Elsevier

Environmental Research

Volume 163, May 2018, Pages 71-79
Environmental Research

Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.034 Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Public concern over the effects of EMF on cancer is growing.

  • In vitro and in vivo experiments concerning ELF and EMF have elicited contradictory results.

  • Epidemiological studies may help us to understand the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of EMF.

  • Do adverse effects differ depending on the EMF frequency involved?

Abstract

New technologies in electronics and communications are continually emerging. An increasing use of these electronic devices such as mobile phone, computer, wireless fidelity connectors or cellular towers is raising questions concerning whether they have an adverse effect on the body. Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) is frequently suggested to have adverse health effects on humans and other organisms. This idea has been reported in many studies. In contrast, the therapeutic effects of EMF on different organs have also been reported. Research findings are inconsistent. This has given rise to very profound discrepancies. The duration and frequency of mobile phone calls and the association observed with various health effects has raised serious concerns due to the frequency with which these devices are used and the way they are held close to the head. The present review assesses the results of in vitro, in vivo, experimental, and epidemiological studies. The purpose of the study is to assess data concerning the carcinogenic and genotoxic effects of non-ionizing EMF. The major genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of EMF, divided into subsections as low frequency effects and radiofrequency effects, were reviewed. The inconsistent results between similar studies and the same research groups have made it very difficult to make any comprehensive interpretation. However, evaluation of current studies suggests that EMF may represent a serious source of concern and may be hazardous to living organisms.

Introduction

With the impact of the globalization, the world has entered a time of change and development. This is leading to rapid population growth and energy consumption (Asumadu-Sarkodie and Owusu, 2016). Fast growing wireless broadband and communication technologies have become the main source of global pollution by creating threats to the environment and human life, while at the same time providing concrete solutions to the emerging needs of globalization (Milner et al., 2012). Today, with the widespread use of electric devices, electromagnetic fields (EMF) have become a particularly important global phenomenon, and one that is creating concerns and worries among many people (Miclaus and Calota, 2010, Stather, 1997).

EMF consists of both electric and magnetic fields of force (Phillips, 2013). It was first discovered during the 19th century (Berkson, 2000), however, it has been present since life first emerged, due to its generation via natural phenomena (Sher, 1997). All living things are continuously exposed to EMF from natural sources at levels between 25 μT and 65 μT (Gould, 1984). In addition to natural sources of EMF, living organisms are also exposed to EMF generated by human-made sources, such as cell phones, cell phone base stations, radio stations, computer screens and many other electrical devices widely used in daily life (Berg, 1992).

The question of whether exposure to EMF is beneficial or hazardous is still the subject of much debate. This debate is encouraging research to determine whether or not it is safe to live with constant exposure to EMF (Kheifets and Ritz, 2006). Numerous studies have shown the impact of EMF on animals, tissues (Aydin and Akar, 2011, Sonmez et al., 2010), and the functional features of cells (Koch et al., 2003, Liburdy et al., 1993), but the findings are still considered preliminary. In contrast, many studies have reported therapeutic effects of EMF on various organs and body systems, including reversal of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Arendash et al., 2010), stimulation of the repair mechanism in bone and cartilage (Bai et al., 2013, Haddad et al., 2007, Trock et al., 1994), wound healing, and nerve regeneration (Mohammadi and Mahmoodzadeh, 2015).

Some of the main features of EMF are its frequency and wavelength, both of which interact with living organisms in different ways (Grimes and Grimes, 2002, Panagopoulos et al., 2002). The biological effects of EMF depend on the frequency or wavelength. The purpose of this review is to summarize and analyze existing studies that describe the association between EMF and their carcinogenic and genotoxic effects on living organisms. A secondary aim is to contribute to the current debate on the possible impacts of EMF, and whether or not EMF exposure is dangerous to humans.

In the first section, EMF and its main ranges are explained. Frequencies and wavelengths are described and differences set out. Then, non-ionizing range is divided into subsections based on frequency. Within the subsections, existing experimental and epidemiological studies are reviewed in terms of genotoxic and carcinogenic effects.

Section snippets

Classification of EMFs

EMF is produced by electrically charged objects and may be defined as a combination of electric fields (EF) and magnetic fields (MF). Electromagnetic waves are carried by particles known as photons (quanta) (Feynman, 1974). EMF exhibits its characteristic features via the interrelated parameter of wavelength and frequency. Frequency is measured in terms of number of oscillations per second (hertz) and wavelength describes the distance between one wave and the next, measured in meters. As the

Extremely low frequency effects

Frequencies up to approximately 300 Hz (Hz) are known as extremely low frequency (ELF), and are part of the non-ionizing radiation range of the electromagnetic spectrum. The fields emitted by power lines, railways, and electrical devices at home and in the workplace are in the ELF range. The effects of both EF and MF on biological systems are highly controversial. Recent studies have focused on the illumination of their potential genotoxic, carcinogenic, and neurological effects. The effects of

Conclusion

The findings reported in the current study highlight the difficulty involved in evaluating the effects of EMF is very difficult. Each of the various study types, in vitro, in vivo, animal experimental, and epidemiological, has its own specific advantages and disadvantages regarding certain frequency ranges and their specific parameters (sample size, dosimetry, study design). International authorities (WHO, ICNIRP and IARC) and local institutions have also published differing and inconsistent

Acknowledgement

We would like to thanks to Dr. Devra Davis and Ms Sarina Scott for their excellent review and contribution to this mansucript.

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References (111)

  • R.P. Liburdy et al.

    Experimental-evidence for 60-hz magnetic-fields operating through the signal-transduction cascade - effects on calcium influx and c-myc messenger-rna induction

    Febs. Lett.

    (1993)
  • R. Meneghini

    Iron homeostasis, oxidative stress, and DNA damage

    Free. Radic. Biol. Med.

    (1997)
  • D.J. Panagopoulos et al.

    Mechanism for action of electromagnetic fields on cells

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2002)
  • J.L. Phillips et al.

    Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage

    Pathophysiology

    (2009)
  • D.W. Reif et al.

    Nitric oxide mediates iron release from ferritin

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1990)
  • D. Sahin et al.

    The 2100 mhz radiofrequency radiation of a 3g-mobile phone and the DNA oxidative damage in brain

    J. Chem. Neuroanat.

    (2016)
  • Y.Y. Shen et al.

    Exposure to 50hz-sinusoidal electromagnetic field induces DNA damage-independent autophagy

    Int. J. Biochem. Cell. B.

    (2016)
  • L. Sher

    Effects of natural and man-made electric/electromagnetic fields on human health: a possible mechanism

    Med. Hypotheses

    (1997)
  • O.F. Sonmez et al.

    Purkinje cell number decreases in the adult female rat cerebellum following exposure to 900 mhz electromagnetic field

    Brain Res.

    (2010)
  • L. Verschaeve et al.

    Co-exposure of ELF-magnetic fields and chemical mutagens: an investigation of genotoxicity with the SOS-based VITOTOX test in Salmonella typhimurium

    Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen.

    (2016)
  • R. Winker et al.

    Chromosomal damage in human diploid fibroblasts by intermittent exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields

    Mutat. Res.

    (2005)
  • R. Akhavan-Sigari et al.

    Connection between cell phone use, p53 gene expression in different zones of glioblastoma multiforme and survival prognoses

    Rare Tumors

    (2014)
  • M. Alcaraz et al.

    Effect of long-term 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on the micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes of mice

    Electromagn. Biol. Med.

    (2014)
  • G.W. Arendash et al.

    Electromagnetic field treatment protects against and reverses cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease mice

    J. Alzheimers Dis.

    (2010)
  • S. Asumadu-Sarkodie et al.

    Carbon dioxide emissions, gdp, energy use, and population growth: a multivariate and causality analysis for Ghana, 1971–2013

    Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.

    (2016)
  • A. Auvinen et al.

    Brain tumors and salivary gland cancers among cellular telephone users

    Epidemiology

    (2002)
  • S. Banerjee et al.

    Analysis of the genotoxic effects of mobile phone radiation using buccal micronucleus assay: A comparative evaluation

    J. Clin. Diagn. Res.

    (2016)
  • G. Berg

    Effect of artificial electromagnetic fields on living organisms

    Gematol. Transfuziol.

    (1992)
  • Bericht im Auftrag des Bundesamts für Umwelt (BAFU), 2014. Evaluation of the evidence of biological effects by weak...
  • W. Berkson

    The holistic inspirations of physics: the underground history of electromagnetic theory

    Philos. Sci.

    (2000)
  • M. Buttiglione et al.

    Radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz) induces Egr-1 gene expression an affects cell-cycle control in human neuroblastoma cells

    J. Cell. Phys.

    (2007)
  • M. Cassien et al.

    Oxidative stress and DNA damages induced by 1-nitropyrene in human lung fibroblasts: new insights into the mechanisms of genotoxicity and EPR-spin trapping direct monitoring of free radicals at subcellular levels

    Toxicol. Lett.

    (2015)
  • H.C. Christensen et al.

    Cellular telephones and risk for brain tumors – a population-based, incident case-control study

    Neurology

    (2005)
  • Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), 2009. Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields,...
  • M.S. Delle et al.

    Inhibition of angiogenesis mediated by extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (elf-mfs)

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • P.S. Deshmukh et al.

    Cognitive impairment and neurogenotoxic effects in rats exposed to low-intensity microwave radiation

    Int. J. Toxicol.

    (2015)
  • M. Destefanis et al.

    Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields affect proliferation and mitochondrial activity of human cancer cell lines

    Int. J. Rad. Biol.

    (2015)
  • A.E. Dikalova et al.

    An in vivo esr spin-trapping study: free radical generation in rats from formate intoxication role of the fenton reaction

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2001)
  • C. Dinu et al.

    The action of the free radicals on DNA and anti-radical defence mechanisms

    Rev. Chim.-Buchar.

    (2016)
  • M. Dizdaroglu et al.

    Mechanisms of free radical-induced damage to DNA

    Free. Radic. Res.

    (2012)
  • W. Duan et al.

    Comparison of the genotoxic effects induced by 50 hz extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields and 1800 mhz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in gc-2 cells

    Radiat. Res.

    (2015)
  • N.S. El-Bialy et al.

    Extremely low-frequency magnetic field enhances the therapeutic efficacy of low-dose cisplatin in the treatment of ehrlich carcinoma

    Biomed. Res. Int.

    (2013)
  • S. Falone et al.

    Pulsed electromagnetic field (pemf) prevents pro-oxidant effects of h2o2 in sk-n-be(2) human neuroblastoma cells

    Int. J. Rad. Biol.

    (2016)
  • S. Falone et al.

    Improved mitochondrial and methylglyoxal-related metabolisms support hyperproliferation induced by 50 hz magnetic field in neuroblastoma cells

    J. Cell. Physio.

    (2016)
  • B.H. Feng et al.

    Mitochondrial ros release and subsequent akt activation potentially mediated the anti-apoptotic effect of a 50-hz magnetic field on fl cells

    Cell. Physiol. Biochem.

    (2016)
  • R.P. Feynman

    Structure of the proton

    Science

    (1974)
  • P.W. French et al.

    Electromagnetic radiation at 835 mhz changes the morphology and inhibits proliferation of a human astrocytoma cell line (vol 43, pg 13, 1997)

    Bioelectroch. Bioener.

    (1998)
  • J.L. Gould

    Magnetic-field sensitivity in animals

    Annu. Rev. Physiol.

    (1984)
  • D.M. Grimes et al.

    The exact electromagnetic field description of photon emission, absorption, and radiation pattern

    J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.

    (2002)
  • W. Grundler et al.

    Mechanisms of electromagnetic-interaction with cellular-systems

    Naturwissenschaften

    (1992)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text