Skip to main content

Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges

  • Chapter
Discourse Theory in European Politics

Abstract

During the last decade there has been mounting interest in various kinds of discourse theory and discourse analysis within what we can broadly define as the social sciences. This is evidenced by the growing number of publications, workshops, conference panels, university courses, and dissertations that draw on the intellectual resources of discourse theory. Some countries and subdisciplines have been more susceptible than others to the influence of the new theories of discourse. In some places, discourse theory has almost become the dominant paradigm, while in other places it has remained marginal. However, very few areas of research have been able to withstand the impact of its new ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Althusser, Louis (1965), For Marx. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Maxwell, and John Heritage (1984), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, John L. (1975), How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy (1978), ? Realist Theory of Science, 2nd edn. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, William E. (1991), Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1978), Writing and Difference. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1981), Positions. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1982), Margins of Philosophy. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, William (1984), Language and Society. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyrberg, Torben Bech, Allan Dreyer Hansen, and Jacob Torfing (2000), Diskursteoren på arbejde. Roskilde: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, Nina (1998), Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Their Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman (1992), Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1985), The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1886a), Power/Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1986b), ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, in Paul Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, pp. 32–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1986c), ‘Power and the Subject’, in Herbert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 208–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1986d), Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1990), History of Sexuality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Roger etal. (1979), Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geras, Norman (1987), ‘Post-Marxism?’, New Left Review, 163, pp. 40–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio (1971), Selections from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, Jaber F., and James A. Holstein (1997), The New Language of Qualitative Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action: vols I-II. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1990), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1992), Faktizität und Geltung: beiträge zur diskurstheorie des rechts und des demokratischen rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G. (1966), Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, Ole R. (1969), Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and the Humanities. Reading: Addisson-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Dick (1987), Defining the Political. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, David (2000), Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, David, Aletta J. Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis (2000), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, William, and David Franchel (1977), Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto (1989), ‘Politics and the Limits of Modernity’, in Andrew Ross (ed.), Universal Abandon? Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto (1990), New Reflections of the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto (1993), ‘Discourse’, in Robert E. Gooding and Philip Pettit (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 431–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto (1996a), ‘The Death and Resurrection of Ideology’, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 201–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto (1996b), Emancipations. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto (2000), ‘Identity and Hegemony’,’ structure, History and the Political’, and ‘Constructing Universality’, in Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek, Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. London: Verso Press, pp. 44–89, 182-212, 281-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe (1982), ‘Recasting Marxism: Hegemony and New Political Movements’, Socialist Review, 12, November, pp. 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantai Mouffe (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantai Mouffe (1987), ‘Post-Marxism without Apologies’, New Left Review, no. 166, pp. 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1969), Totemism. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1972), The Savage Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1995), Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: the Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantal (ed.) (1996), Deconstruction and Pragmatism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pêcheux, Michel (1982), Language, Semantics and Ideology. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poster, Mark (1990), The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell (1987), Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinarman, Craig (1987), American States of Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de (1974), Course in General Linguistics. Suffolk: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, Andrew (1984), Method in Social Science: a Realist Approach. London: Hutchinson.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks (1973), ‘Opening Up Closings’, Semiotica, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 289–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, John M., and Malcolm Coulthard (1975), Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, Jacob (1999), New Theories of Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, Jacob (2004), Det stille sporskifte i Velfœrdsstaten. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitets-forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Peter (1990), The Idea of Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953), Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj (1989), The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj (1990), ‘Beyond Discourse Analysis’, in E. Laclau (ed.), New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso Press, pp. 249–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj (1991), For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges. In: Howarth, D., Torfing, J. (eds) Discourse Theory in European Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics