Volume 55, Issue 5 p. 837-872
Original Article

Navigating Ambivalence: Perceived Organizational Prestige–Support Discrepancy and Its Relation to Employee Cynicism and Silence

Karim Mignonac

Corresponding Author

Karim Mignonac

University of Toulouse 1 Capitole

Address for reprints: Karim Mignonac, TSM-Research (UMR CNRS 5033), Université Toulouse 1 Capitole, CRM, Bât. J., 2 rue du Doyen Gabriel Marty, 31042 Toulouse, France ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Olivier Herrbach

Olivier Herrbach

University of Bordeaux

Search for more papers by this author
Carolina Serrano Archimi

Carolina Serrano Archimi

Aix-Marseille Université

Search for more papers by this author
Caroline Manville

Caroline Manville

University of Toulouse 1 Capitole

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 November 2017
Citations: 35

Abstract

Drawing on the social identity literature, this study offers theoretical arguments and empirical evidence to understand reactions to divergent perceptions of organizational external prestige (PEP) and organizational support (POS) – two crucial bases of employees’ social worth. Across three studies, using both experimental and field data, we find that PEP-POS discrepancy contributes to employees’ perceptions of organizational cynicism and silence behaviour, especially when PEP is high and POS is low (rather than the reverse). Consistent with our social identity perspective, we find that ambivalent identification, that is, the simultaneous identification and disidentification of an individual with an organization, is a key mediating mechanism that transfers the interactive relationship of PEP and POS to cynicism and silence. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of individuals’ social worth at work.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.