Abstract
Purpose
To examine (1) whether a wife’s BMI interacts with either her husband’s weight stigma or (2) her perceived weight criticisms from her husband predict husbands’ and wives’ psychological and relational outcomes.
Methods
The study sample consisted of 209 currently married men and women in a heterosexual relationship. Participants were drawn from an online survey platform (Qualtrics, Inc. Provo, UT) designed to approximate the US population on age, race, and region of the country. Online measures assessed husbands’ weight stigma, wives’ perceived weight criticisms from husband, and husbands’ and wives’: (1) relationship satisfaction, (2) sexual intimacy, (3) self-esteem, (4) depressive symptoms, and (5) perceptions of a desirable or ideal mate.
Results
Wives’ BMI interacted with husbands’ weight stigma to predict (1) mate value for husbands and wives and (2) marital satisfaction for husbands. The same pattern was noted with interaction of wives’ BMI and perceptions of husbands’ weight related criticisms. The interaction reflected that higher wife BMI and higher husband weight stigma or wife perceived weight-related criticism predicted lower marital satisfaction, greater depression, and lower perceptions of a desirable or an ideal mate. Lower BMI was not associated with outcomes regardless of the husbands’ weight stigma or wives’ perceived weight-related criticisms.
Conclusion
To understand the impact of weight stigma and weight related criticisms on perceptions of a desirable or ideal mate and marital outcomes, it is important to examine the interaction with partner’s BMI.
Level of evidence
III: Evidence obtained from cohort or case–control analytic studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Puhl RM, Heuer CA (2009) The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 17(5):1–24
Carels RA, Rossi J, Solar C, Selensky JC (2018) Changes in perceived mate value and weight bias associated with former obesity status. Stigma Health 3(4):338
Pearl RL, Wadden TA, Tronieri JS, Chao AM, Alamuddin N, Bakizada ZM et al (2018) Sociocultural and familial factors associated with weight bias internalization. Obes Facts 11(2):157–164
Eisenberg ME, Franz R, Berge JM, Loth KA, Neumark-Sztainer D (2017) Significant others’ weight-related comments and their associations with weight-control behavior, muscle-enhancing behavior, and emotional well-being. Fam Syst Health 35(4):474
Sheets V, Ajmere K (2005) Are romantic partners a source of college students’ weight concerns? Eat Behav 6(1):1–9
Carels RA, Hlavka R, Selenksy J, Solar C, Rossi J, Miller JC, Ellis J (2020) The associations between wives’ internalized weight bias and other weight-related concerns, perceived husbands’ weight-related comments, perceived mate value, and psychological and relationship outcomes. Stigma Health 5(3):258
Carels RA, Miller JC, Hlavka R, Selensky J, Shonrock AMT, Ellis JM (2020) The association between husbands’ weight bias and related concerns and husbands’ and wives’ psychological and relationship outcomes. Body Image 35:11–21
Durso LE, Latner JD (2008) Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. Obesity 16(2):s80–s86
Markey CN, Markey PM, August KJ, Nave CS (2016) Gender, BMI, and eating regulation in the context of same-sex and heterosexual couples. J Behav Med 39(3):398–407
Crandall CS (1994) Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol 66(5):882–894
Fletcher GJ, Simpson JA, Thomas G, Giles L (1999) Ideals in intimate relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(1):72–79
Befort C, Robinson Kurpius SE, Hull-Blanks E, Nicpon MF, Huser L, Sollenberger S (2011) Body image, self-esteem, and weight-related criticism from romantic partners. J Coll Stud Dev 42(5):407–419
Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385–401
Rosenberg M (1983) Self-esteem scale. In: Robinson JP, Shaver PR (eds) Measures of social psychological attitudes. Survey Research Center for Social Research, Ann Arbor, pp 81–83
Funk JL, Rogge RD (2007) Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. J Fam Psychol 21:572–583
Schaefer MT, Olson DH (1981) Assessing intimacy: the PAIR inventory. J Marital Fam Ther 7(1):47–60
Beach SR, Sandeen E, O’Leary KD (1990) Depression in marriage: a model for etiology and treatment. Guilford Press, New York
Carels RA, Rossi FA, Solar C, Selensky J (2018) Change in perceived mate value and weight bias associated with former obesity status. Stigma Health 3(4):338
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethical approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of East Carolina University (UMCIRB 18-000554).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carels, R.A., Miller, J.C., Hlavka, R. et al. The interaction between BMI, weight criticism, weight bias, and psychological and relational outcomes within marriage. Eat Weight Disord 27, 1887–1893 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01324-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01324-z