Skip to main content

Reconstructing Social Behavior from Dimorphism in the Fossil Record

  • Chapter
Reconstructing Behavior in the Primate Fossil Record

Part of the book series: Advances in Primatology ((AIPR))

Abstract

The social behavior of extinct species has long been a subject for speculation. Group size and composition, mating systems, territoriality, resource defense, predator defense, cooperation, and competition, among others, have all been inferred for extinct taxa (e.g., Aiello and Dunbar, 1993; Blumenberg, 1981, 1984; Fleagle et al.1980; Gingerich, 1981, 1995; Kay, 1982; Kay et al.1997; Krishtalka et al.1991; Lovejoy, 1981; McHenry 1991, 1992, 1994a,b; Moore, 1997; Plavcan and van Schaik, 1997a; Simons and Rasmussen, 1996; Simons et al.1999; Wrangham, 1987; Zihlman, 1997— see chapter by Nunn and van Schaik). Such characters are important for painting a history of the evolution and diversification of lineages, and they occasionally feature as key components of models for primate social evolution. There is an especially rich literature speculating on the evolution of human social behavior (e.g., Kinzey, 1987). The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate how social behavior can (or cannot) be inferred in extinct primates on the basis of remains preserved in the fossil record.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiello, L. C., and Dunbar, R. I. M. 1993. Neocortex size, group size, and the evolution of language. Curr. Anthropol. 34: 184–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, G. H. 1976. Methodological approaches to morphological variation in primate populations: the celebesian macaques. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 20: 290–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, G. H. 1980. Latitudinal, taxonomic, sexual, and insular determinants of size variation in pigtail macaques Macaca nemestrina. Int. J. Primatol. 1: 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, G. H., and Miller, J. A. 1993 Geographic variation in primates: a review with implications for interpreting fossils. In: W. H. Kimbel and L. B. Martin (eds.) Species Species Concepts and Primate Evolution pp. 123–161. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, G. H., Jenkins, P. D., and Godfrey, L. R. 1990. Ecogeographic size variation among the living and subfossil prosimians of Madagascar. Am. J. Primatol. 22: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J. 1994. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Experientia 41: 1296–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, K. C., Qi, T., Dawson, M. R., Wang, B., and Li, C. 1994. A diverse new primate fauna from middle Eocene fissure-fillings in southeastern China. Nature 368: 604–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, B. 1981. Observations on the paleoecology, population structure and body weight of some Tertiary hominoids. J. Hum. Evol. 10: 543–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumbenberg, B. 1984. Allometry and evolution of Tertiary hominoids. J. Hum. Evol. 13: 613–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, C. L. 1972. Sexual dimorphism in human evolution. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 16: 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, C. L., and Ryan, A. S. 1980. Sexual dimorphism and human tooth size differences. J. Hum.Evol. 9: 417–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, E. J. 1985. De Brazza’s monkeys (Cercopithecus neglectus) in Kenya: census, distribution and conservation. Am. J. Primatol. 8: 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud, J. M., Dow, M. M., and Leutenegger, W. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analysis: Sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 38: 1335–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutton-Brock, T. M., and Harvey, P. H. 1978. Mammals, resources and reproductive strategies. Nature 373: 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. 1980. Primates, brains and ecology. J. Zool. London 190: 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. M., Harvey, P. H., and Rudder, B. 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269: 797–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cords, M. 1987. Forest guenons and patas monkeys: male-male competition in one-male groups. In: B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.) Primate Societies pp. 98–111. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cords, M. 1988. Mating systems of forest guenons: a preliminary review. In: A. Gautier-Hion, F. Bourliere, J. Gautier, and J. Kingdon (eds.) A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons pp. 323–339. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. H. 1972. Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism, and social organization in the primates. In: B. Campbell (ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971, pp. 231–281. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. J. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Fiore, A. and Rendall, D. 1994. Evolution of social organization: a reappraisal by using phylogenetic methods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 994–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, J., and Kurland, J. A. 1989. Spatial autocorrelation, phylogenetic constraints, and the causes of sexual dimorphism in primates. Int. J. Primatol. 10: 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S., and Oring, L. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J. G. 1998. Primate Adaptation and Evolution 2nd Edition, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J. G., Kay, R. F., and Simons. 1980. Sexual dimorphism in early anthropoids. Nature 287: 328–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R. A., and Lee, P. C. 1989. Finite social space, evolutionary pathways, and reconstructing hominid behavior. Science 243: 901–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fooden, J. 1995. Systematic review of southeast Asian Longtail Macaques Macaca fascicularis (Raffles, [1821]) Fieldiana Zoology New Series #81. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S. M. 1994. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in body weight in platyrrhines. Am. J. Primatol. 34: 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayer, D. W. 1980. Sexual dimorphism and cultural evolution in the late Pleistocene and Holocene of Europe. J. Hum. Evol. 9: 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., and Sailer, L. D. 1984. Sexual dimorphism in weight among primates: the relative impact of allometry and sexual selection. Int. J. Primatol. 5: 515–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier-Hion, A. 1975. Dimorphisme sexuel et organization sociale chez les cercopithècinès forestiers africains. Mammalia 39: 365–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P. D. 1981. Cranial morphology and adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. I. Sexual dimorphism in Adapis magnus and Adapis parisiensis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 56: 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P. D. 1995. Sexual dimorphism in earliest Eocene Cantius torresi (Mammalia, Primates,Adapoidea). Cont. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 29: 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman, J. L., and van Valkenburg, B. 1997. Sexual dimorphism in the canines and skulls of carnivores: effects of size, phylogeny, and behavioural ecology.]. Zool. London. 242: 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L. R., Lyon, S. K, and Sutherland, M. R. 1993. Sexual dimorphism in large-bodied primates: the case of the subfossil lemurs. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 90: 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, L. O. 1992a. Origin of the human canine: a new solution to an old enigma. Yearb. Phys.Anthropol. 35: 153–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, L. O. 1992b. Relative canine size, behavior and diet in male ceboids. J. Hum. Evol. 23: 469–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, L. O. 1996. Correlated response of homologous characteristics in the anthropoid anterior dentition. J. Hum. Evol. 31: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, L. O. 1998. Canine tip wear in male and female anthropoids. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 107: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, L. O., and Washburn, A. 1991. Polymorphic aspects of male anthropoid canines. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 84: 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H., Kavanagh, M., and Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1978a. Canine tooth size in female primates. Nature 276: 817–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H., Kavanagh, M., and Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1978b. Sexual dimorphism in primate teeth. J. Zool. (London) 186: 474–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H., Martin, R. D., and Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1987) Life histories in comparative perspective. In: B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.) Primate Societies pp. 181–196. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, V. J., Freedman, L., and Oxnard, C. E. 1995. The differential expression of dental sexual dimorphism in subspecies of Colobus guereza. Int. J. Primatol. 16: 971–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, S. C., Juell, K. E., and Rogers, A. R. 1997. Estimating sexual dimorphism by method-of-moments. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 100: 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. 1990. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in prosimian primates. Am. J. Primatol. 21: 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. 1991. Patterns of sexual dimorphism in body weight among prosimian primates. Folia Primatol. 57: 132–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. 1996. Intrasexual selection and phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of sexual canine dimorphism in strepsirhine primates. J.Evol. Biol. 9: 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappelman, J. 1996. The evolution of body mass and relative brain size in fossil hominids./ Hum. Evol. 30: 243–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F. 1982. Sivapithecus simonsi a new species of Miocene hominoid, with comments on the phylogenetic status of Ramapithecinae. Int. J. Primatol. 3: 113–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F., and Cartmill, M. 1977. Cranial morphology and adaptations of Palaechthon nacimienti and other Paromomyidae (Plesiadapoidea, ? Primates), with a description of a new genus and species. J. Hum. Evol. 6: 19–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F., Plavcan, J. M., Glander, K. E., and Wright, P. C. 1988. Sexual selection and canine dimorphism in New World monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 77: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F., Ross, C. F., and Williams, B. A. 1997. Anthropoid origins. Science 275: 797–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. 1993. Taxonomic implications of sexual dimorphism in Lufengpithecus. In: W. H. Kimbel and L. B. Martin(eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, pp. 429–458. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J., and Plavcan, J. M. 1998. A simulation test of hominoid species number at Lufeng, China: implications for the use of the coefficient of variation in paleotaxonomy. J. Hum. Evol. 35: 577–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M., and Stuart, A. 1954. The Advanced Theory of Statistics Vol. 1. MacMillan Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzey, W. G. (ed.). 1987. The Evolution of Human Behavior. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konigsberg, L. W., Hens, S. M., Jantz, L. M., and Jungers, W. L. 1998. Stature estimation and calibration: bayesian and maximum likelihood perspectives in physical anthropology. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 41: 65–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishtalka, L., Stucky, R. K., and Beard, K. C. 1991. The earliest fossil evidence for sexual dimorphism in primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 5223–5226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lague, M. R., and Jungers, W. L. 1999. Patterns of sexual dimorphism in the hominoid distal humerus. J. Hum. Evol. 36: 379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R. 1992. Patterns of variation in the ontogeny of primate body size dimorphism. J. Hum. Evol. 23: 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R. 1995a. Ontogeny and the evolution of body size dimorphism in primates. Anthropologie 33: 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R. 1995b. Socioecology and the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 97: 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R., and Shea, B. T. 1995. Ontogeny and the evolution of adult body size dimorphism in apes. Am. J. Primatol. 36: 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R., and Terranova, C. J. 1998. Comparative perspectives on bimaturism, ontogeny, and dimorphism in lemurid primates. Int. J. Primatol. 19: 723–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W., and Cheverud, J. 1982. Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: ecological and size variables. Int. J. Primatol. 3: 387–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W., and Cheverud, J. M. 1985. Sexual dimorphism in primates. The effects of size. In: W. L. Jungers (ed.) Size and Scaling in Primate Biology pp. 33–50. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W., and Kelly, J.T. 1977. Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates. Primates 18: 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W., and Larson, S. 1985. Sexual dimorphism in the postcranial skeleton of New World Primates. Folia Primatol. 44: 82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W. and Lubach, G. 1987. Sexual dimorphism, mating system, and effect of phylogeny in De Brazza’s monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus). Am. J. Primatol. 13: 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W., and Shell, B. 1987. Variability and sexual dimorphism in canine size of Australopithecus and extant hominoids. J. Hum. Evol. 16: 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, S. S., Gelvin, B. R., and Oxnard, C. E. 1985. Dental sexual dimorphisms in some extant hominoids and ramapithecines from China: A quantitative approach. Am. J. Primatol. 9: 305–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, C. A. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in the face of Australopithecus africanus. Am. J. Phys.Anthropol. 108: 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, C. O. 1981. The origin of man. Science 211: 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, C. O., Kern, K. F., Simpson, S. W., and Meindl, R. S. 1989. A new method for estimation of skeletal dimorphism in fossil samples with an application to Australopithecus afarensis. In: G. Giacobini (ed.), Hominidae: Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Human Paleontology, pp. 103–108. Jaca Book, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, P. W., Corlett, R. T., and Luke, D. A. 1986. Sexual dimorphism in tooth size in anthropoids. Hum. Evol. 1: 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. D., Wilner, L. A., and Dettler, A. 1994. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in primates. In: R. V. Short and E. Balaban (eds.) The Differences Between the Sexes pp. 159–200. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, T. J., and Hartwig, W. C. 1998. Degrees of sexual dimorphism in Cebus and other New World monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 107: 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. 1991. Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis. J. Hum. Evol. 20: 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. 1992. Body size and proportions in early hominids. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 87: 407–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. 1994a. Behavioral ecological implications of early hominid body size. J. Hum. Evol. 27: 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. 1994b. Sexual dimorphism in fossil hominids and its sociological implications. In: S. Shennan and J. Steele (eds.) Power Sex and Tradition: The Archeology of Human Ancestry pp. 91–109. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M., and Berger, L. R. 1998. Body proportions in Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus and the origin of the genus Homo. J. Hum. Evol. 35: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J., Gros-Louis, J., and Richards, A. F. 1996. Sexual dimorphism, the operational sex ratio, and the intensity of male competition in polygynous primates. Am. Nat. 147: 966–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. 1997. Savanna chimpanzees, referential models and the last common ancestor. In: W. C. McGrew, L. F. Marchant, and T. Nishida (eds.) Great Ape Societies pp. 275–292. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins. P. O., and Dryden, I. L. 1993. Sexual dimorphism in hominoids: further studies of craniofacial shape differences in Pan Gorilla and Pongo. J. Hum. Evol. 24: 183–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxnard, C. E. 1984. The Order of Man. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxnard, C. E., Lieberman, S. S., and Gelvin, B. R. 1985. Sexual dimorphisms in dental dimensions of higher primates. Am. J. Primatol. 8: 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M. 1992. A method for the analysis of comparative data. J. Theor. Biol. 156: 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips-Conroy, J. E., and Jolly, C. J. 1981. Sexual dimorphism in two subspecies of Ethiopian baboons (Papio hamadryas) and their hybrids. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 56: 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickford, M. 1986. On the origins of body size dimorphism in primates. In: M. Pickford and B. Chiarelli (eds.) Sexual Dimorphism in Living and Fossil Primates pp. 77–91. Il Sedicessimo,Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. 1990. Sexual Dimorphism in the Dentition of Extant Anthropoid Primates. Ph.D. Dissertation. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. 1993. Canine size and shape in male anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 92: 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. 1994. Comparison of four simple methods for estimating sexual dimorphism in fossils. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94: 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. 1998. Correlated response, competition, and female canine size in primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 107: 401–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., and Kelley, J. 1996. Evaluating the “dual selection” hypothesis of canine reduction. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 99:379–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., and van Schaik, C. P. 1992. Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 87: 461–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., and van Schaik, C. P. 1994. Canine dimorphism. Evol. Anthropol. 2: 208–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., and van Schaik, C. P. 1997a. Interpreting hominid behavior on the basis of sexual dimorphism./ Hum. Evol. 32: 345–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., and van Schaik, C. P. 1997b. Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 103: 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., van Schaik, C. P., and Kappeler, P. M. 1995. Competition, coalitions and canine size in primates. J. Hum. Evol. 28: 245–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. F. 1996. An adaptive explanation for the origin of the Anthropoidea (Primates). Am. J. Primatol. 40: 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C., Williams, B., and Kay, R. F. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of anthropoid relationships. J. Hum. Evol. 35: 221–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T. E. 1988. The social system of guenons, compared with baboons, macaques and mangabeys. In: A. Gautier-Hion, F. Bourliere, J. Gautier, and J. Kingdon (eds.) A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons pp. 439–451. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T. E., and Chism, J. 1986. Sexual dimorphism and mating systems: jumping to conclusions. In: M. Pickford and B. Chiarelli (eds.) Sexual Dimorphism in Living and Fossil Primates pp. 107–111. Il Sedicesimo, Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B. T., Leigh, S. R., and Groves, C. P. 1993. Multivariate craniometric variation in chimpanzees: implications for species identification. In: W. L. Kimbel and L. B. Martin (eds.) Species Species Concepts and Primate Evolution, pp. 265–296. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L., and Rasmussen, D. T. 1996. Skull of Catopithecus brown an early Tertiary catarrhine. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 100: 261–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L., Plavcan, J. M., and Fleagle, J. G. 1999. Canine sexual dimorphism in Egyptian Eocene anthropoid primates: Catopithecus and Proteopithecus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 2559–2562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G., Roe, A., and Lewontin, R. C. 1960. Quantitative Zoology. Harcourt Brace and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. H., Crummett, T. L., and Brandt, K. L. 1994. Ages of eruption of primate teeth: a compendium for aging individuals and comparing life histories. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 37: 177–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. 1981. Interspecific scaling of maxillary canine size and shape in female primates: relationships to social structure and diet. J.Hum. Evol. 10: 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. 1994. Regression models for prediction equations. J. Hum. Evol. 26: 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith. R. J. 1996. Biology and body size in human evolution: statistical inference misapplied. Curr. Anthropol. 37: 451–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J., and Jungers, W. L. 1997. Body mass in comparative primatology. J. Hum. Evol. 32: 523–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (1987) Primate Societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker, T. T., and Leland, L. 1987. Colobines: infanticide by adult males. In: B. B. Smuts, D.L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.) Primate Societies pp. 83–97. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T. R., Anapol, F., and Jolly, C. F. 1994. Body weights of adult vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) at four sites in Kenya. Folia Primatol. 63: 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, A. 1998a. Variation in tooth morphology of Gorilla gorilla. J. Hum. Evol. 34: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, A. 1998b. Variation in tooth morphology of Pongo pygmaeus. J. Hum. Evol. 34: 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, P. S., and Kay, R. F. 1995. The dietary adaptations of European Miocene catarrhines. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci USA 92: 5479–5481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weckerly, F. W. 1998. Sexual-seize dimorphism: influence of mass and mating systems in the most dimorphic mammals. J. Mamm. 79: 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYGRAPH: The System for Graphics. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. 1976. The nature and basis of sexual dimorphism in the primate skeleton. J. Zool. (London) 180: 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. A., Li, Y., and Willoughby C. 1991. Intraspecific variation and sexual dimorphism in cranial and dental variables among higher primates and their bearing on the hominid fossil record. J. Anat. 174: 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. 1980. An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75: 262–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. 1987. The significance of african apes for reconstructing human social evolution. In: W. G. Kinzey (ed.) The Evolution of Human Behavior pp. 51–71. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zihlman, A. 1997. Reconstructions reconsidered: chimpanzee models and human evolution. In: W. C. McGrew, L. F. Marchant, and T. Nishida (eds.) Great Ape Societies pp. 293–304. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Plavcan, J.M. (2002). Reconstructing Social Behavior from Dimorphism in the Fossil Record. In: Plavcan, J.M., Kay, R.F., Jungers, W.L., van Schaik, C.P. (eds) Reconstructing Behavior in the Primate Fossil Record. Advances in Primatology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1343-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1343-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5507-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1343-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics