Abstract
Scholars engaging in comparative historical analysis rely on observational data. The use of these data to analyze causal factors is affected by a number of problems that follow from studying historical developments. First, scholars often face a dearth of data which inhibits both large-n statistical analysis and in-depth qualitative analysis of individual cases. Second, scholars often confront the problem of historical diffusion, a problem that is in itself aggravated by the absence of good historical data. Against this backdrop, this paper devises a “middle-range” framework based on congruence analysis. This framework includes considerations about case selection in the face of diffusion and about the kind of within-case evidence that allows scholars to analyze the causes of political change. The framework devises a systematic way of converting narrative historical descriptions into within-case binary observations. This conversion allows other scholars to replicate the analysis in a transparent way and to probe the validity of the scoring based on the sources referred to. The framework is illustrated via empirical analysis of the origins and development of representative institutions in the medieval Crown of Aragon.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
-
See Lange (2012) for an overview of these methods in comparative historical analysis.
-
There are a series of standard ways to address the problem of diffusion in quantitative comparative historical analysis of the advent of or variation in representative institutions. These include clustering standard errors on regions (e.g., Scandinavia or the Iberian Peninsula), modeling diffusion as convergence by controlling for the initial scores of the political institutions that enter the analysis, and including a variable measuring institutions in neighboring countries. All these techniques are valuable but they cannot substitute for genuinely controlling for diffusion.
-
The dearth of historical data has wider ramifications for both quantitative and qualitative analysis of historical processes of political change. It impedes both the attempt to validly score the dependent variable and key explanatory factors across a larger number of cases and the attempt to carry out, for instance, in-depth process tracing in singular cases. That is, it is not only relevant for the attempt to deal with diffusion. In this more general respect, too, the proposed congruence analysis has a competitive edge.
-
Indeed, it is quite difficult to delimit the political units of the Middle Ages, which were still not genuinely characterized by territoriality (Poggi 1990), in a meaningful way in comparative analysis. Many analyses have used later nation states as the unit (e.g. Stasavage 2010), something that is highly problematical confronted with the shifting sands of medieval and early modern Europe (but see Abramson and Boix 2014).
-
This is not far from the actual situation, although we do not appreciate aspects of Stasavage’s (2010) claim that there were geographical barriers for representation, meaning that smaller units—in spatial terms—would see more often convocations and stronger representative institutions or Boucoyannis’s (2015) claim that state capacity was a prerequisite for representation. That said, Stasavage’s claim shares similarities with the warfare and taxation perspective and Boucoyannis’s claim shares similarities with the public order perspective, which underscores that the partition is close to being exhaustive.
-
I here take”taxation” to include “coinage”, that is, the tax which the monarchs received against a promise not to debase the coinage (see Møller 2016).
References
Abramson, S., Boix, C.: The Roots of the Industrial Revolution: political Institutions or (Socially-Embedded) Know-How? Working paper, Princeton University (2014).
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.: The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(5), 1369–1401 (2001)
Bartolini, S.: On time and comparative research. J. Theor. Polit. 5, 131–167 (1993)
Beach, D., Pedersen, RP.: Causal case studies : foundations and guidelines for comparing, matching and tracing. Ann Habor: University of Michigan Press, p. 370 (2016)
Bisson, T.N.: The Crisis of the Twelfth Century: Power, Lordship, and the Origins of European Government. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)
Blaydes, L., Chaney, E.: The feudal revolution and Europe’s rise: political divergence of the Christian west and the Muslim world before 1500 CE. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107, 16–34 (2013)
Blatter, J., Blume, T.: In search of co-variance, causal mechanisms or congruence towards a plural understanding of case studies. Swiss Polit. Sci. Rev. 14(2), 315–356 (2008)
Boucoyannis, D.A.: No taxation of elites, no representation: state capacity and the origins of representation. Polit. Soc. 43, 303–332 (2015)
Boix, C.: Democracy, development, and the international system. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 105(4), 809–828 (2011)
Capoccia, G., Ziblatt, D.: The historical turn in democratization studies: a new research agenda for Europe and beyond. Comp. Polit. Stud. 43(8/9), 931–968 (2010)
Carr, E.H.: What is History? (1990[1961])
Cerda, J.M.: The assemblies of Alfonso VIII of Castile: burgos (1169) to Carrión (1188). J. Med. Iber. Stud. 3(1), 61–77 (2011)
Coppedge, M.: Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
Ertman, T.: Birth of the Leviathan: building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
Finer, S.E.: The History of Government II. The Intermediate Ages. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997a)
Finer, S.E.: The History of Government III: Empires, Monarchies, and the Modern State. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997b)
Fischer, D.H.: Historians’ Fallacies: toward a Logic of Historical Thought, p. 1971. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1970)
George, A., Bennett, A.: Case Study and Theory Development. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Gerring, J.: Large-N Observational data analysis (aka Messy Data): a modest defense. Qual. Multi-Method Res. 9(1), 8–17 (2011)
Hall, J.A.: Powers & Liberties: the Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1985)
Haggard, S., Kaufman, R.R.: Inequality and regime change: democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106(03), 495–516 (2012)
Hedström, P., Swedberg, R.: Social mechanisms. Acta Soc. 39, 281–308 (1998)
Hintze, O.: Typologie der ständischen Verfassungen des Abenlandes. In: Hintze, O. (ed). Staat und Verfassung vol. I. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht (1962 [1930])
Hintze, O.: The Preconditions of Representative Government in the Context of World History,” in The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze. Oxford University Press, New York (1975 [1931])
Kagay, D.J.: The Development of the Cortes in the Crown of Aragon, 1064–1327. ETD Collection for Fordham University (1981)
Kagay, D.J.: Structures of baronial dissent and revolt under James I (1213-76). Mediaevistik 1, 61–85 (1988)
Kokkonen, A., Sundell, A.: Delivering stability—primogeniture and autocratic survival in European Monarchies 1000–1800. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 108(02), 438–453 (2014)
Lange, M.: Comparative-Historical Methods. London, Sage (2012)
Lijphart, A.: Comparative politics and the comparative method. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 65, 682–693 (1971)
Maddicott, J.R.: The Origins of the English Parliament, 924–1327. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Mann, M.: The Sources of Social Power: a History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Mahoney, J.: Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory Soc. 29, 507–548 (2000)
Mahoney, J., Rueschemeyer, D.: Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Marongiu, A.: Medieval Parliaments: a Comparative Study, vol. 32. Eyre & Spottiswoode, London (1968)
McDonald, T.J.: The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. The University of Michigan Press, Michigan (1996)
Myers, A.R.: Parliaments and Estates in Europe to 1789. Thames and Hudson, London (1975)
Møller, J.: Why Europe avoided hegemony: a historical perspective on the balance of power. Int. Stud. Q. 58(4), 660–670 (2014)
Møller, J.: Composite and loose concepts, historical analogies, and the logic of control in comparative historical analysis. Sociological Methods & Research (online first) (2015)
Møller, J.: The birth of representative institutions: the case of the crown of Aragon. Soc. Sci. Hist. forthcoming (2016)
Møller, J., Skaaning, S.-T.: The ulysses principle: ways of avoiding bias and securing transparency when engaging with the narrative work of historians. Unpublished working paper (2016)
O’Callaghan, J.F.: A History of Medieval Spain. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1975)
O’Callaghan, J.F.: The Cortes of Castile-Léon 1188–1350. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1989)
Poggi, G.: The Development of the Modern State: a Sociological Introduction. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1978)
Poggi, G.: The State Its Nature. Development and Prospects. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1990)
Procter, E.S.: Curia and Cortes in León and Castile 1072–1295. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980)
Sartori, G.: Comparing and miscomparing. J. Theor. Polit. 3, 243–257 (1991)
Schumpeter, J.A. The Crisis of the Tax State. In: Richard, S., Schumpeter, J.A. (eds.) The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, pp. 99–140. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1991 [1917/1918])
Sekhon, J.: Opiate for the matches: matching models for causal inference. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 12, 487–508 (2009)
Sewell, W.H.: Three Temporalities: toward an eventful sociology. In: McDonald, T.J. (ed.) The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, pp. 245–80. The University of Michigan Press, Michigan (1996)
Skocpol, T.: States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1979)
Skocpol, T., Somers, Margaret.: The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 22, 174–197 (1980)
Stasavage, d: When distance mattered: geographic scale and the development of European Representative Assemblies. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104(4), 625–643 (2010)
Stasavage, D.: States of Credit: size, Power, and the Development of European Polities. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)
Stasavage, D.: Representation and consent why they arose in Europe and not elsewhere. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 19, 145–162 (2016)
Te Brake, W.: Shaping History: Ordinary People in European Politics, 1500–1700. University of California Press, Berkeley (1998)
Thelen, K.: Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2, 369–404 (1999)
Tierney, B.: Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought, 1150–1650. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Tilly, C.: Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1984)
Tilly, C.: Coercion, Capital, and European States AD 990–1990. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge (1991)
Van Evera, S.: Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Cornell University Press, London (1997)
Van Zanden, J.L., Buringh, E., Bosker, M.: The rise and decline of European parliaments, 1188–17891. Econ. Hist. Rev. 65(3), 835–861 (2012)
Vincent, N.: Magna Carta: a Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Acknowledgments
I am indebted to participants at the workshop “From Transparency to Replication in Qualitative Inference”, May 23- 24, 2016 at the University of Essex for valuable input. I also wish to thanks an anonymous reviewer at Quality & Quantity. Finally, thanks to Suthan Krishnarajan for research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Møller, J. A framework for congruence analysis in comparative historical analysis of political change. Qual Quant 51, 2337–2355 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0391-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0391-5