Abstract
Advocates of hate crime statutes suggest they are needed because hate crimes are fundamentally different than their ordinary crime counterparts. Hate crimes allegedly hurt more than comparable non-hate-motivated crimes on a number of levels. First, hate crimes have been found to be more physically injurious to primary victims. Second, advocates suggest hate crimes sustain multidimensional injuries including physical, emotional, psychological, and quality of life injuries. Third, hate crimes allegedly affect society at large by undermining democratic ideals of equality, intergroup trust and inclusion. Several scholars suggest hate crime uniquely perpetrate “in terrorum” effects on direct victims but also on proximal and distal victims who share group membership with the primary victim. Finally, proponents of hate crime statutes argue hate crimes are more likely to generate retaliatory victimizations that further polarize discrete groups within a heterogeneous society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barnes, A., & Ephross, P. H. (1994). The impact of hate violence on victims: Emotional and behavioral responses to attacks. Social Work, 39(3), 247–251.
Berrill, K. T. (1990). Anti-gay violence and victimization in the United States an overview. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(3), 274–294.
Boeckmann, R. J., & Turpin-Petrosino, C. (2002). Understanding the harm of hate crime. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 207–225.
Dragowski, E. A., Kalkitis, P. N., Grossman, A. H., & D’Augelli, A. R. (2011). Sexual orientation victimization and post traumatic stress symptoms among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Jornal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 23(2), 226–249.
Erlich, H., Larcom, B., & Pervis, R. (1994). The traumatic effects of ethnoviolence. Towson, Md: Prejudice Institute, Center for the Applied Study of Ethnoviolence.
Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., & Cogan, J. C. (1999). Psychological sequelae of hate-crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 945.
Herek, G. M., Cogan, J. C., & Gillis, J. R. (2002). Victim experiences in hate crimes based on sexual orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 319–339.
Iganski, P. (2001). Hate crimes hurt more. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(4), 626–638.
Iganski, P. (2002). Introduction: The problem of hate crimes and hate crimes laws. In P. Iganski (Ed.), The hate debate: Should hate be punished as a crime. (pp. 1–15). London: The Institute for Jewish Policy Research.
Iganski, P., & Lagou, S. (2014). The personal injuries of ‘hate crime’. In The Routledge international handbook on hate crime, pp. 34–46.
Lawrence, F. M. (2009). Punishing hate: Bias crimes under American law. Harvard University Press.
Levin, B. (1999). Hate crimes worse by definition. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15(1), 6–21.
Levin, Brian. (2002). From slavery to hate crime laws: The emergence of race and status-based protection in American criminal law. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 227–245.
Levin, J., & McDevitt, J. (1993). Hate crimes: The rising tide of bigotry and bloodshed (Vol. 5). New York: Plenum Press.
Lim, H. A. (2009). Beyond the immediate victim: Understanding hate crimes as message crimes. Hate crimes: The consequences of hate crime, 2, 107–222.
Martin, S. E. (1996). Investigating hate crimes: Case characteristics and law enforcement responses. Justice Quarterly, 13(3), 455–480.
McDevitt, J., Balboni, J., Garcia, L., & Gu, J. (2001). Consequences for victims: A comparison of bias and non-bias motivated assaults. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 697–713.
Messner, S. F., McHugh, S., & Felson, R. B. (2004). Distinctive characteristics of assaults motivated by bias. Criminology, 42(3), 585–618.
Perry, B. (2001). In the name of hate: Understanding hate crimes. Psychology Press.
Perry, B. (Ed.). (2009). Hate crimes (Vol. 2). Greenwood Publishing Group.
Perry, B. (2014). Exploring the community impacts of hate crimes. In The Routledge international handbook on hate crime.
Perry, B., & Alvi, S. (2012). ‘We are all vulnerable’ The in terrorem effects of hate crimes. International Review of Victimology, 18(1), 57–71.
Pezzella, F. S., & Fetzer, M. D. (2015). The likelihood of injury among bias crimes: An analysis of general and specific bias types. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260515586374.
State v. Beebe. (1994). 67 Or. App. 738.
Strom, K. (2001). Hate crimes reported in NIBRS, 1997–99. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
The Matthew Shepard & Robert Byrd Jr. Hate Crime Prevention Act 18 U.S. 249.
Weinstein, J. (1992). First amendment challenges to hate crime legislation: Where’s the speech?.
Wisconsin V. Mitchell. (1993). U.S. Supreme Court, 505 U.S. 476.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pezzella, F.S. (2017). The Case for Hate Crime Statutes-Putative Uniqueness of Injuries. In: Hate Crime Statutes. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40842-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40842-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40840-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40842-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)