skip to main content
10.1145/3282894.3282904acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Emotion Enhancement through Ubiquitous Media Technology in a Smart Kitchen Environment

Published:25 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today, Human Computer Interaction is increasingly shifting from 'information worlds' towards 'experience worlds'. Still, much research of smart environment technologies focuses merely on functional aspects. This paper recognizes the relevance of smart environment technologies on emotional experiences. We developed a ubiquitous media technology in a smart kitchen environment to enhance the user's emotions: A touch and voice controlled Visual Atmosphere App (VAA) that can change kitchen ambience through different atmospheric themes by using visual projection on the kitchen surfaces and sound effects. In a quantitative and qualitative laboratory user study (N=30) we measured the impact of the VAA on the user's emotional state. Our findings show that this ubiquitous media technology in a smart environment can have a significant (p<0.05) effect on emotion enhancement. This result is even stronger if the smart environment fits the user's personal preferences. This study is a step towards emotional experiences caused by smart environment technologies to foster desired psychological states.

References

  1. Lynne Baillie and David Benyon. 2008. Place and technology in the home. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 17, 2-3 (2008), 227--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Robert A Baron. 1994. The physical environment of work settings: Effects on task performance, interpersonal relations, and job satisfaction. Research in organizational behavior 16(1994), 1--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mikkel Bille. 2015. Lighting up cosy atmospheres in Denmark. Emotion, Space and Society 15 (2015), 56--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Rubén Blasco, Álvaro Marco, Roberto Casas, Diego Cirujano, and Richard Picking. 2014. A smart kitchen for ambient assisted living. Sensors 14, 1 (2014), 1629--1653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Peter R Boyce, Jennifer A Veitch, Guy R Newsham, CC Jones, J Heerwagen, M Myer, and CM Hunter. 2006. Lighting quality and office work: two field simulation experiments. Lighting Research & Technology 38, 3 (2006), 191--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 25, 1 (1994), 49--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Scott Brave and Clifford Nass. 2003. Emotion in human-computer interaction. The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (2003), 81--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Danielle Butler. 2016. The heart of the home: Developing the modern kitchen in Little Rock's Boyle House. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Arkansas at Little Rock.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rafael A Calvo, Dorian Peters, and Sidney D'Mello. 2015. When technologies manipulate our emotions. Commun. ACM 58, 11 (2015), 41--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Michael H Coen and others. 1998. Design principles for intelligent environments. In AAAI/IAAI. 547-554. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Boris De Ruyter and Emile Aarts. 2004. Ambient intelligence: visualizing the future. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. ACM, 203--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Appliance Design. 2017. Report: Global Smart Kitchen Appliances Market Expected to Grow at 23.4 Percent by 2025. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Arndt Engeln and C. Engeln. 2015. Customer Experience und kundenzentrierte Angebotsentwicklung. Was gehört dazu? (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Haruna Fushimi, Daiya Kato, Youichi Kamiyama, Kazuya Yanagihara, Kouta Minamizawa, and Kai Kunze. 2017. atmoSphere: designing cross-modal music experiences using spatial audio with haptic feedback. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Emerging Technologies. ACM, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Tom Hargreaves, Charlie Wilson, and Richard Hauxwell-Baldwin. 2018. Learning to live in a smart home. Building Research & Information 46, 1 (2018), 127--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Yu-Chun Huang, Kuan-Ying Wu, and Yu-Tung Liu. 2013. Future home design: an emotional communication channel approach to smart space. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 6 (01 Aug 2013), 1281--1293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lynnay Huchendorf. 2007. The effects of color on memory. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research X (2007), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Igor Knez. 1995. Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of environmental psychology 15, 1 (1995), 39--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kriening. Produktaesthetik - Wirkmechanismen und Messung. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas Kubitza and Albrecht Schmidt. 2016. Rapid Interweaving of Smart Things with the meSchup IoT Platform. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 313--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sevinc Kurt and Kelechi Kingsley Osueke. 2014. The effects of color on the moods of college students. SAGE Open 4, 1 (2014), 2158244014525423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. James B Maas, Jill K Jayson, and Douglas A Kleiber. 1974. Effects of spectral differences in illumination on fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology 59, 4 (1974), 524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Remco Magielse and Philip R Ross. 2011. A design approach to socially adaptive lighting environments. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity. ACM, 171--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. CLB McCloughan, PA Aspinall, and RS Webb. 1999. The impact of lighting on mood. International Journal of Lighting Research and Technology 31, 3 (1999), 81--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Michael S Mott, Daniel H Robinson, Ashley Walden, Jodie Burnette, and Angela S Rutherford. 2012. Illuminating the effects of dynamic lighting on student learning. Sage Open 2, 2 (2012), 2158244012445585.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tatsuo Nakajima, Kaori Fujinami, and Eiji Tokunaga. 2005. Building intelligent environments using smart daily objects and personal devices. In CIT 2006: Proceedings of the sixth IEEE international conference on computer and information technology (CIT2006). Citeseer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rosling Picard. 1997. Affective computing. Cambridge, Massachustes Institure of Technology. (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Patrick Riedemann. 2011. Kundenakzeptanz von Innovationen im Produktentwicklungsprozess. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jürgen Scheible, Arnd Engeln, Michael Burmester, Gottfried Zimmermann, Tobias Keber, Uwe Schulz, Sabine Palm, Markus Funk, and Uwe Schaumann. 2016. SMARTKITCHEN Media Enhanced Cooking Environment. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT' 16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 169--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Abigail Sellen, Yvonne Rogers, Richard Harper, and Tom Rodden. 2009. Reflecting human values in the digital age. Commun. ACM 52, 3 (2009), 58--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Javier Serrano-Puche. 2015. Emotions and digital technologies: Mapping the field of research in media studies. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Anya Skatova, Ben Bedwell, Victoria Shipp, Yitong Huang, Alexandra Young, Tom Rodden, and Emma Bertenshaw. 2016. The role of ICT in office work breaks. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3049--3060. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rolf. Steyer, Peter. Schwenkmezger, Peter. Notz, and Michael. Eid. 1997. Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF). Hogrefe, Göttingen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Norbert Streitz, Carsten Magerkurth, Thorsten Prante, and Carsten Röcker. 2005. From information design to experience design: smart artefacts and the disappearing computer. interactions 12, 4 (2005), 21--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Greg Wadley. 2016. Mood-enhancing technology. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM, 326--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Nan Zhao, Asaph Azaria, and Joseph A Paradiso. 2017. Mediated Atmospheres: A Multimodal Mediated Work Environment. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 2 (2017), 31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Emotion Enhancement through Ubiquitous Media Technology in a Smart Kitchen Environment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MUM '18: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
        November 2018
        548 pages
        ISBN:9781450365949
        DOI:10.1145/3282894

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 November 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        MUM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of82submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader