Skip to main content

Mind the Gap: Creative Knowledge Processes Within Interdisciplinary Groups in Organizations and Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity and Learning

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture ((PASCC))

Abstract

We live in a changing world and learning and creativity are significant processes. They are important both in organizations—where the need to be innovative and able to adjust to that ever-changing world persists—as well as in schools and higher education institutions, in order to prepare students for an unknown future. Furthermore, we are facing new social and global challenges that require advanced interdisciplinary solutions. This chapter first presents results on what characterizes the creative knowledge processes when specialized researchers in interdisciplinary groups learn from one another and work to develop innovative ideas in an organizational context. It then describes how these results can be transferred to another context, i.e. to student groups in higher education at the beginning of their educational careers. Some similarities between the two contexts are observed; for instance, both cases involve diversity and individuals with different perspectives, which stimulates the creative knowledge processes and can lead to more learning and new insights and knowledge for the employees and students. One condition for succeeding with learning and creativity is essential however—“minding the gap” and utilizing the differences constructively by ensuring psychological safety and trust within the groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The acquisition metaphor views learning as a cognitive process. Knowledge is understood as a property of an individual mind, in which learning is a matter of construction, acquisition, and outcomes, which are realized in the process of transfer (Paavola et al., 2004, p. 557). The participation metaphor, by contrast, views learning as a social process. Learning is a matter of participation in practices and actions where knowledge is acquired by social activities. Both metaphors complement each other, rather than contradict, and therefore the knowledge creation metaphor was developed.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (2008). Withhin you, without you: Towards a social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of dostoevsky´s poetics. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit knowledge in organizations. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Learning as a creative act. In T. Kettler (Ed.), Modern curriculum for gifted and advanced learners. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A., & Wegerif, R. (2006). Thinking skills and creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalland, C. P., & Thaule-Hatt, H. (2017). Kreativitet i skolen Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2006). The solo/duo gap. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(1), 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, T. A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 3–19). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dysthe, O. (2010). Kunstmuseum som alternative læringsrom. Skoletjenesten/KUAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glǎveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glǎveanu, V. P., & Gillespie, A. (2015). Creativity out of difference: Theorising the semiotic, social and temporal origin of creative acts. In V. P. Glaveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from social and cultural psychology (1st ed., pp. 1–15). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossen, M. (2008). Methods for studying collaborative creativity: An original and adventurous blend. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), 246–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. CERI/OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. (2004). Creative collaboration in organisational settings. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 158–174). Free Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H.-Y. (2011). Beyond group collaboration: Facilitating an idea-centered view of collaboration through knowledge building in a science class of fifth-graders. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(2), 248–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, R., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, K., & Miell, D. (2004). Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 1–10). Free Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2004). How collaboration in creative work impacts identity and motivation. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 11–25). Free Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, I. J. (2016). The room of opportunity: Understanding how knowledge and ideas are constructed in multidisciplinary groups working with innovative ideas (PhD, Dissertation for the degree of PhD), Department of Education, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, I. J. (2017). Polyphonic orchestration—Facilitating creative knowledge processes for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(4), 557–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2016-0049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness, I. J. (2019). Behind the scenes: How to research creative processes in multidisciplinary groups. In I. Lebuda & V. P. Glaveanu (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of social creativity research (pp. 353–373). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ness, I. J. (2020). Polyfoni og kreative vidensprocesser i klasserummet og i videregående uddannelser. In O. Dysthe, I. J. Ness, & P. O. Kirkegaard (Eds.), Dialogisk pædagogik, kreativitet og læring (pp. 113–142). Forlaget Klim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, I. J., & Riese, H. (2015, September). Openness, curiosity and respect: Underlying conditions for developing innovative knowledge and ideas between disciplines. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.03.001.

  • Ness, I. J., & Søreide, G. E. (2014). The room of opportunity: Understanding phases of creative knowledge processes in innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(8), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-10-2013-0077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad, B. A., & Paulus, P. B. (2003). Group creativity: Common themes and future directions. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 326–346). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor—An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (Vol. 128, pp. 69–97). Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1370–1373). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, R. H. (2004). Creativity and innovation in teams. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 175–188). Free Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Messina, R. (2010). Collaborative productivity as self-sustaining processes in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. In K. Gomez, J. Radinsky, & L. Lyons (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C., & Luo, L. (2012). Group creativity in learning context: Understanding in a social-cultural framework and methodology. Creative Education, 3(4), 392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingunn Johanne Ness .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ness, I.J. (2021). Mind the Gap: Creative Knowledge Processes Within Interdisciplinary Groups in Organizations and Higher Education. In: Lemmetty, S., Collin, K., Glăveanu, V.P., Forsman, P. (eds) Creativity and Learning. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77066-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics