Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Part Does Culture Play in FPA?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foreign Policy Analysis

  • 4067 Accesses

Abstract

A number of analysts saw the emergence of the constructivist movement in the 1990s as the return of the cultural dimension to the study of international relations. In reality, FPA has always been interested in culture. Several researchers devoted their entire careers to studying the role of identities, discourses, norms and cultural practices in foreign policy. If being constructivist means being interested in culture, FPA was constructivist before its time. This chapter presents the cultural components that are of most interest to foreign policy analysts, including norms, identities, roles, genders, organizational cultures, strategic cultures and discourses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelal, R., Y.M. Herrera, A.I. Johnston, and R. McDermott. 2006. Identity as a Variable. Perspectives on Politics 4 (4): 695–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abzhaparova, A. 2011. Denuclearization Practices of Kazakhstan. Review of International Studies 37 (4): 1537–1553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. 2011. Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism and Rule-Making in the Third World. International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, E. 1998. Seeds of Peaceful Change. In Security Communities, ed. E. Adler and Mr. Barnett, 11–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s post-Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 195–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, E., and M. Barnett. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggesram, L. 2004. Role Identity and the Europeanisation of Foreign Policy. In Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy, ed. B. Tonra and T. Christiansen, 81–98. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rodhan, N. 2015. Strategic Culture and Pragmatic National Interest. Global Policy Journal, July 22. http://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/22/07/2015/strategic-culture-and-pragmatic-national-interest.

  • Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D.M. 2005. The United States and its Atlantic partners. In The Atlantic Alliance under Stress: US-European Relations after Iraq, ed. D.M. Andrews, 56–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, C. 2008. American Democratic Interventionism: Romancing the Iconic Woodrow Wilson. International Studies Perspectives 9 (3): 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arter, D. 1995. The EU Referendum in Finland on 16 October 1994. Journal of Common Market Studies 33 (3): 361–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashizawa, K. 2008. When Identity Matters. International Studies Review 10 (3): 571–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avey, P.C. 2015. The Role of Nuclear Non-Use Norms in Confrontations Between Nuclear and Non-Nuclear Opponents. Security Studies 24 (4): 563–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K., and Z. Wang. 2005. Culture Apology and International Negotiation. International Negotiation 10 (2): 337–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin-Düzgit, S. 2013. European Security and the Accession of Turkey: Identity and Foreign Policy in the European Commission. Cooperation and Conflict 48 (4): 522–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K. 2006. Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness. Environmental Policy and Governance 16 (5): 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzacq, T., ed. 2011. Securitization Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banchoff, T. 1999. German Identity and European Integration. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 259–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. 1997. The Cultural Logic of National Identity training. In Culture and Foreign Policy, ed. V.M. Hudson, 27–44. Boulder: Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. 1993. Institution, Roles and Disorder: The Case of the Arab States System. International Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 271–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations 5 (1): 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., and T. Weiss, eds. 2008. Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., and D. Antebi. 1992. Beliefs about Negative Intentions of the World: A Study of the Israeli Siege Mentality. Political Psychology 13 (4): 633–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearce, D., and S. Bondanella. 2007. Intergovernmental Organizations, Socialization and Member – State Interest Convergence. International Organization 61 (4): 703–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. 2010. The New Legitimacy and International legitimacy: Civilization and South African Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis 6 (2): 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, L. 1999. Redefining Cultural Diplomacy: Cultural Security and Foreign Policy in Canada. Political Psychology 20 (4): 677–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benes, V., and S. Harnisch. 2015. Role Theory in Symbolic Interactionism: Czech Republic, Germany, and the EU. Cooperation and Conflict 50 (1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, R., and O. Elgstrom. 2012. Conflicting Role design?, The European Union in Global Politics. Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (1): 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, E., and P. Ehin. 2009. Identity and Foreign Policy: Baltic-Russian Relations and European Integration. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, U.T. 1998. Crops of very: National Security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, A. 2007. Co-Constitution of Domestic and International Welfare Obligations. Cooperation and Conflict 42 (1): 73–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biava, A. 2011. Towards a European strategic culture? The New Leuven: Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. 2006. Internal and External Aspects of Security. European Security 15 (4): 385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, A. 2008. Contesting Global Norms: Politics of Identity in Japanese Pro – Whaling Countermobilization. Global Environmental Politics 8 (2): 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, A., and K.R. Nossal. 2007. Toward an ‘Explicative Understanding’ of Strategic Culture. Contemporary Security Policy 28 (2): 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, D. 1993. The Soviet Foreign Policy Belief System: Beliefs, Politics and Foreign Policy Outcomes. International Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. 1979. Strategy and Ethnocentrism. New York: Holmes & Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, S.K. 1990. How the West Was One: Representational Politics of NATO. International Studies Quarterly 24 (3): 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Strategic Stides and World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratberg, O. 2011. Ideas, Tradition and Norm Entrepreneurs. Review of International Studies 37 (1): 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, A. 2009. Speaking of Respect for Women. Journal of International Women’s Studies 10 (3): 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuning, M. 1995. Words and Deeds: Foreign Assistance Rhetoric and Behavior Policy in the Netherlands, Belgium and the United Kingdom. International Studies Quarterly 39 (2): 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M.B. 2000. Ingroup Identification and Intergroup Conflict. In Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict and Conflict Resolution, ed. R. Ashmore, L. Jussim, and D. Wilder, 17–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighi, E. 2006. One Man Alone? A long term Approach to Italy’s Foreign Policy under Berlusconi. Government and Opposition 41 (2): 278–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D.J., and B.A. Valentino. 2011. A War of One’s Own: Understanding the Gender Gap in Support for War. Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (2): 270–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C.S. 2008. Constructivism, Narrative and Foreign Policy Analysis: A Case Study of Finland. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer, K., and C.G. Thies. 2015. The Contested Selection of National Role Conceptions. Foreign Policy Analysis 11 (3): 273–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubela, T., and J. Morin. 2010. Lost in Translation: From Transnational Activism to Domestic Implementation. Health Law Journal 18 (1): 113–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J.W., and J. Monten. 2008. Without Heirs? Perspectives on Politics 6 (3): 451–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. 1992. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Salgado and the Sahel: Documentary Photography and the Imaging of Famine. In Rituals of Mediation: International Politics and Social Meaning, ed. C. Debrix and C. Weber, 69–95. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantir, C., and J. Kaarbo. 2012. Contested Roles and Domestic Politics: reflections on Role Theory in Foreign Policy Analysis and IR Theory. Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (1): 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., eds. 2016. Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X. 2009. Network of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies. International Studies Quarterly 53 (4): 1095–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas, S. 2004. Norm Collision. International Studies Review 6 (2): 213–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. 2006. Innocent Women and Children: Gender, Norms and the Protection of Civilians. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Setting the Advocacy Agenda. International Studies Quarterly 51 (1): 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization 65 (1): 69–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carta, C. 2012. The European Union Diplomatic Service: Ideas, Preferences and Identities. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalinac, A.L. 2007. Identity Theory and Foreign Policy. Politics & Policy 35 (1): 58–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederman, L.-E., T. Warren, and D. Sornette. 2011. Testing Clausewitz. International Organization 65 (4): 605–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P.C. 1980. The Politics of Grandeur: Ideological Aspects of Gaulle Foreign Policy. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti, F., and S. Lucarelli. 2008. The Search for a European Identity: Values Policies and Legitimacy of the European Union. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, G. 1995. The Political Psychology of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. Journal of Politics 57 (3): 743–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, G., H. Abramson, and S. Grillot. 1996. Role Theory and Foreign Policy. Political Psychology 17 (4): 727–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapnick, A. 2000. The Canadian Middle Power Myth. International Journal 55 (2): 188–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J.T. 1993. Ideas, Institutions and the Gorbachev Foreign Policy Revolution. World Politics 45 (2): 271–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics 50 (2): 169–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 84–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3): 553–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization 59 (4): 801–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelotti, N. 2015. A ‘Diplomatic Republic of Europe’? Explaining Role Conceptions in EU Foreign Policy. Cooperation and Conflict 50 (2): 190–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, P. 1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloud, D. 2004. To Veil the Treat of Terror. Quarterly Journal of Speech 90 (3): 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, C. 1987. Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectual. Signs 12 (4): 687–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Wars, Wimps and Women: Talking Gender and Thinking War. In Gendering War Talk, ed. M. Cooke and A. Woollacott, 227–246. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, P., and G. Edwards. 2001. Beyond the EU/NATO Dichotomy. International Affairs 77 (3): 587–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Identifying the Development of year had Strategic Culture. International Affairs 77 (3): 587–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortell, A., and J. Davis. 1996. How Do International Institutions Matter? International Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 451–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coş, K., and P. Bilgin. 2010. Stalin’s Demands: construction of the Soviet Other in Turkey’s Foreign Policy, 1919–1945. Foreign Policy Analysis 6 (1): 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders. Millennium 10 (2): 126–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, N. 1993. Decolonization as year International Norm. In Emerging Norms of Justified Intervention, ed. L. Reed and C. Kaysen, 37–61. Cambridge: American Academy of Arts & Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, S. 2006. Culture, Crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. 1999. Community Under Anarchy: Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The Paradox of Hegemony. European Journal of International Relations 7 (1): 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, T.M. 2009. Social Identity Theory and had Expansion. International Studies Quarterly 53 (3): 649–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Anieri, P. 2002. Russia’s Foreign Policy. In Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective, ed. A. Beasley, J. Kaarbo, J. Lantis, and M. Snarr, 95–120. Washington: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y. 2008. China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. 2009. Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment Network. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desch, M. 1996. War and Strong States, Peace and Weak States? International Organization 50 (2): 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, R. 2005. Hostage to Norms: States, Institutions and Global Forest Politics. Global Environmental Politics 5 (4): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, H. 2003. Japan and United Nations Peacekeeping: New Pressures and New Responses. London: Routledge Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, K. 1993. Geopolitics, and the Making of Foreign Policy Expert. Area 23 (1): 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R.L. 1993. Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post – Positivist Analysis of US Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. 2006. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge: Polity Press Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, J.S. 1999. Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism. International Organization 53 (4): 765–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberg, R.C. 2016. Gender Difference in American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force, 1982–2013. International Studies Quarterly 60 (1): 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberg, R.C., and R.J. Stoll. 2012. Gender Difference gold Parallel public? Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (2): 331–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgstrom, O., and M. Smith, eds. 2006. The European Union’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshtain, J.B. 1995. Women and War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of year Anti – Whaling Discourse, Cambridge. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erjavec, K., and Z. Volcic. 2007. War on Terrorism as a Discursive Battleground. Discourse Society 18 (2): 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, M. 1995. The Paradox of State Strength. International Organization 49 (1): 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, T. 2001. Transnational Norms and Military Development: Constructing Ireland’s Professional Army. European Journal of International Relations 7 (1): 63–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, H. 2007. Chinese Strategic Culture and Foreign Policy decision-making. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Y.H., and R.W. Mansback. 1996. The Past as Prelude to the Future? In The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, ed. Y. Lapid and F. Kratochwil, 21–44. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. 1993. International Organizations as Teachers of Norms. International Organization 47 (4): 565–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanik, W. 2011. Briging FPA Back Home: Cognition, Constructivism and Conceptual Metaphor. Foreign Policy Analysis 7 (1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A. 1996. The Evolution of International Norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (3): 363–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, G., ed. 1995. Remaking the Hexagon: The New France in the New Europe. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, R., and A. Walter. 2013. Global Norms and Major State Behaviour: The Cases of China and the United States. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2): 329–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, B.O. 2011. Who Wants to Be a Major Power. Journal of Peace Research 48 (5): 587–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortmann, M. 2009. March Cycles: Military Revolutions and State Building of the Renaissance to Our Days. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D., and J. Keller. 2010. Rallies and the First Image. Conflict Management and Peace 27 (5): 417–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furia, P.A., and R.E. Lucas. 2006. Determinants of Arab Public Opinion on Foreign Relations. International Studies Quarterly 50 (3): 585–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, C.F. 1994. Nationalism and Foreign Policy in Ukraine. Political Science Quarterly 109 (1): 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, J.L. 1987. The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartzke, E., and K.S. Gleditsch. 2006. Identity and Conflict: Ties That Bind and Differences That Divide. European Journal of International Relations 12 (1): 53–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskarth, J. 2006. Discourses and Ethics: The Social Construction of British Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis 2 (4): 325–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gecelovsky, P. 2009. Constructing a Middle Power: Ideas and Canadian Foreign Policy. Canadian Foreign Policy 15 (1): 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. 2006. Do Strong Group Identities Fuel Intolerance? Evidence from the South African box. Political Psychology 27 (5): 665–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, G., and P. Diehl. 1992. Toward a Theory of International Norms: Some Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (4): 634–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, P.M. 2000. Invisible Borders: Economic Liberalization and National Identity. International Studies Quarterly 44 (4): 533–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. 1988. Ideas, Institutions and American Trade Policy. International Organization 42 (1): 179–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. War and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, S.R. 2003. Beyond the Policy Frontier: Canada, Mexico and the Ideological Origins of the NAFTA. World Politics 55 (3): 361–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P.H. 1993. A Certain Idea of France: French Security Policy and the Gaullists Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P., T. Keenan, and A.-M. Dowd. 2004. A Call to Arms at the End of History. Discourse, Society 15 (2): 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granatsein, J. 1982. The Ottawa Men: The Civil Service Mandarins, 1935–1957. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. 1991. The Sources of Gender Bias in International Relations Theory. In Gender and International Relations, ed. R. Grant and K. Newland, 8–26. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C.S. 1981. National Style in Strategy: The American Example. International Security 6 (2): 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Strategic Culture have Context: The First Generation of Theory Strikes Back. Review of International Studies 25 (1): 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhill, B. 2010. The Company You Keep: International Socialization and the Diffusion of Human Rights Norms. International Studies Quarterly 54 (1): 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gries, P.H. 2005. Social Psychology and the Identity-Conflict Debate: Is a China Threat Inevitable? European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 235–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, A., and N. Carter. 1999. Not All Blarney Is Cast in Stone: International Cultural Conflict in Northern Ireland. Political Psychology 20 (4): 725–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, H. 2011. The Dissent Papers: The Voices of Diplomats in the Cold War and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurowitz, A. 1999. Mobilizing International Norms: Domestic Actors, Immigrants and the Japanese State. World Politics 51 (3): 413–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttieri, K., M.D. Wallace, and P. Suedfeld. 1995. The Integrative Complexity of American Decision Makers in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 (4): 595–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, D. 2004. What Good is Strategic Culture? International Journal 59 (3): 479–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. 1997. Moral Authority as a Power Resource. International Organization 51 (4): 591–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. 2006. Security did Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., B. Harley, and N. Phillips. 2004. Discourse Analysis and Content Analysis: Two Solitudes? Qualitative Methods 2 (1): 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnisch, S. 2001. Change and Continuity in Post-Unification German Foreign Policy. German Politics 10 (1): 35–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Role Theory: Operationalization of Key Concepts. In Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analysis, ed. S. Harnisch, C. Frank, and H. Maull, 7–15. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Conceptualizing the Minefield: Role Theory and Foreign Policy Learning. Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (1): 47–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., and B. Rosamond. 2002. Globalization, European Integration and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (2): 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, E. 2008. East and West Kiss: Gender, Orientalism and Balkanism Muslim-Majority in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Slavic Review 67 (1): 88–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E.A. 1998. The Democratic Peace through the Lens of Culture, 1920–1989. International Studies Quarterly 42 (3): 461–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heng, Y.-K. 2002. Unraveling the War on Terrorism: A Risk – Management Exercise in War Clothing? Security Dialogue 33 (2): 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, R.K., T. Risse-Kappen, and M.B. Brewer, eds. 2004. Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU. Lanham: Lowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. 2003. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintz, L. 2016. ‘Take it outside!’ National Identity Contestation in the Foreign Policy Area. European Journal of International Relations 22 (2): 335–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. 1991. French Dilemmas and Strategies in the New Europe. In After the Cold War, ed. R.O. Keohane and S. Hoffmann, 124–147. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. 2012. Foreign Policy and Political Possibility. European Journal of International Relations 19 (1): 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M., and S. Smith. 1986. Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making. British Journal of Political Science 16 (2): 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, K.J. 1970a. National Role designs in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly 14 (3): 233–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O.R. 1970b. The Operational Code Approach to the Study of Political Leaders. Canadian Journal of Political Science 3 (1): 123–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, K.J. 2011. Exceptionalism in American Foreign Policy: Is It Exceptional? European Journal of International Relations 17 (3): 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, S. 2008. Ideas and changes in US Foreign Aid: Inventing the Millennium Challenge Corporation. Foreign Policy Analysis 4 (2): 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, H. 2001. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, T. 1998. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 23 (1): 171–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities & Foreign Policies: Moscow 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Discourse and Content Analysis: Some Fundamental Incompatibilities. Qualitative Methods 1 (1): 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, D.P. 2007. Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach. Foreign Policy Analysis 3 (1): 24–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. 2004. Why Not Invade North Korea? Threats, Language Games and US Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly 48 (4): 805–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, J. 2004. Discourse, Ideas and Epistemic Communities in European Security and Defence Policy. Western European Politics 27 (1): 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, V. 1999. Cultural Expectations of One’s Own and Other Nations: Foreign Policy Action Templates. Political Psychology 20 (4): 767–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. 1993. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 22–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingebritsen, C. 2006. Small States in International Relations. Washington: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivie, R., and O. Giner. 2007. Hunting the Devil: Democracy’s Rhetorical Impulse to War. Presidential Studies Quarterly 37 (4): 580–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. 1993. The Weight of Ideas in Decolonization. In Foreign Policy Ideas, ed. J. Goldstein and R.O. Keohane, 111–137. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeandesboz, J. 2007. Labeling the Neighborhood: Towards a Genesis of the European Neighborhood Policy. Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (4): 387–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffords, S. 1993. Hard Bodies: Hollywood Masculinity in the Reagan Era. Chapel Hill: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A.I. 1995. Thinking about Strategic Culture. International Security 19 (4): 32–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A.I. 1995a. Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995b. Thinking about Strategic Culture. International Security 19 (4): 32–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P.J. 1996. Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security. In The Culture of National Security, ed. P. Katzenstein, 1–32. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Same War—Different Views: Germany, Japan and the War on Terrorism. International Organization 57 (4): 731–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, T. 2012. Canada and World Order: The Multilateralist Tradition in Canadian Foreign Policy. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. 1989. International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint. Millennium Journal of International Studies 18 (2): 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kier, E. 1997. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella, H.M. 2005. Securing the Civilian. In Power in Global Governance, ed. M. Barnatt and R. Duvall, 249–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, A. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodziej, E. 1974. French International Policy under de Gaulle and Pompidou: The Politics of Grandeur. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornprobst, M., V. Pouliot, N. Shah, and R. Zaiotti, eds. 2008. Metaphors of Globalization: Mirrors, Magicians, and Mutinies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K. 1999. Cross-cultural Dimensions of Multilateral Non-Proliferation and Arms Control dialogue. In Culture and Security, ed. K. Krause, 1–21. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, U., and J. Sperling. 2011. Discord and Collaboration in Franco-American Relations. In Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses, ed. S. Harnisch, C. Frank, and H. Maull, 213–232. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubalkova, V. 2001. Foreign Policy, International Politics and Constructivism. In Foreign Policy in a Constructed World, ed. V. Kubalkova, 15–37. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, C.A. 2010. How Enemies Become Friends: The Sources of Stable Peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, C.A., and P.L. Trubowitz. 2007. Dead Center: The Demise of Liberal Internationalism in the United States. International Security 32 (2): 7–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuusisto, R. 1998. Framing the Wars in the Gulf and in Bosnia: The Rhetorical Definitions of the Western Power Leaders in Action. Journal of Peace Research 35 (5): 603–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffey, M., and J. Weldes. 2004. Methodological Reflections on Discourse Analysis. Qualitative Methods 1 (1): 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapid, Y., and F. Kratochwil, eds. 1996. The Return of Culture and Identity in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, H. 1997. Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain and Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D.W., and A. Shevchenko. 2003. Shortcut to Greatness. International Organization 57 (1): 77–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Prestre, P.G., ed. 1997. Role Quests in the Post – Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transition. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J.W. 1997. Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the ‘Failure’ of Internationalism. International Organization 51 (1): 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lequesne, C., and J. Heilbronn. 2012. Senior Diplomats in the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs: When an Entrance Exam Still determined the Career. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7: 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, M. 2004. In Search of Identity year: Russian Foreign Policy and the End of Ideology. In Ideology and National Identity in Post-Communist Foreign Policy, ed. R. Fawn, 42–59. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, J.M. 2004. Pacifism or Passing the Buck? Testing Theories of Japan’s Security Policy. International Security 29 (1): 92–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, T. 2011. Peace through Recognition: An Interactionist Interpretation of International Crises. International Studies Sociology 5 (1): 68–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipschütz, R. 2001. Cold War Fantasies: Film, Fiction and Foreign Policy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, D. 1993. Moral Vision: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949–1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, P.V., and D.L. Brown. 1977. Image and Policy Preference. International Journal 32 (3): 654–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, G., and L. Bélanger. 2007. Convergence or Divergence Effects: NAFTA and State Preferences Toward the FTAA. In Regionalism and the State: NAFTA and Foreign Policy Convergence, ed. G. Mace, 13–31. Aldershot: Ashgate Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malici, A. 2006. Germans did Venutians: The Culture of German Foreign Policy Behavior. Foreign Policy Analysis 2 (1): 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankoff, J. 2009. Russian Foreign Policy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcussen, M., T. Risse, D. Engelmann-Martin, H.-J. Knopf, and K. Roscher. 2001. Constructing Europe? In The Social Construction of Europe, ed. T. Christiansen, K.E. Jørgensen, and A. Wiener, 614–633. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattern, J.B. 2001. The Power Politics of Identity. European Journal of International Relations 7 (3): 349–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCourt, D.M. 2011. Role-Playing and Identity Affirmation in International Politics. Review of International Studies 37: 1599–1621.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K. 1998. The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. 1999. Security, Identity and Interest. A Sociology of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, S. 1993. Internal and External Wars Battles: Politics, Learning and the Soviet Withdrawal from Afghanistan. World Politics 45 (3): 327–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merand, F. 2008. European Defence Policy: Beyond the Nation State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. 1995. Anarchy and Identity. International Organization 49 (2): 229–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messari, N. 2001. National Security, the Political Space, and Citizenship: the Case of Morocco and the Western Sahara. The Journal of North African Studies 6 (4): 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, S. 2000. What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU-US Trade Negotiations. International Organization 54 (1): 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4): 903–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. 2006. The Quest for a European Strategic Culture: Changing Norms on Security and Defence in the European Union. Macmillan: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, J. 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskimmon, A. 2009. Failing into Line? Kosovo and the Course of German Foreign Policy. International Affairs 85 (3): 561–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagi, Y. 2009. Foreign Policy Making under Koizumi: Norms and Japan’s Role in the 2003 Iraq War. Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (4): 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. 1997. Sex Among Allies: Militarized Prostitution in US-South Korea Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., 2005 [1948], Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, McGraw-Hill Education; 7th edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, J.F. 2010. The Two-Level Game of Transnational Network. International Interactions 36 (4): 309–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, J.F., and R. Gold. 2010. Consensus-Seeking, Distrust and Rhetorical Action. European Journal of International Relations 16 (4): 563–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, V., and B. Rumelili. 2012. The External Constitution of European Identity. Cooperation and Conflict 47 (1): 28–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowle, T.S. 2003. Worldviews in Foreign Policy: Realism, Liberalism and External Conflict. Political Psychology 24 (3): 561–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungiu, A., and D. Mindruta. 2002. Was Huntington Right? Testing Cultural Legacies and the Civilization Border. International Politics 39 (2): 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutimer, D. 2000. The Weapons State: Proliferation and the Framing of Security. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabers, D. 2009. Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in US Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001. Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (2): 191–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelmann, E. 1990. Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society. International Organization 44 (4): 479–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, T. 2011. Deconstructing Development. International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. 2013. O Effeminacy! Effeminacy! War, Masculinity and the Myth of Liberal Peace. European Journal of International Relations 19 (1): 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I.B. 1999. Uses of the Other: The East in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. A Speech That the Entire Ministry May Stand for, or Why Diplomats Never Produce Anything New. International Political Sociology 1 (2): 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I.B., and H. Heikka. 2005. Grand Strategy, Strategic Culture, Practice. The Social Roots of Nordic Defence. Cooperation and Conflict 40 (1): 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I.B., and D.H. Nexon, eds. 2006. Harry Potter and International Relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I.B., and J.M. Welsh. 1991. The Other in European Self-definition. Review of International Studies 17 (4): 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaidis, K., and R. Howse. 2003. This is My EUtopia...: Narrative as Power. In Integration in an Expanding European Union, ed. J.H.H.H. Weiler, I. Begg, and J. Peterson, 341–366. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, K.P.O. 2007. Perceiving Rogue States. Foreign Policy Analysis 3 (4): 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panke, D., and U. Petersohn. 2012. Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes. European Journal of International Relations 18 (4): 719–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquin, J. 2009. Canadian Foreign and Security Policy: Reaching a Balance between Autonomy and North American Harmony in the Twenty-First Century. Canadian Foreign Policy 15 (2): 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Is Ottawa following Washington’s Lead in Foreign Policy? Evidence from the Arab Spring. International Journal 67 (4): 1001–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquin, J., and P. Beauregard. 2013. Shedding Light on Canada’s Foreign Policy Alignment. Canadian Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 617–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. US transatlantic leadership after Iraq. Cooperation and Conflict 50 (4): 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, A. 2002. Kosovo and the Metaphor War. Political Science Quarterly 117 (3): 423–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C.F., and E.K. Stern. 2002. Blindsided: September 11 and the Origins of the Strategic Surprise. Political Psychology 23 (3): 601–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, T.V. 2009. The Tradition of Non-use of Nuclear Weapons. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Taboo or Tradition?: The Non-use of Nuclear Weapons in World Politics. Review of International Studies 36 (4): 853–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peceny, M. 1997. A Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Peace. Journal of Peace Research 34 (4): 415–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy, S.V. 2007. Mercenaries: Strong Norm Weak Law. International Organization 61 (2): 367–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.J. 1992. Whaler, Cetologists, Environmentalists and the International Management of Whaling. International Organization 46 (1): 147–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, V.S. 1995. The Politics of Identity and Gendered Nationalism. In Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation, ed. L. Neack, J. Hey, and P. Haney, 167–186. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettman, J.J. 1996. Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., and C. Hardy. 1997. Managing Multiple Identities: Discourse, Legitimacy and Resources in the UK Refugee System. Organization 4 (2): 159–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, B.R. 1993. Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power. International Security 18 (2): 80–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, E.H. 2008. Branding Canada: Projecting Canada’s Soft Power through Public Diplomacy, Montreal. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot, V. 2006. The Alive and Well Transatlantic Security Community: A Theoretical Reply to Michael Cox. European Journal of International Relations 12 (1): 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities. International Organization 62 (2): 257–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prizel, I. 1998. National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, M.V. 2001. Reflexive Security: NATO and International Risk Society. Millennium 30 (2): 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, K. 2002. The Architecture of International Cooperation. Virginia Journal of International Law 43 (1): 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, G. 1997. Problems and Prospects in the Study of International Norms. Mershon International Studies Review 41 (2): 205–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P.M., and A. Paskeviciute. 2003. Women’s Access to Politics and Peaceful States. Journal of Peace Research 40 (3): 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remacle, E. 2008. Approaches to Human Security: Japan, Canada and Europe in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Social Science 66: 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, L.A. 2001. In Search of Feminist Foreign Policy: Gender, Development and Danish State Identity. Cooperation and Conflict 36 (2): 177–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, E. 1996. Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years’ War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. 2002. China: Defining Its Role in the Global Community. In Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective, ed. A. Beasley, J. Jaarbo, J. Lantis, and M. Snarr, 121–144. Washington: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T., D. Engelmann-Martin, H.-J. Knopf, and K. Roescher. 1999a. To Euro or Not to Euro? European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 147–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T., S.C. Ropp, and K. Sikkink, eds. 1999b. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, T. 1994. Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalition, Domestic Structures and the End of the Cold War. International Organization 48 (2): 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence on US Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, V., ed. 2001. German Foreign Policy since Unification. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. 2009. From Civilian Power to Global Power. Journal of Common Market Studies 47 (4): 831–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich, P.E. 1987. Economic Culture and Foreign Policy: The Cognitive Analysis of Economic Policy Making. International Organization 41 (1): 61–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D.L., and R. Garcia-Retamero. 2007. Identity, Power and Threat Perception. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (5): 744–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.G. 1982. International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (2): 379–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, B. 2004. Constructing Identity and Relating to Difference: Understanding the EU’s Mode of Differentiation. Review of International Studies 30 (1): 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Turkey: Identity, Foreign Policy and Socialization in Post-Enlargement Europe. Journal of European Integration 33 (2): 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, M., and S. Walker. 1987. Cultural Norms and National Roles. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W. 2008. Dynamics of International Norm Change. European Journal of International Relations 14 (1): 101–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, M. 1999. Cooperative and Conflictual Policy Preference. Political Psychology 20 (4): 829–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, M., and S. Crichlow. 2000. Bill Clinton’s Operational Code: Assessing Source Material Bias. Political Psychology 21 (3): 559–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1): 47–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. 1998. NATO Enlargement: A Constructivist Explanation. Security Studies 8 (2): 198–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V.A. 2007. Trapped by Their Ideas: French elite Discourses of European Integration and Globalization. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (7): 992–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously. European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, V.P. 2000. Norms Are What States Make of Them. International Studies Quarterly 44 (4): 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, V.P., and J.W. Keller. 2007. Leadership Style and International Norm Violation: The Case of the Iraq War. Foreign Policy Analysis 3 (1): 79–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, L. 2010. Sex or Gender? In Gender Matters in Global Politics, ed. L. Shepherd, 3–15. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, C.-Y. 1993. China’s Just World: The Morality of Chinese Foreign Policy. Boulder: Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Assigning Role Characteristics to China: The Role State Versus the Ego State. Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (1): 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimko, K. 1994. Metaphors and Foreign Policy Decision Making. Political Psychology 15 (4): 655–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S. 2000. Nationalist Sources of International Economic Integration. International Studies Quarterly 44 (3): 365–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink, K. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization 47 (3): 411–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. 2010. Peacekeeping in Japanese Security Policy: International-Domestic Contexts Interactions. European Journal of International Relations 17 (3): 429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt, R. 2007. The Discursive Origins of a Doctrine. Foreign Policy Analysis 3 (3): 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjursen, H., ed. 2006. What Kind of Power? European Foreign Policy in Perspective. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 170–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skonieczny, A. 2001. Constructing NAFTA. International Studies Quarterly 45 (3): 433–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. 2004. Sovereignty and Power in a Networked World Order. Stanford Journal of International Law 40 (2): 283–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.A., and C.T. Sjolander, eds. 2012. Canada in the World: Internationalism in Canadian Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. 1977. The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Nuclear Options, R-2154-AF. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disaster of 1914. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenu, R. 2010. Feminist Creativities and the Disciplinary Imaginary of International Relations. International Political Sociology 4 (4): 380–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabile, C., and D. Kumar. 2005. Unveiling Imperialism: Media, Gender and the War on Afghanistan. Media, Culture and Society 27 (5): 765–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stairs, D. 1982. The Political Culture of Canadian Foreign Policy. Canadian Journal of Political Science 15 (4): 667–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J.G. 1994. Political Learning by Doing: Gorbachev have Uncommitted Thinker and Self-Motivated Learner. International Organization 48 (2): 155–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. 2011. The Camp David agreement: Ideas, Intellectuals, and the Division of Labor in Egypt’s Foreign Policy toward Israel. International Studies Quarterly 55 (3): 737–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenvenson, H. 2011. India and International Norms of Climate Governance. Review of International Studies 37 (3): 997–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., and J.C. Turner. 1986. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. S. Worchel and W.G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenwald, N. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telo, M. 2007. Europe: A Civilian Power? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, M., J. Nachtwey, and A. Grant. 1999. Further Tests on the Women and Peace Hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly 43 (3): 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewes, H. 1998. Between Deepening and Widening: Role Conflict in Germany’s Enlargement Policy. West European Politics 21 (2): 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. 2001. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights and the Demise of Communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, R., and N. Hynek. 2006. Keeping the Peace and National Unity. International Journal 61 (4): 845–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, J.A. 1988. Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium 17 (3): 429–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. You just don’t Understand. International Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 611–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Feminist Perspectives on 9/11. International Studies Perspectives 3 (4): 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. You May Never Understand: Prospects for Feminist Futures in International Relations. Australian Feminist Law Journal 32 (1): 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. 1985. War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpoleds, 169–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacher, A. 2011. France and Transatlantic Relations. In The Future of Transatlantic Relations: Perceptions, Policy and Practice, ed. Andrew M. Dorman and Joyce P. Kaufman, 95–112. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A.P. 2016. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. 4th ed. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A.P., and M. Tarver-Wahlquist. 2009. Dueling Honors: Power, Identity and the Russia-Georgia Divide. Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (4): 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Evera, S. 1984. The Cult of the Offensive and the Origins of the First World War. International Security 9 (1): 58–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Assumptions on Nationalism and War. International Security 18 (4): 5–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, M.A. 2013. Brazilian Foreign Policy in the Context of Global Climate Norms. Foreign Policy Analysis 9 (4): 369–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic, S. 2011. A Radicalized Peace? How Britain and the US Made Their Relationship Special. Foreign Policy Analysis 7 (4): 403–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S.G. 1979. National Role Concepts and Systemic Outcomes. In Psychological Models in International Politics, Westview Press, Boulder, ed. L. Falkowski, 169–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 1987. Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S.G. 2011. Binary Role Theory. In Rethinking Foreign Policy Analysis, ed. S.G. Walker, A. Choose, and M. Schafer, 245–266. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W., and T. Oliver. 2005. A bridge too far: The United Kingdom and the Transatlantic Relations. In The Atlantic Alliance Under Stress: US-European Relations After Iraq, ed. David M. Andrews, 152–176. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S.M. 2005. The Relationship Between Theory and Policy in International Relations. Annual Review of Political Science 8 (1): 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. 1959. Man, the State and War. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. 1994. Good Girls, Little Girls and Bad Girls. Millennium 23 (2): 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Faking It: US Hegemony in a ‘Post-Phallic’ Era. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K., and P. Kowert. 2007. Cultures of Order: Leadership, Language and Social Reconstruction in Germany and Japan. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C., and M. Lacy. 2011. Securing by Design. Review of International Studies 37: 1021–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldes, J. 1999. Constructing National Interest: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis, Minneapolis. Minneapoli: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. To Seek Out New Worlds: Exploring Links between Science Fiction and World Politics. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldes, J., M. Laffey, H. Gusterson, and R. Duvall. 1999. Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88 (2): 384–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, A., and J. Yates. 2009. Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda: Constructing the War on Drugs. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. 2009. Enacting Meaning-In-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations. Review of International Studies 35 (2): 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, L. 2009. Gendering the Cult of the Offensive. Security Studies 18 (2): 214–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkening, K.E. 1999. Culture and Japanese citizen influence on the transboundary air pollution issue in Northeast Asia. Political Psychology 20 (4): 701–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wish, N.B. 1980. Foreign Policy Makers and Their National Role designs. International Studies Quarterly 24 (4): 532–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., R.M. Reisigl, and K. Leibhart Cillia, eds. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodwell, D. 2007. Nationalism in International Relations: Norms, Foreign Policy and Enmity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahar, A. 2012. Norm Transmission in Peace-and State-Building. Global Governance 18 (1): 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zegart, A. 2007. Spying Blind: The CIA, the FBI and the Origins of 9/11. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehfuss, M. 2001. Constructivism and identity: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations 7 (3): 315–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevelev, I. 2016. Russian National Identity and Foreign Policy, Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/161208_Zevelev_RussianNationalIdentity_Web.pdf.

  • Zheng, S. 2001. Making Sense of the Conflict Between Mainland China and Taiwan. In Foreign Policy in a Constructed World, ed. V. Kubalkova, 203–226. Armonk: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, W. 1973. Outcome-Area and Foreign-Policy Process. American Political Science Review 67 (2): 1004–1012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Université Laval, QC, Canada

    Jean-Frédéric Morin & Jonathan Paquin

Authors
  1. Jean-Frédéric Morin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan Paquin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morin, JF., Paquin, J. (2018). What Part Does Culture Play in FPA?. In: Foreign Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61003-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation