Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cognitive function is mediated by deficit accumulation in older, long-term breast cancer survivors

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine whether cognitive function in older, long-term breast cancer survivors is both a direct effect of cancer and cancer treatments and an indirect effect mediated by deficit accumulation.

Patients and methods

Female breast cancer survivors who had been diagnosed and treated at age 60 or older and were 5–15-year survivors (N = 220) and age- and education-matched non-cancer controls (N = 123) were assessed at enrollment and at 8-, 16-, and 24-month follow-ups with standard neuropsychological tests and the comprehensive geriatric assessment which was used to calculate the deficit accumulation frailty index (DAFI). Blood or saliva samples for APOE genotyping were collected at enrollment. Participants were purposely recruited so that approximately 50% had a history of treatment with chemotherapy or and 50% were not exposed to chemotherapy.

Results

Latent variable mediation analysis revealed that cognitive performance was mediated by deficit accumulation for all three domains. The direct effect of cancer diagnosis and treatment history was significant for the Language domain (p = 0.04), a trend for the learning and memory domain (p = 0.054), and non-significant for the attention, processing speed, executive function (APE) domain. Carrying the APOE ε4 allele had a significant negative direct effect on the APE domain (p = 0.05) but no indirect effect through deficit accumulation.

Conclusion

Cognitive function in older, long-term breast cancer survivors appears to be primarily mediated through deficit accumulation.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

These findings have important clinical implications suggesting that the most effective intervention to prevent or slow cognitive aging in older cancer survivors may be through prevention or management of comorbidities and interventions that maintain functional capacity (exercise, physical therapy) and social and mental health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data can be requested by contacting the corresponding author.

References  

  1. Ahles TA, Root JC. Cognitive effects of cancer and cancer treatments. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018;14:435–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mandelblatt JS, Ahles TA, Lippman ME, Isaacs C, Adams-Campbell L, Saykin AJ, Cohen HJ, Carroll J. Applying a life course biological age framework to improving the care of individuals with adult cancers: review and research recommendations. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7:1692–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahles TA, Saykin A, Furstenberg CT, Cole B, Mott LA, Skalla K, Whedon MB, Bivens S, Mitchell T, Greenberg ER, Silberfarb PM. Neuropsychological impact of standard-dose chemotherapy in long-term survivors of breast cancer and lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:485–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koppelmans V, Breteler MMB, Boogerd W, Seynaeve C, et al. Neuropsychological performance in survivors of breast cancer more than 20 years after adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1080–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamada TH, Denburg NL, Beglinger LJ, Schultz SK. Neuropsychological outcomes of older breast cancer survivors: cognitive features ten or more years after chemotherapy. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010;22:48–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald BC. Structural neuroimaging findings related to adult non-CNS cancer and treatment: review, integration, and implications for treatment of cognitive dysfunction. Neurotherapeutics. 2021;18:792–810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Seward JB, Ellis EG, Cobden AL, Caeyenberghs K. Mapping cognitive deficits in cancer patients after chemotherapy: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of task-related fMRI studies. Brain Imaging Behav. 2022;16(5):2320–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-022-00655-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nardin S, Mora E, Varughese FM, et al. Breast cancer survivorship, quality of life and late toxicities. Front Oncol. 2020;10:864. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00864.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Agrawal S. Late effects of cancer treatment in breast cancer survivors. S Asian J Cancer. 2014;3:112–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandelblatt JS, Small BJ, Luta G, Hurria A, Jim H, McDonald BC, et al. Cancer-related cognitive outcomes among older breast cancer survivors in the thinking and living with cancer study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3211–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, Noll WW, et al. The relationship of APOE genotype to neuropsychological performance in long-term cancer survivors treated with standard dose chemotherapy. Psychooncology. 2003;12:612–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahles TA, Li Y, McDonald BC, et al. Longitudinal assessment of cognitive changes associated with adjuvant treatment for breast cancer: the impact of APOE and smoking. Psychooncology. 2014;23:1382–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahles TA, Orlow I, Schofield E, et al. The impact of APOE and smoking history on cognitive function in older, long-term breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Survivorship. 2022. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1176-022-01267-z.

  14. Amidi A, Agerbaek M, Wu LM, et al. Changes in cognitive functions and cerebral grey matter and their associations with inflammatory markers, endocrine markers, and APOE genotypes in testicular cancer patients undergoing treatment. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017;11:769–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Correa DD, Satagopan J, Baser RE, et al. APOE polymorphisms and cognitive functions in patients with brain tumors. Neurology. 2014;83:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tai LM, Thomas R, Marottoli FM, Koster KP, et al. The role of APOE in cerebrovascular dysfunction. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;13:709–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mourtizi N, Ntanasi E, Yannakoulia M, et al. Apolipoprotein e4 is associated with frailty syndrome: results from the Hellenic longitudinal investigation of ageing and diet study. Age Ageing. 2019;48:917–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Magnuson A, Lei L, Gilmore N, Kleckner AS, Lin FV, Ferguson R, et al. Longitudinal relationship between frailty and cognition in patients age > 50 years with breast cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67:928–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mandelblatt JS, Zhou X, Small BJ, Ahn J, Zhai W, Ahles TA, et al. Deficits accumulation frailty trajectories of older breast cancer survivors and matched non-cancer controls: the Thinking and Living with Cancer (TLC) study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113:1053–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Guida JL, Ahles TA, Belsky D, et al. Measuring aging and identifying aging phenotypes in cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:1245–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahles TA, Schofield E, Li Y, et al. Relationship between cognitive functioning and frailty in older breast cancer survivors. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022;13:27–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katzman R, Brown T, Fuld P, et al. Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140:734–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformations. J Roy Stat Soc B. 1964;26:211–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Benton AL. Neuropsychological assessment. Annu Rev Psychol. 1994;45:1–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weintraub S, Salmon D, Mercaldo N, Ferris S, et al. The Alzheimer’s disease centers’ uniform data set (UDS): the neuropsychological test battery. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009;23:91–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Benton A. Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia. 2006;6:53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) San Antonio TX: Pearson. 2008.

  28. Reitan R, Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. Tucson: AZ, Neuropsychological Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan executive function system. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stern RA, White T. Neuropsychological assessment battery (NAB). Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR), Lutz, Fl. 2003.

  31. Stern RA, White T. NAB psychometric and technical manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 2003.

  32. WMS-R - Wechsler D. WMS-R 1987 Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation

  33. Stewart AL, Ware JE. Measuring functioning and well-being: the medical outcomes study approach. Durham NC: Duke University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA. The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J Gerontol. 1981;36:428–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Pscyhol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Spielberger CD. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI: Form Y). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hann DM, Jacobsen PB, Martin SC, et al. Fatigue in women treated with bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer: a comparison with women with no history of cancer. Support Care Cancer. 1997;5:44–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Owsley C, Sloane M, McGwin G Jr, Ball K. Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: relationship to cognitive function and everyday performance assessments in older adults. Gerontology. 2002;48:254–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cohen HJ, Smith D, Sun CL, Filo J, Katheria V, Hurria A, et al. Frailty as determined by a comprehensive geriatric assessment derived deficit accumulation index in older patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy. Cancer. 2016;15:3865–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Orlow I, Reiner AS, Thomas NE, Roy P, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a population-based study. Carcinogenesis. 2016;37:30–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mahley RW, Rall SC. Apolipoprotein E: far more than a lipid transport protein. Annu Rev Genomics hum Genet. 2000;1:507–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chavance M, Escolano S, Romon M, et al. Latent variables and structural equation models for longitudinal relationships: an illustration in nutritional epidemiology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Luo J, Schousboe JT, Ensrud KE, Hendryx M. Long-term changes of cognitive impairment among older breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Survivorship. 2022. On line ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01220-0.

  44. Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, McDonald BC, Li Y, Furstenberg CT, Hanscom BS, Mulrooney TJ, Schwartz GN, Kaufman PA. Longitudinal assessment of cognitive changes associated with adjuvant treatment for breast cancer: the impact of age and cognitive reserve. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4434–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Aging as a process of deficit accumulation: its utility and origin. In Yashin AI, Jazwinski SM (eds): Aging and health – a systems biology perspective. Interdiscipl Top Gerontol. Basel, Karger. 2015;40; 85–98

  46. Hollinshead MG, Botchway A, Schmidt KE, et al. Cognitive component structure of a neuropsychological battery administered to cognitively-normal adults in the SIU longitudinal cognitive aging study. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022;8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214221130157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mouritzi N, Ntanasi E, Yannakoulia M, et al. Apolipoprotein ε4 allele is associated with frailty syndrome: results from the Hellenic longitudinal investigation of ageing and diet study. Age Aging. 2019;00:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rockwood K, Nassar B, Mitnitski A. Apolipoprotein E-polymorphism, frailty and mortality in older adults. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:2754–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ahles TA, Saykin AJ. Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:192–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Carroll JE, Nakamura ZM, Small BJ, et al. Elevated c-reactive protein and subsequent patient-reported impairment in older breast cancer survivors: the Thinking and Living with Cancer (TLC) Study. J Clin Oncol, 2023;41:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00406

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (TA: R01 CA172119, U54 CA137788, P30 CA008748), the American Cancer Society (SKP: RSG-17–023-01-CPPB), and Internal MSK grants (IO: Society of MSK, Brain Tumor Center Award).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TAA, ES, and YL wrote the main manuscript. ES prepared the figures and tables. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim A. Ahles.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 127 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahles, T.A., Schofield, E., Li, Y. et al. Cognitive function is mediated by deficit accumulation in older, long-term breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01365-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01365-6

Keywords

Navigation