2,782

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Listen

Review

Perspectives on the use and risk of adverse events associated with cytokine-storm targeting antibodies and challenges associated with development of novel monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of COVID-19 clinical cases

Aishwarya Mary JohnsonDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9030-9954 View further author information

Robert BarigyeDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8420-075X View further author information

Hariharan SaminathanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab EmiratesCorrespondencehari.saminathan@uaeu.ac.ae

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0009-7028 View further author information

ABSTRACT

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that lacks globally accessible effective antivirals or extensively available vaccines. Numerous clinical trials are exploring the applicability of repurposed monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting cytokines that cause adverse COVID-19-related pathologies, and novel mAbs directly targeting SARS-CoV-2. However, comorbidities and the incidence of cytokine storm (CS)-associated pathological complexities in some COVID-19 patients may limit the clinical use of these drugs. Additionally, CS-targeting mAbs have the potential to cause adverse events that restrict their applicability in patients with comorbidities. Novel mAbs targeting SARS-CoV-2 require pharmacological and toxicological characterization before a marketable product becomes available. The affordability of novel mAbs across the global economic spectrum may seriously limit their accessibility. This review presents a perspective on antibody-based research efforts and their limitations for COVID-19.

KEYWORDS:

Introduction

With the exception of the swine influenza pandemic of 1918, the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has thus far caused one of the greatest humanitarian and public health challenges worldwide. The severe damage inflicted on the world economy by the COVID-19 pandemic has initiated a global recession precipitated by the necessity to place at least one-third of the global population under lockdown.^Citation1^,Citation2 The origin of the pandemic has been linked to a “wet market” that sold seafood, wild animals, and/or their products in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. Following the initial outbreak of the disease, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention isolated the novel virus from a bronchoalveolar lavage sample taken from a patient in Wuhan.^Citation3 The virus was later confirmed to be a novel enveloped RNA coronavirus (CoV); however, little was known then about the gravity of the public health disaster that was to follow ^Citation3As of 28-February-2021, approximately 114 million COVID-19-positive cases have been reported globally, and more alarmingly, more than 2.5 million lives have succumbed to COVID-19.^Citation4

While the standard of care is continuing to evolve, there is currently no cure for COVID-19. As of 2 March, 2021, monoclonal antibodies – Bamlanivimab, Casarivimab – Imdevimab combination have been granted Emergency Use Authorization approval from the US-FDA, of which two are monoclonal antibody (mAbs) based treatment options for the nonhospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19^Citation5). Whereas three vaccines have been authorized by the CDC, as of 2 March, 2021,^Citation6 however, worldwide availability of efficacious vaccines will likely take several years before the pandemic may be stopped in its tracks.^Citation7 Sustained efforts from many researchers worldwide are rapidly yielding prospects of successful vaccines, antiviral agents, and potentially efficacious supportive therapies.^{Citation8–10}

Scientific advancements over the past several decades have proven that antibody-based therapeutics can be a panacea for many serious diseases. Historically, convalescent blood-based products (CBPs) have been used effectively during pandemics; there is evidence of clinical successes based on a meta-analysis of CBP usage to control the Spanish flu stands as a positive testament.^Citation11 Although the advent of antibiotics has supplanted the use of CBPs for bacterial disease outbreaks, the successful use of immunotherapeutic strategies was yet again evidenced during the H5N1 swine flu pandemic of 2009.^Citation12 However, the inconclusive therapeutic benefits of CBPs for the MERS, SARS, and Ebola outbreaks cast doubts on their usage.^Citation11 More recently, considering the development of immensely powerful in vitro screening and selection methods, in addition to the availability of engineered mAbs, several unmet medical needs and a number of diseases, particularly cancer, can now be successfully treated using an immunotherapeutic approach.^Citation13 As such, there is sustained interest in antibody-based therapeutics as an option for treating dangerous infectious diseases, including those that eventually lead to pandemics. The successful treatment of the COVID-19-stricken ex-president of the United States – Donald Trump – who received a cocktail of SARS-CoV-2-specific mAbs, and thereafter other high-profile COVID-19 patients, reinforces the faith in ongoing research efforts on this treatment option.^{Citation14–16} However, this approach has serious limitations that may impede clinical development and universal applicability, particularly when fighting recently emerged viral pandemics. ^Citation17 The advantages and disadvantages of development and application of mAb-based therapeutic strategies for tackling a pandemic is summarized under

Table 1. Summary of advantages and disadvantages of mAb-based therapeutic strategies

Download CSV Display Table

This review presents asummarized perspective on the background of SARS-CoV-2, comorbidities in COVID-19 patients, CS and adverse events associated with mAbs targeting Cytokine Storm (CS), when administered for the clinical management of COVID-19 patients with preexisting illnesses.

Virology, pathogenesis, and clinical symptoms

As a virus group, CoVs possess a linear positive-stranded RNA genome of ~30 kb in size and ~125 nm in diameter. There are four known CoV genera. α-Coronaviruses include human coronavirus NL63 and viruses that cause porcine epidemic diarrhea, canine coronavirus disease, and transmissible gastroenteritis.^Citation18 β-Coronaviruses include SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, mouse hepatitis virus, and SARS-CoV-2, and γ- and δ-coronaviruses are associated with avian diseases and porcine deltacoronavirus, respectively.^{Citation19–21} Although most CoVs have been identified in animals, three have successfully crossed into humans. Those viruses that have crossed into humans, and particularly SARS-CoV, have been associated with potentially fatal pneumonias and rapidly spreading respiratory infections,^Citation22 MERS,^Citation23 and SARS-CoV-2.^Citation24

It is widely accepted that SARS-CoV-2 enters host cells by binding to the angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptors in the nasal epithelium, and mucous membrane of the lower respiratory tract and lungs; however, other host factors such as the presence of sialic acid in the host cell membranes also positively influences S protein–receptor interactions. Additionally, CoVs penetrate host cells at neutral- or low-pH environments, followed by passage of the nucleocapsid and release of the viral genome. This event initiates the virus replication cycle, which leads to the viremic phase of the infection.^{Citation25,Citation26} Clathrin-mediated endocytosis has also been shown to play a role in the mechanism of virus entry into host cells.^{Citation19–21,Citation27} Interestingly, both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 have affinity for the human ACE2 (hACE2) receptor, which facilitates host cell invasion. A furin cleavage site detected within the SARS-CoV-2 S protein is speculated to be the basis for the comparatively more extensive tissue tropism observed with this virus arguably makes SARS-CoV-2 more pathogenic than SARS-CoV.^Citation28

Many investigations have postulated that, similar to SARS-CoV, the S protein in SARS-CoV-2 is the major pathogenic factor responsible for attachment preceding host cell invasion.^Citation29 To further lend support to this hypothesis, these authors have used computational studies and identified 24 stretches of conserved peptides within the SARS-CoV-2-derived S protein.^Citation29 These conserved peptides also appear to be common across other related CoV strains. Of these peptide stretches, 20 bear important B and T cell epitopes that are predicted to be relevant for immunoprotection.^Citation29 The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 is also explained by the partially open conformation of S protein trimers. SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 have a shared sequence homology of 75%, and additional findings suggest that neutralizing antibodies against the former may cross-protectively prevent host cell attachment and entry of SARS-CoV-2.^{Citation28,Citation30,Citation31} Compelling evidence from numerous COVID-19 vaccine research studies have corroborated the immunogenicity and potential immunoprotective properties of several epitopes located within the S protein.^{Citation32,Citation33} Moreover, structural analysis and studies into the molecular pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 suggest the presence of two virus-binding hotspots in the S protein receptor-binding domain (SARS-CoV-2-RBD). Additionally, the ACE2 binding ridge within RBD has a compact conformation and is accompanied by several residue changes that indicate the significantly higher binding affinities of SARS-CoV-2-RBD to the ACE2 receptor. The uniqueness of RBD is considered a major factor contributing to the infectivity and host range of SARS-CoV-2.^{Citation34,Citation35} Early investigations that focused on identifying anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies suggested that RBD-binding antibodies are strongly correlated with virus neutralization capability.^{Citation36,Citation37} Collectively, these studies explain the predominant molecular clues that elucidate the efficiency with which both viruses can easily spread among humans. In summary, these findings suggest that the S protein RBD is among the most suitable antigenic candidates, and it is being targeted for generating potentially neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.

The prominent clinical symptoms in patients with COVID-19 include fever (98%), cough (76%), and myalgia or fatigue (44%).^{Citation38,Citation39} Less prominent symptoms include sputum production (28%), headache (8%), hemoptysis (5%), and diarrhea (3%). Furthermore, 50% of COVID-19 patients develop dyspnea, which has been consistently reported alongside fever and cough.^{Citation38,Citation39} Additionally, atypical symptoms, such as headaches, confusion, rhinorrhea, sore throat, delirium, hemoptysis, gastrointestinal bleeding, vomiting, and diarrhea have been reported in patients with comorbidities such as heart disease, preexisting lung disease, diabetes mellitus, severe obesity, chronic kidney, or liver disease, and compromised immune system.^{Citation40–44} In the following sections, we review the comorbidities associated with patients with COVID-19 and emphasize on neurological and pediatric patients.

Comorbidities associated with COVID-19

With no established standard of care and most treatment choices being either supportive or investigational, the most worrying aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic is the significant incidence of comorbidities in patients requiring intensive care.^{Citation45,Citation46} Early reports of pervasive mortalities in elderly patients with comorbidities (8 out of 10) such as diabetes and heart and lung diseases underscored the apparent vulnerability of elderly individuals.^{Citation47,Citation48} Other clinically significant comorbidities include but are not limited to chronic lung disease or moderate-to-severe asthma; serious heart conditions; immunosuppression, including cases of poorly controlled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or AIDS; prolonged use of corticosteroids; and severe obesity (body mass index ≥40).^Citation49 During the course of the ongoing pandemic, several studies have focused on cohorts of COVID-19 patients who died from severe pneumonia.^Citation50 In a cohort study of 1,591 COVID-19 patients from Italy, the median age of the patients was 63 (56–70) years; 1,304 (82%) were male, and 509 (49%) had hypertension.^Citation51 Similarly, in another cohort study conducted in the USA, the median age of the patients was 63 years; 60.6% were males.^Citation52 In this study, the most common comorbidities were hypertension (n = 3,026, 56.6%), obesity (n = 1,737, 41.7%), and diabetes mellitus (n = 1,808, 33.8%).^Citation52 Ghisolfi et al. presented an intriguing analysis of predicted COVID-19 fatality rates, wherein higher case fatality rates were more likely to be seen in higher-income countries.^Citation53 An analysis by Hashim et al. based on a survey of COVID-19 mortalities across 93 countries provided compelling evidence on the association between higher case mortalities and preexisting health complications such as Alzheimer’s disease, lung cancer, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in addition to advancing age.^Citation54 These findings reaffirm the similarities between COVID-19 and MERS and SARS with respect to the occurrence of more serious clinical outcomes in individuals with co-existing conditions.^{Citation55–57} These authors also reported that men exhibit a higher susceptibility to these infections than women. Overall, these findings suggest that emergency medical support and treatment choices for COVID-19 patients with chronic comorbidities remain a serious challenge.^Citation49 This may complicate the standard of care for patients with COVID-19 who are receiving multiple prescriptions for their preexisting medical conditions.

Vulnerability of children

Although COVID-19 is frequently asymptomatic in children, some of the pathological manifestations that have been observed thus far are quite different from those observed witnessed in adults, which warrants further investigation. One of the most comprehensive studies on pediatric COVID-19 reported clinical symptoms that are considerably different from those observed in adults, include vomiting, colic, and diarrhea. Of the 58 children investigated in one study, 29 developed shock and required intensive clinical interventions such as inotropic support and fluid resuscitation.^Citation58 Although most cases of pediatric COVID-19 were initially mild, a more severe clinical presentation termed “multisystem inflammatory syndrome” in children (MSI-C) has since been documented. Furthermore, recent reports suggest that some children who recover from SARS-CoV-2 infection develop pediatric MSI-C, which is characterized by clinical presentations such as Kawasaki disease shock syndrome, toxic shock syndrome, myocarditis, and macrophage activation syndrome.^{Citation59–61} A recent report indicated that a low number of pediatric COVID-19 cases were associated with severe pulmonary complications that required intensive care during hospitalization.^Citation62

COVID-19 is spawning a neurological pandemic

Recent clinical observations indicated that some severely ill and recovering COVID-19 patients may manifest neurological signs,^{Citation63–65} including minor central nervous system manifestations such as headache and dizziness and more serious symptoms such as impaired consciousness, ataxia, acute cerebrovascular disease, and epilepsy. A study of 37 patients with COVID-19 in France reported neurological manifestations of altered consciousness (73%), confusion (37%), and agitation (19%).^Citation66 The most striking pathological finding observed in 54% of the patients was intracerebral hemorrhagic lesions.^Citation66 Peripheral nervous system manifestations such as hypogeusia, hyposmia, neuralgia, and skeletal muscular symptoms have also been reported.^{Citation63–65} A recent hypothesis attributed more serious neurological outcomes such as acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE),^Citation67 ischemic stroke,^Citation68 encephalopathy,^Citation69 meningoencephalitis,^Citation70 and Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS)^Citation71 to CSs and/or a compromised blood–brain barrier that developed during disease progression. However, unlike in the case of SARS-CoV, there is still no empirical evidence that has definitively corroborated the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the brain. Clinical studies involving patients with SARS-CoV infection have shown the presence of virus particles in brain specimens; these particles are mostly localized in neurons.^Citation72 Unlike SARS-CoV, the detection of viral RNA in the cerebrospinal fluid has thus far been demonstrated in only a single-case report in which SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with ANE.^Citation73 Based on statistical data from MERS and SARS as a prediction model for the association of neurological involvement and infection with SARS-CoV-2, the possibility of a neurological pandemic is imminent.^Citation74 This finding adds to the uncertainties that could have a bearing on the prognosis of patients with COVID-19. In the near future, it is likely that neurological and other complications will further aggravate the burden on healthcare systems due to the extra patient care and management needs.

Cytokine storm, comorbidities and COVID-19

In COVID-19 patients, the severity of the disease correlates well with the onset of exaggerated immune response that is characterized by higher concentrations of circulating cytokines.^{Citation75,Citation76} The trigger for such CSs (CS) is an uncontrolled immune response resulting in continuous activation and expansion of effector immune cells like lymphocytes, and macrophages. The exaggerated activation induces these cells to produce enormous amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines and related molecules thus resulting in dire immunological events. The severity of disease manifestation is consistently attributable to the actions of heightened levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines – IL-1, IL-6, IL-18, IFN-γ, and TNF-α.^Citation77 Assessment of cytokine levels in a cohort of 41 COVID-19 patients indicated high circulating levels of IL1β, IFNγ, IP10, and chemokine – MCP1.^Citation24 These cytokines along with related pro-inflammatory molecules are predominantly linked to activation of T-helper-1 (Th1) cell responses^Citation24 . Especially patients with excessive circulating levels of cytokines and chemokines – G-CSF, IP-10, TNFα, MCP1, MIP1 required intensive care hospitalization clearly associating the link between CS and disease severities.^Citation24 Whereas CSs are not novel to COVID-19 infections, they have previously been observed during SARS-CoV^Citation78 and MERS-CoV pandemics as well.^Citation79 The uniqueness of CS during COVID-19 infection is an increased secretion of T-helper-2 (Th2) related cytokines (viz.) – IL4 and IL10, which are known to suppress inflammation. Such a phenomenon was not observed in SARS-Co-V patients.^Citation24 Moreover, numerous multi-centric retrospective studies have observed that increases in the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 correlating with increased severity in COVID-19 patients.^{Citation80–82} Alarmingly, eight critically ill pediatric (2 months to 15 cases) COVID-19 cases in China demonstrated increased levels of the cytokines – IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ^Citation83 . This has been further corroborated in similar studies done elsewhere.^Citation84

While CSs have been previously reported during SARS-CoV and MERS, this is neither novel nor unique to Co-V infections alone.^Citation85 Cytokine storms have been reported in several viral infections including influenza infection caused by H5N1^Citation86 H1N1 viruses.^Citation87 While the severity of COVID-19 disease manifestation is more commonly seen in immunosuppressed individuals, and elderly patients with history of obesity, diabetes, renal failure, lung diseases and other comorbidities, the molecular undercurrents that contribute to disease severity is beginning to be understood.^Citation88 For instance, obese COVID-19 patients with an ongoing CS additionally release a larger subset of pro-inflammatory molecules – particularly, the adipokines from their visceral fat deposits.^Citation89 Adipokines are known to affect the immune response, impair chemotaxis, and alter the differentiation of macrophages. The imbalance between the levels of anti- and pro-inflammatory adipokines produced from thoracic and visceral fat deposits are well linked to other comorbidities including but not limited to cardiovascular disease,^Citation90 nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and type 2 diabetes.^Citation91 Adipose tissue also expresses the cytokine – IL-6 receptor, as well as produces IL-6, which, obviously may be contributing factors to exaggerated disease manifestation in COVID-19-stricken obese patients.^Citation92

Abnormalities in blood coagulation pathways have also been reported in some COVID-19 patients leading to the coining of the term – COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC).^{Citation93–95} Elevated circulating levels of prothrombin, fibrinogen and D-dimer, in addition to elevated pro-inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6, are now widely accepted as the markers of CAC.^Citation96 Concomitantly, a heightened risk for inflammatory events, CS and CAS due to increased levels of IL-6 and CRP levels explained the linkage to increased mortalities in diabetic COVID-19 patients.^Citation97

The advancing age and disease severity is another undisputed factor in COVID-19 disease severity. This is explainable by a differential expression of toll-like receptors (TLRs) with advancing age. TLRs in the host tissue bind and interact with components from invading pathogens and trigger host defense responses. However, with advancing age, the changes in TLR expression and polymorphism are implicated in altered and often inadequate response to vaccines in older adults. The paradoxical increases in basal levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines – IL-8 and IL-6 which are amongst the important components of the CS during COVID-19, further lending support to altered disease manifestation with advancing age.^{Citation98–100}

Interestingly, in the pediatric cases of COVID-19, prominently pathological manifestations resemble Kawasaki-like disease. Recent investigations point to differences in T cell subsets, elevated interleukin (IL)-17A levels coinciding with high levels of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), and MMP-10 levels suggesting that arterial inflammation is a prominent pathological feature in this sub-population.^Citation101 Additionally, significant neurological characteristics were documented in a pediatric COVID-19 patient in which the symptoms appeared to correlate with a CS and reduced levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor.^Citation102

Emerging approaches with antibody-based treatments

Given the rapid generation of new research data, COVID-19 treatment is a fast-evolving topic. In the absence of efficacious antiviral drugs at the start of pandemic, much of the options were supportive or adjunct therapies. However, recently, US-FDA has granted emergency use authorization approvals for more treatment options, of which two are novel virus-neutralizing mAbs. The most current updates on the standard of care for COVID-19 are available at NIH.^Citation5 Approximately 3,600 clinical trials are currently underway worldwide. Despite this however, the most urgent missing link in the effective control of the COVID-19 pandemic is an effective and affordable antiviral drug of choice as well as supportive therapy for the clinical management of different stages of the disease.^Citation103 At present, it is widely believed that an effective treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection will emerge from a combination of the following strategies: repurposing previously approved and well-characterized antiviral drugs and/or novel and specific therapeutic molecules that directly disrupt different stages of the viral life cycle; deactivating receptor proteins located on host cells; administering fusion inhibitor peptide and protease inhibitors; administering neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2; and administering anti-ACE2 mAbs.^{Citation104–106}

Ejaz et al. have comprehensively reviewed ongoing clinical trials for different COVID-19 treatments.^Citation107 Other researchers have extensively reviewed repurposed antiviral drugs,^{Citation108,Citation109} novel antiviral agents,^{Citation110,Citation111} and SARS-CoV-2-targeting mAbs.^{Citation112–114} The present review partly focuses on the status, merits, and challenges associated with mAbs targeting CSs, and challenges associated with the development of novel antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2.

mAbs targeting components of the cytokine storm and related pro-inflammatory mediators

Cytokines are diversified groups of small proteins that mediate intercellular signaling and communication by evoking various specific cellular responses as part of the innate or adaptive immune response.^Citation115 To achieve this, cytokines act through paracrine, endocrine, and autocrine activities and receptor binding on target cells. For instance, some of the specific responses arising from cytokine stimulation include cell proliferation and differentiation, immune and inflammatory reactions, and angiogenesis.^Citation115 Although most of these effects are desirable, the excessive production of cytokines such as interferons (IFNs), interleukins (ILs), and TNF-α, along with other related groups of molecules such as chemokines and colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) may constitute “CSs,” which often lead to pathological and clinical manifestations.^Citation116 Some of these effects may become life-threatening or are associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients.^Citation116 Typically, these exaggerated inflammatory responses rapidly involve multiple organs, ultimately leading to complications such as hyperthermia, widespread fibrinous microthrombosis or disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), and eventually multiple-organ failure. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have provided a deeper insight into the individual differences linked to CSs. GWAS analyses suggest that polymorphisms within toll-like receptor 4 might play a role in increased susceptibility to certain pathogens and the severity of disease manifestation in some individuals. In fact, GWAS have identified a strong association between increased susceptibility to bacteremia, tuberculosis, and severe malaria in patients from The Gambia, Hong Kong, Kenya, Malawi, and Vietnam.^Citation117 As noted in some studies, polymorphisms in the cytokine-inducible SRC homology 2 domain protein may negatively impact cytokine signaling.^Citation118 A previous GWAS showed that certain variants in IFN-λ3 are associated with better treatment outcomes and spontaneous resolution of hepatitis C virus infections in patients of European ancestry compared with that in patients of African ancestry.^Citation119 Interestingly, comparative studies between patients with H5N1 and H1N1 infection reported elevated levels of several cytokines and related molecules, including MCP-1 (also known as CCL2), IFN-γ-inducible IP-10, MIG protein, and IL-8.^Citation120 In this study, upregulated cytokine expression during H5N1 infections was strongly correlated with adverse clinical outcomes. As a result of CSs, pathogen-induced pulmonary injury often progresses to acute lung pathology or its more severe form, acute respiratory distress syndrome.^Citation121 These complications often warrant intensive care during hospitalization of patients with more severe SARS-CoV-2 syndromes.^Citation121 One of the key drivers of proinflammatory activities during lung injury in patients is IL-1β, which is often associated with downstream mechanistic events that ultimately manifest in the form of severe bronchoalveolar pathology and edema.^Citation122 With respect to excessive cytokine release, IL-1β and TNF-α are the two perpetrator cytokines that regulate downstream molecular processes that ultimately cause severe damage to endothelial cells and associated extravasation of inflammatory cells as well as the production of secondary cytokine waves. This elevated inflammation causes widespread damage to tissue parenchyma and epithelial cells, which leads to the systemic release of large amounts of secondary cytokines, resulting in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.^Citation123 Previously, CSs in six healthy volunteers in a clinical trial resulted in the need for emergency and intensive medical care.^Citation124 This observation warrants that new COVID-19 drugs under clinical investigation must be closely monitored for such adverse events. Small-molecule drug – Anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist and several mAbs that are discussed in the later sections and listed in can manage COVID-19 associated CSs and therefore alter the course of disease and outcomes.^Citation112

Table 2. Summary of ongoing salient COVID-19 clinical trials with mAbs-targeting cytokine storms and the known adverse events of these mAbs from other approved clinical uses

Download CSV Display Table

Initial investigations in China have suggested that IL-6 is a key driver of dysregulated inflammation in COVID-19 patients, thereby implicating IL-6 as a pharmacological target for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.^{Citation172,Citation173} Other cytokines and growth factors have also been evaluated for their potential as drug targets, including granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF),^Citation174 TNF-α,^Citation175 vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),^Citation176 and IL-1β.^Citation177 The significance of CSs () during COVID-19 has been reviewed in greater detail elsewhere.^{Citation76,Citation121}

Figure 1. Simplified representation of COVID-19 pathogenic phases

(a) SARS-CoV-2 may pass through the mucous membrane of the nasal epithelium and lungs by binding to the ACE2 receptor and multiply upon entry. (b, c) The entry and replication of the virus primes antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages, B lymphocytes, and dendritic cells, which process and present viral antigens to T cells to trigger cellular immunity. Phagocytes, antigen-specific cytotoxic T cells (CD8+), and T helper cells (CD4+) interact to produce a stream of cytokines (cytokine storm). (d) T helper cells (CD4+) and naive B cells interact and process SARS-CoV-2-specific antigens to mount an antibody response. (e) Simultaneously, large-scale replication of SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs leads to immune cell infiltration, causing an increased level of cytokines in the area of infection. This pathologically manifests as vasodilation and increased capillary permeability, causing a phenomenon called cytokine storm. Vital organs of the body such as the heart, kidney, and brain also express ACE2 receptors at significant levels, which are implicated in the disease manifestation in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.ACE2: Angiotensin converting enzyme-2; APCs: Antigen-presenting cells; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2

Using therapeutic mAbs to target CSs is now recognized as a disease course-altering and viable immunotherapeutic strategy for the clinical management of critically ill patients with COVID-19, as evidenced by several clinical trials (summarized in and ). Humanized mAbs possess high epitope specificity and clinically favorable pharmacokinetic properties and are therefore ideal therapeutic tools for tackling the pathological and clinical effects associated with CSs.^Citation75 Recently, a clinical trial demonstrated that lenzilumab, a class IgG1 kappa humanized mAb targeting CSF2/G-CSF, is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection with preexisting conditions.^Citation178 Similarly, clinical investigations involving tocilizumab, an IL-6-targeting humanized mAb, showed remarkable clinical progress in 91% of patients with COVID-19.^Citation112 Interestingly, most of these patients only received a single dose which was followed by marked improvements in respiratory function, rapid defervescence, and successful discharge.^Citation112 However, cytokine-targeting mAbs are also documented to be potentially associated with adverse events.^Citation169 This may impact both the outcomes of clinical trials and post-approval use in critically ill COVID-19 patients, particularly those with comorbidities.

Figure 2. A simplified schematic illustrating the cytokine storm and monoclonal antibody (mAbs) therapeutics targeting cytokines

In response to an infectious stimulus in tissues, lymphocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and endothelial cells produce cytokines as a proinflammatory response. The exaggerated output of cytokines, termed as cytokine storm, is observed during illnesses such as viral infections, sepsis, multiple organ failure, and cancer. Targeting the cytokine storm is postulated as a disease-course altering immunotherapeutic strategy for the clinical management of critically ill patients with COVID-19. This illustration depicts a mAb targeting a specific cytokine or growth factor implicated in the pathogenesis of COVID-19.C5a: Complement component 5a; GM-CSF: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; Interleukin-6; IL-1β: Interleukin-1 beta; PK: Plasma kallikrein; IL-6: TNFα: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor

Adverse events caused by cytokine and related pro-inflammatory mediators-targeting mAbs

A questionnaire-based survey involving 1,355 patients who were undergoing treatment with cytokine-targeting mAbs for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases identified several risks associated with the immunotherapy.^Citation169 Those patients were treated with various therapeutic mAbs including adalimumab, canakinumab, infliximab, rituximab, sarilumab, and tocilizumab. In several patients, the treatment was associated with minor adverse events such as respiratory disorders, nervous system disorders, or cancer in patients with no comorbidities.^Citation169 However, in patients with preexisting comorbidities such as inflammatory rheumatic diseases, 49% (665/1,355) reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs).^Citation169 In total, approximately 1,720 ADRs were reported in patients with comorbidities, with 65% (1,116 ADRs) being musculoskeletal complaints, injection-site reactions, infections, skin reactions, fatigue, and gastrointestinal complications.^Citation169 Moreover, of the patients who developed treatment-associated ADRs, 29 (4%) required hospitalization. Patients with the following ADRs required hospitalization: infections (n = 5), cardiovascular reactions (n = 5), benign or malignant tumors (n = 4), gastrointestinal complaints (n = 2), and skin reactions (n = 2). The authors also reported a higher burden of ADRs in patients with smoking habits and in those with other comorbidities such as respiratory and psychiatric complaints.^Citation169 Collectively, the study findings suggest that ADRs develop during the clinical application of cytokine-targeting mAbs as a treatment option for COVID-19. Thus, ADRs may impede the choice of such immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients, particularly those with comorbidities. Therefore, the use of cytokine-targeting therapeutic mAbs may require constant monitoring for ADRs, thereby posing a serious challenge to the already stretched healthcare systems during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

The following sections describe each cytokine-targeting mAb currently under evaluation for the treatment of COVID-19 and provide a summary of the current clinical status and a description of the adverse events associated with these mAbs. This information is also summarized in .

Adalimumab

There are ongoing phase 3 trials investigating the anti-TNF-α mAb adalimumab (Humira®) for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Humira® was originally developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions.^Citation125 Notably, Humira® is the innovator brand of adalimumab and has at least six biosimilars.^Citation179 Although the potential benefits of adalimumab as an investigative strategy for COVID-19 treatment cannot be overemphasized, adalimumab is not without associated adverse effects, particularly in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular and liver complications. A quick review of the safety information datasheet for adalimumab suggests that refinement of the dosage and other precautions can circumvent potential adverse events associated with the drug.^Citation180 Some adverse events that have been reported in association with adalimumab treatment include a rare type of lymphoma of the liver, spleen, and bone marrow as well as heart failure.^Citation180 Furthermore, adalimumab is potentially associated with hypersensitivity reactions, reactivation of hepatitis B virus in carriers, and adverse neurological and hematological reactions.^Citation180 The co-administration of abatacept with adalimumab has been shown to lead to serious infections.^Citation180 Based on these observations, a multiplicity of ADRs could become a limiting factor in the clinical use of adalimumab in patients undergoing treatment with abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis.^Citation180 Moreover, adalimumab could potentially revive cytochrome P450 activity in patients. Therefore, it is likely that the clinical use of adalimumab for patients with COVID-19 could enhance the adverse effects of other co-administered drugs whose metabolism is dependent on the cytochrome P450 system.^Citation180

Infliximab

Infliximab (Remicade®) is a TNF-α-targeting chimeric mAb with at least seven known biosimilars.^Citation179 Infliximab has previously been administered to patients with autoimmune conditions, such as Crohn’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.^Citation143 Infliximab is associated with serious adverse events in patients who have recovered from tuberculosis or those with the latent form of the disease, those living in regions endemic to histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, and other fungal diseases, and those with diabetes mellitus or immune system problems. Following treatment of patients with COVID-19 with infliximab, adverse events ranging from recurring infections to cardiac failure and ailments, hepatitis B infections, and disorders of the nervous system such as multiple sclerosis and GBS have been reported. These events could be associated with potentially fatal side effects. Considering the potential serious nature of its ADRs, infliximab is contraindicated for use with other TNF-α-based immunotherapies such as anakira, abatacept, and tocilizumab.^Citation143 These limitations severely affect the use of infliximab as a therapeutic choice for critically ill patients with pneumonia, thereby curtailing the wide adoption of the drug as a standard of care for patients with COVID-19.

Bevacizumab

Bevacizumab is mAb that inhibits VEGF, one of the most potent growth factors that increases vascular permeability such as that observed in exudative pneumonia. Bevacizumab has entered the fray of therapeutics undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 with severe pneumonia.^{Citation131,Citation132} Furthermore, in combination with other anti-cancer drugs such as fluorouracil, fluoropyrimidine/irinotecan, and fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin, bevacizumab is indicated for the treatment of certain malignancies.^Citation133 The innovator brand for the drug is Avastin, which has at least seven biosimilars.^Citation179

A review of the prescribing information has highlighted several adverse events that may potentially limit the clinical use of bevacizumab.^Citation134 Because of the wide spectrum of such adverse reactions, bevacizumab has been contraindicated in patients undergoing major surgical procedures and in pregnant and breastfeeding women as well as those planning to get pregnant.^Citation134 Adverse events that might lead to treatment discontinuation include hypertensive crisis/hypertensive encephalopathy, congestive heart failure, and thromboembolic events.^Citation134

Lanadelumab

Lanadelumab is a human IgG1 kappa class mAb that targets plasma kallikrein and thus inhibits the generation of inflammation mediators via the kinin system.^Citation148 The FDA has designated this drug as a breakthrough therapy for the prevention and management of patients with hereditary angioedema. Pulmonary edema symptoms are often reported during the early stage of respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19, and the kallikrein–kinin pathway, specifically the generation of bradykinin, has been implicated during such pathologies in these patients.^Citation181 As previously mentioned, studies are targeting this pathway with lanadelumab as an investigational option in adult patients with COVID-19 with less than 90% oxygen saturation and an oxygen dependency of at least 3 L/min.^{Citation149,Citation150}

A review of Takhzyro’s webpage on safety information indicates that injection-site reactions are the most commonly reported adverse effect in patients treated with lanadelumab.^Citation148 Other common side effects include hypersensitivity reactions, dizziness, maculopapular rashes, myalgia, and elevated serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase. Although lanadelumab has favorable pharmacokinetic properties, the emergence of anti-drug antibodies is possible, which thus far has not been shown to impact the PK profile. However, lanadelumab is also known to produce additive effects when co-administered with C1-esterase inhibitor drugs.^Citation148

Clazakizumab

Clazakizumab is a genetically engineered and IL-6-targeting humanized IgG1 mAb that typically attains picomolar target affinities.^Citation136 Currently, clazakizumab is under investigation for blocking IL-6 to preserve renal function and minimize renal allograft loss due to antibody-mediated rejection.^Citation136 Clazakizumab is an interesting investigational drug used for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 with severe-to-critically severe pneumonia.^{Citation137–140} Recently, clazakizumab was successfully used to treat a 61-year-old patient with COVID-19, and this antibody remains a hopeful choice.^Citation182 Nevertheless, the adverse events associated with the drug remain largely uninvestigated.

Levilimab

Levilimab (BCD-089), which was developed by JCS BIOCAD (Russia), is another IL-6-targeting mAb that has been used for the treatment of several autoimmune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis. Although levilimab was previously evaluated for the treatment for various autoimmune diseases, it recently passed phase I clinical studies as a treatment for COVID-19.^Citation183 However, results from the trials of the drug for patients with arthritis remain unavailable. Nevertheless, levilimab continues to be investigated as a treatment choice for patients with severe COVID-19-related pathology.^Citation151

Olokizumab

Olokizumab is another humanized IL-6-targeting mAb that has been indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients who are unresponsive to TNF inhibitor therapy.^Citation153 In combination with the IL-1β inhibitor RPH 104, olokizumab is currently being evaluated in clinical trials involving patients with COVID-19.^Citation184 A study evaluating the safety and efficacy of olokizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis showed that patients experienced chest pain, pneumonia, perineal abscess, abnormal liver function as per test results, back pain, basal cell carcinoma, mania, and other minor adverse events.^Citation153

Siltuximab

Siltuximab is an IL-6-targeting chimeric mAb that is currently an immunotherapeutic choice for the treatment of multicentric Castleman disease in human herpesvirus-8 and HIV-negative patients. Siltuximab is currently under investigation in patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated respiratory complications.^Citation158 Some of the serious adverse events associated with siltuximab include immunosuppression that may lead to superinfections along with back and chest pain or tightness, nausea and vomiting, flushing, erythema, irregular heartbeat, breathing difficulties, wheezing, dizziness or light-headedness, lip swelling, skin rash, headache, and itching.^Citation158

Otilimab

The humanized mAb otilimab, which targets GM-CSF, is under investigation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis.^Citation156 Otilimab has emerged as an exciting investigative therapeutic alternative for TNF-α inhibitory drugs in the clinical management of severe COVID-19. However, the efficacy and safety of otilimab remain under investigation.^Citation156

Canakinumab

Canakinumab is a humanized mAb targeting IL-1β that is indicated for the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Still’s disease. Currently under investigation as a combinatorial treatment for COVID-19-associated pneumonia,^{Citation129,Citation156,Citation161–164,Citation185–189} canakinumab may inadvertently induce cytokine release syndrome.^Citation165 Additional data are expected from ongoing clinical trials in which canakinumab is being tested as combinatorial therapy with several unspecified standard of care agents for the treatment of COVID-19.^Citation185 However, as a result of IL inhibition, canakinumab is known to predispose patients to serious infections and can increase the risk for developing malignancies. Other adverse events include nasopharyngitis, diarrhea, rhinitis, nausea, headache, bronchitis, gastroenteritis, pharyngitis, musculoskeletal pain, vertigo, and weight gain.^Citation165

Avdoralimab

Avdoralimab is an mAb that targets the complement system and specifically binds and inhibits the C5a receptor, which is often overexpressed in certain tumors. Mechanistically, avdoralimab suppresses T and NK cells and ultimately impedes the activities of programmed death ligand-1 checkpoint blockers.^Citation190 C5a attracts and causes the accumulation of subsets of myeloid-derived suppressor T and NK cells.^Citation129 As an inhibitor of the C5a receptor, avdoralimab may therefore favor the anti-tumor activities of T and NK cells. As an investigational drug of choice for the treatment of COVID-19, avdoralimab is hypothesized to reduce the inflammatory responses in the lung tissue of advanced cases, potentially alleviating severe pneumonia. Several adverse events have been reported for the combination of avdoralimab and durvalumab, including fatigue, headache, hypertension, diarrhea with colic, urinary tract infections, dyspnea, muscle weakness, decreased lymphocyte counts, and anemia.^Citation129

SARS-CoV-2-targeting monoclonal antibodies

The entry of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 into host cells is enabled by the interaction of the RBD of the outer membrane-based S protein and ACE2 receptors on the host cell.^{Citation113,Citation186} As the mechanism of pre-entry viral attachment is currently universally accepted and known to involve the S protein, therefore, the S protein has inevitably become a potential target for experimental immunotherapeutic agents. Most of these agents are currently undergoing clinical trials. To date, prior research experience and abundant SARS-CoV-related data continue to inform the identification and development of efficacious SARS-CoV-2-targeting mAbs.^{Citation187–189} With advances in research, it will be important to ensure that the novel therapeutic mAbs specifically target the SARS-CoV-2-derived S protein or its recombinant versions. This is important because some potent SARS-CoV-specific neutralizing antibodies such as CR3014 and m396 have demonstrated poor avidity against the SARS-CoV-2 S protein.^{Citation104,Citation186} Compelling evidence from many COVID-19 vaccine research studies has corroborated the immunogenicity and potential immunoprotective properties of several epitopes located within the S protein.^{Citation32,Citation33} Early investigations on the affinity of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 suggest that RBD-binding antibodies are strongly correlated with the virus neutralization capability.^{Citation36,Citation37} Data from an investigation involving three antibody subsets purified from the plasma of convalescing COVID-19 patients demonstrated that virus neutralization is directed at the SARS-CoV-2-RBD.^Citation191 Collectively, these findings suggest that the S protein RBD is among the most suitable antigenic candidates and should be targeted to generate potentially neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, mAbs typically have a shorter timeline than small molecules (chemical compounds) both in terms of their development, testing, and approval.^Citation168 As research into the pathophysiology of COVID-19 continues to reveal multiple pharmacological targets, bispecific mAbs representing dual specificities, through the simultaneous combination of different antigens or epitopes, could potentially serve as viable immunotherapeutic agents.^Citation40 However, the therapeutic development and application of novel SARS-CoV-2-targeting mAbs or any disease area to produce a marketable drug product requires the fulfillment of several pharmacological and regulatory criteria.^{Citation192,Citation193} We discuss some of the key challenges facing these requirements in the later sections of this review.

Pharmacological challenges associated with the development of mAbs as drugs

When hybridoma technology was invented in 1975, it ushered in a new era of mAb development based on antibody generation from a single cell line bearing identical binding affinities for specific targets.^Citation194 Although mAbs were then perceived to be the magic bullet for the treatment of many severe diseases and disabilities, it soon became clear that they were also associated with therapeutically unfavorable pharmacokinetic properties some of which had potential for serious side effects in humans. Furthermore, as most mAbs were of murine origin, the constant region (Fc region) did not ideally engage with the human immune system to fully exert the anticipated pharmacological benefits.^Citation195 With scientific advancements, techniques that manipulated the antibody domains led to the advent of chimeric and humanized immunoglobulins with better druggable properties.^Citation196 The development of SARS-CoV-2-targeting mAbs for the clinical management of COVID-19 therefore require to meet multiple optimization criteria beyond efficacy alone.

As therapeutic molecules, mAbs are typically of xenogeneic origin and are widely known to cause hypersensitivity reactions.^Citation197 In turn, this may additively affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of therapeutic mAbs.^Citation197 Although therapeutic mAbs are systemically administered, their bioavailability is typically poor compared with that of other small molecules.^Citation170 This is possibly due to the proteolytic cleavage of mAbs within the interstitial fluid and lymphatic system. Among the various immunoglobulin isotypes, IgGs have better bioavailability because their Fc region specifically binds to Fc receptors (FcRn) to form the IgG–FcRn complex. This in turn facilitates the release of mAbs back into circulation, thereby ensuring optimal antigen–antibody interactions.^{Citation170,Citation197}

mAbs are large therapeutic molecules (~150 kDa) that are typically administered systemically by intravenous, subcutaneous, or intramuscular injections. From the injection site, absorption is achieved through lymphatic uptake, and the distribution is therefore largely restricted to vascular and interstitial fluids. Unlike small molecules, proteolysis is the process of metabolic clearance with excretion largely mediated by the FcRn receptor.^Citation197 The pharmacokinetic behavior of mAbs differs from small molecules and is typically both dose-dependent and non-linear.^Citation198 This makes the pharmacokinetic predictions for mAbs challenging. Target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) is another key parameter that complicates the development of mAbs as antiviral therapeutic agents. The binding affinities of mAbs to their target, antigen density, and antigen turnover rate could be significantly impacted by the different stages of viremia in patients with COVID-19. The uncertain factors in these patients cause a significant challenge in refining the dose as a way of achieving a therapeutically favorable pharmacokinetic profile. TMDD may also lead to extremely unpredictable and rapid removal of mAbs from circulation at non-saturable dose ranges. Additionally, the PK profiles of mAbs could be mediated by nonspecific mechanisms such as pinocytosis and phagocytosis.^Citation197 All these factors explain the extremely wide range of clearance values (90–560 mL/day) and therefore half-lives (11–30 days) of marketed mAbs. Additionally, it is challenging for mAbs to achieve a favorable distribution from the blood compartment to the peripheral tissue, making it harder to attain therapeutic concentrations. Compartmental (population) analyses of mAb pharmacokinetics have shown small values for intercompartmental clearance (Q = 20–40 mL/h), suggesting that distribution to peripheral tissues progresses slowly.^Citation199 Challenges faced in the optimization of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic parameters for mAbs are discussed elsewhere in greater detail.^{Citation170,Citation197,Citation200} Because of the multiple hurdles that must be overcome for a mAb to obtain approval as a therapeutic agent for the clinical management of patients with COVID-19, information obtained from the development of mAbs for other infectious diseases suggest that TMDD is a key determinant.

Challenges in global affordability of mAbs as drugs of choice

The cost-effectiveness of mAbs for the treatment of critical patients with COVID-19 and in general for the control of the pandemic is another significant concern, particularly in low-income countries; furthermore, whether health insurance providers will agree to insurance cover the treatment remains a concern. For instance, the annual cost for treating a patient with cancer with antibodies is approximately USD 35,000. Although the use of antibodies for critically ill patients with COVID-19 may not be as extensive, the pricing and affordability of mAbs across the economic spectrum is highly questionable.^Citation201 According to a conservative estimate from 2007, pharmaceutical companies typically invest USD 40 USD–$650 M toward the development of mAbs as therapeutic molecules.^Citation202 A retrospective analysis demonstrated that the development of mAbs typically takes approximately 7–8 years and another year for obtaining approvals from the FDA, with a possibility of priority review potentially shaving off approximately 8 months for approval.^Citation203

Generally, therapeutic mAbs for the treatment of viral diseases demonstrate a high median total cost of care, which could be another prohibitive factor. For example, palivizumab, a mAb targeting respiratory syncytial virus, has a median cost of care ranging from British £1361–£2630.^Citation204 Although palivizumab is an extremely effective drug, its availability as a prophylaxis or standard of care is unlikely in low-income countries.^Citation205

Experiences from precision medicine-based screening for Kirsten ras oncogene mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer have demonstrated that mAb-based treatments with cetuximab and panitumumab are cost-effective.^Citation206

Concluding remarks

The COVID-19 pandemic has dealt humanity a serious challenge and expediting research efforts toward development of efficacious vaccines and antivirals are the most promising options that will enable humanity to prevail over this pandemic. As we witness the approvals of many promising COVID-19 vaccine candidates, the duration it is likely to take to scale up and administer the vaccine to cover the humanity is a core challenge. Despite of vaccination coverage, there is high likelihood of COVID-19 to become established as a sporadic disease, arguably needing efficacious antiviral drugs, including therapeutic antibodies as an integral strategy for clinical management of severe COVID-19 cases. Convincing investigational evidence on the therapeutic promise of antibody-based options for controlling the viremic phase and alleviating the disease-associated pathologies suggests that this approach will be pharmacologically viable. However, an essential strategy involves the research and development of a treatment paradigm that will cluster patients with COVID-19 with preexisting conditions for the use of approved anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs or repurposed mAbs targeting cytokines. As numerous investigations continue to validate the therapeutic success of mAbs, the cost-effectiveness of the production of these drugs, the development of biosimilars to novel mAbs without patent restrictions, continuous and effective research in identifying reservoir species of CoVs, and financial support or affordable accessibility to therapeutic mAbs will dictate the global utility of these therapeutic magic bullets in controlling this pandemic.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Additional information

Funding

Authors are thankful to United Arab Emirates University for the funding this submission through a research grant (UAE-Research Start-Up 31F129).

References

Burkle FM. Declining public health protections within autocratic regimes: impact on global public health security, infectious disease outbreaks, epidemics, and pandemics. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020;35:237–46. doi:10.1017/S1049023X20000424.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Burkle FM. Political intrusions into the international health regulations treaty and its impact on management of rapidly emerging zoonotic pandemics: what history tells us. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020;35:1–5.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–33. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Johns Hopkins University and medicine. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU); 2020.
Google Scholar
NIH-What’s New in the Guidelines. COVID-19 treatment guidelines- 2020.
Google Scholar
CDC. Different COVID-19 vaccines. 2020.
Google Scholar
Mullard A. How COVID vaccines are being divvied up around the world. Nature. 2020. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03370-6
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Morris G, Bortolasci CC, Puri BK, Olive L, Marx W, O’Neil A, Athan E, Carvalho A, Maes M, Walder K, et al. The pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2: a suggested model and therapeutic approach. Life Sci. 2020;258:118166.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Saxena A. Drug targets for COVID-19 therapeutics: ongoing global efforts. J Biosci. 2020;45(1):87.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Van Riel D, De Wit E. Next-generation vaccine platforms for COVID-19. Nat Mater. 2020;19:810–12. doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0746-0.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Verkerke HP, Maier CL. Towards characterized convalescent plasma for COVID-19: the dose matters. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26:100545. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100545.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Zhou B, Zhong N, Guan Y. Treatment with convalescent plasma for influenza A (H5N1) infection. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1450–51. doi:10.1056/NEJMc070359.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Scott AM, Wolchok JD, Old LJ. Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:278–87. doi:10.1038/nrc3236.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Stolberg SG Trump and friends got coronavirus care many others couldn’t.
Google Scholar
Ledford H. The race to make COVID antibody therapies cheaper and more potent. Nature. 2020;587:18. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02965-3.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Cohen J. Update: here’s what is known about Trump’s COVID-19 treatment. Sciencemag. 2020. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/10/heres-what-known-about-president-donald-trump-s-covid-19-treatment
Google Scholar
Chames P, Van Regenmortel M, Weiss E, Baty D. Therapeutic antibodies: successes, limitations and hopes for the future. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157:220–33. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00190.x.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hartenian E, Nandakumar D, Lari A, Ly M, Tucker JM, Glaunsinger BA. The molecular virology of coronaviruses. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(37):12910–12934.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O’Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, Agha R. World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020;76:71–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kang Y, Xu S. Comprehensive overview of COVID-19 based on current evidence. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e13525. doi:10.1111/dth.13525.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Cao W, Li T. COVID-19: towards understanding of pathogenesis. Cell Res. 2020;30:367–69. doi:10.1038/s41422-020-0327-4.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Drosten C, Günther S, Preiser W, Van Der Werf S, Brodt H-R, Becker S, Rabenau H, Panning M, Kolesnikova L, Fouchier RAM, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1967–76. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa030747.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zaki AM, Van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus ADME, Fouchier RAM. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1814–20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1211721.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Wang Q, Zhang Y, Wu L, Niu S, Song C, Zhang Z, Lu G, Qiao C, Hu Y, Yuen K-Y, et al. Structural and functional basis of SARS-CoV-2 entry by using human ACE2. Cell. 2020;181(4):894–904 e9. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.045.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Letko M, Marzi A, Munster V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(4):562–69. doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Harapan H, Itoh N, Yufika A, Winardi W, Keam S, Te H, Megawati D, Hayati Z, Wagner AL, Mudatsir M, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a literature review. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(5):667–73. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.03.019.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Lan J, Ge J, Yu J, Shan S, Zhou H, Fan S, Zhang Q, Shi X, Wang Q, Zhang L, et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature. 2020;581(7807):215–20. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Vashi Y, Jagrit V, Kumar S. Understanding the B and T cell epitopes of spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2: a computational way to predict the immunogens. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;84:104382. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104382.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Walls AC, Park Y-J, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181(2):281–92 e6. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Lvov DK, Alkhovsky SV. Source of the COVID-19 pandemic: ecology and genetics of coronaviruses (Betacoronavirus: Coronaviridae) SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 (subgenus Sarbecovirus), and MERS-CoV (subgenus Merbecovirus). Vopr Virusol. 2020;65(2):62–70. doi:10.36233/0507-4088-2020-65-2-62-70.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Smith TRF, Patel A, Ramos S, Elwood D, Zhu X, Yan J, Gary EN, Walker SN, Schultheis K, Purwar M, et al. Immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine candidate for COVID-19. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2601. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16505-0.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ahmed SF, Quadeer AA, McKay MR. Preliminary identification of potential vaccine targets for the COVID-19 coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) based on SARS-CoV immunological studies. Viruses. 2020;12(3):12. doi:10.3390/v12030254.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Tai W, He L, Zhang X, Pu J, Voronin D, Jiang S, Zhou Y, Du L. Characterization of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of 2019 novel coronavirus: implication for development of RBD protein as a viral attachment inhibitor and vaccine. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(6):613–20. doi:10.1038/s41423-020-0400-4.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Shang J, Ye G, Shi K, Wan Y, Luo C, Aihara H, Geng Q, Auerbach A, Li F. Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2020;581(7807):221–24. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Yi C, Sun X, Ye J, Ding L, Liu M, Yang Z, Lu X, Zhang Y, Ma L, Gu W, et al. Key residues of the receptor binding motif in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 that interact with ACE2 and neutralizing antibodies. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(6):621–30. doi:10.1038/s41423-020-0458-z.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Premkumar L, Segovia-Chumbez B, Jadi R, Martinez DR, Raut R, Markmann A, Cornaby C, Bartelt L, Weiss S, Park Y, et al. The receptor binding domain of the viral spike protein is an immunodominant and highly specific target of antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Sci Immunol. 2020;5(48):5. doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abc8413.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kumar V. Emerging human coronavirus infections (SARS, MERS, and COVID-19): where they are leading us. Int Rev Immunol. 2020;40(1–2):45–53.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zhang XY, Huang HJ, Zhuang DL, Nasser MI, Yang MH, Zhu P, Zhao M-Y. Biological, clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19, SARS and MERS and AutoDock simulation of ACE2. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):99. doi:10.1186/s40249-020-00691-6.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Forouzesh M, Rahimi A, Valizadeh R, Dadashzadeh N, Mirzazadeh A. Clinical display, diagnostics and genetic implication of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(8):4607–15. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202004_21047.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Cascella M, Rajnik M, Cuomo A, Dulebohn SC, Di Napoli R. Features, evaluation and treatment coronavirus (COVID-19). Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020.
Google Scholar
Gulen M, Satar S. Uncommon presentation of COVID-19: gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020;44(4):e72–e76. doi:10.1016/j.clinre.2020.05.001.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Cipriani G, Danti S, Nuti A, Carlesi C, Lucetti C, Di Fiorino M. A complication of coronavirus disease 2019: delirium. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020;120(4):927–32. doi:10.1007/s13760-020-01401-7.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Abobaker A, Raba AA, Alzwi A. Extrapulmonary and atypical clinical presentations of COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2020;92(11):2458–64. doi:10.1002/jmv.26157.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, Liang HR, Chen ZS, Li YM, Liu XQ, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5):2000547.
Google Scholar
Jutzeler CR, Bourguignon L, Weis CV, Tong B, Wong C, Rieck B, Pargger H, Tschudin-Sutter S, Egli A, Borgwardt K, et al. Comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory findings, imaging features, treatment strategies, and outcomes in adult and pediatric patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;37:101825. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101825.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sarac E, Amaral T, Keim U, Leiter U, Forschner A, Eigentler TK, Garbe C. Prognostic factors in 161 patients with mucosal melanoma: a study of German Central Malignant Melanoma Registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(9):2021–25. doi:10.1111/jdv.16306.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Jackson BR, Gold JAW, Natarajan P, Rossow J, Neblett Fanfair R, Da Silva J, Wong KK, Browning SD, Bamrah Morris S, Rogers-Brown J, et al. Predictors at admission of mechanical ventilation and death in an observational cohort of adults hospitalized with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1459.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Mahumud RA, Kamara JK, Renzaho AMN. The epidemiological burden of and overall distribution of chronic comorbidities in coronavirus disease-2019 among 202,005 infected patients: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection. 2020;48(6):813–33. doi:10.1007/s15010-020-01502-8.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Du RH, Liang LR, Yang CQ, Wang W, Cao TZ, Li M, Guo GY, Du J, Zheng CL, Zhu Q, et al. Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2: a prospective cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5):2000524.
Google Scholar
Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, Cereda D, Coluccello A, Foti G, Fumagalli R, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1574. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.5394.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, Barnaby DP, Becker LB, Chelico JD, Cohen SL, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes Among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6775.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ghisolfi S, Almas I, Sandefur JC, Von Carnap T, Heitner J, Bold T. Predicted COVID-19 fatality rates based on age, sex, comorbidities and health system capacity. BMJ Global Health. 2020;5(9):5. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003094.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hashim MJ, Alsuwaidi AR, Khan G. Population risk factors for COVID-19 mortality in 93 countries. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10(3):204–08. doi:10.2991/jegh.k.200721.001.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Badawi A, Ryoo SG. Prevalence of comorbidities in the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;49:129–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2016.06.015.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Channappanavar R, Fett C, Mack M, Ten Eyck PP, Meyerholz DK, Perlman S. Sex-based differences in susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J Immunol. 2017;198(10):4046–53. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1601896.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Yang J, Zheng Y, Gou X, Pu K, Chen Z, Guo Q, Ji R, Wang H, Wang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;94:91–95. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.017.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Whittaker E, Bamford A, Kenny J, Kaforou M, Jones CE, Shah P, Ramnarayan P, Fraisse A, Miller O, Davies P, et al. Clinical characteristics of 58 children with a pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020;324(3):259–69. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.10369.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Blondiaux E, Parisot P, Redheuil A, Tzaroukian L, Levy Y, Sileo C, Schnuriger A, Lorrot M, Guedj R, Ducou Le Pointe H. Cardiac MRI of children with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19: case series. Radiology. 2020;297:202288.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Chiotos K, Bassiri H, Behrens EM, Blatz AM, Chang J, Diorio C, Fitzgerald JC, Topjian A, John ARO. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic: a case series. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020;9(3):393–98. doi:10.1093/jpids/piaa069.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Greene AG, Saleh M, Roseman E, Sinert R. Toxic shock-like syndrome and COVID-19: a case report of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Am J Emergency Med. 2020;38(11):2492.e5–2492.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.117.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of imaging findings in 919 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215(1):87–93. doi:10.2214/AJR.20.23034.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hassanzadeh K, Perez Pena H, Dragotto J, Buccarello L, Iorio F, Pieraccini S, Sancini G, Feligioni M. Considerations around the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with particular attention to COVID-19 brain infection and neurological symptoms. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11(15):2361–69. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00373.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Riggioni C, Comberiati P, Giovannini M, Agache I, Akdis M, Alves-Correia M, Antó JM, Arcolaci A, Azkur AK, Azkur D, et al. A compendium answering 150 questions on COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2. Allergy. 2020;75(10):2503–41. doi:10.1111/all.14449.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Mao L, Wang M, Chen S, He Q, Chang J, Hong C, Zhou Y, Wang D, Li Y, Jin H, et al. Neurological manifestations of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective case series study. medRxiv. 2020;2020:02.22.20026500.
Google Scholar
Kremer S, Lersy F, De Seze J, Ferre JC, Maamar A, Carsin-Nicol B, Collange O, Bonneville F, Adam G, Martin-Blondel G, et al. Brain MRI findings in severe COVID-19: a retrospective observational study. Radiology. 2020;297(2):E242–E251.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Poyiadji N, Shahin G, Noujaim D, Stone M, Patel S, Griffith B. COVID-19-associated acute hemorrhagic necrotizing encephalopathy: imaging features. Radiology. 2020;296(2):E119–E20. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020201187.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Beyrouti R, Adams ME, Benjamin L, Cohen H, Farmer SF, Goh YY, Humphries F, Jäger HR, Losseff NA, Perry RJ, et al. Characteristics of ischaemic stroke associated with COVID-19. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91(8):889–91. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2020-323586.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, Schenck M, Severac F, Clere-Jehl R, Studer A, Radosavljevic M, Kummerlen C, Monnier A, et al. Delirium and encephalopathy in severe COVID-19: a cohort analysis of ICU patients. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):491. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03200-1.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Moriguchi T, Harii N, Goto J, Harada D, Sugawara H, Takamino J, Ueno M, Sakata H, Kondo K, Myose N, et al. A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-coronavirus-2. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;94:55–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.062.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Toscano G, Palmerini F, Ravaglia S, Ruiz L, Invernizzi P, Cuzzoni MG, Franciotta D, Baldanti F, Daturi R, Postorino P, et al. Guillain-Barre syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(26):2574–76. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2009191.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hung EC, Chim SS, Chan PK, Tong YK, Ng EK, Chiu RW, Leung C-B, Sung JJY, Tam JS, Lo YMD, et al. Detection of SARS coronavirus RNA in the cerebrospinal fluid of a patient with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Chem. 2003;49(12):2108–09. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2003.025437.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Virhammar J, Kumlien E, Fallmar D, Frithiof R, Jackmann S, Skold MK, Kadir M, Frick J, Lindeberg J, Olivero-Reinius H, et al. Acute necrotizing encephalopathy with SARS-CoV-2 RNA confirmed in cerebrospinal fluid. Neurology. 2020;95(10):445–49. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000010250.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ellul MA, Benjamin L, Singh B, Lant S, Michael BD, Easton A, Kneen R, Defres S, Sejvar J, Solomon T, et al. Neurological associations of COVID-19. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(9):767–83. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30221-0.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ, Collaboration HL. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033–34. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Tang Y, Liu J, Zhang D, Xu Z, Ji J, Wen C. Cytokine storm in COVID-19: the current evidence and treatment strategies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1708. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01708.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Shimizu M. Clinical features of cytokine storm syndrome. In: Cron R, Behrens E, editors. Cytokine storm syndrome. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 31–41. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22094-5_3
Google Scholar
Wong C, Lam C, Wu A, Ip W, Lee N, Chan I, Lit LCW, Hui DSC, Chan MHM, Chung SSC, et al. Plasma inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;136(1):95–103. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02415.x.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Mahallawi WH, Khabour OF, Zhang Q, Makhdoum HM, Suliman BA. MERS-CoV infection in humans is associated with a pro-inflammatory Th1 and Th17 cytokine profile. Cytokine. 2018;104:8–13. doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2018.01.025.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Gao Y, Li T, Han M, Li X, Wu D, Xu Y, Zhu Y, Liu Y, Wang X, Wang L, et al. Diagnostic utility of clinical laboratory data determinations for patients with the severe COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2020;92(7):791–96. doi:10.1002/jmv.25770.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Chen L, Liu H, Liu W, Liu J, Liu K, Shang J, Deng Y, Wei S. Analysis of clinical features of 29 patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za zhi= Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi zazhi=. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. 2020;43:E005–E. doi:10.3760/cma.j.1001-0939.2020.0005.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chen G, Wu D, Guo W, Cao Y, Huang D, Wang H, Wang T, Zhang X, Chen H, Yu H, et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(5):2620–29. doi:10.1172/JCI137244.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sun D, Li H, Lu -X-X, Xiao H, Ren J, Zhang F-R, Liu ZS. Clinical features of severe pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan: a single center’s observational study. World J Pediatr. 2020;16(3):251–259. doi:10.1007/s12519-020-00340-w.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Buonsenso D, Di Sante G, Sali M, Group CC-S. Cytokine profile in an adolescent with pediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome temporally related to COVID-19. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39(8):e213–e5. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000002802.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Gerges Harb J, Noureldine HA, Chedid G, Eldine MN, Abdallah DA, Chedid NF, Nour-Eldine W. SARS, MERS and COVID-19: clinical manifestations and organ-system complications: a mini review. Pathog Dis. 2020;78(4):78. doi:10.1093/femspd/ftaa033.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kalaiyarasu S, Kumar M, Senthil Kumar D, Bhatia S, Dash SK, Bhat S, Khetan RK, Nagarajan S. Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus induces cytokine dysregulation with suppressed maturation of chicken monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Microbiol Immunol. 2016;60(10):687–93. doi:10.1111/1348-0421.12443.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Woo PC, Tung ET, Chan K-H, Lau CC, Lau SK, Yuen K-Y. Cytokine profiles induced by the novel swine-origin influenza A/H1N1 virus: implications for treatment strategies. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(3):346–53. doi:10.1086/649785.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Al Mutair A, Ambani Z. Narrative review of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection: updates and implications for practice. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(1):0300060519858030. doi:10.1177/0300060519858030.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Mery G, Epaulard O, Borel AL, Toussaint B, Le Gouellec A. COVID-19: underlying adipokine storm and angiotensin 1–7 umbrella. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1714. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01714.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Maury E, Brichard SM. Adipokine dysregulation, adipose tissue inflammation and metabolic syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;314(1):1–16. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.07.031.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Unamuno X, Gomez-Ambrosi J, Rodriguez A, Becerril S, Fruhbeck G, Catalan V. Adipokine dysregulation and adipose tissue inflammation in human obesity. Eur J Clin Invest. 2018;48(9):e12997. doi:10.1111/eci.12997.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sindhu S, Thomas R, Shihab P, Sriraman D, Behbehani K, Ahmad R, Stover CM. Obesity is a positive modulator of IL-6R and IL-6 expression in the subcutaneous adipose tissue: significance for metabolic inflammation. PloS One. 2015;10(7):e0133494. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133494.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zhu J, Pang J, Ji P, Zhong Z, Li H, Li B, Zhang J, Lu J. Coagulation dysfunction is associated with severity of COVID-19: a meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2021;93(2):962–72. doi:10.1002/jmv.26336.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Lin J, Yan H, Chen H, He C, Lin C, He H, Zhang S, Shi S, Lin K. COVID-19 and coagulation dysfunction in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2021;93(2):934–44. doi:10.1002/jmv.26346.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Asakura H, Ogawa H. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Int J Hematol. 2021;113(1):45–57. doi:10.1007/s12185-020-03029-y.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Connors JM, Levy JH. COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation. Blood J Am Soc Hematol. 2020;135:2033–40.
Google Scholar
Guo W, Li M, Dong Y, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Tian C, Qin R, Wang H, Shen Y, Du K, et al. Diabetes is a risk factor for the progression and prognosis of COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(7):e3319. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3319.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Pinti M, Appay V, Campisi J, Frasca D, Fülöp T, Sauce D, Larbi A, Weinberger B, Cossarizza A. Aging of the immune system: focus on inflammation and vaccination. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46(10):2286–301. doi:10.1002/eji.201546178.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hamann L, Kupcinskas J, Berrocal Almanza LC, Skieceviciene J, Franke A, Nothlings U, Schumann RR. Less functional variants of TLR-1/-6/-10 genes are associated with age. Immun Ageing. 2015;12(1):7. doi:10.1186/s12979-015-0034-z.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Van Duin D, Mohanty S, Thomas V, Ginter S, Montgomery RR, Fikrig E, Allore HG, Medzhitov R, Shaw AC. Age-associated defect in human TLR-1/2 function. J Immunol. 2007;178(2):970–75. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.178.2.970.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Consiglio CR, Cotugno N, Sardh F, Pou C, Amodio D, Rodriguez L, Tan Z, Zicari S, Ruggiero A, Pascucci GR, et al. The immunology of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children with COVID-19. Cell. 2020;183(4):968–981.e7. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.016.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
De Paulis M, Oliveira DBL, Vieira RP, Pinto IC, Machado RRG, Cavalcanti MP, Soares CP, De Araujo AMP, Araujo DB, Bachi ALL, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 with neurologic manifestations in a child: a brief report. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39(10):e321–e4. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000002834.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Statista. Number of registered COVID-19 clinical trials worldwide October 19, 2020, by region Published by Statista Research Department. 2019 Oct 19.
Google Scholar
AminJafari A, Ghasemi S. The possible of immunotherapy for COVID-19: a systematic review. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;83:106455. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106455.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Badani H, Garry RF, Wimley WC. Peptide entry inhibitors of enveloped viruses: the importance of interfacial hydrophobicity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1838(9):2180–97. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.04.015.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Wang Z, Chen X, Lu Y, Chen F, Zhang W. Clinical characteristics and therapeutic procedure for four cases with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia receiving combined Chinese and Western medicine treatment. Biosci Trends. 2020;14(1):64–68. doi:10.5582/bst.2020.01030.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ejaz K, Kauser T, Siddiqa A. Comprehensive overview of COVID-19 clinical trials. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(Suppl 3):S158–S61. doi:10.5455/JPMA.37.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Santos SGVRC. Clinical trials on drug repositioning for COVID-19 treatment. Pan Am J Public Health. 2020;44:7.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Boopathi S, Poma AB, Kolandaivel P. Novel 2019 coronavirus structure, mechanism of action, antiviral drug promises and rule out against its treatment. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2020;1–10. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1758788
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Joshi MG, Kshersagar J, Desai SR, Sharma S. Antiviral properties of placental growth factors: a novel therapeutic approach for COVID-19 treatment. Placenta. 2020;99:117–30. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2020.07.033.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Chen S-J, WaY CC, Chen Y-C. Novel antiviral strategies in the treatment of COVID-19: a review. Microorganisms. 2020;8(9). doi:10.3390/microorganisms8091259.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Xu X, Han M, Li T, Sun W, Wang D, Fu B, Zhou Y, Zheng X, Yang Y, Li X, et al. Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(20):10970–75. doi:10.1073/pnas.2005615117.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Shanmugaraj B, Siriwattananon K, Wangkanont K, Phoolcharoen W. Perspectives on monoclonal antibody therapy as potential therapeutic intervention for Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2020;38(1):10–18. doi:10.12932/AP-200220-0773.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Jahanshahlu L, Rezaei N. Monoclonal antibody as a potential anti-COVID-19. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;129:110337. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110337.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Tisoncik JR, Korth MJ, Simmons CP, Farrar J, Martin TR, Katze MG. Into the eye of the cytokine storm. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76(1):16–32. doi:10.1128/MMBR.05015-11.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Suntharalingam G, Perry MR, Ward S, Brett SJ, Castello-Cortes A, Brunner MD, Panoskaltsis N. Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(10):1018–28. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa063842.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Band G, Le QS, Clarke GM, Kivinen K, Hubbart C, Jeffreys AE, Rowlands K, Leffler EM, Jallow M, Conway DJ, et al. Insights into malaria susceptibility using genome-wide data on 17,000 individuals from Africa, Asia and Oceania. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5732.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Khor CC, Vannberg FO, Chapman SJ, Guo H, Wong SH, Walley AJ, Vukcevic D, Rautanen A, Mills TC, Chang K-C, et al. CISH and susceptibility to infectious diseases. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2092–101. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0905606.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ge D, Fellay J, Thompson AJ, Simon JS, Shianna KV, Urban TJ, Heinzen EL, Qiu P, Bertelsen AH, Muir AJ, et al. Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance. Nature. 2009;461(7262):399–401. doi:10.1038/nature08309.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
De Jong MD, Simmons CP, Thanh TT, Hien VM, Smith GJ, Chau TN, Hoang DM, Van Vinh Chau N, Khanh TH, Dong VC, et al. Fatal outcome of human influenza A (H5N1) is associated with high viral load and hypercytokinemia. Nat Med. 2006;12(10):1203–07. doi:10.1038/nm1477.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Bhaskar S, Sinha A, Banach M, Mittoo S, Weissert R, Kass JS, Rajagopal S, Pai AR, Kutty S. Cytokine storm in COVID-19-immunopathological mechanisms, clinical considerations, and therapeutic approaches: the REPROGRAM consortium position paper. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1648. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01648.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Pugin J, Ricou B, Steinberg KP, Suter PM, Martin TR. Proinflammatory activity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids from patients with ARDS, a prominent role for interleukin-1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153(6):1850–56. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.153.6.8665045.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Wang H, Ma S. The cytokine storm and factors determining the sequence and severity of organ dysfunction in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Am J Emergency Med. 2008;26(6):711–15. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.031.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
St Clair EW. The calm after the cytokine storm: lessons from the TGN1412 trial. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(4):1344–47. doi:10.1172/JCI35382.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION ABOUT HUMIRA® (adalimumab). Humira, Adalimumab; 2002.
Google Scholar
Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT)- RCT20171105037262N4. Evaluation of adalimumab effect on clinical symptoms including respiratory distress, oxygen saturation and lung involvement of patients with COVID-19. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT); 2020.
Google Scholar
Biosimilars of adalimumab. Biosimilars of adalimumab. 2014.
Google Scholar
AVID-CC trial-ISRCTN33260034. Adalimumab for coronavirus in community care. 2020.
Google Scholar
Massard C, Cassier P, Bendell J, Marie D, Bléry M, Morehouse C, Ascierto M, Zerbib R, Mitry E, Tolcher A. Preliminary results of STELLAR-001, a dose escalation phase I study of the anti-C5aR, IPH5401, in combination with durvalumab in advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:v492.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT0437136. Avdoralimab an Anti-C5aR antibody, in patients with COVID-19 severe pneumonia (FORCE). 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04305106. Bevacizumab in severe or critically severe patients with COVID-19 pneumonia-RCT (BEST-RCT). 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04275414. Bevacizumab in severe or critical patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (BEST-CP). 2020.
Google Scholar
Biosimilars of bevacizumab. Biosimilars of bevacizumab. 2014.
Google Scholar
Important Safety Information & indication. avastin (bevacizumab) 100mg/4ml injection for IV use. 2004.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04344782. Trial evaluating efficacy and safety of Bevacizumab (Avastin®/Zeribev®) in patients with COVID-19 infection, nested in the Corimmuno-19 Cohort. 2020.
Google Scholar
Interleukin-6: A Key Player in Antibody-Mediated Rejection (ABMR). Antibody-mediated rejection: the most common cause of kidney allograft failure.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04494724. Clazakizumab vs. Placebo - COVID-19 infection. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04381052. Study for the use of the IL-6 inhibitor clazakizumab in patients with life-threatening COVID-19 infection. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04363502. Use of the interleukin-6 inhibitor clazakizumab in patients with life-threatening COVID-19 infection. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04348500. Clazakizumab (Anti-IL- 6 Monoclonal) compared to placebo for COVID19 disease. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04343989. A randomized placebo-controlled safety and dose-finding study for the use of the IL-6 inhibitor clazakizumab in patients with life-threatening COVID-19 infection. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04659772.A randomized placebo-controlled safety and dose-finding study for the use of the Il-6 inhibitor clazakizumab in patients with life-threatening COVID-19 infection. 2020.
Google Scholar
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION. Remicade (Infliximab). 1998.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04425538. A phase 2 trial of infliximab in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04344249. Cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease during COVID-19 pandemic. 2020.
Google Scholar
Biosimilars of infliximab. Biosimilars of infliximab. 2015.
Google Scholar
Amgen’s Fourth FDA Approval From Biosimilars Portfolio. FDA approves Amgen’s AVSOLA™ (infliximab-axxq), for the same indications as Remicade® (infliximab). 2019.
Google Scholar
A FIRST-OF-ITS-KIND PREVENTIVE TREATMENT FOR HAE. Takhzyro (Lanadelumab subcutaneous injection).
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04422509. Lanadelumab for treatment of COVID-19 disease. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04460105. Lanadelumab in participants hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. 2020.
Google Scholar
Levilimab - Biocad. Levilimab – Biocad.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04397562. A clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of levilimab (BCD-089) in patients with severe COVID-19. 2020.
Google Scholar
Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Furst D, Janssen N, Carter J, Dasgupta B, Bryson J, Duncan B, Zhu W, Pitzalis C, et al. Efficacy and safety of olokizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitor therapy: outcomes of a randomised phase IIb study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(9):1607–15. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204760.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04452474. Study of the efficacy and safety of a single administration of olokizumab vs. placebo in addition to standard treatment in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19). 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04380519. An international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, adaptive placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of a single administration of olokizumab and RPH-104 with standard therapy in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). 2020.
Google Scholar
Otilimab (MOR103/GSK3196165). Otilimab (MOR103/GSK3196165) is a fully human HuCAL antibody directed against GM-CSF out-licensed to GSK in clinical development for inflammatory diseases.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04376684. Investigating otilimab in patients with severe pulmonary COVID-19 related disease. 2020.
Google Scholar
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION. SYLVANT (Siltuximab). 2014.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04329650. Efficacy and safety of siltuximab vs. corticosteroids in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04322188. An observational study of the use of siltuximab (SYLVANT) in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection who have developed serious respiratory complications. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04510493. Canakinumab in patients with COVID-19 and type 2 diabetes. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04476706. Canakinumab MAP in COVID-19 pneumonia with CRS. 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04365153. Canakinumab in Covid-19 cardiac injury (The three C study). 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04362813. Study of efficacy and safety of canakinumab treatment for CRS in participants with COVID-19-induced pneumonia. 2020.
Google Scholar
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION. ILARIS. 2009.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04348448. Observational study on the use of canakinumab administered subcutaneously in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. 2020.
Google Scholar
Marovich M, Mascola JR, Cohen MS. Monoclonal antibodies for prevention and treatment of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(2):131–32. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.10245.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Collins DF Enlisting monoclonal antibodies in the fight against COVID-19. 2020.
Google Scholar
Van Lint JA, Jessurun NT, Hebing RCF, Hoentjen F, Tas SW, Vonkeman HE, Van Doorn MBA, Sobels A, Spuls PI, Van Puijenbroek EP, et al. Patient-reported burden of adverse drug reactions attributed to biologics used for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Drug Saf. 2020;43(9):917–25. doi:10.1007/s40264-020-00946-z.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ovacik M, Lin K. Tutorial on monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and its considerations in early development. Clin Transl Sci. 2018;11(6):540–52. doi:10.1111/cts.12567.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Farid S. A decision-support tool for strategic decisionmaking in biopharmaceutical manufacture. UCL, ed; 2002.
Google Scholar
Liu Z, Li J, Chen D, Gao R, Zeng W, Chen S, Huang Y, Huang J, Long W, Li M, et al. Dynamic interleukin-6 level changes as a prognostic indicator in patients with COVID-19. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:1093. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.01093.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Gubernatorova EO, Gorshkova EA, Polinova AI, Drutskaya MS. IL-6: relevance for immunopathology of SARS-CoV-2. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;53:13–24. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.05.009.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Bonaventura A, Vecchie A, Wang TS, Lee E, Cremer PC, Carey B, Rajendram P, Hudock KM, Korbee L, Van Tassell BW, et al. Targeting GM-CSF in COVID-19 pneumonia: rationale and strategies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1625. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01625.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ye W, Lu S, Xue A. The potential role of TNFalpha in 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia. Respir Med Case Rep. 2020;30:101087. doi:10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101087.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Teuwen LA, Geldhof V, Pasut A, Carmeliet P. COVID-19: the vasculature unleashed. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(7):389–91. doi:10.1038/s41577-020-0343-0.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Nile SH, Nile A, Qiu J, Li L, Jia X, Kai G. COVID-19: pathogenesis, cytokine storm and therapeutic potential of interferons. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;53:66–70. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.05.002.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Temesgen Z, Assi M, Vergidis P, Rizza SA, Bauer PR, Pickering BW, Razonable RR, Libertin CR, Burger CD, Orenstein R, et al. First clinical use of lenzilumab to neutralize GM-CSF in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. medRxiv. 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.06.08.20125369.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
FDA-Approved Biosimilar Products. Biosimilar product information. 2020.
Google Scholar
Humira. Humira, Adalimumab.
Google Scholar
Van de Veerdonk FL, Netea MG, Van Deuren M, Van der Meer JW, De Mast Q, Bruggemann RJ, Van Der Hoeven H. Kallikrein-kinin blockade in patients with COVID-19 to prevent acute respiratory distress syndrome. Elife. 2020;9:9. doi:10.7554/eLife.57555.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Vaidya G, Czer LSC, Kobashigawa J, Kittleson M, Patel J, Chang D, Kransdorf E, Shikhare A, Tran H, Vo A, et al. Successful treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with clazakizumab in a heart transplant recipient: a case report. Transplant Proc. 2020;52(9):2711–14. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.06.003.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT03455842. The BCD-089 (aIL6R) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (AURORA). 2018.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT04380519. Study of the efficacy and safety of a single administration of olokizumab and RPH-104 with standard therapy in patients with severe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19). 2020.
Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04362813. Study of efficacy and safety of canakinumab treatment for CRS in participants with COVID-19-induced pneumonia (CAN-COVID). 2020.
Google Scholar
Tian X, Li C, Huang A, Xia S, Lu S, Shi Z, Lu L, Jiang S, Yang Z, Wu Y, et al. Potent binding of 2019 novel coronavirus spike protein by a SARS coronavirus-specific human monoclonal antibody. Emergency Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):382–85. doi:10.1080/22221751.2020.1729069.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Parray HA, Chiranjivi AK, Asthana S, Yadav N, Shrivastava T, Mani S, Sharma C, Vishwakarma P, Das S, Pindari K, et al. Identification of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain-directed human monoclonal antibody from a naive semisynthetic library. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(36):12814–21. doi:10.1074/jbc.AC120.014918.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kreye J, Reincke SM, Kornau HC, Sanchez-Sendin E, Corman VM, Liu H, Yuan M, Wu NC, Zhu X, Lee CCD, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody protects from lung pathology in a COVID-19 hamster model. bioRxiv. 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.08.15.252320.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Huo J, Le Bas A, Ruza RR, Duyvesteyn HME, Mikolajek H, Malinauskas T, Tan TK, Rijal P, Dumoux M, Ward PN, et al. Neutralizing nanobodies bind SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD and block interaction with ACE2. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2020;27(9):846–54. doi:10.1038/s41594-020-0469-6.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03665129. IPH5401 (Anti-C5aR) in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (STELLAR-001). 2020.
Google Scholar
Brouwer PJM, Caniels TG, Van der Straten K, Snitselaar JL, Aldon Y, Bangaru S, Torres JL, Okba NMA, Claireaux M, Kerster G, et al. Potent neutralizing antibodies from COVID-19 patients define multiple targets of vulnerability. Science. 2020;369(6504):643–50. doi:10.1126/science.abc5902.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Lu RM, Hwang YC, Liu IJ, Lee CC, Tsai HZ, Li HJ, Wu HC. Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27:1.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sifniotis V, Cruz E, Eroglu B, Kayser V. Current advancements in addressing key challenges of therapeutic antibody design, manufacture, and formulation. Antibodies (Basel). 2019;8(2):8. doi:10.3390/antib8020036.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Parray HA, Shukla S, Samal S, Shrivastava T, Ahmed S, Sharma C, Kumar R. Hybridoma technology a versatile method for isolation of monoclonal antibodies, its applicability across species, limitations, advancement and future perspectives. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;85:106639. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106639.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Salazar E, Perez KK, Ashraf M, Chen J, Castillo B, Christensen PA, Eubank T, Bernard DW, Eagar TN, Long SW, et al. Treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with convalescent plasma. Am J Pathol. 2020;190(8):1680–90. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.05.014.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zhang C. Hybridoma technology for the generation of monoclonal antibodies. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;901:117–35.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ryman JT, Meibohm B. Pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(9):576–88. doi:10.1002/psp4.12224.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Glassman PM, Balthasar JP. Physiologically-based modeling of monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics in drug discovery and development. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019;34(1):3–13. doi:10.1016/j.dmpk.2018.11.002.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Keizer RJ, Huitema AD, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(8):493–507. doi:10.2165/11531280-000000000-00000.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Wang-Lin SX, Balthasar JP. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for the use of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of bacterial infections. Antibodies (Basel). 2018;7(1):7. doi:10.3390/antib7010005.
Google Scholar
Farid S A decision-support tool for simulating the process and business perspectives of biopharmaceutical manufacture [PhD Thesis]. University of London. 2002.
Google Scholar
Farid SS. Process economics of industrial monoclonal antibody manufacture. J Chromatogr B. 2007;848(1):8–18. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.07.037.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Natanson L. New report shows monoclonal antibody development times are lengthening.
Google Scholar
Prescott WA, Doloresco F, Brown J, Paladino JA. Cost effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis. PharmacoEconomics. 2010;28(4):279–93. doi:10.2165/11531860-000000000-00000.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Andabaka T, Nickerson JW, Rojas-Reyes MX, Rueda JD, Vrca VB, Barsic B. Monoclonal antibody for reducing the risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children. Evidence-Based Child Health. 2013;8(6):2243–376. doi:10.1002/ebch.1950.
Google Scholar
Lange A, Prenzler A, Frank M, Kirstein M, Vogel A, Von der Schulenburg JM, Von Der Schulenburg JM. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(1):40–49. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.008.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Perspectives on the use and risk of adverse events associated with cytokine-storm targeting antibodies and challenges associated with development of novel monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of COVID-19 clinical cases

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Table 1. Summary of advantages and disadvantages of mAb-based therapeutic strategies

Virology, pathogenesis, and clinical symptoms

Comorbidities associated with COVID-19

Vulnerability of children

COVID-19 is spawning a neurological pandemic

Cytokine storm, comorbidities and COVID-19

Emerging approaches with antibody-based treatments

mAbs targeting components of the cytokine storm and related pro-inflammatory mediators

Table 2. Summary of ongoing salient COVID-19 clinical trials with mAbs-targeting cytokine storms and the known adverse events of these mAbs from other approved clinical uses

Adverse events caused by cytokine and related pro-inflammatory mediators-targeting mAbs

Adalimumab

Infliximab

Bevacizumab

Lanadelumab

Clazakizumab

Levilimab

Olokizumab

Siltuximab

Otilimab

Canakinumab

Avdoralimab

SARS-CoV-2-targeting monoclonal antibodies

Pharmacological challenges associated with the development of mAbs as drugs

Challenges in global affordability of mAbs as drugs of choice

Concluding remarks

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Perspectives on the use and risk of adverse events associated with cytokine-storm targeting antibodies and challenges associated with development of novel monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of COVID-19 clinical cases

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Table 1. Summary of advantages and disadvantages of mAb-based therapeutic strategies

Virology, pathogenesis, and clinical symptoms

Comorbidities associated with COVID-19

Vulnerability of children

COVID-19 is spawning a neurological pandemic

Cytokine storm, comorbidities and COVID-19

Emerging approaches with antibody-based treatments

mAbs targeting components of the cytokine storm and related pro-inflammatory mediators

Table 2. Summary of ongoing salient COVID-19 clinical trials with mAbs-targeting cytokine storms and the known adverse events of these mAbs from other approved clinical uses

Adverse events caused by cytokine and related pro-inflammatory mediators-targeting mAbs

Adalimumab

Infliximab

Bevacizumab

Lanadelumab

Clazakizumab

Levilimab

Olokizumab

Siltuximab

Otilimab

Canakinumab

Avdoralimab

SARS-CoV-2-targeting monoclonal antibodies

Pharmacological challenges associated with the development of mAbs as drugs

Challenges in global affordability of mAbs as drugs of choice

Concluding remarks

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

Additional information

Funding

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date