Skip to main content

The Case for Hate Crime Statutes-Putative Uniqueness of Injuries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hate Crime Statutes

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSPOLICI))

  • 1284 Accesses

Abstract

Advocates of hate crime statutes suggest they are needed because hate crimes are fundamentally different than their ordinary crime counterparts. Hate crimes allegedly hurt more than comparable non-hate-motivated crimes on a number of levels. First, hate crimes have been found to be more physically injurious to primary victims. Second, advocates suggest hate crimes sustain multidimensional injuries including physical, emotional, psychological, and quality of life injuries. Third, hate crimes allegedly affect society at large by undermining democratic ideals of equality, intergroup trust and inclusion. Several scholars suggest hate crime uniquely perpetrate “in terrorum” effects on direct victims but also on proximal and distal victims who share group membership with the primary victim. Finally, proponents of hate crime statutes argue hate crimes are more likely to generate retaliatory victimizations that further polarize discrete groups within a heterogeneous society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnes, A., & Ephross, P. H. (1994). The impact of hate violence on victims: Emotional and behavioral responses to attacks. Social Work, 39(3), 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrill, K. T. (1990). Anti-gay violence and victimization in the United States an overview. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(3), 274–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeckmann, R. J., & Turpin-Petrosino, C. (2002). Understanding the harm of hate crime. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragowski, E. A., Kalkitis, P. N., Grossman, A. H., & D’Augelli, A. R. (2011). Sexual orientation victimization and post traumatic stress symptoms among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Jornal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 23(2), 226–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlich, H., Larcom, B., & Pervis, R. (1994). The traumatic effects of ethnoviolence. Towson, Md: Prejudice Institute, Center for the Applied Study of Ethnoviolence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., & Cogan, J. C. (1999). Psychological sequelae of hate-crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., Cogan, J. C., & Gillis, J. R. (2002). Victim experiences in hate crimes based on sexual orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iganski, P. (2001). Hate crimes hurt more. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(4), 626–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iganski, P. (2002). Introduction: The problem of hate crimes and hate crimes laws. In P. Iganski (Ed.), The hate debate: Should hate be punished as a crime. (pp. 1–15). London: The Institute for Jewish Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iganski, P., & Lagou, S. (2014). The personal injuries of ‘hate crime’. In The Routledge international handbook on hate crime, pp. 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, F. M. (2009). Punishing hate: Bias crimes under American law. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1999). Hate crimes worse by definition. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15(1), 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Brian. (2002). From slavery to hate crime laws: The emergence of race and status-based protection in American criminal law. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., & McDevitt, J. (1993). Hate crimes: The rising tide of bigotry and bloodshed (Vol. 5). New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H. A. (2009). Beyond the immediate victim: Understanding hate crimes as message crimes. Hate crimes: The consequences of hate crime, 2, 107–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. E. (1996). Investigating hate crimes: Case characteristics and law enforcement responses. Justice Quarterly, 13(3), 455–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, J., Balboni, J., Garcia, L., & Gu, J. (2001). Consequences for victims: A comparison of bias and non-bias motivated assaults. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., McHugh, S., & Felson, R. B. (2004). Distinctive characteristics of assaults motivated by bias. Criminology, 42(3), 585–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. (2001). In the name of hate: Understanding hate crimes. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. (Ed.). (2009). Hate crimes (Vol. 2). Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. (2014). Exploring the community impacts of hate crimes. In The Routledge international handbook on hate crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B., & Alvi, S. (2012). ‘We are all vulnerable’ The in terrorem effects of hate crimes. International Review of Victimology, 18(1), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzella, F. S., & Fetzer, M. D. (2015). The likelihood of injury among bias crimes: An analysis of general and specific bias types. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260515586374.

    Google Scholar 

  • State v. Beebe. (1994). 67 Or. App. 738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, K. (2001). Hate crimes reported in NIBRS, 1997–99. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Matthew Shepard & Robert Byrd Jr. Hate Crime Prevention Act 18 U.S. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, J. (1992). First amendment challenges to hate crime legislation: Where’s the speech?.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisconsin V. Mitchell. (1993). U.S. Supreme Court, 505 U.S. 476.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank S. Pezzella .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pezzella, F.S. (2017). The Case for Hate Crime Statutes-Putative Uniqueness of Injuries. In: Hate Crime Statutes. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40842-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40842-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40840-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40842-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics