Skip to main content
Log in

Do levels of income explain differences in game abundance? An empirical test in two Honduran villages

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although researchers have documented the role of anthropogenic huntingpressure on the abundance of game, few have measured the direct effects ofincome or economic development on game abundance. Economic theory tends topredict an ambiguous causal relation between income and the abundance of game.Here we test whether income (a standard proxy of economic development) erodesthe abundance of game in two Tawahka Amerindian villages in the rain forest ofHonduras. The two villages have similar ecologies and weather and lie 17km apart but differ in income, population size, wealth, thepresence of outside institutions, and hunting pressure. A census of animals doneover 2 continuous years suggests that the richer village had less game andrelatively fewer large-bodied animals. At the level of animal groups (e.g.,mammals) or individual species, or when we include controls for the simultaneouseffect of vegetation type, distance from the start of the hunting trail, andtime of the year through a random-effect probit model, the two villages displayno statistically significant differences in game abundance. A random-effect,multivariate tobit model, in fact, suggests that being in the more remotevillage correlated with 43.5% fewer animals seen in any one encounter; resultswere significant at the 99% confidence level. The conclusions contain adiscussion of why income might produce ambiguous effects on game abundance andthe tradeoffs of using bivariate and multivariate techniques to analyze thecovariates of game abundance in the tropical rain forests of the New World.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvard M.S. 1995. Shotguns and sustainable hunting in the neotropics. Oryx 29: 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard M.S., Robinson J.G., Redford K.H. and Kaplan H. 1997. The sustainability of subsistence hunting in the neotropics. Conservation Biology 11: 977–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen A. and Kaimowitz D. (eds) 2001. Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baksh M. 1985. Faunal food as a 'limiting factor' on Amazonian cultural behavior: a Machiguenga example. Research in Economic Anthropology 7: 145–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett A.F. 2001. Roads, roadsides, and wildlife conservation: a review. In: Saunders D.A. (ed.), Nature Conservation 2: The Role of Corridors. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E.L. and Robinson J.G. 2000. Hunting for sustainability: the start of a synthesis. In: Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 499–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon N. and Hames R. 1979. Protein deficiency and tribal warfare in Amazonia: new data. Science 203: 910–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropper M. and Griffiths C. 1994. The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. American Economic Review 84: 250–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz G. and Benítez E. 1994. EsDiagnóstico Etnológico y Ecológico de la Biósfera Tawahka Asangni. Three volumes. Federación Indigena Tawahka de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmer J. and Overman H. 2001. Indigenous people conserving the rain forest? Tropenbos Series 19, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

  • Emmons L.H. and Feer F. 1990. Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson B.R. 1989. Game wars? Ecology and conflict in Amazonia. Journal of Anthropology Research 45: 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman R.T.T. and Alexander L.E. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 29: 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist V. 1988. How markets for wildlife meat and parts, and the sale of hunting privileges, jeopardize wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology 2: 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy R.A. 2001. Indians, Markets, and Rain Forests: Theory, Methods, Analysis. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good K. 1987. Limiting factors in Amazonian ecology. In: Harris M. and Ross E. (eds), Food and Evolution: Toward a Theory of Human Food Habits. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 407–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good K. 1989. Yanomami hunting patterns: trekking and garden relocation as an adaptation to game availability in Amazonia, Venezuela, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross D.R. 1975. Protein capture and cultural development. American Anthropologist 77: 526–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G.M. and Krueger A.B. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 353–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames R.B. and Vickers W.T. 1982. Optimal foraging theory as a model to explain variability in Amazonian hunting. American Ethnologist 9: 358–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames R.B. and VickersW.T. 1983. Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson J.P. 1993. Gardens, wildlife densities, and subsistence hunting by Maya Indians in Quintana Roo, Mexico, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Wildlife, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linares O.F. 1976. Garden Hunting in the American tropics. Human Ecology 4: 331–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizot J. 1997. Population, resources, and warfare among the Yanomamö. Man 12: 497–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizot J. 2001. On food taboos and Amazon cultural ecology. Current Anthropology 20: 150–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhusudhan M.D. and Karanth K.U. 2000. Hunting for an answer: is local hunting compatible with large mammal conservation in India? In: Robinson J.G. and Bennet E. (eds), Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 238–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeny K. 2000. In the forest is our money: The changing role of commercial extraction in Tawahka livelihoods, eastern Honduras, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geography, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss A.J. 1998. The impacts of cable snare hunting on wildlife populations in the forests of the Central African Republic. Conservation Biology 12: 390–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien T.G. and Kinnaird M.F. 2000. Differential vulnerability of large birds and mammals to hunting in North Sulawesi, Indonesia and the outlook for the future. In: Robinson J.G. and Bennett E.L. (eds), Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T. 2000. Economic growth and the environment. In: Maler K.-G. and Vincent J. (eds) Handbook of Environmental Economics, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J.G. 1996. Hunting wildlife in forest patches: an ephemeral resource. In: Schelhas J. and Greenberg R. (eds), Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J.G. and Bennett E.L. 1999. Carrying capacity limits to sustainable hunting in tropical forests. In: Robinson J.G. and Bennett E.L. (eds), Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross E.B. 1978. Food taboos, diet and hunting strategy: the adaptation to animals in Amazon cultural ecology. Current Anthropology 19: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shively G.E. 1997. Poverty, technology, and wildlife hunting in Palawan. Environmental Conservation 24: 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith D.A. 1998. Cultural landscapes, indigenous hunting, and wildlife conservation in neotropical rain forests (manuscript).

  • Spellerberg I.F. 1998. Ecological effects of roads and traffic: a literature review. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 7: 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearman A.M. and Redford K.H. 1992. Commercial hunting by subsistence hunters: Siriono Indians and Paraguayan caiman in lowland Bolivia. Human Organisation 51: 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens D.W. and Krebs J.R. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern D., Common M.S. and Barbier E.B. 1996. Economic growth and envrionmental degradation; the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development 234: 1151–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend W.R. 2000. The sustainability of subsistence hunting by the Sirionó Indians of Bolivia. In: Robinson J.G. and Bennett E.L. (eds), Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 48–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers W.T. 1994. From opportunism to nascent conservation. The case of the Siona-Secoya. Human Nature 5: 307–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie D.S. and odoy R.A. 2001. Income and price elasticities of bushmeat demand in lowland Amerindian societies. Conservation Biology 15: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie D.S., Morelli G.A., Shaw E., Rotberg F. and Auzel P. 2000. Roads, development and conservation in the Congo Basin. Conservation Biology 14: 1614–1622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost J.A. and Kelley P.M. 1983. Shotguns, blowguns, and spears: the analysis of technological efficiency. In: Hames R.B. and VickersW.T. (eds), Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. Academic Press, New York, pp. 189–224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demmer, J., Godoy, R., Wilkie, D. et al. Do levels of income explain differences in game abundance? An empirical test in two Honduran villages. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 1845–1868 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020305903156

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020305903156

Navigation