Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary History of food Withdraw Movements in Primates: Food Withdraw is Mediated by Nonvisual Strategies in 22 Species of Strepsirrhines

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anthropoid vision contributes not only to reaching and grasping but also to the orienting of a food item during the withdraw movement to precisely place it in the mouth for eating. The evolutionary history of this visual control of feeding is not known. It likely evolved from the nonvisual control of the hand that is used with good effect for eating in many non-primate animal species. Strepsirrhines are a relatively large monophyletic group, diverging near the base of the primate cladogram, and described as using vision to reach for food. It is not known whether they use vision to orient food items during the withdraw movement. Video recordings of 7,464 withdraw movements from 22 species of captive strepsirrhines eating their normal food provisions were used to assess whether and how vision contributes to the withdraw movement. The constituent acts of withdraw movements, head orientation, body posture, ground-withdraw and inhand-withdraw, were assessed using frame-by-frame video inspection. Strepsirrhines were versatile in using their hands to get food to the mouth. They displayed variation between and within families that were weakly related to phylogenetic relationships and mainly related to feeding niches. There was no evidence that any species used vision to assist with the withdraw movement. Instead strepsirrhines used mouth reaching to take food from the hand and/or perioral contact to positioning food for biting. Our findings support two hypotheses: that visual mediation of food orienting for placement in the mouth during the withdraw movement is an anthropoid innovation, and that the evolution of the visual control of feeding was not a singular event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Duke Lemur Center, the Antwerp Zoo and the Vincennes Zoo for their assistance during data collection. A.-C.F. thanks the Fondation Fyssen and the Marie-Skłodowska Curie fellowship (EU project 655694 – GETAGRIP) for funding. C.E.W. thanks the National Science Foundation for funding (BCS-1062239). E. Pouydebat thanks the “ATM Collections Vivantes, MNHN, Paris, France” for funding. This is Duke Lemur Center Publication Number 1546.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.Q.W. conceptualized the study, L.R.P. and A.-C. F. collected the data. I.Q.W. and L.R.P. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. A.-C.F., E.P. and C.E.W. provided funding for data collection. All authors participated in reviewing and editing the MS and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise R. Peckre.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Supplementary Material 4

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peckre, L.R., Fabre, AC., Wall, C.E. et al. Evolutionary History of food Withdraw Movements in Primates: Food Withdraw is Mediated by Nonvisual Strategies in 22 Species of Strepsirrhines. Evol Biol 50, 206–223 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-023-09598-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-023-09598-0

Keywords

Navigation