation protocols as most are parameter-sensitive wet-chemistry syntheses. For example, although uniformly distributed thiol-protected AuNPs can be synthesized, both the classical one-step Brust–Schiffrin method (24) and the one-phase version (25) suffer from a divergence of the NP core diameter when varying the composition of the ligand shell, making comparability and systematic studies difficult. (26)
Exchange of the capping agent offers a viable route to decoupling gold core preparation from ligand shell functionalization. (27,28) In the so-called place-exchange reaction, an excess of target ligands is introduced to replace the existing protecting shell. (29) The kinetics and evolution of the ligand shell morphology in thiol-for-thiol exchange reactions were recently studied in great detail. (30) An alternative is the synthesis of AuNPs with a more labile intermediate capping agent to facilitate the exchange. The use of AuNP protectants such as citrate, (31) phosphine, (32,33) 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP), (34,35) dioctylamine (DOA), (36) and tetraoctylammonium bromide (TOAB) (37) allows us to separate the synthesis of the AuNP core and the formation of a tailored ligand shell via a thiol-for-agent ligand-exchange procedure. (37)
While each of the routes described above has been successfully implemented in certain protocols, their general applicability is limited by drawbacks such as (i) the available AuNP size range and size tunability, (ii) the uniformity in size and shape of the AuNP core, (iii) the stability and exchangeability of the intermediate capping agent, (iv) the yield and scalability of the reaction, and (v) the practicality of the procedure. Reliable thiol-for-thiol exchange is time-consuming, with most protocols requiring daylong procedures. (30) Because of the strong association between the capping agent and the gold core, it is generally challenging to achieve complete and homogeneous substitution. Typically, replacement thiols are introduced in large excess, which raises concerns over partial etching of the AuNP core. (38,39) For citrate-based AuNPs, the available size range is typically 10–150 nm, (40) though some protocols exists to tune the mean size below this range. (41) In contrast, phosphine-based protocols are limited to <2 nm. For DMAP-based, DOA-based, and TOAB-based AuNPs, the available uniformity and tunability of the AuNP core are somewhat restricted. (36,42,43) Moreover, it remains a challenge to achieve a satisfiable yield and compatibility with large-scale synthesis when the intermediate AuNP complex is unstable. (33,44)
The use of oleylamine (OAm) in AuNP synthesis has attracted considerable interest due to its ability to play multiple roles as surfactant, solvent, and reducing agent. (45) OAm alone is able to reduce the gold precusor and stabilize >8 nm AuNPs at elevated temperature (>80 °C) in small-scale syntheses. (46−49) Recently, the introduction of additional reducing agents enabled the facile production of smaller AuNPs with a narrow size distribution and size tunability near room temperature. (50,51) The potential of further surface functionalization by ligand exchange was recently validated for alkylthiol, (52) biphenylthiol, (53) azothiol, (54) and charged thiol mixtures. (55)
Based on OAm as intermediated capping agent, we herein report on a two-step protocol for independent control over AuNP core and ligand shells. We study the applicability of this approach to produce thiol-capped AuNPs via thiol-for-OAm ligand replacement and establish a successful procedure to tune the core size as well as the capping-layer composition within a broad library of thiol ligands and mixtures thereof. The resulting AuNPs exhibit solubilities ranging from hexane to water and are ideally suited for systematic studies of AuNP structure–function relationships as well as AuNP engineering of crucial design parameters.

Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Synthesis of OAm-AuNPs

The chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (U.K.) and used without further purification unless otherwise stated. A generic OAm-AuNP synthesis started with the preparation of the precursor at room temperature (RT, 20 °C) by dissolving 0.5 mmol of hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) hydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O, 95%) in a 40 mL solvent mixture of OAm (C18 content: 80%–90%) and n-octane (97%) (1:1 v/v). The solution was sonicated under a flow of argon (Ar) for 10 min before stirring at a designated reaction temperature. For the precise control of the reaction temperature, a 100 mL jacketed flask was used in the synthesis with a temperature-controlled circulating bath (Grant Instruments, GR150-R2). The reducing solution was prepared by dissolving 0.5 mmol of t-butylamine-borane complex (tBAB, 97%) in 1 mL of OAm and 1 mL of octane before the injection into the precursor solution under vigorous stirring. The mixture was left reacting in an Ar atmosphere at the specified reaction temperature for 2 h before 30 mL of acetone was added to quench the reaction. Various batches of OAm-AuNPs were prepared in octane to study the effect of the reaction temperature in the range of 1–50 °C. The scalability of this method was studied at 15 °C, when 0.25 and 1.0 mmol of HAuCl4 were used, respectively. The AuNPs were collected by centrifugation at 5000g for 10 min and then redispersed in dichloromethane (DCM). The obtained samples were dried in a vacuum desiccator after repeated washing in ethanol.

Thiol-for-OAm Ligand Exchange for AuNPs with a Homoligand Shell

The general procedure of the ligand-exchange process started by dissolving 0.2 mmol of the designated thiol ligand mixture in 10 mL of DCM by vigorous stirring at RT for 10 min. Subsequently, 30 mg of the OAm-capped AuNPs in 5 mL of DCM solution was injected, and the solution was allowed to react at RT for 6 h. To terminate the ligand-exchange procedure of organic-soluble AuNPs, the solution was first evaporated in a rotary evaporator before washing with methanol (MeOH) or acetone three times to remove the excess free ligands in solution. In the case of targeting water-soluble AuNPs, MeOH or acetone was directly added to terminate the reaction. The functionalized AuNPs were collected by repetitive centrifugation at 5000g for 10 min before further drying in a vacuum desiccator. Various batches using the following thiol ligands were prepared with the same protocol: 1-hexanethiol (HT, 97%), 1-octanethiol (OT, 98%), 11-mercapto-1-undecanol (MUO, 97%), 2-phenylethanethiol (PET, 98%), MDDCBO (synthesis adapted from a reported protocol, (42) see SI), MNT (synthesis adapted from protocol, (56) see SI), 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA, 95%), and 11-mercapto-1-undecanesulfonate (MUS) (synthesized as reported, (57) see SI). For a more detailed summary of the results, see Table 1.
Table 1. Thiol Ligands Used for Homoligand AuNPs
To compare the ligand density of thiol-protected AuNPs prepared by the two-step OAm ligand-exchange method via a classical one-step synthesis, OT-capped AuNPs were prepared following the single-phase protocol developed by Stucky and co-workers. (25) In detail, 0.5 mmol of chloro(triphenylphosphine)gold(I) (95%) was mixed with 2 mmol of OT at 80 °C followed by subsequent reduction with 5 mmol of tBAB at the same temperature for 1 h. The solution was cooled to 40 °C before the addition of 30 mL of MeOH. The AuNPs were collected after washing three times in acetone and subsequent vacuum drying.

Thiol-for-OAm Ligand Exchange for AuNPs with a Mixed-Ligand Shell

Similar to the functionalization of a homoligand shell, mixed-ligand AuNPs were prepared by mixing 0.2 mmol of the thiol ligand mixture at a given feed ratio with 30 mg of the OAm-capped AuNPs in DCM. Functionalized AuNPs with the following ligand mixtures (molar feed ratio) were used: MUO-PET (50–50%), MNT-HT (60–40%), MDDCBO-HT (60–40%), and MUS-OT (60–40%). For MUS-OT composition variation, the following prescriptions were introduced: 80–20, 60–40, 40–60, and 20–80%.

Characterization

A high-resolution 200 keV transmission electron microscope (TEM) system (JEOL, JEM-2010) was used for size imaging. UV–visible (UV–vis) absorption was measured with a fiber-based setup that combined a stabilized tungsten–halogen light source (Thorlabs, SLS201/M, a cuvette holder (Quantum Northwest, qpod 2e) and a high-sensitivity spectrometer (Ocean Optics, QE-Pro). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was studied with a thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Instruments, TGA 550) at a ramp rate of 20 °C/min from RT to 550 °C. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) results were obtained at 400 MHz (Bruker, Avance III). NMR analysis was carried out in two steps. First, the effectiveness of AuNP washing was verified by line broadening of the surface-bound thiol ligands. Subsequently, ligand desorption was induced by the addition of iodine (I2); see the Supporting Information.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The synthesis platform based on AuNP synthesis with OAm as an intermediate capping agent and subsequent thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange is illustrated in Figure 1. While the reaction temperature is used as sole parameter to tune the AuNP core size in the initial synthesis, subsequent ligand exchange involving thiols (in minimum excess) allows us to produce thiol-capped AuNPs with ionic, amphiphathic, and hydrophobic ligand functionalization as well as mixtures thereof.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic of two-step gold nanoparticle (AuNP) preparation consisting of AuNP synthesis with oleylamine (OAm) and subsequent functionalization via thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange.

Fine Tuning of the OAm-AuNP Core Size with Temperature

The synthesis of OAm-capped AuNPs was revisited using the burst nucleation method based on the reduction of HAuCl4 by tBAB. (50) A representative image of AuNPs stemming from synthesis at different reaction temperatures is shown in Figure 2a. The resulting size distribution as a function of reaction temperature is summarized in Figure 2b with characteristic histograms for each temperature in the Supporting Information (Figure S1). A clear effect of the reaction temperature variation on the resulting AuNP size can be observed. For example, at a reaction temperature of 1 °C, AuNPs with an average size of 6.3 ± 0.7 nm were obtained, which reduced to 5.0 ± 0.6 nm for 10 °C, 4.0 ± 0.6 nm for 20 °C, 3.0 ± 0.5 nm for 30 °C, and 2.2 ± 0.4 nm for 40 °C. An increase in the reaction temperature to 50 °C did not lead to a further reduction of the average diameter (2.2 ± 0.4 nm). Thus, by controlling only a single experimental parameter, the reaction temperature, the average size of the AuNPs was systematically tuned in the range of 2–7 nm. These results are in line with reported values for OAm-based synthesis in octane (26) and show a trend similar to that of the OAm-based synthesis in tetralin. (50) Moreover, this approach yielded excellent scalability as evidenced by the consistent results when varying the batch size by a factor of 4. At 15 °C, the size distributions for 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mmol HAuCl4 batch sizes were determined to be 4.6 ± 0.5, 4.6 ± 0.6, and 4.7 ± 0.6 nm, respectively (Supporting Information, Figure S2). This simple tunability over such a broad size range makes the OAm-based AuNP synthesis an ideal base for the subsequent functionalization via thiol-for-OAm replacement.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Oleylamine-based synthesis of gold nanoparticles. (a) Representative TEM images for different reaction temperatures. (b) Average size and standard deviation of the nanoparticle populations as a function of reaction temperature.

Ligand Packing Density

While OAm-based synthesis was previously introduced as a reliable procedure for AuNP preparation, the primary aim of this work was to use this protocol as a base for subsequent functionalization with a broad range of target thiol ligands and mixtures thereof. In order to compare the ligand shell of 1-octanethiol (OT)-capped AuNPs after thiol-for-OAm exchange (OAm-OT AuNP) with those obtained directly by a one-phase method (OT AuNP), batches were prepared for each method and dried thoroughly by rotary evaporation and subsequently overnight in a vacuum desiccator. The TGA results of those samples are presented in Figure S8. The weight loss observed in the range below 600 °C can be exclusively related to the decomposition of the organic ligand shell as most of the organic component is converted to H2O or CO2 in air. This conversion predominantly was observed at around 200 °C for OT ligands. From TEM images, the average sizes of OAm-OT and OT AuNPs were analyzed to be 4.9 ± 0.4 and 4.4 ± 0.4 nm in diameter, respectively. Combining the weight loss determined by TGA and the average size from TEM analysis, the ligand density of OAm-OT AuNPs and OT AuNPs was determined to be 4.5 and 4.7 ligands/nm2 using a simplified spherical model (58) (Table S1). The similarity in the ligand packing between the two synthesis routes suggests that the OAm method is an ideal alternative to the established one-step, one-phase method with distinct advantages. While the reaction temperature is an important parameter in the one-phase method, size control over the full reported range typically requires further adjustment of the reaction solvent mixture. (25) More importantly, the type of thiol ligand plays an important role in the observed size distribution of the AuNP core, making it particularly difficult to independently vary both parameters in systematic studies. (32)

Variation of Thiol Capping and Resulting Solubility of AuNPs

Various thiol-capped AuNPs from an extensive library of DCM-soluble ligands were successfully prepared via the presented thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange approach. An overview of the studied ligands and the resulting AuNP solubility after functionalization is shown in Table 1. UV–vis absorption spectroscopy was used to evaluate the AuNP solvation by tracking their respective plasmon resonance peak (Figure S9). The simple but versatile ligand-exchange step enabled the functionalization of thiol-capped AuNPs that could be dissolved in solvents ranging from nonpolar (hexane, toluene, and chloroform) to polar aprotic (DCM) and polar protic solvents (H2O, MeOH, and EtOH). Furthermore, the complete thiol replacement was also evidenced by the disappearance of the OAm characteristic footprint from 1H NMR, as presented in Figure 3. An overview of the obtained yield for both AuNP syntheses in OAm (step 1) and thiol-for-OAm AuNP functionalization (step 2) is shown in the Supporting Information (Table S2). While a reaction yield of 94.9% was recovered for step 1, we obtained yields of 91.6 and 87.8% for subsequent functionalization with MUA and MUO, respectively.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange for homoligand AuNPs. NMR and TGA results for AuNPs before and after thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange using MUS, OT, and MUO, respectively. The 1H NMR spectra of various AuNPs were obtained after purification and subsequent I2-induced ligand desorption.

AuNPs with various binary mixtures of thiol ligands were also studied by introducing a prescribed feed composition for OAm-AuNPs with a size distribution of 4.9 ± 0.4 nm during the thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange. The UV–vis results of different mixtures (Figure S11) indicate the solubility of MUS-OT AuNPs in H2O, MUO-PET AuNPs in MeOH, MNT-HT AuNPs in chloroform, and MDDCBO-HT AuNPs in the liquid crystal (LC) 4-cyano-4′-pentylbiphenyl (5CB). Most distinct is the effect of a binary ligand mixture on solvation for a combination of MDDCBO and HT. While the homoligand-protected AuNPs with MDDCBO (or HT) showed very limited solubility in 5CB, the binary ligand mixture of MDDCBO and HT greatly improved solvation. This can be explained by the introduction of the short ligand as a spacing agent. (42)

Variation of Ligand Shell Composition for Binary Mixtures of MUS and OT

In order to establish a detailed relationship between the feed ratio of the binary ligand mixture in the thiol-for-OAm exchange step and the resulting ligand composition on the surface of the AuNPs, batches were prepared from six different molecular ratios of MUS and OT. The same OAm-protected AuNPs were used as based material throughout this study, with a size distribution of 3.6 ± 0.5 nm in diameter. In detail, the washed and dried AuNPs after ligand exchange were dissolved in a mixture of D2O and MeOD (batches with MUS) and CDCl3 (the batch with OT only) for the purpose of AuNP (and I2) solvation. The 1H NMR spectra of these solutions maintained only peaks from the solvents or impurities (Figures S12–S17), which suggests that a vast majority of the thiol ligands were attached to the AuNP surface. (59) The addition of I2 in excess gave rise to the distinct and characteristic peaks by the desorption of the thiols from the AuNP surface. By comparing the integration data of peaks contributed by MUS and OT individually, the yield ratio was determined and compared with the original feed ratio, as presented in Figure 4. (57) Interestingly, the resulting surface composition scaled accurately and reproducibly with the feed ratio variation, demonstrating that the ligand composition can be precisely controlled with the herein-presented approach.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Variation of ligand composition for mixed ligand MUS-OT AuNPs through the feed ratio. (a) Chemical shift profile after purification and subsequent I2-induced ligand desorption and (b) the calculated ligand yield ratio with respect to the ligand feed ratio.

These results are in stark contrast to thiol-for-thiol place exchange reactions, where the difference in thiol affinity for the gold surface poses a challenge for the consistent variation and tunability of the effective binary ligand composition on the AuNPs. (60,61) In the present approach, the dominating competition for surface adsorption is between thiol and OAm rather than thiol and thiol. The composition variation was further supported by the TGA results shown in the Supporting Information (Figure S18). On the basis of the ligand shell molar ratio of MUS and OT obtained by NMR analysis, the partial packing density for each ligand component was calculated for the different MUS-OT batches, as shown in Table S3.
We note that for reliable and reproducible functionalization with a consistent relationship between the ligand feed in solution and ligand yield on the AuNPs, the presented route relies on the solubility of the respective target thiols in a common solvent with the OAm-protected AuNPs, here DCM. A vast library of thiol ligands are either hydrophobic or amphipathic and thus compatible with the approach. Indeed, most of the commonly used thiol ligands exhibit a hydrophobic alkyl backbone with a functional (and often polar) end group. In contrast, hydrophilic thiols with poor solubility in DCM require functionalization via a two-phase process with H2O, which resulted in less precise control over the ligand composition. Additionally, the above shown tuning of the ligand shell composition by the feed ratio relies on a nonspecific coadsorption of both thiol ligands in a binary mixture. Recent work by Klajn and co-workers elucidated the effect of electrostatic interactions between different ligand types on the final composition of the ligand shell. (55) For a mixture of a positively charged viologen-based ligand and a zwitterionic sulfobetaine ligand, a variation of the ligand feed ratio by a factor of 5000 changed the effective ligand composition on the nanoparticles by only a factor of 3. In more general terms, we anticipate our approach to be a versatile nanoparticle platform for the study of both size and ligand composition on the resulting ligand shell morphology. (62)

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The presented synthesis platform for AuNP synthesis enabled the decoupling of core size refinement and ligand shell variation in thiol-capped AuNPs. Following a modified synthesis with OAm as an intermediate protecting capping agent, the core size was tuned in the range of 2–7 nm by varying the reaction temperature. Subsequently, the functionalization of the OAm-AuNPs with a wide choice of thiol ligands and binary mixtures thereof was achieved, resulting in tunable solubility ranging from H2O and alcohols to apolar organic solvents and LCs. Moreover, the thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange method proved to be as efficient as the conventional one-step method in preparing AuNPs with dense ligand packing. For MUS-OT-protected AuNPs, a consistent relationship was established between the thiol ligand mixture in the feed solution and the resulting composition on the AuNP, demonstrating precise control over the surface properties. We regard this synthesis platform as a valuable tool for fabricating thiol-protected AuNPs with rational design optimization for target applications.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00353.

  • TEM histograms of synthesized NPs; further experimental details; and NMR, TGA, MS, and UV–vis data (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 633635 (DIACHEMO). Y.Y. acknowledges University College London for the Overseas Research Scholarship and the Graduate Research Scholarship. S.G. is thankful for support by a start-up fund from the Department of Chemical Engineering at University College London. The authors are grateful to Dr. Paulo Jacob Silva and Prof. Francesco Stellacci (EPFL) for providing the MUS ligand and Dr. Jakub W. Trzcinski for valuable feedback on the manuscript.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 62 other publications.

  1. 1
    Barnes, W. L.; Dereux, A.; Ebbesen, T. W. Surface Plasmon Subwavelength Optics. Nature 2003, 424, 824830,  DOI: 10.1038/nature01937
  2. 2
    Tian, Y.; Tatsuma, T. Mechanisms and Applications of Plasmon-Induced Charge Separation at TiO2 Films Loaded with Gold Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 76327637,  DOI: 10.1021/ja042192u
  3. 3
    Haruta, M.; Yamada, N.; Kobayashi, T.; Iijima, S. Gold Catalysts Prepared by Coprecipitation for Low-Temperature Oxidation of Hydrogen and of Carbon Monoxide. J. Catal. 1989, 115, 301309,  DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(89)90034-1
  4. 4
    Corma, A.; Garcia, H. Supported Gold Nanoparticles as Catalysts for Organic Reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 20962126,  DOI: 10.1039/b707314n
  5. 5
    Wang, C.; Yin, H.; Dai, S.; Sun, S. A General Approach to Noble Metal-Metal Oxide Dumbbell Nanoparticles and Their Catalytic Application for CO Oxidation. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 32773282,  DOI: 10.1021/cm100603r
  6. 6
    Howes, P. D.; Chandrawati, R.; Stevens, M. M. Colloidal Nanoparticles as Advanced Biological Sensors. Science 2014, 346, 1247390,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1247390
  7. 7
    Dykman, L.; Khlebtsov, N. Gold Nanoparticles in Biomedical Applications: Recent Advances and Perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 22562282,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15166E
  8. 8
    Shukla, R.; Bansal, V.; Chaudhary, M.; Basu, A.; Bhonde, R. R.; Sastry, M. Biocompatibility of Gold Nanoparticles and Their Endocytotic Fate inside the Cellular Compartment: a Microscopic Overview. Langmuir 2005, 21, 1064410654,  DOI: 10.1021/la0513712
  9. 9
    Kinnear, C.; Moore, T. L.; Rodriguez-Lorenzo, L.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Petri-Fink, A. Form Follows Function: Nanoparticle Shape and Its Implications for Nanomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1147611521,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00194
  10. 10
    Castner, D. G.; Hinds, K.; Grainger, D. W. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Sulfur 2p Study of Organic Thiol and Disulfide Binding Interactions with Gold Surfaces. Langmuir 1996, 12, 50835086,  DOI: 10.1021/la960465w
  11. 11
    Bürgi, T. Properties of the Gold-Sulphur Interface: from Self-Assembled Monolayers to Clusters. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 1555315567,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR03497C
  12. 12
    Giljohann, D. A.; Seferos, D. S.; Daniel, W. L.; Massich, M. D.; Patel, P. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Gold Nanoparticles for Biology and Medicine. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 32803294,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904359
  13. 13
    Saha, K.; Agasti, S. S.; Kim, C.; Li, X.; Rotello, V. M. Gold Nanoparticles in Chemical and Biological Sensing. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 27392779,  DOI: 10.1021/cr2001178
  14. 14
    Yeh, Y.-C.; Creran, B.; Rotello, V. M. Gold Nanoparticles: Preparation, Properties, and Applications in Bionanotechnology. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 18711880,  DOI: 10.1039/C1NR11188D
  15. 15
    Le Ouay, B.; Guldin, S.; Luo, Z.; Allegri, S.; Stellacci, F. Freestanding Ultrathin Nanoparticle Membranes Assembled at Transient Liquid-Liquid Interfaces. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1600191,  DOI: 10.1002/admi.201600191
  16. 16
    DeVries, G. A.; Brunnbauer, M.; Hu, Y.; Jackson, A. M.; Long, B.; Neltner, B. T.; Uzun, O.; Wunsch, B. H.; Stellacci, F. Divalent Metal Nanoparticles. Science 2007, 315, 358361,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1133162
  17. 17
    Kuna, J. J.; Voïtchovsky, K.; Singh, C.; Jiang, H.; Mwenifumbo, S.; Ghorai, P. K.; Stevens, M. M.; Glotzer, S. C.; Stellacci, F. The Effect of Nanometre-Scale Structure on Interfacial Energy. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 837842,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2534
  18. 18
    Colangelo, E.; Comenge, J.; Paramelle, D.; Volk, M.; Chen, Q.; Lévy, R. Characterizing Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold Nanoparticles. Bioconjugate Chem. 2017, 28, 1122,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00587
  19. 19
    Bradford, S. M.; Fisher, E. A.; Meli, M.-V. Ligand Shell Composition-Dependent Effects on the Apparent Hydrophobicity and Film Behavior of Gold Nanoparticles at the Air-Water Interface. Langmuir 2016, 32, 97909796,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02238
  20. 20
    Edwards, W.; Marro, N.; Turner, G.; Kay, E. R. Continuum Tuning of Nanoparticle Interfacial Properties by Dynamic Covalent Exchange. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 125133,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC03666C
  21. 21
    Jiang, Y.; Huo, S.; Mizuhara, T.; Das, R.; Lee, Y.-W.; Hou, S.; Moyano, D. F.; Duncan, B.; Liang, X.-J.; Rotello, V. M. The Interplay of Size and Surface Functionality on the Cellular Uptake of Sub-10 nm Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 99869993,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03521
  22. 22
    Hung, A.; Mwenifumbo, S.; Mager, M.; Kuna, J. J.; Stellacci, F.; Yarovsky, I.; Stevens, M. M. Ordering Surfaces on the Nanoscale: Implications for Protein Adsorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14381450,  DOI: 10.1021/ja108285u
  23. 23
    Huang, R.; Carney, R. P.; Stellacci, F.; Lau, B. L. Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions: the Effects of Surface Compositional and Structural Heterogeneity Are Scale Dependent. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 69286935,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02117c
  24. 24
    Brust, M.; Fink, J.; Bethell, D.; Schiffrin, D.; Kiely, C. Synthesis and Reactions of Functionalised Gold Nanoparticles. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 16551656,  DOI: 10.1039/c39950001655
  25. 25
    Zheng, N.; Fan, J.; Stucky, G. D. One-Step One-Phase Synthesis of Monodisperse Noble-Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Colloidal Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 65506551,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0604717
  26. 26
    Wu, B.-H.; Yang, H.-Y.; Huang, H.-Q.; Chen, G.-X.; Zheng, N.-F. Solvent Effect on the Synthesis of Monodisperse Amine-Capped Au Nanoparticles. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2013, 24, 457462,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2013.03.054
  27. 27
    Shon, Y.-S.; Choo, H. Organic Reactions of Monolayer-Protected Metal Nanoparticles. C. R. Chim. 2003, 6, 10091018,  DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2003.08.008
  28. 28
    Neouze, M.-A.; Schubert, U. Surface Modification and Functionalization of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles by Organic Ligands. Monatsh. Chem. 2008, 139, 183195,  DOI: 10.1007/s00706-007-0775-2
  29. 29
    Hostetler, M. J.; Green, S. J.; Stokes, J. J.; Murray, R. W. Monolayers in Three Dimensions: Synthesis and Electrochemistry of ω-Functionalized Alkanethiolate-Stabilized Gold Cluster Compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 42124213,  DOI: 10.1021/ja960198g
  30. 30
    Luo, Z.; Hou, J.; Menin, L.; Ong, Q. K.; Stellacci, F. Evolution of the Ligand Shell Morphology during Ligand Exchange Reactions on Gold Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1352113525,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201708190
  31. 31
    Hurst, S. J.; Lytton-Jean, A. K.; Mirkin, C. A. Maximizing DNA Loading on a Range of Gold Nanoparticle Sizes. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 83138318,  DOI: 10.1021/ac0613582
  32. 32
    Woehrle, G. H.; Brown, L. O.; Hutchison, J. E. Thiol-Functionalized, 1.5-nm Gold Nanoparticles through Ligand Exchange Reactions: Scope and Mechanism of Ligand Exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 21722183,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0457718
  33. 33
    Shichibu, Y.; Negishi, Y.; Tsukuda, T.; Teranishi, T. Large-Scale Synthesis of Thiolated Au25 Clusters via Ligand Exchange Reactions of Phosphine-Stabilized Au11 Clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1346413465,  DOI: 10.1021/ja053915s
  34. 34
    Gittins, D.; Caruso, F. Spontaneous Phase Transfer of Nanoparticulate Metals from Organic to Aqueous Media. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 30013004,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010817)40:16<3001::AID-ANIE3001>3.0.CO;2-5
  35. 35
    Rucareanu, S.; Gandubert, V. J.; Lennox, R. B. 4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)pyridine-Protected Au Nanoparticles: Versatile Precursors for Water- and Organic-Soluble Gold Nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 46744680,  DOI: 10.1021/cm060793+
  36. 36
    Manea, F.; Bindoli, C.; Polizzi, S.; Lay, L.; Scrimin, P. Expeditious Synthesis of Water-Soluble, Monolayer-Protected Gold Nanoparticles of Controlled Size and Monolayer Composition. Langmuir 2008, 24, 41204124,  DOI: 10.1021/la703558y
  37. 37
    Brinas, R. P.; Maetani, M.; Barchi, J. J., Jr. A Survey of Place-Exchange Reaction for the Preparation of Water-Soluble Gold Nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 392, 415421,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.042
  38. 38
    Wilcoxon, J. P.; Provencio, P. Etching and Aging Effects in Nanosize Au Clusters Investigated Using High-Resolution Size-Exclusion Chromatography. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 1294912957,  DOI: 10.1021/jp027575y
  39. 39
    Shichibu, Y.; Negishi, Y.; Tsunoyama, H.; Kanehara, M.; Teranishi, T.; Tsukuda, T. Extremely High Stability of Glutathionate-Protected Au25 Clusters Against Core Etching. Small 2007, 3, 835839,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.200600611
  40. 40
    Baranov, D.; Kadnikova, E. N. Synthesis and Characterization of Azidoalkyl-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles as Scaffolds for “Click”-Chemistry Derivatization. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 61526157,  DOI: 10.1039/c1jm10183h
  41. 41
    Ojea-Jimenez, I.; Romero, F. M.; Bastus, N. G.; Puntes, V. Small Gold Nanoparticles Synthesized with Sodium Citrate and Heavy Water: Insights into the Reaction Mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 18001804,  DOI: 10.1021/jp9091305
  42. 42
    Milette, J.; Toader, V.; Reven, L.; Lennox, R. B. Tuning the Miscibility of Gold Nanoparticles Dispersed in Liquid Crystals via the Thiol-for-DMAP Reaction. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 90439050,  DOI: 10.1039/c1jm10553a
  43. 43
    Isaacs, S.; Cutler, E.; Park, J.; Lee, T.; Shon, Y. Synthesis of Tetraoctylammonium-Protected Gold Nanoparticles with Improved Stability. Langmuir 2005, 21, 56895692,  DOI: 10.1021/la050656b
  44. 44
    Zhao, P.; Li, N.; Astruc, D. State of the Art in Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 638665,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.09.002
  45. 45
    Mourdikoudis, S.; Liz-Marzán, L. M. Oleylamine in Nanoparticle Synthesis. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 14651476,  DOI: 10.1021/cm4000476
  46. 46
    Hiramatsu, H.; Osterloh, F. E. A Simple Large-Scale Synthesis of Nearly Monodisperse Gold and Silver Nanoparticles with Adjustable Sizes and with Exchangeable Surfactants. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 25092511,  DOI: 10.1021/cm049532v
  47. 47
    Lau, C. Y.; Duan, H.; Wang, F.; He, C. B.; Low, H. Y.; Yang, J. K. Enhanced Ordering in Gold Nanoparticles Self-Assembly through Excess Free Ligands. Langmuir 2011, 27, 33553360,  DOI: 10.1021/la104786z
  48. 48
    Ojea-Jiménez, I.; García-Fernández, L.; Lorenzo, J.; Puntes, V. F. Facile Preparation of Cationic Gold Nanoparticle-Bioconjugates for Cell Penetration and Nuclear Targeting. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 76927702,  DOI: 10.1021/nn3012042
  49. 49
    Zhang, T.; Guerin, D.; Alibart, F.; Vuillaume, D.; Lmimouni, K.; Lenfant, S.; Yassin, A.; Oçafrain, M.; Blanchard, P.; Roncali, J. Negative Differential Resistance, Memory, and Reconfigurable Logic Functions Based on Monolayer Devices Derived from Gold Nanoparticles Functionalized with Electropolymerizable TEDOT Units. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 1013110139,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00056
  50. 50
    Peng, S.; Lee, Y.; Wang, C.; Yin, H.; Dai, S.; Sun, S. A Facile Synthesis of Monodisperse Au Nanoparticles and Their Catalysis of CO Oxidation. Nano Res. 2008, 1, 229234,  DOI: 10.1007/s12274-008-8026-3
  51. 51
    Shen, C.; Hui, C.; Yang, T.; Xiao, C.; Tian, J.; Bao, L.; Chen, S.; Ding, H.; Gao, H. Monodisperse Noble-Metal Nanoparticles and Their Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Properties. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 69396944,  DOI: 10.1021/cm800882n
  52. 52
    Kluenker, M.; Mondeshki, M.; Nawaz Tahir, M.; Tremel, W. Monitoring Thiol-Ligand Exchange on Au Nanoparticle Surfaces. Langmuir 2018, 34, 17001710,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04015
  53. 53
    Malicki, M.; Hales, J. M.; Rumi, M.; Barlow, S.; McClary, L.; Marder, S. R.; Perry, J. W. Excited-State Dynamics and Dye-Dye Interactions in Dye-Coated Gold Nanoparticles with Varying Alkyl Spacer Lengths. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 62676277,  DOI: 10.1039/b926938j
  54. 54
    Köhntopp, A.; Dabrowski, A.; Malicki, M.; Temps, F. Photoisomerisation and Ligand-Controlled Reversible Aggregation of Azobenzene-Functionalised Gold Nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1010510107,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC02250E
  55. 55
    Chu, Z.; Han, Y.; Kral, P.; Klajn, R. ”Precipitation on Nanoparticles”: Attractive Intermolecular Interactions Stabilize Specific Ligand Ratios on the Surfaces of Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 16,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201800673
  56. 56
    Liu, X.; Hu, Y.; Stellacci, F. Mixed-Ligand Nanoparticles as Supramolecular Receptors. Small 2011, 7, 19611966,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201100386
  57. 57
    van Lehn, R. C.; Ricci, M.; Silva, P. H.; Andreozzi, P.; Reguera, J.; Voïtchovsky, K.; Stellacci, F.; Alexander-Katz, A. Lipid Tail Protrusions Mediate the Insertion of Nanoparticles into Model Cell Membranes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4482,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5482
  58. 58
    Harkness, K. M.; Hixson, B. C.; Fenn, L. S.; Turner, B. N.; Rape, A. C.; Simpson, C. A.; Huffman, B. J.; Okoli, T. C.; McLean, J. A.; Cliffel, D. E. A Structural Mass Spectrometry Strategy for the Relative Quantitation of Ligands on Mixed Monolayer-Protected Gold Nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 92689274,  DOI: 10.1021/ac102175z
  59. 59
    Badia, A.; Gao, W.; Singh, S.; Demers, L.; Cuccia, L.; Reven, L. Structure and chain dynamics of alkanethiol-capped gold colloids. Langmuir 1996, 12, 12621269,  DOI: 10.1021/la9510487
  60. 60
    Smith, A. M.; Marbella, L. E.; Johnston, K. A.; Hartmann, M. J.; Crawford, S. E.; Kozycz, L. M.; Seferos, D. S.; Millstone, J. E. Quantitative Analysis of Thiolated Ligand Exchange on Gold Nanoparticles Monitored by 1H NMR Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 27712778,  DOI: 10.1021/ac504081k
  61. 61
    Goldmann, C.; Ribot, F.; Peiretti, L. F.; Quaino, P.; Tielens, F.; Sanchez, C.; Chanéac, C.; Portehault, D. Quantified Binding Scale of Competing Ligands at the Surface of Gold Nanoparticles: The Role of Entropy and Intermolecular Forces. Small 2017, 13, 1604028,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201604028
  62. 62
    Luo, Z.; Marson, D.; Ong, Q. K.; Loiudice, A.; Kohlbrecher, J.; Radulescu, A.; Krause-Heuer, A.; Darwish, T.; Balog, S.; Buonsanti, R.; Svergun, D. I.; Posocco, P.; Stellacci, F. Quantitative 3D Determination of Self-Assembled Structures on Nanoparticles Using Small Angle Neutron Scattering. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1343,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03699-7

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 24 publications.

  1. Palida Pongsanon, Yoshiko Oota, Akifumi Kawamura, Hideya Kawasaki, Takashi Miyata. Controllable Catalytic Activity of Temperature-Responsive Polymer Hybrid Microgels Designed Using a Gold Nanoparticle Monomer with Polymerizable Groups. Macromolecules 2023, 56 (23) , 9853-9865. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01659
  2. Farzin Mashali, Colin M. Basham, Xufeng Xu, Camilla Servidio, Paulo H. Jacob Silva, Francesco Stellacci, Stephen A. Sarles. Simultaneous Electrophysiology and Imaging Reveal Changes in Lipid Membrane Thickness and Tension upon Uptake of Amphiphilic Gold Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2023, 39 (42) , 15031-15045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c01973
  3. Stefan Borsley, William Edwards, Ioulia K. Mati, Guillaume Poss, Marta Diez-Castellnou, Nicolas Marro, Euan R. Kay. A General One-Step Synthesis of Alkanethiyl-Stabilized Gold Nanoparticles with Control over Core Size and Monolayer Functionality. Chemistry of Materials 2023, 35 (15) , 6168-6177. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01506
  4. Niamh Mac Fhionnlaoich, Stephen Schrettl, Nicholas B. Tito, Ye Yang, Malavika Nair, Luis A. Serrano, Kellen Harkness, Paulo Jacob Silva, Holger Frauenrath, Francesca Serra, W. Craig Carter, Francesco Stellacci, Stefan Guldin. Reversible Microscale Assembly of Nanoparticles Driven by the Phase Transition of a Thermotropic Liquid Crystal. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (11) , 9906-9918. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c09203
  5. Yinan Fan, Adrien Girard, Michael Waals, Caroline Salzemann, Alexa Courty. Ag@Pt Core–Shell Nanoparticles for Plasmonic Catalysis. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (2) , 1193-1202. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c04767
  6. Mengxue Zhang, Taylor Larison, Sidong Tu, Olga Kuksenok, Morgan Stefik. Effect of Fluorophobic Character upon Switching Nanoparticles in Polymer Films from Aggregated to Dispersed States Using Immersion Annealing. ACS Applied Polymer Materials 2022, 4 (10) , 7042-7053. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.2c00968
  7. Jia Liu, Jiatao Zhang. Nanointerface Chemistry: Lattice-Mismatch-Directed Synthesis and Application of Hybrid Nanocrystals. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (4) , 2123-2170. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00443
  8. Zonglin Chu, Yanxiao Han, Tong Bian, Soumen De, Petr Král, Rafal Klajn. Supramolecular Control of Azobenzene Switching on Nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (5) , 1949-1960. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b09638
  9. Pedro D. Ortiz, Judith Castillo-Rodriguez, Ximena Zarate, Rudy Martin-Trasanco, Mónica Benito, Ignasi Mata, Elies Molins, Eduardo Schott. Synthesis of Au Nanoparticles Assisted by Linker-Modified TiO2 Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2018, 34 (32) , 9402-9409. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04195
  10. V. Gopalakrishnan, R. Singaravelan. Enhanced antidiabetic and antioxidant properties of gold nanoparticles green synthesized using blossom extract of Azadirachta indica: In vitro studies. Inorganic Chemistry Communications 2023, 158 , 111609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2023.111609
  11. D. Slavov, I. Bliznakova, Y. Andreeva, Z. Peshev. Application of coating based on 5 nm octadecylamine-functionalized gold-nanoparticles for protecting the spin-polarization of atoms confined in a vacuum cell. Optical Materials 2023, 142 , 113978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.113978
  12. Xinna Bai, Weifang Gong, Yaxin Guo, Di Zhu, Xuemei Li. Detection of saxitoxin by a SERS aptamer sensor based on enzyme cycle amplification technology. The Analyst 2023, 148 (10) , 2327-2334. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AN00330B
  13. Emanuele Petretto, Quy K. Ong, Francesca Olgiati, Ting Mao, Pablo Campomanes, Francesco Stellacci, Stefano Vanni. Monovalent ion-mediated charge–charge interactions drive aggregation of surface-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2022, 14 (40) , 15181-15192. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR02824G
  14. Ryan D. Mellor, Ijeoma F. Uchegbu. Ultrasmall-in-Nano: Why Size Matters. Nanomaterials 2022, 12 (14) , 2476. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142476
  15. Quy Ong, Ting Mao, Neda Iranpour Anaraki, Łukasz Richter, Carla Malinverni, Xufeng Xu, Francesca Olgiati, Paulo Henrique Jacob Silva, Anna Murello, Antonia Neels, Davide Demurtas, Seishi Shimizu, Francesco Stellacci. Cryogenic electron tomography to determine thermodynamic quantities for nanoparticle dispersions. Materials Horizons 2022, 9 (1) , 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MH01461G
  16. Mahboob Alam. Photocatalytic activity of biogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles: In vitro antimicrobial, biocompatibility, and molecular docking studies. Nanotechnology Reviews 2021, 10 (1) , 1079-1091. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2021-0069
  17. Rituraj Borah, Rajeshreddy Ninakanti, Gert Nuyts, Hannelore Peeters, Adrián Pedrazo‐Tardajos, Silvia Nuti, Christophe Vande Velde, Karolien De Wael, Silvia Lenaerts, Sara Bals, Sammy W. Verbruggen. Selectivity in the Ligand Functionalization of Photocatalytic Metal Oxide Nanoparticles for Phase Transfer and Self‐Assembly Applications. Chemistry – A European Journal 2021, 27 (35) , 9011-9021. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202100029
  18. He Huang, Hendrik du Toit, Luca Panariello, Luca Mazzei, Asterios Gavriilidis. Continuous synthesis of gold nanoparticles in micro- and millifluidic systems. Physical Sciences Reviews 2021, 6 (3) https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2017-0119
  19. Giacomo Filippini, Paolo Pengo, Susanna Bosi, Giulio Ragazzon, Lucia Pasquato, Maurizio Prato. Engineering Functional Nanomaterials Through the Amino Group. 2021, 285-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527826186.ch8
  20. Jakub W Trzciński, Luca Panariello, Maximilian O Besenhard, Ye Yang, Asterios Gavriilidis, Stefan Guldin. Synthetic guidelines for the precision engineering of gold nanoparticles. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2020, 29 , 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.05.004
  21. Ye Yang, Suiyang Liao, Zhi Luo, Runzhang Qi, Niamh Mac Fhionnlaoich, Francesco Stellacci, Stefan Guldin. Comparative characterisation of non-monodisperse gold nanoparticle populations by X-ray scattering and electron microscopy. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (22) , 12007-12013. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR09481D
  22. Federico De Biasi, Fabrizio Mancin, Federico Rastrelli. Nanoparticle-assisted NMR spectroscopy: A chemosensing perspective. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 2020, 117 , 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2019.12.001
  23. Biagio De Angelis, Nicoletta Depalo, Francesca Petronella, Concetta Quintarelli, M. Lucia Curri, Roberto Pani, Antonella Calogero, Franco Locatelli, Luciano De Sio. Stimuli-responsive nanoparticle-assisted immunotherapy: a new weapon against solid tumours. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2020, 8 (9) , 1823-1840. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TB02246E
  24. Ye Yang, Guillaume Poss, Yini Weng, Runzhang Qi, Hanrui Zheng, Nikolaos Nianias, Euan R. Kay, Stefan Guldin. Probing the interaction of nanoparticles with small molecules in real time via quartz crystal microbalance monitoring. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (23) , 11107-11113. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR03162F
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic of two-step gold nanoparticle (AuNP) preparation consisting of AuNP synthesis with oleylamine (OAm) and subsequent functionalization via thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Oleylamine-based synthesis of gold nanoparticles. (a) Representative TEM images for different reaction temperatures. (b) Average size and standard deviation of the nanoparticle populations as a function of reaction temperature.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange for homoligand AuNPs. NMR and TGA results for AuNPs before and after thiol-for-OAm ligand exchange using MUS, OT, and MUO, respectively. The 1H NMR spectra of various AuNPs were obtained after purification and subsequent I2-induced ligand desorption.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Variation of ligand composition for mixed ligand MUS-OT AuNPs through the feed ratio. (a) Chemical shift profile after purification and subsequent I2-induced ligand desorption and (b) the calculated ligand yield ratio with respect to the ligand feed ratio.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 62 other publications.

    1. 1
      Barnes, W. L.; Dereux, A.; Ebbesen, T. W. Surface Plasmon Subwavelength Optics. Nature 2003, 424, 824830,  DOI: 10.1038/nature01937
    2. 2
      Tian, Y.; Tatsuma, T. Mechanisms and Applications of Plasmon-Induced Charge Separation at TiO2 Films Loaded with Gold Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 76327637,  DOI: 10.1021/ja042192u
    3. 3
      Haruta, M.; Yamada, N.; Kobayashi, T.; Iijima, S. Gold Catalysts Prepared by Coprecipitation for Low-Temperature Oxidation of Hydrogen and of Carbon Monoxide. J. Catal. 1989, 115, 301309,  DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(89)90034-1
    4. 4
      Corma, A.; Garcia, H. Supported Gold Nanoparticles as Catalysts for Organic Reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 20962126,  DOI: 10.1039/b707314n
    5. 5
      Wang, C.; Yin, H.; Dai, S.; Sun, S. A General Approach to Noble Metal-Metal Oxide Dumbbell Nanoparticles and Their Catalytic Application for CO Oxidation. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 32773282,  DOI: 10.1021/cm100603r
    6. 6
      Howes, P. D.; Chandrawati, R.; Stevens, M. M. Colloidal Nanoparticles as Advanced Biological Sensors. Science 2014, 346, 1247390,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1247390
    7. 7
      Dykman, L.; Khlebtsov, N. Gold Nanoparticles in Biomedical Applications: Recent Advances and Perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 22562282,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15166E
    8. 8
      Shukla, R.; Bansal, V.; Chaudhary, M.; Basu, A.; Bhonde, R. R.; Sastry, M. Biocompatibility of Gold Nanoparticles and Their Endocytotic Fate inside the Cellular Compartment: a Microscopic Overview. Langmuir 2005, 21, 1064410654,  DOI: 10.1021/la0513712
    9. 9
      Kinnear, C.; Moore, T. L.; Rodriguez-Lorenzo, L.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Petri-Fink, A. Form Follows Function: Nanoparticle Shape and Its Implications for Nanomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1147611521,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00194
    10. 10
      Castner, D. G.; Hinds, K.; Grainger, D. W. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Sulfur 2p Study of Organic Thiol and Disulfide Binding Interactions with Gold Surfaces. Langmuir 1996, 12, 50835086,  DOI: 10.1021/la960465w
    11. 11
      Bürgi, T. Properties of the Gold-Sulphur Interface: from Self-Assembled Monolayers to Clusters. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 1555315567,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR03497C
    12. 12
      Giljohann, D. A.; Seferos, D. S.; Daniel, W. L.; Massich, M. D.; Patel, P. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Gold Nanoparticles for Biology and Medicine. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 32803294,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904359
    13. 13
      Saha, K.; Agasti, S. S.; Kim, C.; Li, X.; Rotello, V. M. Gold Nanoparticles in Chemical and Biological Sensing. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 27392779,  DOI: 10.1021/cr2001178
    14. 14
      Yeh, Y.-C.; Creran, B.; Rotello, V. M. Gold Nanoparticles: Preparation, Properties, and Applications in Bionanotechnology. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 18711880,  DOI: 10.1039/C1NR11188D
    15. 15
      Le Ouay, B.; Guldin, S.; Luo, Z.; Allegri, S.; Stellacci, F. Freestanding Ultrathin Nanoparticle Membranes Assembled at Transient Liquid-Liquid Interfaces. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1600191,  DOI: 10.1002/admi.201600191
    16. 16
      DeVries, G. A.; Brunnbauer, M.; Hu, Y.; Jackson, A. M.; Long, B.; Neltner, B. T.; Uzun, O.; Wunsch, B. H.; Stellacci, F. Divalent Metal Nanoparticles. Science 2007, 315, 358361,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1133162
    17. 17
      Kuna, J. J.; Voïtchovsky, K.; Singh, C.; Jiang, H.; Mwenifumbo, S.; Ghorai, P. K.; Stevens, M. M.; Glotzer, S. C.; Stellacci, F. The Effect of Nanometre-Scale Structure on Interfacial Energy. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 837842,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2534
    18. 18
      Colangelo, E.; Comenge, J.; Paramelle, D.; Volk, M.; Chen, Q.; Lévy, R. Characterizing Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold Nanoparticles. Bioconjugate Chem. 2017, 28, 1122,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00587
    19. 19
      Bradford, S. M.; Fisher, E. A.; Meli, M.-V. Ligand Shell Composition-Dependent Effects on the Apparent Hydrophobicity and Film Behavior of Gold Nanoparticles at the Air-Water Interface. Langmuir 2016, 32, 97909796,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02238
    20. 20
      Edwards, W.; Marro, N.; Turner, G.; Kay, E. R. Continuum Tuning of Nanoparticle Interfacial Properties by Dynamic Covalent Exchange. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 125133,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC03666C
    21. 21
      Jiang, Y.; Huo, S.; Mizuhara, T.; Das, R.; Lee, Y.-W.; Hou, S.; Moyano, D. F.; Duncan, B.; Liang, X.-J.; Rotello, V. M. The Interplay of Size and Surface Functionality on the Cellular Uptake of Sub-10 nm Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 99869993,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03521
    22. 22
      Hung, A.; Mwenifumbo, S.; Mager, M.; Kuna, J. J.; Stellacci, F.; Yarovsky, I.; Stevens, M. M. Ordering Surfaces on the Nanoscale: Implications for Protein Adsorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14381450,  DOI: 10.1021/ja108285u
    23. 23
      Huang, R.; Carney, R. P.; Stellacci, F.; Lau, B. L. Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions: the Effects of Surface Compositional and Structural Heterogeneity Are Scale Dependent. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 69286935,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02117c
    24. 24
      Brust, M.; Fink, J.; Bethell, D.; Schiffrin, D.; Kiely, C. Synthesis and Reactions of Functionalised Gold Nanoparticles. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 16551656,  DOI: 10.1039/c39950001655
    25. 25
      Zheng, N.; Fan, J.; Stucky, G. D. One-Step One-Phase Synthesis of Monodisperse Noble-Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Colloidal Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 65506551,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0604717
    26. 26
      Wu, B.-H.; Yang, H.-Y.; Huang, H.-Q.; Chen, G.-X.; Zheng, N.-F. Solvent Effect on the Synthesis of Monodisperse Amine-Capped Au Nanoparticles. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2013, 24, 457462,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2013.03.054
    27. 27
      Shon, Y.-S.; Choo, H. Organic Reactions of Monolayer-Protected Metal Nanoparticles. C. R. Chim. 2003, 6, 10091018,  DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2003.08.008
    28. 28
      Neouze, M.-A.; Schubert, U. Surface Modification and Functionalization of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles by Organic Ligands. Monatsh. Chem. 2008, 139, 183195,  DOI: 10.1007/s00706-007-0775-2
    29. 29
      Hostetler, M. J.; Green, S. J.; Stokes, J. J.; Murray, R. W. Monolayers in Three Dimensions: Synthesis and Electrochemistry of ω-Functionalized Alkanethiolate-Stabilized Gold Cluster Compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 42124213,  DOI: 10.1021/ja960198g
    30. 30
      Luo, Z.; Hou, J.; Menin, L.; Ong, Q. K.; Stellacci, F. Evolution of the Ligand Shell Morphology during Ligand Exchange Reactions on Gold Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1352113525,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201708190
    31. 31
      Hurst, S. J.; Lytton-Jean, A. K.; Mirkin, C. A. Maximizing DNA Loading on a Range of Gold Nanoparticle Sizes. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 83138318,  DOI: 10.1021/ac0613582
    32. 32
      Woehrle, G. H.; Brown, L. O.; Hutchison, J. E. Thiol-Functionalized, 1.5-nm Gold Nanoparticles through Ligand Exchange Reactions: Scope and Mechanism of Ligand Exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 21722183,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0457718
    33. 33
      Shichibu, Y.; Negishi, Y.; Tsukuda, T.; Teranishi, T. Large-Scale Synthesis of Thiolated Au25 Clusters via Ligand Exchange Reactions of Phosphine-Stabilized Au11 Clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1346413465,  DOI: 10.1021/ja053915s
    34. 34
      Gittins, D.; Caruso, F. Spontaneous Phase Transfer of Nanoparticulate Metals from Organic to Aqueous Media. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 30013004,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010817)40:16<3001::AID-ANIE3001>3.0.CO;2-5
    35. 35
      Rucareanu, S.; Gandubert, V. J.; Lennox, R. B. 4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)pyridine-Protected Au Nanoparticles: Versatile Precursors for Water- and Organic-Soluble Gold Nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 46744680,  DOI: 10.1021/cm060793+
    36. 36
      Manea, F.; Bindoli, C.; Polizzi, S.; Lay, L.; Scrimin, P. Expeditious Synthesis of Water-Soluble, Monolayer-Protected Gold Nanoparticles of Controlled Size and Monolayer Composition. Langmuir 2008, 24, 41204124,  DOI: 10.1021/la703558y
    37. 37
      Brinas, R. P.; Maetani, M.; Barchi, J. J., Jr. A Survey of Place-Exchange Reaction for the Preparation of Water-Soluble Gold Nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 392, 415421,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.042
    38. 38
      Wilcoxon, J. P.; Provencio, P. Etching and Aging Effects in Nanosize Au Clusters Investigated Using High-Resolution Size-Exclusion Chromatography. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 1294912957,  DOI: 10.1021/jp027575y
    39. 39
      Shichibu, Y.; Negishi, Y.; Tsunoyama, H.; Kanehara, M.; Teranishi, T.; Tsukuda, T. Extremely High Stability of Glutathionate-Protected Au25 Clusters Against Core Etching. Small 2007, 3, 835839,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.200600611
    40. 40
      Baranov, D.; Kadnikova, E. N. Synthesis and Characterization of Azidoalkyl-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles as Scaffolds for “Click”-Chemistry Derivatization. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 61526157,  DOI: 10.1039/c1jm10183h
    41. 41
      Ojea-Jimenez, I.; Romero, F. M.; Bastus, N. G.; Puntes, V. Small Gold Nanoparticles Synthesized with Sodium Citrate and Heavy Water: Insights into the Reaction Mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 18001804,  DOI: 10.1021/jp9091305
    42. 42
      Milette, J.; Toader, V.; Reven, L.; Lennox, R. B. Tuning the Miscibility of Gold Nanoparticles Dispersed in Liquid Crystals via the Thiol-for-DMAP Reaction. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 90439050,  DOI: 10.1039/c1jm10553a
    43. 43
      Isaacs, S.; Cutler, E.; Park, J.; Lee, T.; Shon, Y. Synthesis of Tetraoctylammonium-Protected Gold Nanoparticles with Improved Stability. Langmuir 2005, 21, 56895692,  DOI: 10.1021/la050656b
    44. 44
      Zhao, P.; Li, N.; Astruc, D. State of the Art in Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 638665,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.09.002
    45. 45
      Mourdikoudis, S.; Liz-Marzán, L. M. Oleylamine in Nanoparticle Synthesis. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 14651476,  DOI: 10.1021/cm4000476
    46. 46
      Hiramatsu, H.; Osterloh, F. E. A Simple Large-Scale Synthesis of Nearly Monodisperse Gold and Silver Nanoparticles with Adjustable Sizes and with Exchangeable Surfactants. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 25092511,  DOI: 10.1021/cm049532v
    47. 47
      Lau, C. Y.; Duan, H.; Wang, F.; He, C. B.; Low, H. Y.; Yang, J. K. Enhanced Ordering in Gold Nanoparticles Self-Assembly through Excess Free Ligands. Langmuir 2011, 27, 33553360,  DOI: 10.1021/la104786z
    48. 48
      Ojea-Jiménez, I.; García-Fernández, L.; Lorenzo, J.; Puntes, V. F. Facile Preparation of Cationic Gold Nanoparticle-Bioconjugates for Cell Penetration and Nuclear Targeting. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 76927702,  DOI: 10.1021/nn3012042
    49. 49
      Zhang, T.; Guerin, D.; Alibart, F.; Vuillaume, D.; Lmimouni, K.; Lenfant, S.; Yassin, A.; Oçafrain, M.; Blanchard, P.; Roncali, J. Negative Differential Resistance, Memory, and Reconfigurable Logic Functions Based on Monolayer Devices Derived from Gold Nanoparticles Functionalized with Electropolymerizable TEDOT Units. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 1013110139,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00056
    50. 50
      Peng, S.; Lee, Y.; Wang, C.; Yin, H.; Dai, S.; Sun, S. A Facile Synthesis of Monodisperse Au Nanoparticles and Their Catalysis of CO Oxidation. Nano Res. 2008, 1, 229234,  DOI: 10.1007/s12274-008-8026-3
    51. 51
      Shen, C.; Hui, C.; Yang, T.; Xiao, C.; Tian, J.; Bao, L.; Chen, S.; Ding, H.; Gao, H. Monodisperse Noble-Metal Nanoparticles and Their Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Properties. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 69396944,  DOI: 10.1021/cm800882n
    52. 52
      Kluenker, M.; Mondeshki, M.; Nawaz Tahir, M.; Tremel, W. Monitoring Thiol-Ligand Exchange on Au Nanoparticle Surfaces. Langmuir 2018, 34, 17001710,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04015
    53. 53
      Malicki, M.; Hales, J. M.; Rumi, M.; Barlow, S.; McClary, L.; Marder, S. R.; Perry, J. W. Excited-State Dynamics and Dye-Dye Interactions in Dye-Coated Gold Nanoparticles with Varying Alkyl Spacer Lengths. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 62676277,  DOI: 10.1039/b926938j
    54. 54
      Köhntopp, A.; Dabrowski, A.; Malicki, M.; Temps, F. Photoisomerisation and Ligand-Controlled Reversible Aggregation of Azobenzene-Functionalised Gold Nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1010510107,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC02250E
    55. 55
      Chu, Z.; Han, Y.; Kral, P.; Klajn, R. ”Precipitation on Nanoparticles”: Attractive Intermolecular Interactions Stabilize Specific Ligand Ratios on the Surfaces of Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 16,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201800673
    56. 56
      Liu, X.; Hu, Y.; Stellacci, F. Mixed-Ligand Nanoparticles as Supramolecular Receptors. Small 2011, 7, 19611966,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201100386
    57. 57
      van Lehn, R. C.; Ricci, M.; Silva, P. H.; Andreozzi, P.; Reguera, J.; Voïtchovsky, K.; Stellacci, F.; Alexander-Katz, A. Lipid Tail Protrusions Mediate the Insertion of Nanoparticles into Model Cell Membranes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4482,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5482
    58. 58
      Harkness, K. M.; Hixson, B. C.; Fenn, L. S.; Turner, B. N.; Rape, A. C.; Simpson, C. A.; Huffman, B. J.; Okoli, T. C.; McLean, J. A.; Cliffel, D. E. A Structural Mass Spectrometry Strategy for the Relative Quantitation of Ligands on Mixed Monolayer-Protected Gold Nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 92689274,  DOI: 10.1021/ac102175z
    59. 59
      Badia, A.; Gao, W.; Singh, S.; Demers, L.; Cuccia, L.; Reven, L. Structure and chain dynamics of alkanethiol-capped gold colloids. Langmuir 1996, 12, 12621269,  DOI: 10.1021/la9510487
    60. 60
      Smith, A. M.; Marbella, L. E.; Johnston, K. A.; Hartmann, M. J.; Crawford, S. E.; Kozycz, L. M.; Seferos, D. S.; Millstone, J. E. Quantitative Analysis of Thiolated Ligand Exchange on Gold Nanoparticles Monitored by 1H NMR Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 27712778,  DOI: 10.1021/ac504081k
    61. 61
      Goldmann, C.; Ribot, F.; Peiretti, L. F.; Quaino, P.; Tielens, F.; Sanchez, C.; Chanéac, C.; Portehault, D. Quantified Binding Scale of Competing Ligands at the Surface of Gold Nanoparticles: The Role of Entropy and Intermolecular Forces. Small 2017, 13, 1604028,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201604028
    62. 62
      Luo, Z.; Marson, D.; Ong, Q. K.; Loiudice, A.; Kohlbrecher, J.; Radulescu, A.; Krause-Heuer, A.; Darwish, T.; Balog, S.; Buonsanti, R.; Svergun, D. I.; Posocco, P.; Stellacci, F. Quantitative 3D Determination of Self-Assembled Structures on Nanoparticles Using Small Angle Neutron Scattering. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1343,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03699-7
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00353.

    • TEM histograms of synthesized NPs; further experimental details; and NMR, TGA, MS, and UV–vis data (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect