ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Recognition and Application of Catalysis in Secondary Rechargeable Batteries

  • Changhao Wang
    Changhao Wang
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Discipline of Intelligent Instrument and Equipment, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    More by Changhao Wang
  • Xiaohong Wu
    Xiaohong Wu
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    More by Xiaohong Wu
  • Yilong Chen
    Yilong Chen
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    More by Yilong Chen
  • Baodan Zhang
    Baodan Zhang
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    More by Baodan Zhang
  • Haiyan Luo
    Haiyan Luo
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    More by Haiyan Luo
  • Zhengang Li
    Zhengang Li
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    More by Zhengang Li
  • Yawen Yan
    Yawen Yan
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    More by Yawen Yan
  • Zixin Wu
    Zixin Wu
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    More by Zixin Wu
  • Kai Fang
    Kai Fang
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    More by Kai Fang
  • Yu Qiao*
    Yu Qiao
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    *Email for Y.Q.: [email protected]
    More by Yu Qiao
  • , and 
  • Shi-Gang Sun*
    Shi-Gang Sun
    State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    *Email for S.G.S.: [email protected]
    More by Shi-Gang Sun
Cite this: ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 16, 10641–10650
Publication Date (Web):July 31, 2023
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c02455

Copyright © 2023 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

  • Free to Read

Article Views

2417

Altmetric

-

Citations

-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (6 MB)

Abstract

With the exponentially increasing requirement for cost-effective energy storage systems, secondary rechargeable batteries have become a major topic of research interest and achieved remarkable progresses. For the past few years, a growing number of studies have introduced catalysts or the concept of catalysis into battery systems for achieving better electrochemical performance or designing materials with distinctive structures and excellent properties. In this brief Perspective, we explore the catalysis in secondary rechargeable batteries, including: 1) classical battery systems with exquisite catalyst design; 2) manipulation of electrode–electrolyte interface layers via selective catalysis; and 3) design of cathodes with distinctive structures using the mindset of catalysis toward anionic redox activity. This Perspective emphasizes catalysis in battery studies with the aim of inspiring distinctive ideas and directions for the future development of rechargeable battery technology.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

1. Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The increasing demand for sustainable energy storage has triggered the interest of researchers around the world. (1−3) Nowadays, merging the concept of catalysis into battery studies has become more and more important, whether in scientific investigations or industrial technologies. (4−9) Catalysis, an old term, was first proposed by Jöns Jakob Berzelius from Sweden. (10) In 1836, he accidentally discovered that platinum powder can accelerate the oxidation of alcohol with air. After that, this phenomenon was called catalysis (katalύein in the Greek word), which means “to dissolve”. Over a period of nearly 200 years, catalysts have been widely used in various industries, including petroleum refining, fuel cell, textile industry, pharmaceutical industry, and so on. (11−14) In the book “Catalysis: Concepts and Green Applications”, the author Gadi Rothenberg (15) pointed out that “A catalyst is a substance that facilitates a chemical reaction, without being consumed in the process. In most cases, the catalyst in fact opens a different, faster reaction pathway.” Due to these intrinsic properties of catalysts, many high-efficiency catalysts were also employed recently in rechargeable batteries to achieve the anticipated purposes. (16−18)
In this Perspective, we discuss the related issues of catalysis in secondary rechargeable batteries. We divide this article into three parts based on the purpose of catalysis (Figure 1). First, we review and discuss the conventional catalysts used in lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) and lithium-oxygen batteries (LOBs). In this part, we expect that the catalysts can speed up the reaction kinetics as much as possible, leading to a better electrochemical performance of batteries. Second, the formation of electrode–electrolyte interfaces in batteries is narrated in detail. This section shows the importance of selective catalysis for battery systems. In the third section, according to the broad theory of catalysis, we discuss the design of new electrode materials by regulating the energy level/band structure. Finally, we discuss opportunities and challenges of rechargeable batteries associated with catalysis and how to make better use of catalysis in batteries.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Selected most popular research orientations in catalysis which used in secondary rechargeable batteries. Copyright 2012 Springer Nature. (36) Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (57) Copyright 2016 Springer Nature. (73)

2. Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

2.1. Conventional Catalysis: Accelerating the Kinetics of a Battery

In terms of catalysis used in secondary batteries, the first things we could think of are Li-S and Li-O2 batteries. As for the LSB, (19−22) it is consisted of a cathode with sulfur (S) as the active material, electrolyte (solid-state or liquid), an anode (Li metal), and a separator (Figure 2a). (23) Due to the multielectron reaction (S8 + 16Li+ + 16e ⇋ 8Li2S), LSBs possess a high theoretical capacity of 1674 mAh g–1, which is much higher than that of commercialized lithium ion batteries (LIBs). (24−26) However, the chemical/electrochemical conversion process of S8 is a multistage reaction, which would inevitably generate lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) as intermediates. Because of the solid–liquid conversion reaction (insoluble S8, Li2S2/Li2S and soluble long chain LiPSs), the sluggish kinetics of LSBs limits its further commercialization. (24,27) Besides, the notorious polysulfide shuttle effect and large volume change of sulfur-containing cathodes in LSBs lead to dreadful Coulombic efficiency, unsatisfactory cycling performance, and various security concerns. (28−30) To solve these problems, tremendous studies have been conducted and researchers found that integrating conductive host materials (such as carbon-based materials) and catalysts (especially for single atom catalysts (SACs)) with sulfur to fabricate composite electrodes is one of the most efficient strategies to improve the overall performance of LSBs. (31) The role of conductive host materials is to enhance the electrical conductivity of cathode. Meanwhile, these scaffolds can provide more spaces to accommodate sulfur and confine the shuttle effect of LiPSs. The reason for employing efficient catalysts in LSBs is to anchor the soluble LiPSs, accelerate the conversion reaction of LiPSs, and improve the dynamic performance of LSBs. Based on this, a large number of transition metal (TM) oxides, sulfides, phosphates, MXene, and other heterostructures were used in sulfur-containing cathodes to explore their catalytic performance toward the conversion reaction of LiPSs (reducing the redox reaction energy barriers of LiPSs conversion). Zhao et al. (32) utilized density functional theory (DFT) to elaborately compute the catalytic activities and anchoring effects of a series of transition metal phthalocyanines (TMPcs) in LSBs (Figure 2b). The TMPcs with TM-N4 structure can be regarded as SAC analogues. DFT results show that the binding energy between S8/LiPSs and TMPcs is higher than those between S8/LiPSs and metal-free phthalocyanine (H2Pc). Additionally, the charge density distributions suggest that compared with the Li–N bond, the TM–S bond would be stronger in the anchoring effect of LiPSs than Li–N bond. With the help of TMPcs, the Li–S bond can be effectively weakened, lowering the decomposition energy barrier of Li2S. The experimental results also show that TMPcs, especially TiPc, are excellent adsorption-catalysis dual-functional additives for LSBs, increasing reversible capacity and ensuring long-term cycle stability.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of operating principle of Li-S batteries. Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH. (23) (b) Free-energy profiles for the S8/LiPSs conversion on the surface of TiPc and H2Pc. Copyright 2021 Elsevier. (32) (c) Abridged general view of a nonaqueous Li-O2 battery with dominant Li2O2 product on the cathode side. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society. (37) (d) Mechanisms of O2 reduction in Li-O2 batteries during recharge process. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (41) (e) Free energy diagram of CoPt@gra-OH&NH2 system. Copyright 2021 Elsevier. (43)

As for the LOBs, Abraham et al. introduced the first rechargeable Li-O2 batteries in 1996, although this new battery system gained limited attention all over the world due to its nauseous cycle life. (33) Ten years later, Bruce et al. successfully proved the rechargeability of LOBs, which intrigued researchers all over the world. (34) Li-O2 batteries can be simply classified by the type of electrolytes. Taking aprotic Li-O2 batteries as an example, as shown in Figure 2c, it is made up of a porous cathode, a separator, an aprotic electrolyte with lithium salts, and a Li metal anode. (35,36) In the process of discharge, Li metal at the anode side is oxidized to form Li+ and then dissolved into electrolyte. Meanwhile, the dissolved O2 at the cathode side would react with Li+ to produce discharge product Li2O2 on porous cathodes (oxygen reduction reaction, or ORR). In this case, electrons would transfer from external circuits (from anode to cathode) to provide electric energy. In reverse, the Li2O2 would be decomposed and then released the O2 during the charging process (oxygen evolution reaction, or OER). The electrochemical reaction can be described as 2Li ↔ 2Li+ + 2e (anode side) and 2Li+ + O2 + 2e ↔ Li2O2 (cathode side). (37) The aprotic Li-O2 batteries possess a theoretically specific energy density of 3500 Wh kg–1 on the basis of Li2O2 mass loading. Besides, it is worth mentioning that Li-O2 batteries with aqueous electrolytes would produce hydrated LiOH as a discharge product. (38) The theoretical energy density of these aqueous LOBs is lower than that of aprotic Li-O2 batteries. (39) Despite the huge specific capacity of Li-O2 batteries, there are still numerous scientific and technical problems needed to be solved before commercialization. One of these hurdles is high overpotential especially for the charging process. As for the aprotic LOBs, their discharging overpotentials are usually ∼0.3 V, but charging overpotentials can be up to ∼1.0–1.5 V, which leads to low round-trip efficiency (<70%) with huge energy consumption. The essential reason for this phenomenon stems from the sluggish kinetics of ORR/OER in LOBs. (40) As indicated in Figure 2d, Lu et al. (41) analyzed the mechanism of the increase in recharging potential detailed. Recently, the effective solution to this issue is applying high-efficiency catalysts in cathode side, which can decrease the reaction energy barriers in charging/discharging process. (42) Zhang et al. (43) synthesized CoPt clusters on modified graphene (grafting with OH and NH2 groups, named as CoPt@gra-OH&NH2) and added it into the cathode of LOBs (Figure 2e). They employed density functional theory (DFT) to calculate Gibbs free energy (ΔG) to evaluate the ORR/OER properties of CoPt@gra-OH&NH2 catalyst. The calculated overpotentials (η) were regarded as the descriptor for assessing the catalytic activity in Li-O2 batteries. Compared with CoPt clusters on ordinary graphene or commonly used porous carbon cloth cathodes, the CoPt@gra-OH&NH2 catalyst possesses lower ηORR of the rate-determining step (about 0.42 V). For the OER process, the overpotential of CoPt@gra-OH&NH2 catalyst in the rate-determining step is also the lowest (0.68 V). With the aid of the adsorption-catalysis-conversion effect of these high-efficiency catalysts, the overpotential of LOBs during the charging and discharging process could be significantly decreased, leading to higher energy efficiency and longer cycle life.
From the viewpoint of common battery systems of the LSBs and LOBs discussed above, we recognized the importance of catalysts to accelerate the kinetics and improve the reversibility of the batteries. We expect the catalytic performance of these catalysts to be as high as possible. However, some catalysts work in different ways into the batteries, which we define as selective catalysis.

2.2. Selective Catalysis: Enhancing the Stability of an Electrolyte–Electrode Interface

Generally, laboratory-grade lithium-ion batteries are mainly composed of cathode, anode, separator, and electrolyte. As for the aprotic electrolytes such as carbonate-based electrolytes, they would be reduced at negative electrodes and oxidized at positive electrodes to form the well-known solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) by various complicated electrochemical and chemical reactions. (44) During the operation of the batteries, a stable electrode–electrolyte interface (EEI) layer is of vital importance to obtain a long cycle life and a high voltage output. Even so, it is difficult to develop an ideal EEI layer to keep the batteries operating for a long time. (45) For example, due to the high reactivity of the Li anode (or other alkali metals), it would react with electrolyte to form an ionically conductive but electronically insulating SEI layer. Nonetheless, the developed SEI layer is commonly nonuniform and fragile, which would lead to dendrite growth and even catastrophic short circuit. Based on the previous works, the formation of EEI layer depends on the electrode material and specific salt and solvent used in the electrolyte. (46−48) The compatibility between the electrode and electrolyte is usually related to the composition/structure of EEI layers. Substantially, according to the theory of Goodenough et al., the thermodynamic driving force of the formation of EEI layer is derived from the difference between the Fermi level of the electrode and the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) or the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) levels of the electrolyte. (49) Thinking from a different view, the key point of catalysis is to regulate the energy level structure. Following this thought, we may audaciously assert that fine-tuning the Fermi level of the electrode or aligning the HOMO or LUMO levels of the electrolyte takes advantage of the ideology of catalysis in a broad sense. This modification strategy is an effective and commonly used method that can acquire stable and beneficial EEI layers. In detail, as shown in Figure 3a, if the LUMO level of the electrolyte locates under that of the Fermi level of the anode, the electrolyte would obtain the electrons from the anode, causing the reduction of the electrolyte until a passivated SEI layer is generated. Similarly, if the HOMO level of the electrolyte is higher in energy than the Fermi level of the cathode, the electrons would transfer from the solvent-electrolyte to the cathode, resulting in the oxidation of the electrolyte on the positive electrode. It should be pointed out that the calculated LUMO or HOMO values of solvent molecules can indeed be used to describe the reduction and oxidation of solvent. Based on this theory, many researchers regulate the EEI layers by adjusting the formula of the electrolyte or adding new additives (selective catalysis or purposive redox pair regulation). Nevertheless, some scholars analyzed experimental data elaborately and found that the reduction potentials or oxidation potentials (related with the LUMO or HOMO levels), which are computed employing hybrid functional density functional theory (DFT) calculations in the polarizable continuum model (PCM), are different from practical data. (50−52) In fact, the LUMO values of various pure carbonate solvent (such as ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, and dimethyl carbonate) are not significantly different in DFT calculation models. (53) Due to the interaction between Li+ and carbonate solvent (the extra electron surrounded at the carbon atom), this resulted in lower LUMO levels of the electrolytes compared with pure solvents (Figure 3b). Additionally, the salt anions in electrolytes (e.g., PF6, ClO4, and BF4) could also cause the similar effects. (54−56) Generally, the calculated HOMO values of pure carbonate solvents in DFT models are quite low, which are below the Fermi level of cathode materials, just consulting their numerical values. Its corresponding oxidation potential is about 7 V (vs Li/Li+). (48) In practice, the highest oxidation potential of these carbonate electrolytes is about 5.5 V (vs Li/Li+). In addition, if we take the existence of impurities into account, the oxidation potential of these electrolytes would become lower (∼4.5 V vs Li/Li+), as shown in Figure 3b. It is important to know that the decomposition of electrolyte in the battery is not only the effect of applied potential but also the result of catalysis/electrocatalysis, and the real battery systems are much more complex. Therefore, these catalysis or electrocatalysis issues must be taken into account when we govern the surface-interface (or EEI layers) of the electrodes by electrolyte modification. (57) Besides, the electrode materials are equally important to establish a stable EEI layer. This issue illustrates that the electrode materials with different catalytic properties would also change the decomposition of solvent or redox properties of anions in electrolytes. In a nutshell, as described in Figure 3c, Yang Shao-Horn et al. (58) found that the thermodynamic driving force for dehydrogenation of carbonate solvents would be enhanced with increased nickel content in the LiNixCoyMnzO2 (NCM) system (both nickel and nickel ion possess strong catalytic performance inherently). Moreover, the content of delithiation is also a crucial influencing factor on the decomposition of carbonate solvents. NCM with a high delithiation state contributes to dehydrogenation of solvents such as ethylene carbonate (EC), resulting in a stronger catalysis/oxidation effect toward carbonate-based electrolytes. This viewpoint is supported by calculating the O-p band center trend of NCM111, 622, and 811. (59) DFT results indicate that as the Fermi level approaches the O-p band because of high delithiation state or the increase of Ni content in NMC, the dissociative adsorption of EC on the oxide surface becomes more energetically favorable. Gasteiger et al. (60) deemed that highly charged NCM systems (especially at xLi = ∼0.2) would generate highly reactive catalytic species such as singlet oxygen, which can attack carbonate molecules in the electrolyte. Ulteriorly, the dehydrogenated carbonate intermediates can participate in the formation of the EEI layers (organic composition). Additionally, the generated protic species would potentially bond with anions such as PF6 to produce oxidized resultants (PF3O), which can be aggregated on the surface of cathodes (one of the compositions of EEI layers). (61,62) In addition, from the perspective of material structure, it has been reported that the generated SEI layer would be quite different in compositions and thicknesses on the basal and edge planes of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG). (63−65) As exhibited in Figure 3d, on the edge plane, the SEI is mainly inorganic composition; however, the SEI on the basal plane principally consists of organic species. Although there are many explanations for the nature of this phenomenon, further proofs are needed to consolidate these hypotheses. But we must know that the decomposition of electrolytes also depends on the different planes of materials, which is associated with charge transfer kinetics. (66−68) Through reasonable material design, using selective adsorption/catalysis to establish prospective EEI layers is crucial for the life of batteries.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Schematic energy diagram of a liquid electrolyte under open-circuit state. Eg is the stable window of the electrolyte. ΦA and ΦC signify the anode and cathode work functions, respectively. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society. (49) (b) Computed reduction and oxidation energy levels of common solvents and solvated salts used in Li-ion batteries. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (57) (c) Ethylene carbonate dissociative adsorption energy on LiNi0.33Co0.33Mn0.33O2, LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2, and LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (dashed lines) by projecting their computed O 2p band centers onto the trend established by layered oxides. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (58) (d) Schematic illustration of the SEI on basal (top) and edge (bottom) planes of HOPG. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (57)

In this section, we realized that catalysis is actually inseparable from batteries at present. Designing the electrolytes/electrode materials consciously on the basis of the concept of selective catalysis is extremely important. Innumerable researchers have contributed to the realization of more stable and superior batteries in this way. Nonetheless, due to some extent of misguidance when using approximated electronic structure theory (LUMO/HOMO levels), we need new and reliable descriptors (preferably ones that are easy to compute) to evaluate electrolytes and electrode materials. How to better connect these three parameters of composition, structure, and performance with quantitative methods is a great challenge for us.

2.3. Generalized Catalysis: Regulating the Energy Level Structure to Design New Cathodes

Given that the essence of catalysis is to regulate the energy level/band structure. Further, in this section, we focus on the design of cathodes with new structures using this mindset of catalysis. Due to the higher specific capacities, lithium-rich oxides are regarded as next-generation cathodes, which bridge the capacity gap between traditional layered-oxide and future oxygen/sulfur cathodes. As shown in Figure 4a, in traditional layered-oxide (AMO2, A and M are alkali-metal ions and transition metal ions, respectively), the overlaps between O 2p orbits and M (n+1)s/(n+1)p orbits constitute bonding a1g/t1u and antibonding a1g*/t1u*. The nd (eg) orbitals of M are bonded with oxygen, forming strong σ bonds (eg and eg*); however, the nd (t2g) orbitals of M remain nonbonding orbitals. Because the Fermi level of AMO2 is located at eg* or t2g with M nd character, the capacity of AMO2 cathode is principally stemmed from the redox couple of Mx+/My+. (69) By manipulating the energy levels, the O 2p orbitals are hybridized with M nd (eg), (n+1)s and (n+1)p orbitals to form antibonding orbitals (a1* and b2*), and σ-type bonds (a1 and b2) are also formed in A2MO3. The difference is that π-type less-bonding (b1) and less-antibonding (b1*) molecular orbitals can be generated between two O 2p orbitals (A-O-A axis) and two M nd (t2g) orbitals, as exhibited in Figure 4b. Because the energy level of the occupied M nd (t2g) is lower than that of O 2p, the formed b1* antibonding orbitals are predominantly made up of O 2p, which results in an additional capacity associated O redox. (70) Based on this, a series of new materials with high theoretical capacity, such as lithium-rich materials, are currently being designed, which can realize cationic and anionic redox simultaneously.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Molecular orbital energy diagrams of (a) an OA3M3 octahedron in layered AMO2 and (b) an OA4M2 octahedron in A-excess layered A2MO3. A and M denote alkali-metal ions and transition metal ions, respectively. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (69) Taking Mott-Hubbard splitting into consideration, the Li2MO3 band structure can be classified under three cases (c–e), depending on the interaction between the dd Coulomb repulsion term U and the charge transfer term Δ. UHB and LHB signify the upper and lower Hubbard bands, respectively. Copyright 2018 Springer Nature. (71) (f) projected DOS of the O-2p and Fe-3d orbitals of O2– ions in the Li6-O configurations and nearest Fe ions in cation-disordered Li3FeO3.5. Increased pDOS near the Fermi level for the O2– coordinated by six Li+ manifests the particular Li6-O configuration. Copyright 2017 Springer Nature. (85) (g) Schematic illustration of the role played by the Li6-O configurations during the lithiation or delithiation of Li5FeO4. Copyright 2017 Springer Nature. (85)

To better understand the anionic redox reaction (ARR) in lithium-rich oxides. Jean-Marie Tarascon et al. (71,72) introduced the d-d Coulomb interaction term U to evaluate the repulsive interaction of d orbital electrons based on solid state physics. There is a split in the partially filled (M-O)* band (labeled Mott-Hubbard splitting), which leads to filled lower and empty upper-Hubbard bands (LHB and UHB respectively. The relative position of the O 2p nonbonding band and LHB decide the values of U and Δ. In the first case (Figure 4c), U ≪ Δ, electrons would only be exchanged from the filled LHB, which suggests the traditional layered-oxide with M redox. (73) In the second case (Figure 4d), U/2 ≈ Δ, the overlap between the O 2p nonbonding bands and LHB could deliver a dual capacity from cationic redox and anion redox. In this situation, due to the instability when removing electrons, the structural distortion including Jahn–Teller or Peierls distortions would occur. By lowering the symmetry of the structure and refreaming oxygen network (the formation of O–O dimers), M-(O2)n interactions would be stabilized, (74,75) which is consistent with the experimental data of Li2IrO3, (76,77) Li2RuO3, (78,79) and so on. This momentous discovery sheds light on the construction of high-quality cathodes with extra capacity due to anion redox. The delicate balance between Δ and U is crucial, which can be manipulated via regulation of the energy level/band structure (choosing metal–ligand combinations). In the last case (Figure 4e), U ≫ Δ, the electrons can be directly removed from the nonbonding O 2p band, which is situated above the filled LHB. This would produce the highly reactive On species or even O2, leading to irreversible processes in electrode materials. However, these materials are not useless. Some of them (antifluorite) are often used as cathode prelithiation additives such as Li6CoO4, Li5FeO4, and so on. (80−84) As shown in Figures 4f and 4g, Amine et al. (85) investigated Li5FeO4 with antifluorite structure via density of states (DOS) and charge/spin density analyses, which can realize simultaneous anionic and cationic redox at the same potential. They discussed the internal mechanism of the anionic redox related with the reversibility of structures, the influence of charge/discharge cutoff voltage, and the interaction between cationic redox (Fe3+/Fe4+) with anionic redox (O2–/O/O2) in detail. The experimental results confirm that the O2–/O redox could be reversible in Li5FeO4 by lowering the charging cutoff voltage. Ensuring the stability of Li6-O configurations in Li5FeO4 can effectively avoid the generation of O2, enhancing the reversibility of the electrode material. On the other hand, as mentioned above, these materials with antifluorite structure can be used as cathode prelithiation additives based on their intrinsic properties. Taking the simplest example, lithium oxide (Li2O) with antifluorite structure can provide Li+ and realize charge compensation by oxygen (Li2O ⇋ 0.5 Li2O2 + Li+ + e). (86) Based on this, Li2O was considered as a potential candidate for prelithiation additives. However, it is hard for pristine Li2O to be an ideal cathode prelithiation additive due to its poor ionic/electronic conductivity and low electrochemical activity. The effective Li2O/Li2O2 conversion always requires appropriate catalysts to accelerate this electrochemical process, lowering the reaction barrier. The interaction between Li2O and catalysts in the mixing (high-energy ball milling) or calcination (high temperature sintering) process can be regarded as the formation of defective antifluorite compounds such as Li6MnO4, Li6CoO4, Li5FeO4, and so on. (85) The introduction of M (M = Mn, Co, Fe, and so on) in antifluorite materials could effectively reduce its decomposition potential via regulating the energy level/band structure. These materials have been proven to be effective prelithiation additives which has gradually been adopted by various companies such as Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited. (13,87,88) Although these antifluorite materials can meet the criteria to be cathode prelithiation additives (donable capacity, appropriate decomposition potential, industrial compatibility and scalability), some other problems or challenges are still thought-provoking and need to be addressed such as safety hazards of prelithiation, residues and side reactions, chemical and ambient stability, and so on. (80,89−93)

3. Challenges and Prospects

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In this Perspective, multifarious catalysis used in secondary rechargeable batteries are discussed point by point. Whether introducing catalysts directly into the cathodes (such as LSBs and LOBs) to accelerate the reaction kinetics or adopting selective catalysis to obtain the desired EEI layers via optimizing the compositions of the electrolytes and tailoring the components and structures of the electrode materials, even employing the essential concept of catalysis to design/synthesize materials with new structures, we can see that catalysis and batteries are already intertwined and inseparable. Based on what we have achieved so far, our future direction should be to further master the underlying mechanism of catalysts used in secondary rechargeable batteries. There are a range of long-standing puzzles/challenges that need to be elucidated/solved, including: where is the exact catalytic sites of the catalysts used in batteries? what is the specific catalytic mechanism/reaction path? what parameters/descriptors can accurately describe the formation of EEI layers? How can we better use the concept of catalysis to design new materials? what is the essential mechanism between prelithiation additives such as Li2O and the catalysts? Fortunately, with the constant development of advanced characterization technologies, especially in situ or in operando techniques (in situ surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy (SEIRAS), differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), surface-enhanced Raman, and so on) and novel computational simulations (machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) calculation), the chance of success is highly provided for us to elaborately deal with the aforementioned challenges. The in-depth understanding of these existing ambiguities or problems would certainly guide us to develop new design principles to predict/realize better electrochemical performance in secondary rechargeable batteries. Hope must prevail!

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Changhao Wang - State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Discipline of Intelligent Instrument and Equipment, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    • Xiaohong Wu - State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, ChinaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4905-0792
    • Yilong Chen - State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    • Baodan Zhang - State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    • Haiyan Luo - State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    • Zhengang Li - State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, ChinaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1848-3998
    • Yawen Yan - State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    • Zixin Wu - State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
    • Kai Fang - State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22288102).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 93 other publications.

  1. 1
    Zou, P. C.; Sui, Y. M.; Zhan, H. C.; Wang, C. Y.; Xin, H. L.; Cheng, H. M.; Kang, F. Y.; Yang, C. Polymorph Evolution Mechanisms and Regulation Strategies of Lithium Metal Anode under Multiphysical Fields. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 59866056,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01100
  2. 2
    Wu, X. H.; Wang, X. T.; Li, Z. G.; Chen, L. B.; Zhou, S. Y.; Zhang, H. T.; Qiao, Y.; Yue, H. J.; Huang, L.; Sun, S. G. Stabilizing Li-O2 Batteries with Multifunctional Fluorinated Graphene. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 49854992,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01713
  3. 3
    Chen, L. Y.; Chiang, C. L.; Wu, X. H.; Tang, Y. L.; Zeng, G. F.; Zhou, S. Y.; Zhang, B. D.; Zhang, H. T.; Yan, Y. W.; Liu, T. T.; Liao, H. G.; Kuai, X. X.; Lin, Y. G.; Qiao, Y.; Sun, S. G. Prolonged Lifespan of Initial-Anode-Free Lithium-Metal Battery by Pre-Lithiation in Li-Rich Li2Ni0.5Mn1.5O4 Spinel Cathode. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 21832191,  DOI: 10.1039/D2SC06772B
  4. 4
    Qiao, Y.; Deng, H.; He, P.; Zhou, H. S. A 500 Wh/kg Lithium-Metal Cell Based on Anionic Redox. Joule 2020, 4, 14451458,  DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.012
  5. 5
    Qiao, Y.; Yang, H. J.; Chang, Z.; Deng, H.; Li, X.; Zhou, H. S. A High-Energy-Density and Long-Life Initial-Anode-Free Lithium Battery Enabled by a Li2O Sacrificial Agent. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 653662,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-021-00839-0
  6. 6
    Zhu, Y. C.; Fontaine, O. When Batteries Breathe without Air. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 953954,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-019-0377-5
  7. 7
    Wu, X. H.; Li, Z. A.; Song, C.; Chen, L. B.; Dai, P.; Zhang, P. F.; Qiao, Y.; Huang, L.; Sun, S. G. Regulating the Architecture of a Solid Electrolyte Interface on a Li-Metal Anode of a Li-O2 Battery by a Dithiobiuret Additive. ACS Mater. Lett. 2022, 4, 682691,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00756
  8. 8
    Wang, C. H.; Huang, L.; Zhong, Y.; Tong, X. L.; Gu, C. D.; Xia, X. H.; Zhang, L. J.; Wang, X. L.; Tu, J. P. Ti2Nb10O29 Anchored on Aspergillus Oryzae Spore Carbon Skeleton for Advanced Lithium Ion Storage. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2021, 28, e00272,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00272
  9. 9
    Hu, L.; Lin, C. F.; Wang, C. H.; Yang, C.; Li, J. B.; Chen, Y. J.; Lin, S. W. TiNb2O7 Nanorods as a Novel Anode Material for Secondary Lithium-Ion Batteries. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2016, 9, 1642004,  DOI: 10.1142/S1793604716420042
  10. 10
    Filippi, E.; Pizzolitto, C. The Past and the Future of Catalysis and Technology in Industry: A Perspective from Casale SA Point of View. Catal. Today 2022, 387, 911,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2021.11.005
  11. 11
    Xiao, C.; Lu, B. A.; Xue, P.; Tian, N.; Zhou, Z. Y.; Lin, X.; Lin, W. F.; Sun, S. G. High-Index-Facet and High-Surface-Energy Nanocrystals of Metals and Metal Oxides as Highly Efficient Catalysts. Joule 2020, 4, 25622598,  DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.002
  12. 12
    Zhou, Z. Y.; Tian, N.; Li, J. T.; Broadwell, I.; Sun, S. G. Nanomaterials of High Surface Energy with Exceptional Properties in Catalysis and Energy Storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 41674185,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00176g
  13. 13
    Wang, T.; Zhang, Y. R.; Huang, B. T.; Cai, B.; Rao, R. R.; Giordano, L.; Sun, S. G.; Shao-Horn, Y. Enhancing Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysis by Tuning Interfacial Hydrogen Bonds. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 753762,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-021-00668-0
  14. 14
    Li, M.; Bi, X.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Jiang, G.; Li, L.; Zhong, C.; Chen, Z.; Lu, J. Relating Catalysis between Fuel Cell and Metal-Air Batteries. Matter 2020, 2, 3249,  DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.10.007
  15. 15
    Rothenberg, G. Catalysis: Concepts and Green Applications; John Wiley & Sons: 2017; p 10.
  16. 16
    Yin, S.-H.; Yang, S.-L.; Li, G.; Li, G.; Zhang, B.-W.; Wang, C.-T.; Chen, M.-S.; Liao, H.-G.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.-X.; Sun, S.-G. Seizing Gaseous Fe2+ to Densify O2-Accessible Fe-N4 Sites for High-Performance Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 30333040,  DOI: 10.1039/D2EE00061J
  17. 17
    Wang, C. H.; Li, Y. H.; Gu, C. D.; Zhang, L. J.; Wang, X. L.; Tu, J. P. Active Co@CoO Core/Shell Nanowire Arrays as Efficient Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132226,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132226
  18. 18
    Wang, C. H.; Li, Y. H.; Wang, X. L.; Tu, J. P. N-Doped NiO Nanosheet Arrays as Efficient Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50, 50725080,  DOI: 10.1007/s11664-021-09053-w
  19. 19
    Yang, H. J.; Qiao, Y.; Chang, Z.; He, P.; Zhou, H. S. Designing Cation-Solvent Fully Coordinated Electrolyte for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Sulfur Full Cell Based on Solid-Solid Conversion. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 1772617734,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202106788
  20. 20
    Zhou, T.; Liang, J. N.; Ye, S. H.; Zhang, Q. L.; Liu, J. H. Fundamental, Application and Opportunities of Single Atom Catalysts for Li-S Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 55, 322355,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.002
  21. 21
    Sha Li, X. Gu-Lian Wang, Hui-Qun Wang, Wei-Ming Xiong, Li Zhang. Ultraviolet-Initiated In-Situ Cross-Linking of Multifunctional Binder Backbones Enables Robust Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Electrochem. 2023, 29, 2217004
  22. 22
    Zhen-Yu Wang, X.-P. G. Metals and Alloys as Catalytic Hosts of Sulfur Cathode for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Electrochem. 2023, 29, 2217001
  23. 23
    Zhang, J.; Huang, H.; Bae, J.; Chung, S. H.; Zhang, W. K.; Manthiram, A.; Yu, G. H. Nanostructured Host Materials for Trapping Sulfur in Rechargeable Li-S Batteries: Structure Design and Interfacial Chemistry. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1700279,  DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201700279
  24. 24
    Wang, C. H.; Li, Y. H.; Cao, F.; Zhang, Y. Q.; Xia, X. H.; Zhang, L. J. Employing Ni-Embedded Porous Graphitic Carbon Fibers for High-Efficiency Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 1045710466,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c24755
  25. 25
    Wang, C. H.; Li, Y. H.; Zhang, Y. Q.; Zhang, L. J.; Gu, C. D.; Wang, X. L.; Tu, J. P. Integrating a 3D Porous Carbon Fiber Network Containing Cobalt with Artificial Solid Electrolyte Interphase to Consummate Advanced Electrodes for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Mater. Today Energy 2022, 24, 100930,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100930
  26. 26
    Wang, H. S.; Yu, Z.; Kong, X.; Kim, S. C.; Boyle, D. T.; Qin, J.; Bao, Z. N.; Cui, Y. Liquid electrolyte: The Nexus of Practical Lithium Metal Batteries. Joule 2022, 6, 588616,  DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.018
  27. 27
    Wu, Q. P.; Yao, Z. G.; Zhou, X. J.; Xu, J.; Cao, F. H.; Li, C. L. Built-In Catalysis in Confined Nanoreactors for High-Loading Li-S Batteries. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 33653377,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09231
  28. 28
    Bi, C. X.; Zhao, M.; Hou, L. P.; Chen, Z. X.; Zhang, X. Q.; Li, B. Q.; Yuan, H.; Huang, J. Q. Anode Material Options Toward 500 Wh kg–1 Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2103910,  DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103910
  29. 29
    Liu, Y. R.; Zhao, M.; Hou, L. P.; Li, Z.; Bi, C. X.; Chen, Z. X.; Cheng, Q.; Zhang, X. Q.; Li, B. Q.; Kaskel, S.; Huang, J. Q. An Organodiselenide Comediator to Facilitate Sulfur Redox Kinetics in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries with Encapsulating Lithium Polysulfide Electrolyte. Angew. Chem. 2023, 135, e202303363,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.202303363
  30. 30
    Chen, Z. X.; Zhang, Y. T.; Bi, C. X.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, R.; Li, B. Q.; Huang, J. Q. Premature Deposition of Lithium Polysulfide in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 82, 507512,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.03.015
  31. 31
    Zhou, L.; Danilov, D. L.; Eichel, R. A.; Notten, P. H. L. Host Materials Anchoring Polysulfides in Li-S Batteries Reviewed. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2001304,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202001304
  32. 32
    Yu, B.; He, Q.; Zhao, Y. Exploring the Anchoring Effect and Catalytic Mechanism of 3d Transition Metal Phthalocyanine for S8/LiPSs: A Density Functional Theory Study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 558, 149928,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149928
  33. 33
    Abraham, K. M.; Jiang, Z. A Polymer Electrolyte-Based Rechargeable Lithium/Oxygen Battery. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1996, 143, 15,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1836378
  34. 34
    Ogasawara, T.; Debart, A.; Holzapfel, M.; Novak, P.; Bruce, P. G. Rechargeable Li2O2 Electrode for Lithium Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13901393,  DOI: 10.1021/ja056811q
  35. 35
    Feng, N. N.; He, P.; Zhou, H. S. Critical Challenges in Rechargeable Aprotic Li-O2 Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502303,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201502303
  36. 36
    Bruce, P. G.; Freunberger, S. A.; Hardwick, L. J.; Tarascon, J. M. Li-O2 and Li-S Batteries with High Energy Storage. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 1929,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3191
  37. 37
    Luntz, A. C.; McCloskey, B. D. Nonaqueous Li-Air Batteries: A Status Report. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1172111750,  DOI: 10.1021/cr500054y
  38. 38
    Lu, J.; Cheng, L.; Lau, K. C.; Tyo, E.; Luo, X. Y.; Wen, J. G.; Miller, D.; Assary, R. S.; Wang, H. H.; Redfern, P.; Wu, H. M.; Park, J. B.; Sun, Y. K.; Vajda, S.; Amine, K.; Curtiss, L. A. Effect of the Size-Selective Silver Clusters on Lithium Peroxide Morphology in Lithium-Oxygen Batteries. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4895,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5895
  39. 39
    Kraytsberg, A.; Ein-Eli, Y. Review on Li-Air Batteries-Opportunities, Limitations and Perspective. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 886893,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.031
  40. 40
    McCloskey, B. D.; Burke, C. M.; Nichols, J. E.; Renfrew, S. E. Mechanistic Insights for the Development of Li-O2 Battery Materials: Addressing Li2O2 Conductivity Limitations and Electrolyte and Cathode Instabilities. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 1270112715,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CC04620C
  41. 41
    Lu, Y. C.; Shao-Horn, Y. Probing the Reaction Kinetics of the Charge Reactions of Nonaqueous Li-O2 Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 9399,  DOI: 10.1021/jz3018368
  42. 42
    McCloskey, B. D.; Scheffler, R.; Speidel, A.; Bethune, D. S.; Shelby, R. M.; Luntz, A. C. On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li-O2 Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1803818041,  DOI: 10.1021/ja207229n
  43. 43
    Xia, H.; Xie, Q. F.; Tian, Y. H.; Chen, Q.; Wen, M.; Zhang, J. L.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Y. P.; Zhang, S. High-Efficient CoPt/Activated Functional Carbon Catalyst for Li-O2 Batteries. Nano Energy 2021, 84, 105877,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105877
  44. 44
    Liu, W.; Liu, P. C.; Mitlin, D. Review of Emerging Concepts in SEI Analysis and Artificial SEI Membranes for Lithium, Sodium, and Potassium Metal Battery Anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2002297,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202002297
  45. 45
    Adenusi, H.; Chass, G. A.; Passerini, S.; Tian, K. V.; Chen, G. H. Lithium Batteries and the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI)-Progress and Outlook. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2203307,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202203307
  46. 46
    Borodin, O.; Jow, T. R. Quantum Chemistry Studies of the Oxidative Stability of Carbonate, Sulfone and Sulfonate-Based Electrolytes Doped with BF4, PF6 Anions. ECS Trans. 2011, 33, 7784,  DOI: 10.1149/1.3563092
  47. 47
    Xing, L. D.; Borodin, O.; Smith, G. D.; Li, W. S. Density Functional Theory Study of the Role of Anions on the Oxidative Decomposition Reaction of Propylene Carbonate. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 1389613905,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206153n
  48. 48
    Zhang, X. R.; Pugh, J. K.; Ross, P. N. Computation of Thermodynamic Oxidation Potentials of Organic Solvents Using Density Functional Theory. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, E183E188,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1362546
  49. 49
    Goodenough, J. B.; Kim, Y. Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 587603,  DOI: 10.1021/cm901452z
  50. 50
    Leung, K. Two-electron reduction of ethylene carbonate: A Quantum Chemistry Re-Examination of Mechanisms. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 568, 18,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.08.022
  51. 51
    Vollmer, J. M.; Curtiss, L. A.; Vissers, D. R.; Amine, K. Reduction Mechanisms of Ethylene, Propylene, and Vinylethylene Carbonates - A Quantum Chemical Study. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A178A183,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1633765
  52. 52
    Wang, Y. X.; Nakamura, S.; Ue, M.; Balbuena, P. B. Theoretical Studies to Understand Surface Chemistry on Carbon Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: Reduction Mechanisms of Ethylene Carbonate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1170811718,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0164529
  53. 53
    Leung, K. Electronic Structure Modeling of Electrochemical Reactions at Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces in Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 15391547,  DOI: 10.1021/jp308929a
  54. 54
    Chattopadhyay, S.; Lipson, A. L.; Karmel, H. J.; Emery, J. D.; Fister, T. T.; Fenter, P. A.; Hersam, M. C.; Bedzyk, M. J. In Situ X-ray Study of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) Formation on Graphene as a Model Li-ion Battery Anode. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 30383043,  DOI: 10.1021/cm301584r
  55. 55
    Jiang, J. W.; Dahn, J. R. Effects of Solvents and Salts on the Thermal Stability of LiC6. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 49, 45994604,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.014
  56. 56
    Malmgren, S.; Ciosek, K.; Lindblad, R.; Plogmaker, S.; Kuhn, J.; Rensmo, H.; Edstrom, K.; Hahlin, M. Consequences of Air Exposure on the Lithiated Graphite SEI. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 105, 8391,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.04.118
  57. 57
    Gauthier, M.; Carney, T. J.; Grimaud, A.; Giordano, L.; Pour, N.; Chang, H.-H.; Fenning, D. P.; Lux, S. F.; Paschos, O.; Bauer, C.; Maglia, F.; Lupart, S.; Lamp, P.; Shao-Horn, Y. Electrode-Electrolyte Interface in Li-Ion Batteries: Current Understanding and New Insights. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 46534672,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01727
  58. 58
    Yu, Y.; Karayaylali, P.; Katayama, Y.; Giordano, L.; Gauthier, M.; Maglia, F.; Jung, R.; Lund, I.; Shao-Horn, Y. Coupled LiPF6 Decomposition and Carbonate Dehydrogenation Enhanced by Highly Covalent Metal Oxides in High-Energy Li-Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 2736827382,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07848
  59. 59
    Giordano, L.; Karayaylali, P.; Yu, Y.; Katayama, Y.; Maglia, F.; Lux, S.; Shao-Horn, Y. Chemical Reactivity Descriptor for the Oxide-Electrolyte Interface in Li-Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 38813887,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01655
  60. 60
    Wandt, J.; Freiberg, A. T. S.; Ogrodnik, A.; Gasteiger, H. A. Singlet Oxygen Evolution from Layered Transition Metal Oxide Cathode Materials and Its Implications for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 825833,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.037
  61. 61
    Gauthier, M.; Karayaylali, P.; Giordano, L.; Feng, S. T.; Lux, S. F.; Maglia, F.; Lamp, P.; Shao-Horn, Y. Probing Surface Chemistry Changes Using LiCoO2-Only Electrodes in Li-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A1377A1387,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0431807jes
  62. 62
    Gueguen, A.; Streich, D.; He, M. L.; Mendez, M.; Chesneau, F. F.; Novak, P.; Berg, E. J. Decomposition of LiPF6 in High Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries Studied with Online Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, A1095A1100,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0981606jes
  63. 63
    Bar-Tow, D.; Peled, E.; Burstein, L. A Study of Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite as a Model for the Graphite Anode in Li-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, 146, 824832,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1391688
  64. 64
    Eshkenazi, V.; Peled, E.; Burstein, L.; Golodnitsky, D. XPS Analysis of the SEI Formed on Carbonaceous Materials. Solid State Ionics 2004, 170, 8391,  DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2738(03)00107-3
  65. 65
    Peled, E.; Bar Tow, D.; Merson, A.; Gladkich, A.; Burstein, L.; Golodnitsky, D. Composition, Depth Profiles and Lateral Distribution of Materials in the SEI Built on HOPG-TOF SIMS and XPS Studies. J. Power Sources 2001, 97-98, 5257,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00505-5
  66. 66
    Funabiki, A.; Inaba, M.; Ogumi, Z. AC Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Lithium Intercalation into Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite. J. Power Sources 1997, 68, 227231,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02556-6
  67. 67
    Banks, C. E.; Davies, T. J.; Wildgoose, G. G.; Compton, R. G. Electrocatalysis at Graphite and Carbon Nanotube Modified Electrodes: Edge-Plane Sites and Tube Ends are the Reactive Sites. Chem. Commun. 2005, 829841,  DOI: 10.1039/b413177k
  68. 68
    McCreery, R. L. Advanced Carbon Electrode Materials for Molecular Electrochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 26462687,  DOI: 10.1021/cr068076m
  69. 69
    Okubo, M.; Yamada, A. Molecular Orbital Principles of Oxygen-Redox Battery Electrodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 3646336472,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b09835
  70. 70
    Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Park, S.; Kim, D. Design Picture in Enabling Reversible Oxygen Capacity for O-Type Na 3d Layered Oxides. Energy Storage Materials 2023, 54, 330338,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.10.041
  71. 71
    Assat, G.; Tarascon, J. M. Fundamental Understanding and Practical Challenges of Anionic Redox Activity in Li-Ion Batteries. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 373386,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0097-0
  72. 72
    Zaanen, J.; Sawatzky, G. A.; Allen, J. W. Band-Gaps and Electronic-Structure of Transition-Metal Compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 418421,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.418
  73. 73
    Grimaud, A.; Hong, W. T.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Tarascon, J. M. Anionic Redox Processes for Electrochemical Devices. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 121126,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat4551
  74. 74
    Sathiya, M.; Rousse, G.; Ramesha, K.; Laisa, C. P.; Vezin, H.; Sougrati, M. T.; Doublet, M. L.; Foix, D.; Gonbeau, D.; Walker, W.; Prakash, A. S.; Ben Hassine, M.; Dupont, L.; Tarascon, J. M. Reversible Anionic Redox Chemistry in High-Capacity Layered-Oxide Electrodes. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 827835,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3699
  75. 75
    Saubanere, M.; McCalla, E.; Tarascon, J. M.; Doublet, M. L. The Intriguing Question of Anionic Redox in High-Energy Density Cathodes for Li-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 984991,  DOI: 10.1039/C5EE03048J
  76. 76
    McCalla, E.; Abakumov, A. M.; Saubanere, M.; Foix, D.; Berg, E. J.; Rousse, G.; Doublet, M. L.; Gonbeau, D.; Novak, P.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Dominko, R.; Tarascon, J. M. Visualization of O-O Peroxo-Like Dimers in High-Capacity Layered Oxides for Li-Ion Batteries. Science 2015, 350, 15161521,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aac8260
  77. 77
    Pearce, P. E.; Perez, A. J.; Rousse, G.; Saubanere, M.; Batuk, D.; Foix, D.; McCalla, E.; Abakumov, A. M.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Doublet, M. L.; Tarascon, J. M. Evidence for Anionic Redox Activity in a Tridimensional-Ordered Li-Rich Positive Electrode Beta-Li2IrO3. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 580,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat4864
  78. 78
    Assat, G.; Iadecola, A.; Delacourt, C.; Dedryvere, R.; Tarascon, J. M. Decoupling Cationic-Anionic Redox Processes in a Model Li-Rich Cathode via Operando X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 97149724,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03434
  79. 79
    Li, B. A.; Shao, R. W.; Yan, H. J.; An, L.; Zhang, B.; Wei, H.; Ma, J.; Xia, D. G.; Han, X. D. Understanding the Stability for Li-Rich Layered Oxide Li2RuO3 Cathode. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 13301337,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201504836
  80. 80
    Liu, X. X.; Tan, Y. C.; Wang, W. Y.; Li, C. H.; Seh, Z. W.; Wang, L.; Sun, Y. M. Conformal Prelithiation Nanoshell on LiCoO2 Enabling High-Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 45584565,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01413
  81. 81
    Noh, M.; Cho, J. Role of Li6CoO4 Cathode Additive in Li-Ion Cells Containing Low Coulombic Efficiency Anode Material. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, A1329A1334,  DOI: 10.1149/2.085208jes
  82. 82
    Park, H.; Yoon, T.; Kim, Y. U.; Ryu, J. H.; Oh, S. M. Li2NiO2 as a Sacrificing Positive Additive for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 108, 591595,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.117
  83. 83
    Su, X.; Lin, C. K.; Wang, X. P.; Maroni, V. A.; Ren, Y.; Johnson, C. S.; Lu, W. Q. A New Strategy to Mitigate the Initial Capacity Loss of Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 324, 150157,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.063
  84. 84
    Kobayashi, H.; Tsukasaki, T.; Ogasawara, Y.; Hibino, M.; Kudo, T.; Mizuno, N.; Honma, I.; Yamaguchi, K. Cation-Disorder-Assisted Reversible Topotactic Phase Transition between Antifluorite and Rocksalt Toward High-Capacity Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 4360543613,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c10768
  85. 85
    Zhan, C.; Yao, Z. P.; Lu, J.; Ma, L.; Maroni, V. A.; Li, L.; Lee, E.; Alp, E. E.; Wu, T. P.; Wen, J. G.; Ren, Y.; Johnson, C.; Thackeray, M. M.; Chan, M. K. Y.; Wolverton, C.; Amine, K. Enabling the High Capacity of Lithium-Rich Anti-Fluorite Lithium Iron Oxide by Simultaneous Anionic and Cationic Redox. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 963971,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-017-0043-6
  86. 86
    Zhu, Z.; Kushima, A.; Yin, Z. Y.; Qi, L.; Amine, K.; Lu, J.; Li, J. Anion-Redox Nanolithia Cathodes for Li-Ion Batteries. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16111,  DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.111
  87. 87
    Kulkarni, P.; Jung, H. Y. Y.; Ghosh, D.; Jalalah, M.; Alsaiari, M.; Harraz, F. A.; Balakrishna, R. G. A Comprehensive Review of Pre-Lithiation/Sodiation Additives for Li-ion and Na-ion Batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 76, 479494,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.10.001
  88. 88
    Ding, R. Q.; Tian, S. Y.; Zhang, K. C.; Cao, J. R.; Zheng, Y.; Tian, W. C.; Wang, X. Y.; Wen, L. Z.; Wang, L.; Liang, G. C. Recent Advances in Cathode Prelithiation Additives and Their Use in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021, 893, 115325,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115325
  89. 89
    Cao, M. Y.; Liu, Z. P.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Xu, S. W.; Weng, S. T.; Zhang, S. M.; Li, X. Y.; Li, Y. J.; Liu, T. C.; Gao, Y. R.; Wang, X. F.; Wang, Z. X.; Chen, L. Q. Feasibility of Prelithiation in LiFePO4. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2210032,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202210032
  90. 90
    Sun, Y. M.; Li, Y. B.; Sun, J.; Li, Y. Z.; Pei, A.; Cui, Y. Stabilized Li3N for Efficient Battery Cathode Prelithiation. Energy Storage Mater. 2017, 6, 119124,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2016.10.004
  91. 91
    Yue, X. Y.; Yao, Y. X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, S. Y.; Li, Z. H.; Yan, C.; Zhang, Q. Unblocked Electron Channels Enable Efficient Contact Prelithiation for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2110337,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202110337
  92. 92
    Xu, H.; Li, S.; Zhang, C.; Chen, X. L.; Liu, W. J.; Zheng, Y. H.; Xie, Y.; Huang, Y. H.; Li, J. Roll-to-Roll Prelithiation of Sn Foil Anode Suppresses Gassing and Enables Stable Full-Cell Cycling of Lithium Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 29913000,  DOI: 10.1039/C9EE01404G
  93. 93
    Sun, Y. M.; Lee, H. W.; Seh, Z. W.; Liu, N.; Sun, J.; Li, Y. Z.; Cui, Y. High-Capacity Battery Cathode Prelithiation to Offset Initial Lithium Loss. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15008,  DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2015.8

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Selected most popular research orientations in catalysis which used in secondary rechargeable batteries. Copyright 2012 Springer Nature. (36) Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (57) Copyright 2016 Springer Nature. (73)

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of operating principle of Li-S batteries. Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH. (23) (b) Free-energy profiles for the S8/LiPSs conversion on the surface of TiPc and H2Pc. Copyright 2021 Elsevier. (32) (c) Abridged general view of a nonaqueous Li-O2 battery with dominant Li2O2 product on the cathode side. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society. (37) (d) Mechanisms of O2 reduction in Li-O2 batteries during recharge process. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (41) (e) Free energy diagram of CoPt@gra-OH&NH2 system. Copyright 2021 Elsevier. (43)

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Schematic energy diagram of a liquid electrolyte under open-circuit state. Eg is the stable window of the electrolyte. ΦA and ΦC signify the anode and cathode work functions, respectively. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society. (49) (b) Computed reduction and oxidation energy levels of common solvents and solvated salts used in Li-ion batteries. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (57) (c) Ethylene carbonate dissociative adsorption energy on LiNi0.33Co0.33Mn0.33O2, LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2, and LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (dashed lines) by projecting their computed O 2p band centers onto the trend established by layered oxides. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (58) (d) Schematic illustration of the SEI on basal (top) and edge (bottom) planes of HOPG. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (57)

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Molecular orbital energy diagrams of (a) an OA3M3 octahedron in layered AMO2 and (b) an OA4M2 octahedron in A-excess layered A2MO3. A and M denote alkali-metal ions and transition metal ions, respectively. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (69) Taking Mott-Hubbard splitting into consideration, the Li2MO3 band structure can be classified under three cases (c–e), depending on the interaction between the dd Coulomb repulsion term U and the charge transfer term Δ. UHB and LHB signify the upper and lower Hubbard bands, respectively. Copyright 2018 Springer Nature. (71) (f) projected DOS of the O-2p and Fe-3d orbitals of O2– ions in the Li6-O configurations and nearest Fe ions in cation-disordered Li3FeO3.5. Increased pDOS near the Fermi level for the O2– coordinated by six Li+ manifests the particular Li6-O configuration. Copyright 2017 Springer Nature. (85) (g) Schematic illustration of the role played by the Li6-O configurations during the lithiation or delithiation of Li5FeO4. Copyright 2017 Springer Nature. (85)

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 93 other publications.

    1. 1
      Zou, P. C.; Sui, Y. M.; Zhan, H. C.; Wang, C. Y.; Xin, H. L.; Cheng, H. M.; Kang, F. Y.; Yang, C. Polymorph Evolution Mechanisms and Regulation Strategies of Lithium Metal Anode under Multiphysical Fields. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 59866056,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01100
    2. 2
      Wu, X. H.; Wang, X. T.; Li, Z. G.; Chen, L. B.; Zhou, S. Y.; Zhang, H. T.; Qiao, Y.; Yue, H. J.; Huang, L.; Sun, S. G. Stabilizing Li-O2 Batteries with Multifunctional Fluorinated Graphene. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 49854992,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01713
    3. 3
      Chen, L. Y.; Chiang, C. L.; Wu, X. H.; Tang, Y. L.; Zeng, G. F.; Zhou, S. Y.; Zhang, B. D.; Zhang, H. T.; Yan, Y. W.; Liu, T. T.; Liao, H. G.; Kuai, X. X.; Lin, Y. G.; Qiao, Y.; Sun, S. G. Prolonged Lifespan of Initial-Anode-Free Lithium-Metal Battery by Pre-Lithiation in Li-Rich Li2Ni0.5Mn1.5O4 Spinel Cathode. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 21832191,  DOI: 10.1039/D2SC06772B
    4. 4
      Qiao, Y.; Deng, H.; He, P.; Zhou, H. S. A 500 Wh/kg Lithium-Metal Cell Based on Anionic Redox. Joule 2020, 4, 14451458,  DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.012
    5. 5
      Qiao, Y.; Yang, H. J.; Chang, Z.; Deng, H.; Li, X.; Zhou, H. S. A High-Energy-Density and Long-Life Initial-Anode-Free Lithium Battery Enabled by a Li2O Sacrificial Agent. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 653662,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-021-00839-0
    6. 6
      Zhu, Y. C.; Fontaine, O. When Batteries Breathe without Air. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 953954,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-019-0377-5
    7. 7
      Wu, X. H.; Li, Z. A.; Song, C.; Chen, L. B.; Dai, P.; Zhang, P. F.; Qiao, Y.; Huang, L.; Sun, S. G. Regulating the Architecture of a Solid Electrolyte Interface on a Li-Metal Anode of a Li-O2 Battery by a Dithiobiuret Additive. ACS Mater. Lett. 2022, 4, 682691,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00756
    8. 8
      Wang, C. H.; Huang, L.; Zhong, Y.; Tong, X. L.; Gu, C. D.; Xia, X. H.; Zhang, L. J.; Wang, X. L.; Tu, J. P. Ti2Nb10O29 Anchored on Aspergillus Oryzae Spore Carbon Skeleton for Advanced Lithium Ion Storage. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2021, 28, e00272,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00272
    9. 9
      Hu, L.; Lin, C. F.; Wang, C. H.; Yang, C.; Li, J. B.; Chen, Y. J.; Lin, S. W. TiNb2O7 Nanorods as a Novel Anode Material for Secondary Lithium-Ion Batteries. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2016, 9, 1642004,  DOI: 10.1142/S1793604716420042
    10. 10
      Filippi, E.; Pizzolitto, C. The Past and the Future of Catalysis and Technology in Industry: A Perspective from Casale SA Point of View. Catal. Today 2022, 387, 911,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2021.11.005
    11. 11
      Xiao, C.; Lu, B. A.; Xue, P.; Tian, N.; Zhou, Z. Y.; Lin, X.; Lin, W. F.; Sun, S. G. High-Index-Facet and High-Surface-Energy Nanocrystals of Metals and Metal Oxides as Highly Efficient Catalysts. Joule 2020, 4, 25622598,  DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.002
    12. 12
      Zhou, Z. Y.; Tian, N.; Li, J. T.; Broadwell, I.; Sun, S. G. Nanomaterials of High Surface Energy with Exceptional Properties in Catalysis and Energy Storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 41674185,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00176g
    13. 13
      Wang, T.; Zhang, Y. R.; Huang, B. T.; Cai, B.; Rao, R. R.; Giordano, L.; Sun, S. G.; Shao-Horn, Y. Enhancing Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysis by Tuning Interfacial Hydrogen Bonds. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 753762,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-021-00668-0
    14. 14
      Li, M.; Bi, X.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Jiang, G.; Li, L.; Zhong, C.; Chen, Z.; Lu, J. Relating Catalysis between Fuel Cell and Metal-Air Batteries. Matter 2020, 2, 3249,  DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.10.007
    15. 15
      Rothenberg, G. Catalysis: Concepts and Green Applications; John Wiley & Sons: 2017; p 10.
    16. 16
      Yin, S.-H.; Yang, S.-L.; Li, G.; Li, G.; Zhang, B.-W.; Wang, C.-T.; Chen, M.-S.; Liao, H.-G.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.-X.; Sun, S.-G. Seizing Gaseous Fe2+ to Densify O2-Accessible Fe-N4 Sites for High-Performance Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 30333040,  DOI: 10.1039/D2EE00061J
    17. 17
      Wang, C. H.; Li, Y. H.; Gu, C. D.; Zhang, L. J.; Wang, X. L.; Tu, J. P. Active Co@CoO Core/Shell Nanowire Arrays as Efficient Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132226,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132226
    18. 18
      Wang, C. H.; Li, Y. H.; Wang, X. L.; Tu, J. P. N-Doped NiO Nanosheet Arrays as Efficient Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50, 50725080,  DOI: 10.1007/s11664-021-09053-w
    19. 19
      Yang, H. J.; Qiao, Y.; Chang, Z.; He, P.; Zhou, H. S. Designing Cation-Solvent Fully Coordinated Electrolyte for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Sulfur Full Cell Based on Solid-Solid Conversion. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 1772617734,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202106788
    20. 20
      Zhou, T.; Liang, J. N.; Ye, S. H.; Zhang, Q. L.; Liu, J. H. Fundamental, Application and Opportunities of Single Atom Catalysts for Li-S Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 55, 322355,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.002
    21. 21
      Sha Li, X. Gu-Lian Wang, Hui-Qun Wang, Wei-Ming Xiong, Li Zhang. Ultraviolet-Initiated In-Situ Cross-Linking of Multifunctional Binder Backbones Enables Robust Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Electrochem. 2023, 29, 2217004
    22. 22
      Zhen-Yu Wang, X.-P. G. Metals and Alloys as Catalytic Hosts of Sulfur Cathode for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Electrochem. 2023, 29, 2217001
    23. 23
      Zhang, J.; Huang, H.; Bae, J.; Chung, S. H.; Zhang, W. K.; Manthiram, A.; Yu, G. H. Nanostructured Host Materials for Trapping Sulfur in Rechargeable Li-S Batteries: Structure Design and Interfacial Chemistry. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1700279,  DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201700279
    24. 24
      Wang, C. H.; Li, Y. H.; Cao, F.; Zhang, Y. Q.; Xia, X. H.; Zhang, L. J. Employing Ni-Embedded Porous Graphitic Carbon Fibers for High-Efficiency Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 1045710466,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c24755
    25. 25
      Wang, C. H.; Li, Y. H.; Zhang, Y. Q.; Zhang, L. J.; Gu, C. D.; Wang, X. L.; Tu, J. P. Integrating a 3D Porous Carbon Fiber Network Containing Cobalt with Artificial Solid Electrolyte Interphase to Consummate Advanced Electrodes for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Mater. Today Energy 2022, 24, 100930,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100930
    26. 26
      Wang, H. S.; Yu, Z.; Kong, X.; Kim, S. C.; Boyle, D. T.; Qin, J.; Bao, Z. N.; Cui, Y. Liquid electrolyte: The Nexus of Practical Lithium Metal Batteries. Joule 2022, 6, 588616,  DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.018
    27. 27
      Wu, Q. P.; Yao, Z. G.; Zhou, X. J.; Xu, J.; Cao, F. H.; Li, C. L. Built-In Catalysis in Confined Nanoreactors for High-Loading Li-S Batteries. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 33653377,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09231
    28. 28
      Bi, C. X.; Zhao, M.; Hou, L. P.; Chen, Z. X.; Zhang, X. Q.; Li, B. Q.; Yuan, H.; Huang, J. Q. Anode Material Options Toward 500 Wh kg–1 Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2103910,  DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103910
    29. 29
      Liu, Y. R.; Zhao, M.; Hou, L. P.; Li, Z.; Bi, C. X.; Chen, Z. X.; Cheng, Q.; Zhang, X. Q.; Li, B. Q.; Kaskel, S.; Huang, J. Q. An Organodiselenide Comediator to Facilitate Sulfur Redox Kinetics in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries with Encapsulating Lithium Polysulfide Electrolyte. Angew. Chem. 2023, 135, e202303363,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.202303363
    30. 30
      Chen, Z. X.; Zhang, Y. T.; Bi, C. X.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, R.; Li, B. Q.; Huang, J. Q. Premature Deposition of Lithium Polysulfide in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 82, 507512,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.03.015
    31. 31
      Zhou, L.; Danilov, D. L.; Eichel, R. A.; Notten, P. H. L. Host Materials Anchoring Polysulfides in Li-S Batteries Reviewed. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2001304,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202001304
    32. 32
      Yu, B.; He, Q.; Zhao, Y. Exploring the Anchoring Effect and Catalytic Mechanism of 3d Transition Metal Phthalocyanine for S8/LiPSs: A Density Functional Theory Study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 558, 149928,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149928
    33. 33
      Abraham, K. M.; Jiang, Z. A Polymer Electrolyte-Based Rechargeable Lithium/Oxygen Battery. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1996, 143, 15,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1836378
    34. 34
      Ogasawara, T.; Debart, A.; Holzapfel, M.; Novak, P.; Bruce, P. G. Rechargeable Li2O2 Electrode for Lithium Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13901393,  DOI: 10.1021/ja056811q
    35. 35
      Feng, N. N.; He, P.; Zhou, H. S. Critical Challenges in Rechargeable Aprotic Li-O2 Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502303,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201502303
    36. 36
      Bruce, P. G.; Freunberger, S. A.; Hardwick, L. J.; Tarascon, J. M. Li-O2 and Li-S Batteries with High Energy Storage. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 1929,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3191
    37. 37
      Luntz, A. C.; McCloskey, B. D. Nonaqueous Li-Air Batteries: A Status Report. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1172111750,  DOI: 10.1021/cr500054y
    38. 38
      Lu, J.; Cheng, L.; Lau, K. C.; Tyo, E.; Luo, X. Y.; Wen, J. G.; Miller, D.; Assary, R. S.; Wang, H. H.; Redfern, P.; Wu, H. M.; Park, J. B.; Sun, Y. K.; Vajda, S.; Amine, K.; Curtiss, L. A. Effect of the Size-Selective Silver Clusters on Lithium Peroxide Morphology in Lithium-Oxygen Batteries. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4895,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5895
    39. 39
      Kraytsberg, A.; Ein-Eli, Y. Review on Li-Air Batteries-Opportunities, Limitations and Perspective. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 886893,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.031
    40. 40
      McCloskey, B. D.; Burke, C. M.; Nichols, J. E.; Renfrew, S. E. Mechanistic Insights for the Development of Li-O2 Battery Materials: Addressing Li2O2 Conductivity Limitations and Electrolyte and Cathode Instabilities. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 1270112715,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CC04620C
    41. 41
      Lu, Y. C.; Shao-Horn, Y. Probing the Reaction Kinetics of the Charge Reactions of Nonaqueous Li-O2 Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 9399,  DOI: 10.1021/jz3018368
    42. 42
      McCloskey, B. D.; Scheffler, R.; Speidel, A.; Bethune, D. S.; Shelby, R. M.; Luntz, A. C. On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li-O2 Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1803818041,  DOI: 10.1021/ja207229n
    43. 43
      Xia, H.; Xie, Q. F.; Tian, Y. H.; Chen, Q.; Wen, M.; Zhang, J. L.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Y. P.; Zhang, S. High-Efficient CoPt/Activated Functional Carbon Catalyst for Li-O2 Batteries. Nano Energy 2021, 84, 105877,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105877
    44. 44
      Liu, W.; Liu, P. C.; Mitlin, D. Review of Emerging Concepts in SEI Analysis and Artificial SEI Membranes for Lithium, Sodium, and Potassium Metal Battery Anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2002297,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202002297
    45. 45
      Adenusi, H.; Chass, G. A.; Passerini, S.; Tian, K. V.; Chen, G. H. Lithium Batteries and the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI)-Progress and Outlook. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2203307,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202203307
    46. 46
      Borodin, O.; Jow, T. R. Quantum Chemistry Studies of the Oxidative Stability of Carbonate, Sulfone and Sulfonate-Based Electrolytes Doped with BF4, PF6 Anions. ECS Trans. 2011, 33, 7784,  DOI: 10.1149/1.3563092
    47. 47
      Xing, L. D.; Borodin, O.; Smith, G. D.; Li, W. S. Density Functional Theory Study of the Role of Anions on the Oxidative Decomposition Reaction of Propylene Carbonate. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 1389613905,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206153n
    48. 48
      Zhang, X. R.; Pugh, J. K.; Ross, P. N. Computation of Thermodynamic Oxidation Potentials of Organic Solvents Using Density Functional Theory. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, E183E188,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1362546
    49. 49
      Goodenough, J. B.; Kim, Y. Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 587603,  DOI: 10.1021/cm901452z
    50. 50
      Leung, K. Two-electron reduction of ethylene carbonate: A Quantum Chemistry Re-Examination of Mechanisms. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 568, 18,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.08.022
    51. 51
      Vollmer, J. M.; Curtiss, L. A.; Vissers, D. R.; Amine, K. Reduction Mechanisms of Ethylene, Propylene, and Vinylethylene Carbonates - A Quantum Chemical Study. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A178A183,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1633765
    52. 52
      Wang, Y. X.; Nakamura, S.; Ue, M.; Balbuena, P. B. Theoretical Studies to Understand Surface Chemistry on Carbon Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: Reduction Mechanisms of Ethylene Carbonate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1170811718,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0164529
    53. 53
      Leung, K. Electronic Structure Modeling of Electrochemical Reactions at Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces in Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 15391547,  DOI: 10.1021/jp308929a
    54. 54
      Chattopadhyay, S.; Lipson, A. L.; Karmel, H. J.; Emery, J. D.; Fister, T. T.; Fenter, P. A.; Hersam, M. C.; Bedzyk, M. J. In Situ X-ray Study of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) Formation on Graphene as a Model Li-ion Battery Anode. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 30383043,  DOI: 10.1021/cm301584r
    55. 55
      Jiang, J. W.; Dahn, J. R. Effects of Solvents and Salts on the Thermal Stability of LiC6. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 49, 45994604,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.014
    56. 56
      Malmgren, S.; Ciosek, K.; Lindblad, R.; Plogmaker, S.; Kuhn, J.; Rensmo, H.; Edstrom, K.; Hahlin, M. Consequences of Air Exposure on the Lithiated Graphite SEI. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 105, 8391,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.04.118
    57. 57
      Gauthier, M.; Carney, T. J.; Grimaud, A.; Giordano, L.; Pour, N.; Chang, H.-H.; Fenning, D. P.; Lux, S. F.; Paschos, O.; Bauer, C.; Maglia, F.; Lupart, S.; Lamp, P.; Shao-Horn, Y. Electrode-Electrolyte Interface in Li-Ion Batteries: Current Understanding and New Insights. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 46534672,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01727
    58. 58
      Yu, Y.; Karayaylali, P.; Katayama, Y.; Giordano, L.; Gauthier, M.; Maglia, F.; Jung, R.; Lund, I.; Shao-Horn, Y. Coupled LiPF6 Decomposition and Carbonate Dehydrogenation Enhanced by Highly Covalent Metal Oxides in High-Energy Li-Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 2736827382,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07848
    59. 59
      Giordano, L.; Karayaylali, P.; Yu, Y.; Katayama, Y.; Maglia, F.; Lux, S.; Shao-Horn, Y. Chemical Reactivity Descriptor for the Oxide-Electrolyte Interface in Li-Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 38813887,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01655
    60. 60
      Wandt, J.; Freiberg, A. T. S.; Ogrodnik, A.; Gasteiger, H. A. Singlet Oxygen Evolution from Layered Transition Metal Oxide Cathode Materials and Its Implications for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 825833,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.037
    61. 61
      Gauthier, M.; Karayaylali, P.; Giordano, L.; Feng, S. T.; Lux, S. F.; Maglia, F.; Lamp, P.; Shao-Horn, Y. Probing Surface Chemistry Changes Using LiCoO2-Only Electrodes in Li-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A1377A1387,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0431807jes
    62. 62
      Gueguen, A.; Streich, D.; He, M. L.; Mendez, M.; Chesneau, F. F.; Novak, P.; Berg, E. J. Decomposition of LiPF6 in High Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries Studied with Online Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, A1095A1100,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0981606jes
    63. 63
      Bar-Tow, D.; Peled, E.; Burstein, L. A Study of Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite as a Model for the Graphite Anode in Li-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, 146, 824832,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1391688
    64. 64
      Eshkenazi, V.; Peled, E.; Burstein, L.; Golodnitsky, D. XPS Analysis of the SEI Formed on Carbonaceous Materials. Solid State Ionics 2004, 170, 8391,  DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2738(03)00107-3
    65. 65
      Peled, E.; Bar Tow, D.; Merson, A.; Gladkich, A.; Burstein, L.; Golodnitsky, D. Composition, Depth Profiles and Lateral Distribution of Materials in the SEI Built on HOPG-TOF SIMS and XPS Studies. J. Power Sources 2001, 97-98, 5257,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00505-5
    66. 66
      Funabiki, A.; Inaba, M.; Ogumi, Z. AC Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Lithium Intercalation into Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite. J. Power Sources 1997, 68, 227231,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02556-6
    67. 67
      Banks, C. E.; Davies, T. J.; Wildgoose, G. G.; Compton, R. G. Electrocatalysis at Graphite and Carbon Nanotube Modified Electrodes: Edge-Plane Sites and Tube Ends are the Reactive Sites. Chem. Commun. 2005, 829841,  DOI: 10.1039/b413177k
    68. 68
      McCreery, R. L. Advanced Carbon Electrode Materials for Molecular Electrochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 26462687,  DOI: 10.1021/cr068076m
    69. 69
      Okubo, M.; Yamada, A. Molecular Orbital Principles of Oxygen-Redox Battery Electrodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 3646336472,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b09835
    70. 70
      Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Park, S.; Kim, D. Design Picture in Enabling Reversible Oxygen Capacity for O-Type Na 3d Layered Oxides. Energy Storage Materials 2023, 54, 330338,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.10.041
    71. 71
      Assat, G.; Tarascon, J. M. Fundamental Understanding and Practical Challenges of Anionic Redox Activity in Li-Ion Batteries. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 373386,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0097-0
    72. 72
      Zaanen, J.; Sawatzky, G. A.; Allen, J. W. Band-Gaps and Electronic-Structure of Transition-Metal Compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 418421,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.418
    73. 73
      Grimaud, A.; Hong, W. T.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Tarascon, J. M. Anionic Redox Processes for Electrochemical Devices. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 121126,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat4551
    74. 74
      Sathiya, M.; Rousse, G.; Ramesha, K.; Laisa, C. P.; Vezin, H.; Sougrati, M. T.; Doublet, M. L.; Foix, D.; Gonbeau, D.; Walker, W.; Prakash, A. S.; Ben Hassine, M.; Dupont, L.; Tarascon, J. M. Reversible Anionic Redox Chemistry in High-Capacity Layered-Oxide Electrodes. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 827835,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3699
    75. 75
      Saubanere, M.; McCalla, E.; Tarascon, J. M.; Doublet, M. L. The Intriguing Question of Anionic Redox in High-Energy Density Cathodes for Li-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 984991,  DOI: 10.1039/C5EE03048J
    76. 76
      McCalla, E.; Abakumov, A. M.; Saubanere, M.; Foix, D.; Berg, E. J.; Rousse, G.; Doublet, M. L.; Gonbeau, D.; Novak, P.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Dominko, R.; Tarascon, J. M. Visualization of O-O Peroxo-Like Dimers in High-Capacity Layered Oxides for Li-Ion Batteries. Science 2015, 350, 15161521,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aac8260
    77. 77
      Pearce, P. E.; Perez, A. J.; Rousse, G.; Saubanere, M.; Batuk, D.; Foix, D.; McCalla, E.; Abakumov, A. M.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Doublet, M. L.; Tarascon, J. M. Evidence for Anionic Redox Activity in a Tridimensional-Ordered Li-Rich Positive Electrode Beta-Li2IrO3. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 580,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat4864
    78. 78
      Assat, G.; Iadecola, A.; Delacourt, C.; Dedryvere, R.; Tarascon, J. M. Decoupling Cationic-Anionic Redox Processes in a Model Li-Rich Cathode via Operando X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 97149724,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03434
    79. 79
      Li, B. A.; Shao, R. W.; Yan, H. J.; An, L.; Zhang, B.; Wei, H.; Ma, J.; Xia, D. G.; Han, X. D. Understanding the Stability for Li-Rich Layered Oxide Li2RuO3 Cathode. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 13301337,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201504836
    80. 80
      Liu, X. X.; Tan, Y. C.; Wang, W. Y.; Li, C. H.; Seh, Z. W.; Wang, L.; Sun, Y. M. Conformal Prelithiation Nanoshell on LiCoO2 Enabling High-Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 45584565,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01413
    81. 81
      Noh, M.; Cho, J. Role of Li6CoO4 Cathode Additive in Li-Ion Cells Containing Low Coulombic Efficiency Anode Material. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, A1329A1334,  DOI: 10.1149/2.085208jes
    82. 82
      Park, H.; Yoon, T.; Kim, Y. U.; Ryu, J. H.; Oh, S. M. Li2NiO2 as a Sacrificing Positive Additive for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 108, 591595,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.117
    83. 83
      Su, X.; Lin, C. K.; Wang, X. P.; Maroni, V. A.; Ren, Y.; Johnson, C. S.; Lu, W. Q. A New Strategy to Mitigate the Initial Capacity Loss of Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 324, 150157,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.063
    84. 84
      Kobayashi, H.; Tsukasaki, T.; Ogasawara, Y.; Hibino, M.; Kudo, T.; Mizuno, N.; Honma, I.; Yamaguchi, K. Cation-Disorder-Assisted Reversible Topotactic Phase Transition between Antifluorite and Rocksalt Toward High-Capacity Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 4360543613,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c10768
    85. 85
      Zhan, C.; Yao, Z. P.; Lu, J.; Ma, L.; Maroni, V. A.; Li, L.; Lee, E.; Alp, E. E.; Wu, T. P.; Wen, J. G.; Ren, Y.; Johnson, C.; Thackeray, M. M.; Chan, M. K. Y.; Wolverton, C.; Amine, K. Enabling the High Capacity of Lithium-Rich Anti-Fluorite Lithium Iron Oxide by Simultaneous Anionic and Cationic Redox. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 963971,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-017-0043-6
    86. 86
      Zhu, Z.; Kushima, A.; Yin, Z. Y.; Qi, L.; Amine, K.; Lu, J.; Li, J. Anion-Redox Nanolithia Cathodes for Li-Ion Batteries. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16111,  DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.111
    87. 87
      Kulkarni, P.; Jung, H. Y. Y.; Ghosh, D.; Jalalah, M.; Alsaiari, M.; Harraz, F. A.; Balakrishna, R. G. A Comprehensive Review of Pre-Lithiation/Sodiation Additives for Li-ion and Na-ion Batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 76, 479494,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.10.001
    88. 88
      Ding, R. Q.; Tian, S. Y.; Zhang, K. C.; Cao, J. R.; Zheng, Y.; Tian, W. C.; Wang, X. Y.; Wen, L. Z.; Wang, L.; Liang, G. C. Recent Advances in Cathode Prelithiation Additives and Their Use in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021, 893, 115325,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115325
    89. 89
      Cao, M. Y.; Liu, Z. P.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Xu, S. W.; Weng, S. T.; Zhang, S. M.; Li, X. Y.; Li, Y. J.; Liu, T. C.; Gao, Y. R.; Wang, X. F.; Wang, Z. X.; Chen, L. Q. Feasibility of Prelithiation in LiFePO4. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2210032,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202210032
    90. 90
      Sun, Y. M.; Li, Y. B.; Sun, J.; Li, Y. Z.; Pei, A.; Cui, Y. Stabilized Li3N for Efficient Battery Cathode Prelithiation. Energy Storage Mater. 2017, 6, 119124,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2016.10.004
    91. 91
      Yue, X. Y.; Yao, Y. X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, S. Y.; Li, Z. H.; Yan, C.; Zhang, Q. Unblocked Electron Channels Enable Efficient Contact Prelithiation for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2110337,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202110337
    92. 92
      Xu, H.; Li, S.; Zhang, C.; Chen, X. L.; Liu, W. J.; Zheng, Y. H.; Xie, Y.; Huang, Y. H.; Li, J. Roll-to-Roll Prelithiation of Sn Foil Anode Suppresses Gassing and Enables Stable Full-Cell Cycling of Lithium Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 29913000,  DOI: 10.1039/C9EE01404G
    93. 93
      Sun, Y. M.; Lee, H. W.; Seh, Z. W.; Liu, N.; Sun, J.; Li, Y. Z.; Cui, Y. High-Capacity Battery Cathode Prelithiation to Offset Initial Lithium Loss. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15008,  DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2015.8

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect