Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adolescent Pediatric Decision-Making: A Critical Reconsideration in the Light of the Data

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adolescents present a puzzle. There are foundational unclarities about how they should be regarded as decision-makers. Although superficially adolescents may appear to have mature decisional capacity, their decision-making is in many ways unlike that of adults. Despite this seemingly obvious fact, a concern for the claims of autonomy has led to the development of the legal doctrine of the mature minor. This legal construct considers adolescents, as far as possible, as equivalent to adults for the purpose of medical decision-making. The movement to support independent decision-making by adolescents through providing information to them and securing their consent apart from their parents is encouraged by those legal understandings that hold that unemancipated minors should generally be considered as possessing effective decisional capacity. Such legal structures, however, do not adequately take account of the wide variations in adolescent capacities, the immaturity of most adolescent decision-makers, or the important contributions made by parents to the development of their adolescents through parental partnering in the adolescent’s decision-making. The data available indicate that in general adolescents should be regarded as apprentice decision-makers who should make decisions in collaboration with their parents until at least the age of 18. Steps should not be taken pre-emptively to isolate adolescents from the guidance of their parents. As a general rule, what Piker has referred to as “collaborative paternalism” appears most likely both to protect adolescents from their own untoward choices, while also very importantly helping them with parental guidance to develop into mature decision-makers with the capacity to make medical choices on their own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although there is no law or apparent official public policy in Michigan mandating private conversations of adolescents with a physician or nurse in the course of the medical treatment, evidently some parents have been informed that such conversations are standard policy. For information on the controversy, see http://www.infowars.com/new-medical-law-mandates-private-conversation-with-child-before-every-doctor-visit/.

References

  • Adaljarnardottir, S., & Hafsteinsson, L. G. (2001). Adolescents’ perceived parenting styles and their substance use: Concurrent and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2014). The teenage brain: Peer influences on adolescent decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2012). Decision-making in the adolescent brain. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 1184–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blustein, J. (1982). Parents and children: The ethics of the family. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravender, T., Price, N., & English, A. (2004). Primary care providers’ willingness to see unaccompanied adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34, 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. A., & Potenza, M. N. (2003). Neurodevelopment, impulsivity, and adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 53–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commendador, K. (2010). The relationship between maternal parenting style, female adolescent decision making, and contraceptive use. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 23, 561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, M. A., & Shelp, E. E. (Eds.). (1991). Competency. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, A. M. (2014). What influences adolescents’ contraceptive decision-making? A meta-ethnography. Journal of Pediatric Nursing,. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2014.05.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, D. K., Kann L., Kinchen, S., Ross, J., Hawkins J., Harris, W. A., et al. (2005). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2005. MMWR Surveillance Summary, 55, 1108.

  • Galvan, A. (2010). Adolescent development of the reward system. Front Hum Neurosci, 4(6). doi:10.3389/neuro.09.006.2010.

  • Galvan, A., & Rahdar, A. (2013). The neurobiological effects of stress on adolescent decision making. Neuroscience, 249, 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvan, T. A., Hare, C. E., Parra, J., Penn, H., Voss, S., Glober, G., et al. (2006). Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6885–6892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescent and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. (1977). Medical care for the child at risk: On state supervention of parental autonomy. Yale Law Journal, 86, 645–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huver, R. M. E., Engels, M. C. M. E., van Breukelen, G., & de Vries, H. (2007). Parenting style and adolescent smoking cognitions and behavior. Psychology and Health, 22, 575–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, C., Jones, D. J., Sterrett, E., & McKee, L. (2012). A review of parenting and adolescent sexual behavior: The moderating role of gender. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kun, J.-M. (1996). Rejecting the adage children should be seen and not heard—the mature minor doctrine. Pace Law Review, 16(2), 423–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, M. A., Rushton, C. H., Glover, J., Murray, M., & Leikin, S. (1996). Implications of the patient self-determination act: Guidelines for involving adolescents in medical decision making. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, B. C. (2013). The mature minor: some critical psychological reflections on the empirical bases. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(3), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piker, A. (2011). Balancing liberation and protection: A moderate approach to adolescent health care decision-making. Bioethics, 25(4), 202–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilling, J. K., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo, M. J., Padrón, I., de Vega, M., & Ferstl, E. C. (2014). Adolescents’ risky decision-making activates neural networks related to social cognition and cognitive control processes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 60. Retrieved February 14, 2014. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00060.

  • Romer, D., Duckworth, A. L., Sznitman, S., & Park, S. (2010). Can adolescents learn self-control? Delay of gratification in the development of control over risk taking. Prevention Science, 11, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. F. (1998). Children, families, and health care decision making. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. J. (1999). An emerging right for mature minors to receive information. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(1), 223–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, D. S., & Mowen, T. J. (2014). Parenting style transitions and delinquency. Youth & Society, 46(2), 228–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shad, M. U., Bidesi, A. S., Chen, L.-A., Thomas, B. P., Ernst, M., & Rao, U. (2011). Neurobiology of decision-making in adolescents. Behavioural Brain Research, 217, 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovet, L., & Metz, A. J. (2014). Parenting styles and career decision-making among French and Korean adolescents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84, 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, L. (2000). Neurobehavioural changes in adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2004). Risk taking in adolescence: what changes, and why? Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1021, 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2008).  A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78–106.

  • Steinberg, L. (2013). Does recent research on adolescent brain development inform the mature minor doctrine? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(3), 256–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Elmen, D. J., & Mounts, N. S. (1989). Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents. Child Development, 60, 1424–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauch, B. (2003). The primal teen: What the new discoveries about the teenage brain tell us about our kids. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1990). Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2011). Changing brains, changing perspectives: The neurocognitive development of reciprocity. Psychological Science, 22(1), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., & Crone, E. A. (2013). The teenage brain: A neuroeconomic approach to adolescent decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 108–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leijenhorst, L., Moor, B. G., Op de Macks, Z. A., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Westenberg, P. M., & Crone, E. A. (2010). Adolescent risky decision-making: Neurocognitive development of reward and control regions. Neuroimage, 51, 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watabe, A., & Hibbard, D. R. (2014). The influence of authoritarian and authoritative parenting on children’s academic achievement motivation: A comparison between the United States and Japan. North American Journal of Psychology, 16(2), 359–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. H., & Conrad Schwartz, J. (1996). The relationship between parenting types and older adolescents’ personality, academic achievement, adjustment, and substance use. Child Development, 67, 2101–2114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (1995). Competence to Consent. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelms, E. A., & Reyna, V. F. (2013). Fuzzy trace theory and medical decisions by minors: differences in reasoning between adolescents and adults. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(3), 268–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, L. P. (1975). Children’s rights: Removing the parental consent barrier to medical treatment of minors. Arizona State Law Journal, 31, 31–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, L., Bechara, A., Palmer, P. H., Trinidad, D. R., Wei, Y., Jia, Y., et al. (2011). Parent-child engagement in decision-making and the development of adolescent affective decision capacity and binge-drinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kenai Peninsula College, University of Alaska Anchorage, 533 E. Pioneer Ave, Homer, AK, 99603, USA

    Brian Partridge

Authors
  1. Brian Partridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Partridge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Partridge, B. Adolescent Pediatric Decision-Making: A Critical Reconsideration in the Light of the Data. HEC Forum 26, 299–308 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-014-9250-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-014-9250-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation