Skip to main content
Log in

“That Was Fun, I Gotta Run:” Comparing Exit Strategies of a One-Time Sexual Encounter to Buyer–Seller Relationship Dissolution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing literature on sexual behavior has often examined several different types of casual sexual relationships (CSRs) collectively as a CSR as opposed to looking at each type of CSR individually. Research has previously looked at exit strategies in conjunction with committed relationships, but there is a dearth of research looking at how individuals exit noncommittal sexual encounters, such as a one-time sexual encounters (OTSE). This study aimed to examine exit strategies from an OTSE and then compare them to exit strategies used in business relationship dissolution. We gathered qualitative data from 48 participants and analyzed it using thematic analysis. Three main themes from this data were (1) communications that signaled the end of an OTSE, (2) actions taken that signaled the end of an OTSE and (3) agreements made about an OTSE. Eleven of our subthemes mapped on to the business model used. These findings demonstrate that OTSEs may be viewed as a transactional encounter instead of a short-term personal relationship by those who engage in them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alajoutsijärvi, K., Möller, K., & Tähtinen, J. (2000). Beautiful exit: how to leave your business partner. European Journal of Marketing, 34(11–12), 1270–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachtel, M. (2013). Do Hookups Hurt? Exploring College Students’ Experiences and Perceptions. Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health, 58(1), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating and relationships on campus. . New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, S., & Van Dulmen, M. (2013). Casual Sexual Relationships and Experiences in Emerging Adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. (pp. 181–223) Thousand Oaks.

  • Drigotas, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1992). Should I stay or should I go? A dependence model of breakups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, S., Lavoie, F., Blais, M., & Hébert, M. (2017). Consequences of casual sex relationships and experiences on adolescents’ psychological well-being: a prospective study. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(8), 1006–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, M., Ackard, D., Resnick, M., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2009). Casual Sex and Psychological Health Among Young Adults: Is Having “Friends with Benefits” Emotionally Damaging? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(4), 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. L., Worth, K., Garcia, J. R., & Meredith, T. (2012). Feelings of regret following uncommitted sexual encounters in Canadian university students. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 14(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No Strings Attached: The Nature of Casual Sex in College Students. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heldman, C., & Wade, L. (2010). Hook-up culture: Setting a new research agenda. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7(4), 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, H. (2012). Thematic analysis. Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy. 1.

  • Jonason, P. K. (2013). Four functions for four relationships: Consensus definitions of university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(8), 1407–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennair, L., Wyckoff, J., Asao, K., Buss, D., & Bendixen, M. (2018). Why do women regret casual sex more than men do? Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S.-L.T., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. (2014). Doing Social Constructivist Research Means Making Empathic and Aesthetic Connections with Participants. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(4), 538–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, S. L., & Smith, M. L. (2000). Qualitative research for counseling psychology. Handbook of counseling psychology, 3, 199–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of sexual behavior, 40(2), 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E., & Hayes, K. (2002). The casualties of 'casual' sex: a qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students' hookups. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships. 19(5); 639–661 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502195006

  • Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and Correlates of College Students’ Spontaneous and Anonymous Sexual Experiences. Journal Of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piemonte, J. L., Conley, T. D., & Gusakova, S. (2019). Orgasm, gender and responses to heterosexual casual sex. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchers, J., de Visser, R., Rissel, C., & Smith, A. (2006). Sexual practices at last heterosexual encounter and occurrence of orgasm in a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(1), 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Zembrodt, I. M., & Gunn, L. K. (1982). Exit, voice, loyalty and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. (1996). The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of sexual behavior, 15(2), 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (2018). Generalizability in qualitative research: misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis and management. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 68(3), 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, trans.).

  • Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 20(3).

  • Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. (2014). Casual sexual relationships: Identifying definitions for one night stands, booty calls, fuck buddies and friends with benefits. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(3), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph M. Currin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cox, K., Currin, J.M., Garos, S. et al. “That Was Fun, I Gotta Run:” Comparing Exit Strategies of a One-Time Sexual Encounter to Buyer–Seller Relationship Dissolution. Sexuality & Culture 25, 1771–1788 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09849-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09849-2

Keywords

Navigation