An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability
Corresponding Author
Angela T. Hall
Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.
Correspondence to: Angela T. Hall, School of Human Resources and Labor Relations, Michigan State University, 368 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Angela T. Hall
Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.
Correspondence to: Angela T. Hall, School of Human Resources and Labor Relations, Michigan State University, 368 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Accountability is a fundamental element of all societies and the organizations that operate within them. This paper focuses on the individual-level accountability concept of felt accountability (also referred to in the literature as simply accountability), which can be described as the perceptions of one's personal accountability. We describe key theories that have formed the theoretical groundwork for the body of felt accountability literature, and discuss the empirical research published since the last major review of the accountability literature in the late 1990s. Empirical research has revealed that accountability has both constructive and deleterious consequences. Moreover, research examining accountability and key outcomes has produced mixed results, suggesting that consideration of moderators and nonlinear relationships are important when examining accountability. Although accountability is an important construct, there are many issues that have yet to be investigated by scholars. We identify limitations and gaps in the current body of the empirical research and conclude the paper with suggestions for scholars striving to make contributions to this line of research. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
- Adelberg, S., & Batson, C. D. (1978). Accountability and helping: When needs exceed resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 343–350.
- Ammeter, A. P., Douglas, C., Ferris, G. R., & Goka, H. (2004). A social relationship conceptualization of trust and accountability in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 47–65.
10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.003 Google Scholar
- Baldridge, D. C., & Veiga, J. F. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of the willingness to request an accommodation: Can requesters' beliefs disable the Americans with Disabilities Act? Academy of Management Review, 26, 85–99.
- Bergsteiner, H. (2012). Accountability theory meets accountability practice. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
- Beu, D. S., & Buckley, M. R. (2004). Using accountability to create a more ethical climate. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 67–83.
10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.004 Google Scholar
- Breaux, D. M., Munyon, T. P., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2009). Politics as a moderator of the accountability–job satisfaction relationship: Evidence across three studies. Journal of Management, 35, 307–326.
- Breaux, D. M., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Time to try a little tenderness? The detrimental effects of accountability when coupled with abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 111–122.
10.1177/1548051808321787 Google Scholar
- Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance.
- Brief, A. P., Dukerich, J. M., & Doran, L. I. (1991). Resolving ethical dilemmas in management: Experimental investigations of values, accountability, and choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 380–396.
- Brown, C. L. (1999). Do the right thing: Diverging effects of accountability in a managerial context. Marketing Science, 18, 230–246.
- Brtek, M. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2002). Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 185–191.
- Burke, L. A., & Saks, A. M. (2009). Accountability in training transfer: Adapting Schlenker's model of responsibility to a persistent but solvable problem. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 382–402.
10.1177/1534484309336732 Google Scholar
- Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and social order. New York, NY: Scribner.
10.1037/e533602009-029 Google Scholar
- Corneille, O., Leyens, J., Yzerbyt, V., & Walther, E. (1999). Judgeability concerns: The interplay of information, applicability, and accountability in overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 377–387.
- Cropanzano, R., Chrobot-Mason, D., Rupp, D. E., & Prehar, C. A. (2004). Accountability for corporate injustice. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 107–133.
10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.006 Google Scholar
- Cummings, L. L., & Anton, R. J. (1990). The logical and appreciative dimensions of accountability. In S. Srivastava, D. Cooperrider, & Associates (Eds.), Appreciative management and leadership (pp. 257–286). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Davis, W. D., Mero, N., & Goodman, J. A. (2007). The interactive effects of goal orientation and accountability on task performance. Human Performance, 20, 1–21.
- De Cremer, D., & Bakker, M. (2003). Accountability and cooperation in social dilemmas: The influence of other's reputational concerns. Current Psychology, 22, 155–163.
- De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & Dewitte, S. (2001). ‘The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?’ The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 93–107.
- De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2009). Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of endowment asymmetry and accountability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 45–55.
- De Dreu, C. K., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 345–357.
- Dubnick, M. J. (2011). Move over, Daniel: We need some “accountability space.”. Administration & Society, 43(6), 704–716. doi:10.1177/009539971142569.
- Erdogan, B., Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., & Dunnegan, K. J. (2004). Implications of organizational exchanges for accountability theory. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 19–45.
10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.002 Google Scholar
- Ferris, G. R., Mitchell, T. R., Canavan, P. J., Frink, D. D., & Hopper, H. (1995). Accountability in human resource systems. In G. R. Ferris, S. D. Rosen, & D. T. Barnum (Eds.), Handbook of human resource management (pp. 175–196). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers.
- Ferris, G. R., Bowen, M. G., Treadway, D. C., Hochwarter, W. A., Hall, A. T., & Perrewé, P. L. (2006). The assumed linearity of organizational phenomena: Implications for occupational stress and well being. In P. L. Perrewé, & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being (Vol. 5, pp. 203–232). Oxford, UK: JAI Press/Elsevier Science.
10.1016/S1479-3555(05)05006-7 Google Scholar
- Ferris, G. R., Russ, G. S., & Fandt, P. M. (1989). Politics in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone, & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 143–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Ford, T. E., Gambino, F., Lee, H., Mayo, E., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). The role of accountability in suppressing manager's interview bias against African-American sales job applicants. The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 24, 113–124.
- Frink, D. D., & Ferris, G. R. (1998). Accountability, impression management, and goal setting in the performance evaluation process. Human Relations, 51, 1259–1283.
- Frink, D. D., & Ferris, G. R. (1999). The moderating effects of accountability on the conscientiousness–performance relationship. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 515–524.
- Frink, D. D., Hall, A. T., Perryman, A. A., Ranft, A. L., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., & Royle, M. T. (2008). A meso-level theory of accountability in organizations. In J. J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 27, pp. 177–245). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
- Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1998). Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resources management. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 16, pp. 1–50). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Ganster, D. C., & Schaubroeck, J. (1991). Work stress and employee health. Journal of Management, 17, 235–271.
- Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J., & Lim, B. C. (2004). Culture and accountability: Variations in forms of social control across cultures. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 135–160.
10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.007 Google Scholar
- Gelfand, M. J., & Realo, A. (1999). Individualism–collectivism and accountability in intergroup negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 721–736.
- Gordon, R. A., Rozelle, R. M., & Baxter, J. C. (1989). The effect of applicant age, job level and accountability on perceptions of female job applicants. Journal of Psychology, 123, 59–68.
- Green, M. C., Visser, P. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1380–1391.
- Hall, A. T., Blass, F. R., Ferris, G. R., & Massengale, R. (2004). Leader reputation and accountability: Implications for dysfunctional leader behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 515–536.
- Hall, A. T., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). Accountability and extra-role behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23, 131–144. doi:10.1007/s10672-010-9148-9.
- Hall, A. T., Ferris, G. R., Bowen, M. G., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (2007). Accountability as a perceptual lens for framing management education. Business Horizons, 50, 405–413.
10.1016/j.bushor.2007.04.005 Google Scholar
- Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., & Bowen, M. G. (2003). Accountability in human resources management. In C. A. Schriesheim, & L. Neider (Eds.), New directions in human resource management (pp. 29–63). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
- Hall, A. T., Royle, M. T., Brymer, R. A., Perrewé, P. L., Ferris, G. R., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2006). Relationship between felt accountability as a stressor and strain reactions: The neutralizing role of autonomy across two studies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 87–99.
- Hall, A. T., Zinko, R., Perryman, A. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior and reputation: Mediators in the relationships between accountability and job performance and satisfaction. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 381–392.
10.1177/1548051809331504 Google Scholar
- Hattrup, K., & Ford, J. K. (1995). The roles of information characteristics and accountability in moderating stereotype-driven processes during social decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 73–86.
- Hendricks, M., & Brickman, P. (1974). Effects of status and knowledgeability of audience on self-presentation. Sociometry, 37, 440–449.
- Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 337–421.
- Hochwarter, W. A., Ellen, E. P., & Ferris, G. R. (2014). Examining the interactive effects of accountability, politics, and voice. Career Development International, 19, 358–380.
- Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Gavin, M. B., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., & Frink, D. D. (2007). Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability–job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 226–239.
- Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., & Ferris, G. R. (2005). Negative affectivity as a moderator of the form and magnitude of the relationship between felt accountability and job tension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 517–534.
- Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. New York: Free Press.
- Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (1997). Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (POPS): A multiple sample investigation. Journal of Management, 23, 627–658.
- Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations ( 2nd ed.,, ). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.
- Klimoski, R. J. (1972). The effects of intragroup forces on intergroup conflict resolution. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 363–383.
- Klimoski, R. J., & Ash, R. A. (1974). Accountability and negotiator behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 409–425.
- Klimoski, R., & Inks, L. (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 194–208.
- Kray, L. J., George, L. G., Liljenquist, K. A., Galinksy, A. D., Tetlock, P. E., & Roese, N. J. (2010). From what might have been to what must have been: Counterfactual thinking creates meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 106–118.
- Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64, 289–313. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01211.x.
- Laird, M. D., Perryman, A. A., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., & Zinko, R. (2009). The moderating effects of personal reputation on accountability-strain relationships. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 70–83.
- Langhe, B. D., van Osselaer, S. M. J., & Wierenga, B. (2011). The effects of process and outcome accountability on judgment process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 238–252.
- Lanivich, S., Brees, J. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2010). P-E fit as a moderator of the accountability-employee reactions relationships. Convergent results across two samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 425–436.
- Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255–275.
- Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
10.1037/10019-000 Google Scholar
- Libby, T., Salterio, S. E., & Webb, A. (2004). The balanced scorecard: The effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. The Accounting Review, 79, 1075–1094.
- Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader–member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662–674.
- Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511815447 Google Scholar
- Liu, W., Friedman, R., & Hong, Y. (2011). Culture and accountability in negotiation: Recognizing the importance of in-group relations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 221–234.
- Madsen, P. M. (2013). Perils and profits: A reexamination of the link between profitability and safety in U. S. aviation. Journal of Management, 39, 763–791.
- Markham, K. D., & Tetlock, P. (2000a). “I couldn't have known”: Accountability, forseeability and counterfactual denials of responsibility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 13–325.
- Markman, K. D., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000b). Accountability and close-call counterfactuals: The loser who nearly won and the winner who nearly lost. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1213–1224.
- McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Mero, N. P., Guidice, R. M., & Brownlee, A. L. (2007). Accountability in a performance appraisal context: The effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior. Journal of Management, 33, 223–252.
- Mero, N. P., Guidice, R. M., & Werner, S. (2014). A field study of the antecedents and performance consequences of perceived accountability. Journal of Management, 40, 1627–1652.
- Mitchell, T. R., Hopper, H., Daniels, D., Falvy, J., & Ferris, G. R. (1998). Power, accountability, and inappropriate actions. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 497–517.
- Morris, M. W., & Moore, P. C. (2000). The lessons we (don't) learn: Counterfactual thinking and organizational accountability after a close call. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 737–765.
- Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. New York, NY: Appleton- Century-Crofts.
- O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Tiedt, P., & Bowes-Sperry, L. (2004). Answering accountability questions in sexual harassment: Insights regarding harassers, targets, and observers. Human Resources Management Review, 14, 85–106.
10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.005 Google Scholar
- Paolini, S., Crisp, R. J., & McIntyre, K. (2009). Accountability moderates member-to-group generalization: Testing a dual process model of stereotype change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 676–685.
- Palmer, J. K., & Feldman, J. M. (2005). Accountability and need for cognition effects on contrast, halo, and accuracy in performance ratings. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 119–137.
- Pennington, J., & Schlenker, B. R. (1999). Accountability for consequential decisions: Justifying ethical judgments to audiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1067–1081.
- Pinter, B., Insko, C. A., Wildschut, T., Kirchner, J. L., Montoya, R. M., & Wolf, S. T. (2007). Reduction of interindividual–intergroup discontinuity: The role of leader accountability and proneness to guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 250–265.
- Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2013). Masters of the universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 550–558. doi:10.1037/a0031697.
- Quinn, A., & Schlenker, B. R. (2002). Can accountability produce independence? Goals as determinants of the impact of accountability on conformity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 472–483.
- Roch, S. G., & McNall, L. A. (2007). An investigation of factors influencing accountability and performance ratings. Journal of Psychology, 141, 499–523.
- Roethlisberger, F., & Dickson, W. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
- Royle, M. T. (2013). Embeddedness: The nexus of learned needs, conscientiousness, and informal accountability for others. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 6, 15–41.
- Royle, M. T., & Hall, A. T. (2012). The relationship between McClelland's Theory of Needs, feeling individually accountable, and information accountability for others. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 5, 21–42.
- Royle, M. T., Hall, A. T., Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2005). The interactive effects of accountability and job self-efficacy on organizational citizenship and political behavior. Organizational Analysis, 13, 53–72.
- Rutkowski, K. A., & Steelman, L. A. (2005). Testing a path model for antecedents of accountability. The Journal of Management Development, 24, 473–486.
10.1108/02621710510598472 Google Scholar
- Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632–652.
- Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1989). Self-identification and accountability. In R. A. Giacalone, & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 21–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Schlenker, B. R., Weigold, M. F., & Doherty, K. (1991). Coping with accountability: Self-identification and evaluative reckonings. In C. R. Snyder, & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology (pp. 96–115). New York, NY: Pergamon.
- Scholten, L., van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 539–552.
- Sedikides, C., Herbst, K. C., Hardin, D. P., & Dardis, G. (2002). Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: The search for mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 592–605.
- Siegel-Jacobs, K., & Yates, J. F. (1996). Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 1–17.
- Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London, UK: A. Millar.
10.1093/oseo/instance.00042831 Google Scholar
- Tan, H., Ng, T., & Mak, B. (2002). The effects of task complexity on auditors' performance: The impact of accountability and performance. Auditing: A Journal of Theory & Practice, 21, 81–95.
- ter Laak, J., van Leuven, M., & Brugman, G. (2000). The effect of the accountability instruction and two job types on the big five scores. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 209–213.
- Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 297–332). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Tetlock, P. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice. Toward a social contingency model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 331–377). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies of coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Interpersonal Relations and Group Dynamics, 57, 632–641.
- Tetlock, P. E., Vieider, F., Patil, S. V., & Grant, A. (2013). Accountability and ideology: When left looks right and right looks left. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 22–35.
- Thoms, P., Dose, J. J., & Scott, K. S. (2002). Relationships between accountability, job satisfaction, and trust. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13, 307–323.
10.1002/hrdq.1033 Google Scholar
- van Kaam, A. (1966). Existential foundations of psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
- Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
- Wallace, J. C., Johnson, P. D., Mathe, K., & Paul, J. (2011). Structural and psychological empowerment climates, performance, and the moderating role of shared felt accountability: A managerial perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 840–850.
- Wikhamn, W., & Hall, A. T. (2014). Felt accountability and job satisfaction: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29, 458–471.
- Wolff, H., & Klauss, M. (2008). Choice, accountability, and effortful processing in escalation situations. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 216, 235–243. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.4.235.
- Yarnold, P. R., Mueser, K. T., & Lyons, J. S. (1988). Type A behavior, accountability, and work rate in small groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 353–360.
- Zajonc, R. B. (1964). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.
- Zellars, K. L., Hochwarter, W. A., Lanivich, S. E., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). Accountability for other, perceived resources and well-being: Convergent restricted non-linear results in two samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 95–115.