Abstract
The Formal Darwinism Project is an attempt to use mathematical theory to prove the claim that fitness maximization is the outcome of evolution in nature. Grafen’s (2014, p. 12) conclusion from this project is that “….there is a very general expectation of something close to fitness maximisation, which will convert into fitness-maximisation unless there are particular kinds of circumstances—and further, that fitness is the same quantity for all genetic architectures.” Grafen’s claim appears to mean to him that natural populations are expected to contain individuals whose traits are optimal, i.e., any given trait outperforms all reasonable alternatives. I describe why Grafen’s attempt can never provide a meaningful expectation as to the ubiquity of optimal traits in nature. This is so because it is based upon a misconception of the relationship between theory and empirical analysis. Even if one could use theory in the way Grafen proposes, I describe how his theory is causally incomplete. Finally, I describe how Grafen’s conceptual framework is ambiguous. The Formal Darwinism Project has been inspired by “On The Origin of Species” by Darwin. The great lesson of this book was Darwin’s demonstration of the necessary dialog between theory and data, with each influencing and being influenced by the other. Grafen’s Formal Darwinism Project, an attempt to create understanding of nature by removing data from this dialog, reflects a failure to understand Darwin’s great lesson.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brandon R, Rausher MD (1996) Testing adaptationism: a comment on Orzack and Sober. Am Nat 148:189–201
Brockmann HJ, Dawkins R (1979) Joint nesting in a digger wasp as an evolutionarily stable preadaptation to social life. Behaviour 71:203–245
Brockmann HJ, Grafen A, Dawkins R (1979) Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger wasp. J Theor Biol 77:473–496
Cain AJ (1989) The perfection of animals. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 36:3–29
Chamary JV, Parmley JL, Hurst LD (2006) Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Nat Rev Genet 7:98–108
Charnov E (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ginzburg LR (1979) Why are heterozygotes often superior in fitness? Theor Popul Biol 15:264–267
Godfrey-Smith P (2001) Three kinds of adaptationism. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 335–357
Grafen A (1999) Formal Darwinism, the individual-as-maximising-agent analogy, and bet-hedging. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 266:799–803
Grafen A (2000) Developments of Price’s Equation and natural selection under uncertainty. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 267:1223–1227
Grafen A (2002) A first formal link between the Price equation and an optimisation program. J Theor Biol 217:75–91
Grafen A (2006a) Optimisation of inclusive fitness. J Theor Biol 238:541–563
Grafen A (2006b) A theory of Fisher’s reproductive value. J Math Biol 53:15–60
Grafen A (2014) The formal darwinism project in outline. Biol Philos 29(2). doi:10.1007/s10539-013-9414-y
Hansen TF, Orzack SH (2005) Assessing current adaptation and phylogenetic inertia as explanations of trait evolution: the need for controlled comparisons. Evolution 59:2063–2072
Hansen TF, Pienaar J, Orzack SH (2008) A comparative method for studying adaptation to a randomly evolving environment. Evolution 62:1965–1977
Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, New York
Herre EA (1987) Optimality, plasticity and selective regime in fig wasp sex ratios. Nature 329:627–629
Karlin S, Lieberman U (1975) Random temporal variation in selection intensities: case of large population size. Theor Popul Biol 6:355–382
Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kolman W (1960) The mechanism of natural selection for the sex ratio. Am Nat 94:373–377
Leigh EG Jr (1986) Ronald Fisher and the development of evolutionary theory. I. The role of selection. Oxf Surv Evolut Biol 3:187–223
Lewontin RC, Ginzburg L, Tuljapurkar S (1978) Heterosis as an explanation for large amounts of genic polymorphism. Genetics 88:149–170
Lynch M (1989) Phylogenetic hypotheses under the assumption of neutral quantitative-genetic variation. Evolution 43:1–17
May RM (1973) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Orzack SH (1990) The comparative biology of second sex ratio evolution within a natural population of a parasitic wasp, Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics 124:385–396
Orzack SH, Hines WGS (2005) The evolution of strategy variation: will an ESS evolve? Evolution 59:1183–1193
Orzack SH, Sober E (1993) A critical look at Richard Levins’ ‘‘The strategy of model building in population biology.” Q Rev Biol 68:533–546
Orzack SH, Sober E (1994a) Optimality models and the test of adaptationism. Am Nat 143:361–380
Orzack SH, Sober E (1994b) How (not) to test an optimality model. Trends Ecol Evol 9:265–267
Orzack SH, Sober E (1996) How to formulate and test adaptationism. Am Nat 148:202–210
Orzack SH, Sober E (2001) Adaptation, phylogenetic inertia, and the method of controlled comparisons. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 45–63
Orzack SH, Parker ED Jr, Gladstone J (1991) The comparative biology of genetic variation for conditional sex ratio adjustment in a parasitic wasp, Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics 127:583–599
Poethke HJ (1988) Sex ratio polymorphism: the impact of mutation and drift on evolution. Acta Biotheor 37:121–147
Price GR (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521
Rice SH (2008) A stochastic version of the price equation reveals the interplay of deterministic and stochastic processes in evolution. BMC Evol Biol 8:262–279
Rice SH, Papadopoulos A (2009) Evolution with stochastic fitness and stochastic migration. PLoS ONE 4(10):e7130. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007130
Shpak M, Orzack SH, Barany E (2013) The influence of demographic stochasticity on evolutionary dynamics and stability. Theor Popul Biol 88:47–56
Suzuki Y, Iwasa Y (1980) A sex ratio theory of gregarious parasitoids. Res Popul Ecol 22:366–382
Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Trivers R (1985) Social evolution. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Menlo Park
Waage JK, Lane JA (1984) The reproductive strategy of a parasitic wasp II. Sex allocation and local mate competition in Trichogramma evanescens. J Anim Ecol 53:417–426
Werren JH (1980) Sex ratio adaptations to local mate competition in a parasitic wasp. Science 208:1157–1159
Werren JH (1983) Sex ratio evolution under local mate competition in a parasitic wasp. Evolution 37:116–124
Werren JH (1987) Labile sex ratios in wasps and bees. Bioscience 37:498–506
West SA (2009) Sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, cross-breeding and selection in evolution. Proc VI Int Congr Genet 1:356–366
Acknowledgments
I thank Brian McLoone, Samir Okasha, Sean Rice, Elliott Sober, and Bill Stubblefield for advice and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orzack, S.H. A commentary on “The Formal Darwinism Project”: there is no grandeur in this view of life. Biol Philos 29, 259–270 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9423-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9423-x