Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“It Can’t Be Rape”: Female vs. Male Rape Myths Among Israeli Police Officers

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compared male and female Israeli police officers (n = 242) and undergraduate students (n = 273) in their perception of myths about male and female rape and the association between these myths and social attitudes toward gender roles. The results indicated that men were more likely to subscribe to myths about male and female rape, and that police officers accept myths about female rape more than students of either gender. Analysis of the regression findings shows that gender role stereotypes significantly predict acceptance of rape myths among both men and women. The implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderden MA, Ullman SE (2012) Gender difference or indifference? Detective decision making in sexual assault cases. J Interpers Violence 27(1):3–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson I (2004) Explaining negative rape victim perception: homophobia and the male rape victim. Curr Res Soc Psychol 10:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem SL (1981) Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing. Psychol Rev 88:354–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David S, Schneider O (2005) Rape perception, sex-role attitudes and victim-perpetrator acquaintance. Sex Roles J Res 53:385–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohner G, Eyssel F, Pina A, Siebler F, Viki GT (2009) Rape myth acceptance; cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of belief that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In: Horvath M, Brown J (eds) Rape; challenging contemporary thinking. Willan, Ore, pp 17–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JM, King J (1998) Gender differences in police officers attitudes towards rape: results of an exploratory study. Psychol Crime Law 4:265–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt M (1980) Cultural myths supports for rape. J Pers Soc Psychol 38:217–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt MR (1991) Rape myths. In: Parrot A, Bechhofer L (eds) Acquaintance rape: the hidden crime. John Wiley, New York, pp 26–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen G (2016) Punitive attitudes and causal attribution of crime among Israeli police officers: is there a gender gap? Psychol Crime Law 22:758–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies M, Hudson J (2011) Judgments toward male and transgendered victims in a depicted stranger rape. J Homosex 58(2):237–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies M, McCartney S (2003) Effects of gender and sexuality on judgements of victim blame and rape myth acceptance in a depicted male rape. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 13:391–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies M, Rogers P, Whitelegg L (2009a) Effects of victim gender, victim sexual orientation, victim response and respondent gender on judgements of blame in a hypothetical adolescent rape. Leg Criminol Psychol 14:331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies M, Smith R, Rogers P (2009b) Police perceptions of rape as a function of victim gender and sexuality. Police J 82:4–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies M, Gilston J, Rogers P (2012) Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. J Interpers Violence 27:2807–2823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson JF (2014) Moderation in management research: what, why, when and how. J Bus Psychol 29:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Mont J, Macdonald S, White M, Turner L (2013) Male victims of adult sexual assault: a descriptive study of survivors’ use of sexual assault treatment services. J Interpers Violence 28:2676–2604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrão MC, Gonçalves G (2015) Rape crimes reviewed: the role of observer variables in female victim blaming. Psychological Thought 8:2193–2260

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger B (2016) An inside look at Israeli police critical incident first responders. Social Science 11(4):414–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerger H, Kley H, Bohner G, Siebler F (2007) The Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) Scale: development and validation in German and English. Aggress Behav 33:422–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb A, Turner E (2012) Attribution of blame in rape cases: a review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggress Violent Behav 17:443–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond L, Ioannou M, Fewster M (2017) Perceptions of male rape and sexual assault in a male sample from the United Kingdom: barriers to reporting and the impacts of victimization. J Investig Psychol Offender Profiling 14:133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen A, Ellonen N (2016) ‘Crime or not?’–police officers’ perceptions of disciplinary violence, its criminalisation and its investigation. Polic Soc 26:503–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine B, Murphy A (2017) The impact of victim-perpetrator relationship, reputation and initial point of resistance on officers’ responsibility and authenticity ratings towards hypothetical rape cases. J Crim Just 49:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Idisis Y, Edoute A (2017) Attribution of blame to rape victims and offenders, and attribution of severity in rape cases: non-therapists and survivor and offender therapists. Int Rev Victimol 23:257–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel National Police (2017) Transparency of Police Data for 2017 Hebrew Retrieved in 30 March 2019. https://www.police.gov.il/graphskifout.aspx?mid=67

  • Javaid A (2017) Giving a voice to the voiceless: police responses to male rape. Policing: J Poli Pract 11(2):146–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LG, Beech A (2017) Rape myth acceptance in convicted rapists: a systematic review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav 34:20–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan-Zamir T, Harpaz A (2014) Police understanding of the foundations of their legitimacy in the eyes of the public: the case of commanding officers in the Israel National Police. Br J Criminol 54(3):469–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan J (2011) Here we go ‘round the review go-round: rape investigation and prosecution: are things getting worse, not better? J Sex Aggress 17:234–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassing LR, Beesley D, Frey LL (2005) Gender role conflict, homophobia, age, and education as predictors of male rape myth acceptance. J Ment Health Couns 27:311–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelaar L, Lange A, van de Velde JW (1997) The influence of positive and negative victim credibility on the assessment of rape victims: an experimental study of the expectancy–confirmation bias. Int Rev Victimol 5:61–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn A, Efrat S (2004) The coverage of rape in the Israeli popular press. Violence Against Women 10(9):1056–1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi I, Ben David S (2015) Mechanism of bystander-blaming: defensive attribution, counterfactual thinking, and gender. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 59:96–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF (1994) Rape myths in review. Psychol Women Q 18:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway KA, Welch S, Fitzgerald LF (2001) Police training in sexual assault response: process, outcomes, and elements of change. Crim Justice Behav 28(6):695–730

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean IA (2013) The male victim of sexual assault. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27(1):39–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara RP (1999) The socialization of the police. In: Kenney DJ, McNamara RP (eds) Police and policing: contemporary issues 2nd ed. Praeger, Westport, pp 309–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor A (2016) When does sexual coercion become rape? common misperceptions among students and implications for prevention. In: Paludi MA (ed) Campus action against sexual assault: needs, policies, procedures, and training programs. Praeger, California, pp 147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagoshi J, Brzuzy S, Terrell H (2012) Perceptions of gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation among transgender individuals. Fem Psychol 22:405–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Page AD (2007) Behind the blue line: investigating police officers’ attitudes toward rape. J Police Crim Psychol 22:22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Page AD (2008) Gateway to reform? Policy implications of police officers’ attitudes toward rape. Am J Crim Justice 33(1):44–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Page AD (2010) True colors: police officers and rape myth acceptance. Fem Criminol 5(4):315–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson D (2011) The linkage between secondary victimization by law enforcement and rape case outcomes. J Interpers Violence 26:328–347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez M, Sasson-Levy O (2015) Avoiding military service in a militaristic society: a chronicle of resistance to hegemonic masculinity. Peace & Change 40(4):462–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper SW (2014) Effective policing for 21st-century Israel. Israel Ministry of Public Security (No. 17), Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hemp CE (2009) POLICE women or police WOMEN? Doing gender and police work. Fem Criminol 4:114–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich K, Seffrin PM (2012) Police interviews of sexual assault reporters: does rape myth acceptance matter? Violence Vict 27:263–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sable MR, Danis F, Mauzy DL, Gallagher SK (2006) Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: perspectives of college students. J Am Coll Heal 55(3):157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarid O (2015) Assessment of anger terms in Hebrew: a gender comparison. J Psychol 149(3):303–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sasson-Levy O (2003) Feminism and military gender practices: Israeli women soldiers in “masculine” roles. Sociol Inq 73(3):440–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson-Levy O, Amram-Katz S (2007) Gender integration in Israeli officer training: degendering and regendering the military. Signs J Women Cult Soc 33(1):105–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw J, Campbell R, Cain D, Feeney H (2016) Beyond surveys and scales: how rape myths manifest in sexual assault police records. Psychology of Violence Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000072

  • Shechory Bitton M (2014) When you say “No” Do you mean it? Males rape myths among police officers and students. In: Wilchek-Aviad Y, Mazeh Y (eds) Silenced violence: men as victims (pp. 205–219). Ariel University (Hebrew), Ariel

    Google Scholar 

  • Shechory Bitton M, Ben Shaul D (2013) Perceptions and attitudes to sexual harassment: an examination of sex differences and the sex composition of the harasser–target dyad. J Appl Soc Psychol 43(10):2136–2145

    Google Scholar 

  • Shechory Bitton M, Ben-David S (2014) Elaborations on sexual assault on dates among Israeli students: risk, detrimental effect, and resilience factors. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 58(12):1500–1519

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shechory M, Idisis Y (2006) Rape myths and social distance toward sex offenders and victims among therapists and students. Sex Roles 54:651–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleath E, Bull R (2010) Male rape victim and perpetrator blaming. J Interper Violence 25:969–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleath E, Bull R (2012) Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample: differences between police officers with and without special training. Crim Justice Behav 39:642–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleath E, Bull R (2015) A brief report on rape myth acceptance: differences between police officers, law students, and psychology students in the United Kingdom. Violence Vict 30(1):136–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sleath E, Bull R (2017) Police perceptions of rape victims and the impact on case decision making: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav 34:102–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Wilkes N, Bouffard LA (2016) Rape myth adherence among campus law enforcement officers. Crim Justice Behav 43:539–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez E, Gadalla TM (2010) Stop blaming the victim: a meta-analysis on rape myths. J Interpers Violence 25:2010–2035

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot KK, Neill KS, Rankin LL (2010) Rape-accepting attitudes of university undergraduate students. J Forensic Nurs 6:170–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turchik JA, Edwards KM (2012) Myths about male rape: a literature review. Psychol Men Masculinity 13:211–226

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Bruggen M, Grubb AR (2014) A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: an analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggress Violent Behav 19:523–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Venema RM (2016) Making judgments: how blame mediates the influence of rape myth acceptance in police response to sexual assault. J Interpers Violence 1:26

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonderhaar RL, Carmody DC (2015) There are no “innocent victims” the influence of just world beliefs and prior victimization on rape myth acceptance. J Interpers Violence 30:1615–1632

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wentz E, Archbold CA (2012) Police perceptions of sexual assault victims: exploring the intra-female gender hostility thesis. Police Q 15:25–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel

    Mally Shechory Bitton

  2. The Faculty of Society and Culture, Beit Berl College, Kfar Saba, Israel

    Lea Jaeger

Authors
  1. Mally Shechory Bitton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lea Jaeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mally Shechory Bitton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest

Ethical Approval and Informed Consent

The questionnaires, procedures, informed consent forms, and instructions were reviewed and confirmed by the ethics committee of Ariel University (see the “Procedure” section).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shechory Bitton, M., Jaeger, L. “It Can’t Be Rape”: Female vs. Male Rape Myths Among Israeli Police Officers. J Police Crim Psych 35, 494–503 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09327-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09327-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation