Abstract
In this chapter, mètis is first presented as being both an entity (expert know-how) and a dynamic phenomenon (expert action). Tacit knowledge is then reviewed, not only as an important aspect of mètis, but in defining what it is and what it isn’t. It is argued that purely repository approaches based on words and code cannot fully explicate (nor ‘convert’) or address the inherent ineffability of tacit knowledge. Managers must grasp that a person cannot learn another’s tacit knowledge by way of only using an IT/KS repository of explicit knowledge. A novice seeking to appreciate an expert’s tacit knowledge must also immerse himself/herself within the activity or practice in question. Paradoxically, across increased task automation in combination with the growing use of expert system prompts, there is less hands-on practice and training occurring within the workplace; thus, leading to a loss of expertise (mètis) able to adequately deal with new, complex and ambiguous situations—situations which expert or automated systems are unable to successfully address alone. Finally, preliminary insights are proposed regarding more effective organizational configurations able to retain expert tacit knowledge while encouraging the evolution of mètis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2001). Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 811–829.
Amin, A., & Cohendet, P. (2004). Architecture of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities and Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ancori, B., Bureth, A., & Cohendet, P. (2000). The Economics of Knowledge: The Debate About Codification and Tacit Knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 255.
Balmisse, G. (2002). Gestions des connaissances: outils et applications du knowledge management. Coll. «Entreprendre informatique». Paris: Vuibert.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. London: Sage.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Bérubé, M.-È., & Privé, C. (2009). La captation des connaissances dans le processus de relève. Le coin de l’expert. http://www.orhri.org/expert/fiche.aspx?p=351356
Carter, C., Clegg, S., & Kornberge, M. (2008). A Very Short, Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Studying Strategy. London: Sage.
Chalmers, D. (2011). A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition. The Journal of Cognitive Science, 12, 323–357.
Chemero, T. (2009). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Collins, H. (2007). Bicycling on the Moon: Collective Tacit Knowledge and Somatic-Limit Tacit Knowledge. Organization Studies, 28(2), 257–262.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cook, S., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.
Dejoux, C., & Léon, E. (2018). Métamorphose des managers. Paris: Pearson.
Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York: Putnam.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2005). Peripheral Vision Expertise in Real World Contexts. Organization Studies, 26(5), 779–792.
Falconer, L. (2006). Organizational Learning, Tacit Information, and e-Learning: A Review. The Learning Organization, 13(2), 140–151.
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and Organizing in the Age of the Learning Algorithm. Information and Organization, 28, 62–70.
Friedman, L. H., & Bernell, S. (2006). The Importance of Team Level Tacit Knowledge and Related Characteristics of High-Performing Health Care Teams. Health Care Management Review, 31(3), 223–230.
Gherardi, S. (2009). Knowing and Learning in Practice-Based Studies: An Introduction. The Learning Organization, 16(5), 352–359.
Glasersfeld, E. von. (2002). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Guiette, A., & Vandenbempt, K. (2016). Learning in Times of Dynamic Complexity Through Balancing Phenomenal Qualities of Sensemaking. Management Learning, 47(1), 83–99.
Hall, R., & Andriani, P. (2003). Managing Knowledge Associated with Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 145–152.
Harkins, A. D. (2005). Too Much Guidance? Lancet, 365, 1768.
Harrison, S., & Checkland, K. (2009). Evidence-Based Practice in UK Health Policy. New York: Routledge.
Høyland, S., Aase, K., & Hollund, J. G. (2011). Exploring Varieties of Knowledge in Safe Work Practices—An Ethnographic Study of Surgical Teams. Patient Safety in Patients, 21(5), 1–7.
James, W. (1950). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover.
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Human-AI Symbiosis in Organizational Decision Making. Business Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007.
Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for Intuitive Expertise. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526.
Kakihara, M., & Sørensen, C. (2002). Exploring Knowledge Emergence: From Chaos to Organisational Knowledge. Journal of Global Information, 5(3), 48–66.
Latour, B. (2006). A Textbook Case Revisited: Knowledge as Mode of Existence. In E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wacjman (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies –Third Edition (pp. 83–112). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leonard, D., & Swap, W. (2004). Deep Smarts. Harvard Business Review, 30(2), 157–169.
Lindkvist, L. (2005). Knowledge Communities and Knowledge Collectivities: A Typology of Knowledge Work in Groups. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1189–1210.
Marwala, T. (2015). Causality, Correlation and Artificial Intelligence for Rational Decision Making. Singapore: World Scientific.
Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602–620.
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. London: M.E. Sharpe.
Nonaka, I., & Peltokorpi, V. (2006). Objectivity and Subjectivity in Knowledge Management: A Review of 20 Top Articles. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(2), 73–82.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2004). Hitotsubashi on Knowledge Management. Wiley (Asia): Singapore, Singapore.
Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, 33, 5–34.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing Flow: A Process Theory of the Knowledge-Based Firm. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Oakeshott, M. (1991). Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, New and Expanded Edition.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.
Pomerol, J. C. (1997). Artificial Intelligence and Human Decision Making. European Journal of Operational Research, 99, 3–25.
Ray, T., & Clegg, S. (2007). Can We Make Sense of Knowledge Management’s Tangible Rainbow? A Radical Constructivist Alternative. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 25(2), 161–185.
Rivard, L., & Roy, M.-C. (2005). Gestion stratégique des connaissances. Beaconsfield: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human State Have Failed. Binghamton: Vail-Ballou Press.
Selamat, M. H., & Choudrie, J. (2004). The Diffusion of Tacit Knowledge and Its Implications on Information Systems: The Role of Meta-Abilities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 128–139.
Suchman, L. A. (2009). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Szulanski, G. (2000). The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9–27.
Tsoukas, H. (2003). Do We Really Understand Tacit knowledge. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (pp. 410–427). New York: Blackwell.
Tsoukas, H. (2009). A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957.
Tsoukas, H. (2015). How Should We Understand Tacit Knowledge? A Phenomenological View. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (pp. 453–476). London: Wiley.
Varella, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Virtanen, I. (2013). In Search for a Theoretically Firmer Epistemological Foundation for the Relationship Between Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 118–126.
Wachter, B. (2015, February 23). My Interview with Capt. Sully Sullenberger: On Aviation, Medicine and Technology. The Hospital Leader. https://thehospitalleader.org/my-interview-with-capt-sully-sullenberger-on-aviation-medicine-and-technology/
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Weick, K. E. (2009). Making Sense of the Organization (Volume 2): The Impermanent Organization. Chichester: Wiley.
Winther, R. G. (2014). James and Dewey on Abstractions. The Pluralist, 9(2), 1–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holford, W.D. (2020). The Dilemma of Developing and Maintaining High-Level Expertise. In: Managing Knowledge in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41156-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41156-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41155-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41156-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)