Volume 38, Issue 2 p. 204-224
The IRIOP Annual Review Issue

An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability

Angela T. Hall

Corresponding Author

Angela T. Hall

Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.

Correspondence to: Angela T. Hall, School of Human Resources and Labor Relations, Michigan State University, 368 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Dwight D. Frink

Dwight D. Frink

University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
M. Ronald Buckley

M. Ronald Buckley

University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 September 2015
Citations: 142

Summary

Accountability is a fundamental element of all societies and the organizations that operate within them. This paper focuses on the individual-level accountability concept of felt accountability (also referred to in the literature as simply accountability), which can be described as the perceptions of one's personal accountability. We describe key theories that have formed the theoretical groundwork for the body of felt accountability literature, and discuss the empirical research published since the last major review of the accountability literature in the late 1990s. Empirical research has revealed that accountability has both constructive and deleterious consequences. Moreover, research examining accountability and key outcomes has produced mixed results, suggesting that consideration of moderators and nonlinear relationships are important when examining accountability. Although accountability is an important construct, there are many issues that have yet to be investigated by scholars. We identify limitations and gaps in the current body of the empirical research and conclude the paper with suggestions for scholars striving to make contributions to this line of research. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.