Distributed leadership: A critical analysis
Abstract
Changes to the governance and management of institutions of higher education (often described as ‘new managerialism’) and the effects this is having on the work of academics have been the subject of much discourse over the last 30 years in the pursuit of a globally appropriate model for higher education. Less attention has been afforded to discussion of new forms of institutional leadership needed to effectively respond to the associated challenges. Despite growing research into shared models of leadership, particularly distributed leadership, as a potentially appropriate approach distinct from traditional structural/positional leadership, discussion has been principally confined to normative description of the parameters that describe distributed leadership rather than rigorous critical analysis of its applicability in, and effectiveness for, higher education. Underpinning this discourse is the presumption that increased collaboration is synonymous with distributed leadership. This paper presents a more critical analysis of the experience of a distributed leadership approach used to build leadership capacity in learning and teaching in an Australian university. This example demonstrates first, that despite evidence of a relationship between distributed leadership and collaboration, there is no evidence of an inherent direct causal relationship, second, that a distributed leadership, while it may increase participation of academics in decision making, is not synonymous with democratic decision making. It is concluded that for a distributed leadership approach to be appropriate and effective, higher education institutions need to instigate action supported by formal leaders and underpinned by an action reflective approach that enables change over time.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
ALTC (Australian Learning and Teaching Council) (2011) ALTC Leadership for excellence in learning and teaching. Completed and continuing leadership projects. Strawberry Hills, NSW: ALTC.
ALTC LE67 (2006) Developing multi-level leadership in the use of student feedback to enhance student learning and teaching practice. Available at: http://emedia.rmit.edu.au/altclgp (accessed 15 July 2011).
Anderson D and Johnson R (2006). Ideas of leadership underpinning proposals to the Carrick Institute. Available at: http://www.altc.edu.au/resources-ideas-of-leadership-underpinning-proposals-altc-2006 (accessed 30 May 2011).
Avolio B, Sivasubramaniam N, Murry W, Jung D, Garger J (2003) Assessing shared leadership: Development and preliminary validation of a team multifactor questionnaire. In: Pearce C, Conger J (eds) Shared Leadership, Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 141–172.
Becher T (1994) The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education 19(2): 151–161.
Bennett N Harvey J Wise C and Woods P (2003) Distributed Leadership: A Desk Study. Available at: www.ncsl.org.uk/literature reviews.
Bolden R, Petrov G and Gosling J (2008) Developing collective leadership in higher education. Final Report, Research and Development Series. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
Bosanquet A, Cameron A, Marshall S and Orrell J (2008) Ensuring sustainable leadership for quality learning and teaching. Australian Association for Quality Learning and Teaching. Available at: http://www.aare.edu.au/08pap/bos08405.pdp (accessed 23 September 2011).
Bradley D, Noonan B, Nugent H, Scales B (2008) Review of Australian higher education: Final report, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Bryman A (2004) Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly 15: 729–769.
Burke C, Fiore S, Salas E (2003) The role of shared cognition in enabling share leadership and team adaptability. In: Pearce C, Conger J (eds) Shared Leadership, Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 103–122.
Coates H, Dobson I, Edwards D, et al. (2009) Changing academic professions. Research briefing, LH Martin Institute, Educational Policy Analysis and ACER, Melbourne.
Conger J, Pearce C (2003) A landscape of opportunities: Future research on shared leadership. In: Pearce C, Conger J (eds) Shared Leadership, Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 285–303.
Day D, Gronn P, Salas E (2004) Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly 15: 857–880.
Deem R (1998) New managerialism in higher education: the management of performance and cultures in universities. International Studies in Sociology of Education 8(1): 47–70.
Deem R (2001) Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education 37(1): 7–20.
Dinham S, Brennan K, Collier J, Deece A and Mulford B (2009) The secondary head of department: Key links in the quality of teaching and learning chain. Quality Teaching Series No.2, Australian College of Education, 1–35.
Drath W, McCauley C, Palus C, Velsor E, O’Connor P, McGuire J (2008) Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 19: 635–653.
Gronn P (2000) Distributed properties. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 28(3): 317–338.
Gronn P (2009) Hybrid leadership. In: Leithwood K, Mascall B, Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence, New York: Routledge, pp. 17–40.
Harris A(2009) Distributed Leadership – Different Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer.
Hargreaves S, Fink D (2008) Distributed leadership: Democracy or delivery? Journal of Educational Administration 46(2): 229–240.
Harris A (ed.) (2009) Distributed Leadership - Different Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Houghton J, Neck C, Manz C (2003) Self-leadership and superleadership: The heart and art of creating shared leadership in teams. In: Pearce C, Conger J (eds) Shared Leadership, Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 123–140.
Jones S and Novak B (2009a) Student Feedback and Leadership, Final Report. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Available at: http://emedia.rmit.edu.au/altclgp (accessed 15 July 2011).
Jones S and Novak B (2009b) Student Feedback and Leadership, Resource Portfolio. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Available at: http://emedia.rmit.edu.au/altclgp (accessed 15 July 2011).
Lumby J (2003) Distributed leadership in colleges. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 32: 283–293.
Martin E, Trigwell K, Prosser M, Ramsden P (2003) Variation in the experience of leadership of teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 28(3): 247–259.
Parker L (2006) Synthesis of leadership colloquium discussion. Available at: http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-leadership-colloquium-altc-2006 (accessed 29 February 2011).
Pearce C (2004) The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive 18(1): 47–57.
Pearce C, Conger J (2003) Shared Leadership: Reframing The Hows and Whys of Leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pearce C, Man C, Sims H Jr (2008) The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice. The Leadership Quarterly 19: 363–359.
Ramsden P (1998) Learning to Lead in Higher Education, London: Routledge.
Scott G, Coates H and Anderson M (2008) Academic leadership capacities for Australian Higher Education. Available at: http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-learning-leaders-change-uws-2008 (accessed 8 June 2011).
Slaughter S, Leslie G (1997) Academic Capitalism, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Spillane J (2006) Distributed Leadership, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Woods P (2004) Democratic leadership: Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership. Leadership in Education 7(1): 3–26.
Woods P, Gronn P (2009) Nurturing democracy. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 37(4): 430–451.
Woods P, Bennett N, Harvey J, Wise C (2004) Variables and dualities in distributed leadership: Findings from a systematic literature review. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 32(4): 439–457.
Biographies
Sandra Jones is Professor of Employment Relations at RMIT University in Melbourne. She leads several research projects funded by the Australian Government under its Leadership for Excellence programme into distributed leadership to build leadership capacity in learning and teaching in higher education (www.distributedleadership.com.au).
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: April 8, 2014
Issue published: May 2014
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Article usage*
Total views and downloads: 6686
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 42 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 0
-
The Quality of Early Childhood Curricula and Distributed Leadership in...
-
An Overview of Distributed Leadership and its Shortcomings in Educatio...
-
A relatedness-based model of transformational leadership: a case study...
-
Collegial and distributed leadership: two sides of the same coin?
-
Why is collective leadership so elusive?
-
Dialectics of distributed leadership in an interorganizational entrepr...
-
What makes a socially skilled leader? Findings from the implementation...
-
Participation of charity beneficiaries
-
Fifty-five years of managerial shared leadership research: A review of...
-
Challenging humanist leadership: Toward an embodied, ethical, and effe...
-
Balancing leadership in projects: Role of the socio-cognitive space
-
Changing Organizational Conditions: Experiences of Introducing and Put...
-
What lies beneath resilience: Analyzing the affective-relational basis...
-
Enabling leadership capacity for higher education scholarship in learn...
-
Verteilte und substituierbare Führung: Wer oder was führt, wenn die Fü...
-
Organisational Strategies for Implementing Education for Sustainable D...
-
Supporting the development of program leaders in higher education: An ...
-
Uncovering and comparing academics’ views of teaching using the pedago...
-
Uncover the Hidden Relationships of Work
-
Distributing Leadership or Distributing Tasks? The Practice of Distrib...
-
Distributed Leadership Agency and Work Outcomes: Validation of the Ita...
-
A critical reflection of current trends in discourse analytical resear...
-
Conceptualizing educational leadership in an academic development prog...
-
Distributed leadership in the construction of a new higher education c...
-
Shared Principalship: The Perspective of Close Subordinate Colleagues
-
Overview of Related Academic Literature
-
Inclusive Educational Policy and the Democratic Context of Educational...
-
Affect and ipsative approaches as a counter to pedagogic frailty: the ...
-
Distributed leadership in HE...
-
Dynamics of distributed leadership during a hospital merger
-
Characterizing and unpacking learning to learn together skills in a wi...
-
Habits and the Social Phenomenon of Leadership
-
The shared principalship: invitation at the top
-
The student voice in Critical Leadership Education: An exploration of ...
-
Do labels matter when implementing change? Implications of labelling a...
-
Followership: A Spiritual Perspective and the Implications for Organiz...
-
Followership: A Spiritual Perspective and the Implications for Organiz...
-
Spiritual Followership: Emerging Conceptualizations
-
Spiritual Followership: Emerging Conceptualizations
-
A Technology-Enhanced Pedagogical Framework to Promote Collaborative C...
-
Going beyond “two-getherness”: Nurse managers’ experiences of working ...
-
Distributed leadership and research degree adminis...
-
Network structure in CA models of contacts between employees
-
Demonstrating the impact of a distributed leadership approach in highe...
-
Mapping the Terrain of Pedagogic Frailty
-
Academic Leadership
-
Taking the (Heroic) Leader Out of Leadership. The In Situ Practice of ...
-
Agency and Leadership for Learning and Teaching
-
Leadership and Followership in Post-1992 University Business Schools i...
-
Vocational teachers taking the lead: VET teachers and the career servi...
-
Reformed or Deformed? The Unending Renewal of the Public University be...
-
The Mapping of Pedagogic Frailty: A Concept in Which Connectedness is ...
-
Using workforce strategy to address academic casualisation: a Universi...
-
Towards new forms of educational leadership? The local implementation ...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
