Volume 78, Issue 2 p. 266-282
REGULAR ARTICLE

Evaluating interactions between emotion regulation strategies through the interpersonal context of female friends

Kara Alise Christensen

Corresponding Author

Kara Alise Christensen

Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

Correspondence Kara Alise Christensen, University of Kansas, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd. Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Ilana Seager van Dyk

Ilana Seager van Dyk

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew W. Southward

Matthew W. Southward

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Michael W. Vasey

Michael W. Vasey

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 July 2021
Citations: 1

Abstract

Introduction

There is a growing interest in examining how interpersonal relationships may shape associations between emotion regulation (ER) strategies and psychopathology.

Methods

We used multilevel modeling to test if respondents' self-reported intrapersonal ER, friends' self-reported intrapersonal ER, and their interaction were associated with psychopathology in a sample of 120 female friend dyads.

Results

Respondents' use of brooding rumination, expressive suppression, and worry were positively associated with respondent psychopathology. Friend reappraisal moderated the association between respondent reappraisal and respondent psychopathology. Consistent with an interference hypothesis, respondent cognitive reappraisal was only associated with respondent psychopathology when friend cognitive reappraisal was low. Consistent with a compensatory hypothesis, respondent reappraisal was primarily associated with respondent psychopathology when friend repetitive negative thought was high.

Discussion

Results support the extension of models of ER strategy interactions from intrapersonal to interpersonal contexts. Future research is needed to replicate the interference and compensatory interactions observed in the data.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/jclp.23214

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The dataset analyzed during the current study is available in the Open Science Framework repository, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/2QJVK. All code available upon request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.