Skip to main content

Democracy with an ‘E’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cyberdemocracy

Abstract

This book is about the possibilities that cyberdemocracy can offer in expanding both the political landscape and suffrage to citizens. Towards the end of this chapter, there is a section titled ‘Making a Path for Cyberdemocracy’, hence adding ‘E’ to the title. But before we get there, it is necessary to briefly dip into history, particularly of the emergence of a form of democracy in Ancient Athens before examining modern democracy and some of the issues therein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Chomsky (1989, 2002) asks ‘why are we fixated on representative systems? Because this is a clever way for capitalists to circumvent substantive democracy replacing it with an illusory democratic system that they can manipulate while appeasing the masses, lending the system a semblance of legitimacy’ (Asimakopoulos, 2016, p. 18).

Bibliography

  • Asimakopoulos, J. (2016). Against the Grain: The British Far Left from 1956. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blockmans, S., & Russack, S. (2019). Representative democracy in the EU: Recovering legitimacy. CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2005). The network society: From knowledge to policy. In M. Castells & G. Cardoso (Eds.), The network society: From knowledge to policy. Center for Transatlantic Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1989). Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies. Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2002). Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. New York, NY: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creeber, G. (2009). Digital theory: Theorizing new media. Digital cultures. Understanding New Media, pp. 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijck, J., Waal, M., & Poell, T. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fajemisin, J. O. (2012). Cyber-democracy and its impact on politics. Humanities and Social Sciences Review, 1(3), 435–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, M. (2005). Democracy as human rights: Freedom and equality in the age of globalization. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1964). Being and time. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, N. (2009). Gender, class, and freedom in modern political theory. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. (1998). Pericles of Athens and the birth of democracy. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in science and technology, 32(3), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (2007a). Capitalism and metaphysics. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(5), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government. London, UK: Awnsham Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober, J. (2011). Political dissent in democratic Athens: intellectual critics of popular rule. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). The Social Contract. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Marc-Michel Rey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silier, Y. (2017). Freedom: Political, metaphysical, negative and positive. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, J., & Van Ham, C. (2017). A legitimacy crisis of representative democracy? In C. Van Ham, J. Thomassen, K. Aarts, & R. Andeweg (Eds.), Myth and reality of the legitimacy crisis. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, C. W. (2012). Reason’s dark champions: Constructive strategies of sophistical argument. University of South Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, A. G. (2000). Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in cyberspace. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karem, H. (2023). Democracy with an ‘E’. In: Cyberdemocracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27544-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics