Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published July 1997

The Golden Section and the Aesthetics of Form and Composition: A Cognitive Model

Abstract

Previous work on the aesthetics of simple figures such as rectangles and triangles, as well as on the aesthetics of color, suggests that although there are clear population level preferences, there are also large individual differences which are temporally stable, and which any adequate theoretical analysis must take into account. Data presented here show similar phenomena in a related problem in composition—where to place an object within the frame of a picture to produce the optimal aesthetic effect. A novel and powerful “method of randomized paired comparisons” first showed that there are overall population level preferences, with objects being placed preferentially at the two golden sections horizontally, and between the two golden sections vertically. As in the studies of simple figures and colors, there are large individual differences. A cognitive model of “sensory aesthetics” is proposed in which continua of any type (space, geometric objects, colors, or whatever), are described categorically, usually in terms of words such as “square,” “rectangle,” “line,” etc., each of which is a fuzzy set. Preference functions are then derived from the union and intersection of the fuzzy set functions, which differ between individuals as their categories differ or as they prefer objects which are prototypical, or are at the boundaries between prototypes. There is therefore wide inter-individual variability.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Angier R. P. (1903). The aesthetics of unequal division. Psychological Review, Monograph Supplement, 4.
Anonymous. (1984). Raffaelo e la sezione aurea, Exhibition catalogue, Palazzo Barberini, Roma, 27 Mar-30 Apr 1984. Bologna: Edizioni Bora.
Arnheim R. (1955). A review of proportion. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 14, 44–57.
Arnheim R. (1986). The other Gustav Theodor Fechner. In Arnheim R. (Ed.), New essays on the psychology of art. (pp. 39–49). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Association des Amis de Boscodon. (1987). L'Art des batisseurs romans. La Geometrie et les Maitres de l'Oeuvre. La Construction: Les metiers et les outils. Boscodon, France: Abbaye de Boscodon.
Benjafield J. (1985). A review of recent research on the golden section. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 3, 117–134.
Berlin B., & Kay P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Birkhoff G. D. (1933). Aesthetic measure. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Boselie F., & Leeuwenberg E. (1984). A general notion of beauty used to quantify the aesthetic attractivity of geometric forms. In Crozier W. R. & Chapman A. J. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in the perception of art. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Boselie F. (1991). Against prototypicality as a central concept in aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 65–73.
Brant L., Marshall P. H., & Roark B. (1995). On the development of prototypes and preferences. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, 161–170.
Burke E. (1757). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. London: R and J Dodsley.
Carter B. A. R. (1953). The perspective of Piero della Francesca's “Flagellation.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 16, 295–302.
Fechner G. T. (1871). Zur experimentalen Aesthetik, Abhandlungen der Koenigl. Saechsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. Leipzig: Hirzel.
Fechner G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Haertel.
Godkewitsch M. (1974). The golden section: An artefact of stimulus range and measure of preference. American Journal of Psychology, 269–277.
Gombrich E. H. (1984). The sense of order. (2nd ed.). London: Phaidon.
Green C. D. (1995). All that glitters: A review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section. Perception, 24, 937–968.
Hekkert P., & Snelders H. M. J. J. (1995). Prototypicality as an explanatory concept in aesthetics: A reply to Boselie (1991). Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, 149–160.
Höge H. (1995). Fechner's experimental aesthetics and the golden section hypothesis today. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, 131–148.
Humphrey N. K. (1973). The illusion of beauty. Perception, 2, 429–439.
Humphrey N. K. (1983). Consciousness regained: Chapters in the development of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kay P. (1975). Synchronic variability and diachronic range in basic color terms. Language in Society, 4, 257–270.
Kay P., & McDaniel C. K. (1978), The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms. Language, 4, 610–646.
Kay P., Berlin B., & Merrifield W. (1991). Biocultural implications of systems of color naming. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 1, 12–25.
Kelly G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Morton.
Kosko B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24, 65–75.
Lalo C. (1908). L'Esthetique experimentale contemporaine. Paris: Alcan.
MacCarthy F. (1989). Eric Gill. London: Faber and Faber.
Martindale C. (1984). The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 49–80.
Martindale C., & Moore K. (1988). Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 661–670.
McManus I. C. (1980). The aesthetics of simple figures. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 505–524.
McManus I. C., Jones A. L., & Cottrell J. (1981). The aesthetics of colour. Perception, 10, 651–666.
McManus I. C., (1983). Basic colour terms in literature. Language and Speech, 26, 247–252.
McManus I. C. Half a million basic colour words. Perception, 26, 367–370, 1997.
Mervis C. B., & Rosch E. (1981). Categorisation of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.
Padovan R. (1986). Measuring and counting. The Architect, May, 54–58.
Pickford R. W. (1979). Semantic differential judgements of geometric figures of aesthetic interest. In Nodine C. F. & Fischer D. F. (Eds.), Perception and pictorial representation. New York: Praeger.
Piehl J. (1976). The golden section: An artefact of stimulus range and demand characteristics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 47–50.
Piehl J. (1978). The golden section: The “true” ratio? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 831–834.
Popham J. K. (1957). Pictorial composition. London: Pitman.
Ravenscroft I. (1996). Thinking in mentalese. Times Literary Supplement, Dec 27th, 26.
Rosch E. (1975). The nature of mental codes for color categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 303–322.
Scruton R. (1987). Modern philosophy and the neglect of aesthetics. Times Literary Supplement, 604.
Thomas B. (1969). Geometry in pictorial composition. Newcastle: Oriel Press.
Witmer L. (1894). Zur experimentallen Aesthetik einfacher raeumlicher Formverhaltnisse. Philosophische Studien, 9, 96–144.
Wittkower R. (1960). The changing concept of proportion. Daedalus, 89, 199–215.
Zadeh L. A., Fu K. S., Tanaka K., & Shimura M. (1975). Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes. New York: Academic Press.
Zipf G. K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. New York: Harper.
Zwick R. (1993). Fuzzy sets: Review of Fuzzy set theory and its application by H-J Zimmerman. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 304–308.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: July 1997
Issue published: July 1997

Rights and permissions

© 1997 SAGE Publications.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

I. C. McManus
University College, London
P. Weatherby
University College, London

Notes

Direct reprint requests to: I. C. McManus, Department of Psychology, University College, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Empirical Studies of the Arts.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 57

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

  1. Influence of spatial imagery and imagery control on geometric form loc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Aesthetic experience enhances first-person spatial representation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Visual Geometry of Classical Japanese Gardens
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Aesthetic appeal is no coincidence: Preference for generic over specif...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The Interplay of Objective and Subjective Factors in Empirical Aesthet...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. A Study of Objects With Smooth or Sharp Features Created as Line Drawi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Warm, lively, rough? Assessing agreement on aesthetic effects of artwo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Enjoying Art: The Experience of Beauty from Understanding Regularities
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Contextual and social variables modulate aesthetic appreciation of bod...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A Match Made in Heaven or Down Under? The Effectiveness of Matching Vi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Is Red Warm for Everyone? Assessing the Agreement on Aesthetic Effects...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  13. Dissecting perceptions of wind energy projects: A laboratory experimen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Taking the Perfect Selfie: Investigating the Impact of Perspective on ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Enviro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. The arcane roots of colour psychology, chromotherapy, and colour forec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Can you find the golden ratio in your plate?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. “Mute, motionless, variegated rectangles”: aesthetics andphotography
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Does the composition of landscape photographs affect visual preference...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. ‘Selfies’ Reveal Systematic Deviations from Known Principles of Photog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Testing Whether and When Abstract Symmetric Patterns Produce Affective...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. The Aesthetic Appeal of Visual Qualities
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Visual Aesthetics and Human Preference
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. The beauty of the body
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Aesthetic Judgment of Triangular Shape: Compactness and Not the Golden...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  26. The anterior bias in visual art: The case of images of animals
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Preference Judgment for Dynamic Symmetry
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. The Sisters of the Golden Section
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  29. The Psychometrics of Photographic Cropping: The Influence of Colour, M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  30. Does Left–Right Orientation Matter in the Perceived Expressiveness of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  31. The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Eye Centring in Portraits: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  33. The effects of graphical display and screen ratio on information retri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Ratios in Proportion: What Should the Shape of the Package Be?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. The effects of screen ratio and order on information retrieval in web ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. The Golden Section: Elusive, but Detectable
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Testing the Aesthetic Significance of the Golden-Section Rectangle
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub