Skip to main content
Log in

When can we reconstruct the ancestral state? Beyond Brownian motion

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reconstructing the ancestral state of a group of species helps answer many important questions in evolutionary biology. Therefore, it is crucial to understand when we can estimate the ancestral state accurately. Previous works provide a necessary and sufficient condition, called the big bang condition, for the existence of an accurate reconstruction method under discrete trait evolution models and the Brownian motion model. In this paper, we extend this result to a wide range of continuous trait evolution models. In particular, we consider a general setting where continuous traits evolve along the tree according to stochastic processes that satisfy some regularity conditions. We verify these conditions for popular continuous trait evolution models including Ornstein–Uhlenbeck, reflected Brownian Motion, bounded Brownian Motion, and Cox–Ingersoll–Ross.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

The R code for the simulations is available at https://github.com/lamho86/When-can-we-reconstruct-the-ancestral-state-Beyond-Brownian-motion.

Notes

  1. https://github.com/fcboucher/BBM.

References

  • Ané C (2008) Analysis of comparative data with hierarchical autocorrelation. Ann Appl Stat 2(3):1078–1102

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ané C, Ho LST, Roch S (2017) Phase transition on the convergence rate of parameter estimation under an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck diffusion on a tree. J Math Biol 74(1):355–385

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoszek K, Sagitov S (2015) Phylogenetic confidence intervals for the optimal trait value. J Appl Probab 52(4):1115–1132

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bastide P, Ho LST, Baele G, Lemey P, Suchard MA (2021) Efficient Bayesian inference of general Gaussian models on large phylogenetic trees. Ann Appl Stat 15(2)

  • Beaulieu JM, Jhwueng DC, Boettiger C, O’Meara BC (2012) Modeling stabilizing selection: expanding the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model of adaptive evolution. Evolution 66(8):2369–2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg SP, Rathnayake SI, Moreau CM (2020) Beyond Brownian motion and the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process: stochastic diffusion models for the evolution of quantitative characters. Am Nat 195(2):145–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher FC, Démery V (2016) Inferring bounded evolution in phenotypic characters from phylogenetic comparative data. Syst Biol 65(4):651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher FC, Démery V, Conti E, Harmon LJ, Uyeda J (2018) A general model for estimating macroevolutionary landscapes. Syst Biol 67(2):304–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert R, Lemey P, Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Alekseyenko AV, Drummond AJ, Gray RD, Suchard MA, Atkinson QD (2012) Mapping the origins and expansion of the indo-european language family. Science 337(6097):957–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan WTL, Roch S (2018) Necessary and sufficient conditions for consistent root reconstruction in markov models on trees. Electron J Probab 23

  • Faria NR, Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Baele G, Bedford T, Ward MJ, Tatem AJ, Sousa JD, Arinaminpathy N, Pépin J et al (2014) The early spread and epidemic ignition of HIV-1 in human populations. Science 346(6205):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125(1):1–15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gill MS, Tung Ho LS, Baele G, Lemey P, Suchard MA (2017) A relaxed directional random walk model for phylogenetic trait evolution. Syst Biol 66(3):299–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen TF (1997) Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51(5):1341–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho LST, Ané C (2013) Asymptotic theory with hierarchical autocorrelation: Ornstein–Uhlenbeck tree models. Ann Stat 41(2):957–981

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ho LST, Ané C (2014) A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Syst Biol 63(3):397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho LST, Dinh V (2022) When can we reconstruct the ancestral state? a unified theory. Theor Popul Biol 148:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho LST, Susko E (2022) Ancestral state reconstruction with large numbers of sequences and edge-length estimation. J Math Biol 84(4):1–28

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jhwueng DC (2020) Modeling rate of adaptive trait evolution using Cox–Ingersoll–Ross process: an approximate Bayesian computation approach. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 145:106924

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lepage T, Lawi S, Tupper P, Bryant D (2006) Continuous and tractable models for the variation of evolutionary rates. Math Biosci 199(2):216–233

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maritz B, Barends JM, Mohamed R, Maritz RA, Alexander GJ (2021) Repeated dietary shifts in elapid snakes (Squamata: Elapidae) revealed by ancestral state reconstruction. Biol J Lin Soc 134(4):975–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neureiter N, Ranacher P, van Gijn R, Bickel B, Weibel R (2021) Can Bayesian phylogeography reconstruct migrations and expansions in linguistic evolution? Royal Soc Open Sci 8(1):201079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odom KJ, Hall ML, Riebel K, Omland KE, Langmore NE (2014) Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nat Commun 5(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlfs RV, Harrigan P, Nielsen R (2014) Modeling gene expression evolution with an extended Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process accounting for within-species variation. Mol Biol Evol 31(1):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyeda JC, Harmon LJ (2014) A novel Bayesian method for inferring and interpreting the dynamics of adaptive landscapes from phylogenetic comparative data. Syst Biol 63(6):902–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

LSTH was supported by the Canada Research Chairs program, the NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2018-05447, and the NSERC Discovery Launch Supplement DGECR-2018-00181. VD was supported by a startup fund from the University of Delaware, a University of Delaware Research Foundation’s Strategic Initiatives Grant, and National Science Foundation grant DMS- 1951474. The authors would like to thank Douglas Rizzolo for a helpful discussion that lead to the bounds for the Bounded Brownian Motion model.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lam Si Tung Ho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vu, N.L., Nguyen, T.P., Nguyen, B.T. et al. When can we reconstruct the ancestral state? Beyond Brownian motion. J. Math. Biol. 86, 88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-023-01922-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-023-01922-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation