Abstract
Technology is changing our lives fundamentally by redefining our way of interacting with each other, performing transactions, commuting from one place to another, etc. Smart wearable technology is one of the areas in which explosive growth is witnessed in recent years. Smart wearable devices (SWD) are eventually going to become an integral part of human life, and the design discipline has clearly understood the potential of these devices. Traditionally, design discipline has always been responsive to the technology and material advances by coming up with their practical and innovative usages. In this, design education has played a crucial role by fostering designers to cope with the pace of technology change. However, contemporary design education lacks the explicit emphasis on the design of these new-age products. Since emerging technologies like SWD offer new prospects for designers to cultivate, enhance, and implement their thoughts and imaginations, a critical understanding of these present-day devices is highly required today for young upcoming designers. For that to happen, the need has arisen to relook at the current design curriculum. This paper tries to rationalize the significance of smart wearable device design for the current design curriculum and propose a systematic ideation method using the emotional design approach. Furthermore, an exploratory study was conducted with undergraduate design students to develop a structured approach to enhance the creativity of idea generation for SWD. Insights from this study would help design academicians to formulate guidelines for SWD design in the design curriculum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bolz N.: The meaning of surface. Mediamatic Mag. 7(3/4) (1994)
Park, E.: User acceptance of smart wearable devices: an expectation-confirmation model approach. Telematics Informatics 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101318
Cecchinato, M.E., Cox, A.L., Bird.: Smartwatches—the good, the bad and the ugly? CHI’15 Ext. Abstr., pp. 2133–2138 (2015)
Gonzalez, I., Val, E., Justel, D., Iriarte, I.: A framework for product design based on semantic attribution process. Des. J. 20, S16–S27 (2017)
Overbeeke, C.J., Hekkert, P.: Editorial. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design and Emotion, pp. 5–6, Delft (1999)
Brown, T.: Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperCollins e-books (2009)
Alaniz, T., Biazzo, S.: Emotional design: the development of a process to envision emotion-centric new product ideas. Proc. Comput. Sci. 158, 474–484 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.078
Gemperle, F., Kasabach, C., Stivoric, J., Bauer, M., Martin, R.: Design for wearability. Digest of Papers. In: Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Cat. No.98EX215), pp. 116–122. Pittsburgh, PA, USA (1998)
Starner, T.: How wearables worked their way into the mainstream. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 13(4), 10–15 (2014)
Sazonov, E., Neuman, M.R.: Wearable Sensors: Fundamentals, Implementation and Applications. Elsevier (2014)
Park, S., Chung, K., Jayaraman, S.: Wearables: fundamentals, advancements, and a roadmap for the future. In: Wearable Sensors: Fundamentals, Implementation and Applications, pp. 1–23. Elsevier (2014)
Sinha, N., Gupta, M.: Taxonomy of wearable devices: a systematic review of literature. Int. J. Technol. Diffusion 10(2), 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtd.2019040101
Creusen, M., Schoormans, J.P.L.: The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 22(1), 63–81 (2004)
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.J.: Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Des. Stud. 25(6), 547–577 (2004)
Subramanian, C.: Why 2014 Is Not the Year of Wearables. http://fortune.com/2014/06/20/2014-not-year-wearables/. Last accessed 05 Jan 2021
Gandy, M., Baker, P., Zagler, C.: Imagining futures: a collaborative policy/device design for wearable computing. Futures 87, 106–121 (2017)
Norman, D.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2004)
Creusen, M.: Product Appearance and Consumer Choice. Delft University of Technology, Delft (1998)
Yang, C., Zhou, Y., Zhu, B., Yu, C., Wu, L.: Emotionally intelligent fashion design using CNN and GAN. Comput.-Aided Des. Appl. 18(5), 900–913 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2021.900-913
Vaidya, G., Kalita, P.C.: Emotion assessment methods in the field of product design: a review. Int. J. Des. Educ. 16(2), 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-128X/CGP/v16i02/1-19
Vaidya, G., Kalita, P.C.: Understanding emotions and their role in the design of products: an integrative review. Arch. Des. Res. 34(3), 5–21 (2021)
Kim, D., Boradkar, P.: Sensibility design. In: IDSA National Design Education Conference, pp. 17–20 (2002)
Ürgen, C.: The Use and Importance of Emotional Design in Contemporary Design Practice. Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of Izmir Institute of Technology (2006)
Bloch, P.: Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. J. Mark. 59(3), 16 (1995)
Kesteren, I., Stappers, P.J., Kandachar, P.: Representing product personality in relation to materials in a product design problem. In: International Conference of the Nordic Design Research Society (2005)
Lefteri, C.: Materials: the big attraction and why material innovation is important. Ingredients 2, 4–6. https://issuu.com/leoh.h/docs/material_exploration. Last accessed 05 Feb 2021
Karana, E., Hekkert, P., Kandachar, P.: Meanings of materials through sensorial properties and manufacturing processes. Mater. Des. 30(7), 2778–2784 (2009)
Zhang, X., Yang, M., Su, J., Yang, W., Qiu, K.: Research on product color design decision driven by brand image. Color. Res. Appl. 45(6), 1202–1216 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22540
Kurt, S., Osueke, K.: The effects of color on the moods of college students. SAGE Open 4(1), 1–12 (2014)
Roberts, K.: Lovemarks: The Future Beyond Brands. PowerHouse Books, New York (2004)
Armstrong, L.: It Started with an Egg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/1991-12-01/it-started-with-an-egg. Last accessed on 05 Dec 2020
Desmet, P.: A multilayered model of product emotions. Des. J. 6(2), 4–13 (2003)
Mugge, R., Govers, P., Schoormans, J.: The development and testing of a product personality scale. Des. Stud. 30(3), 287–302 (2009)
Torrance, E.P.: The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Norms-Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A and B. Scholastic Testing Service, Bensenville, IL (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vaidya, G., Kalita, P.C. (2023). A Framework for the Design of Smart Wearable Devices Using Emotional Design Approach. In: Chakrabarti, A., Singh, V. (eds) Design in the Era of Industry 4.0, Volume 3. ICORD 2023. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 346. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0428-0_64
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0428-0_64
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0427-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0428-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)