Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Covariation of sexual dichromatism and plumage colours in lekking and non-lekking birds: A comparative analysis

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extreme polygyny expressed by male lekking birds leads to the expectation that sexual dimorphism should be greater in lekkers than related non-lekkers. However, evidence for this association is weak, and many lekkers are actually monomorphic in size and plumage. To better understand the kinds of plumages associated with lekking, I characterized plumage variation for combinations of sexual dichromatism and colourfulness-and-conspicuousness (COCO) among lekking and related non-lekking birds. Compared in this way, the plumages of lekkers and non-lekkers differ dramatically for both sexes. Correlations between sexual dichromatism and COCO for phylogenetically independent contrasts are significant for male lekkers (positive) and female non-lekkers (negative), but not for female lekkers or male non-lekkers. Moreover, the total number of character–state combinations, and multivariate measures of variability, are greater in non-lekkers than lekkers.The characteristic plumages of lekkers (‘duller monochromatic’, ‘brighter dichromatic’ and intermediate between these extremes) comprise just a subset of those observed among non-lekkers, and exclude extremely ‘dull dichromatic’ and extremely ‘bright monochromatic’ plumages. I suggest that predation, and foraging behaviours compatible with lekking, may restrict plumage variation among lekkers. Thus ecological rather than overt sexual characteristics may explain monomorphism in birds under intense mate competition, as well as the paradox of strong female mate preferences on leks, where males appear to contribute only sperm to female reproductive efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, M. (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S.J. (1983) Sexual selection: The interface of theory and empiricism. In Mate Choice (P. Bateson, ed.), pp. 67–107. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A. (1991) Mate choice on leks. TREE 6, 274–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiweiss, R. (1983) Variation and evolution in some Andean hummingbird genera. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

  • Bleiweiss, R. (1985) Iridescent polychromatism in a female hummingbird: Is it related to feeding strategies? Auk 102, 701–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiweiss, R. (1992a) Widespread polychromatism in female sunangel hummingbirds (Heliangelus: Trochilidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 45, 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiweiss, R. (1992b) Reversed plumage ontogeny in a female hummingbird: Implications for the evolution of iridescent colors and sexual dichromatism. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 47, 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiweiss, R. (1994) Behavioural and evolutionary consequences of UV reflectance by the gorgets of polychromatic sunangel hummingbirds. Animal Behav. 48, 978–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J.W. (1981) The evolution of leks. In Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Research and New Theory (R.D. Alexander and D.W. Tinkle, eds), pp. 138–169. Chiron Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J.W. and Gibson, R.M. (1983) Leks and mate choice. In Mate Choice (P. Bateson, ed.), pp. 109–138. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J.W. and Vehrencamp, S.L. (1977) Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats. III. Mating systems. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, D. (1989) UV-vision: A bird's eye view of feathers. J. Comp. Physiol. A 164, 787–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, G.S. and Rohwer, S. (1989) The evolution of conspicuous and distinctive coloration for communication in birds. In Current Ornithology (D.M. Power, ed.), pp. 51–108. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray, London.

  • Dickerman, A.W., Jones, J.A. and Garland, T., Jr (1993) Phenotypic Diversity Analysis Program, Version 1.1. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A. (1978) A predator's view of animal color patters. Evol. Biol. 11, 319–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A. (1980) Natural selection on color pattern in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34, 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger, P. and Colwell, R.K. (1978) Community organization among neotropical nectar-feeding birds. Am. Zool. 18, 779–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1993) PHYLIP. Phylogenetic inference package and documentation, Version 3.4. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1958) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.L. (1976) Animal Biochromes and Structural Colors. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, T., Jr, Harvey, P.H. and Ives, A.R. (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41, 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, T., Jr, Dickerman, A.W., Janis, C.M. and Jones, J.A. (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42, 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, F.B. (1990) Ornithology. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A. (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 326, 119–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P.H. and Pagel, M.D. (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, G.E. (1990) Female house finches prefer colourful males: Sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Animal Behav. 40, 563–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, G.E. (1992) Proximate basis of variation in carotenoid pigmentation in male house finches. Auk 109, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund, J. (1989) Size and plumage dimorphism in lek-breeding birds: A comparative analysis. Am. Nat. 134, 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund, J. and Alatalo, R.V. (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund, J. and Lundberg, A. (1987) Sexual selection in a monomorphic lek-breeding bird: Correlates of male mating success in the great snipe Gallinago media. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund, J. and Sillén-Tullberg, B. (1994) Does lekking promote the evolution of male-biased size dimorphism in birds? On the use of comparative approaches. Am. Nat. 144, 881–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund, J., Eriksson, M. and Lindell, L.E. (1990) Females of the lek-breeding great snipe, Gallinago media, prefer males with white tails. Animal Behav. 40, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudon, J. and Brush, A.H. (1992) Identification of carotenoid pigments in birds. Meth. Enzymol. 213, 312–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P.A. (1981) The Plovers, Sandpipers, and Snipes of the World. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P.A. (1983) The Grouse of the World. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P.A. (1994) Arena Birds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. and Ryan, M.J. (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. (1980) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34, 292–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721–3725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W.P. and Maddison, D.R. (1992) MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 3.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J.P. (1979) Leks, sex, and buff-breasted sandpipers. Am. Birds 33, 823–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, E.J. (1992) Lekking and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds: Comparative approaches. Am. Nat. 140, 665–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, J.W., Ptacek, J.A. and Will, K.L. (1984) The detection of near-ultraviolet light by nonmigratory and migratory birds. Auk 101, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R.B. (1984) Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Ornithol. Monogr. 33. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, A. and Garland, T., Jr (1994) Polytomies in comparative analyses of continuous characters. Syst. Biol. 42, 569–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralls, K. (1977) Sexual dimorphism in mammals: Avian models and unanswered questions. Am. Nat. 111, 917–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, C.L. (1969) The control of color in birds. Am. Zool. 9, 521–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgely, R.S. and Tudor, G. (1994) The Birds of South America, Vol. II. The Suboscine Passerines. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M.B. (1985) Social organization of the Band-tailed Manakin (Pipra fasciicauda). Condor 87, 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossotti, H. (1983) Colour. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1988) SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savalli, U.M. (1995) The evolution of bird colouration and plumage elaboration. Curr. Ornithol. 12, 141–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1967) Statistical Methods. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.W. (1982) The Cotingas. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.W. and Snow, B.K. (1979) The ocher-bellied flycatcher and the evolution of lek behavior. Condor 81, 286–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, F.G. and Wolf, L.L. (1979) Ecology and evolution of lek mating behavior in the long-tailed hermit hummingbird. Ornithol. Monogr. 27, American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D.L. (1985) PAUP, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsomony, Program and Documentation, Version 2.4.2. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trail, P.W. (1990) Why should lek-breeders be monomorphic? Evolution 44, 1837–1852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J. and Willson, M.F. (1969) Mating systems, sexual dimorphism and the role of male North American passerine birds in the nesting cycle. Ornithol. Monogr. 9. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhardt, M.J. (1983) Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Quart. Rev. Biol. 58, 155–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R.H. (1991) Lekking in birds and mammals: Behavioral and evolutionary issues. Adv. Study Behav. 20, 201–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, E.O. (1972) The behavior of spotted antbirds. Ornithol. Monogr. 10. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, E.O., Wechsler, D. and Willis, Y.O. (1978) On behavior and nesting of McConnell's flycatcher (Pipromorpha mcconnelli): Does female rejection lead to male promiscuity? Auk 95, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, L.L. (1969) Female territoriality in a tropical hummingbird. Auk 86, 490–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, L.L. and Stiles, F.G. (1970) Evolution of pair-cooperation in a tropical hummingbird. Evolution 24, 759–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiweiss, R., Kirsch J.A.W. and Matheus, J.C. (1994) DNA-DNA hybridization evidence for subfamily structure among hummingbirds. Auk 111, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forshaw, J.M. (1978) Parrots of the World. David and Charles, Newton Abbot, Devon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, F.B. and Gerwin, J.A. (1989) Protein relationships among hermit hummingbirds. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 141, 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P.A. (1981) The Plovers, Sandpipers, and Snipes of the World. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P.A. (1983) The Grouse of the World. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P.A. (1991) Bustards, Hemipodes, and Sandgrouse. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, S., Urban, E.K. and Fry, C.H. (1992) The Birds of Africa, Vol. IV. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R.B. (1973) Behavior, mimetic songs and song dialects, and relationship of the parasitic indigobirds (Vidua) of Africa. Ornithol. Monogr. 11. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prum, R.O. (1990) Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of display behavior in the Neotropical manakins (Aves: Piopridae). Ethology 84, 202–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prum, R.O. and Lanyon, W.E. (1989) Monophyly and phylogeny of the Schiffornis group (Tyrannoidea). Condor 91, 444–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C.G. and Ahlquist, J.E. (1991) Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.W. (1982) The Cotingas. British Museum of Natural History, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauch, J.G., Jr (1978) The phylogeny of the Charadriiformes (Aves): A new estimate using the method of character compatibility analysis. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 34, 263–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zusi, R.L. and Bentz, G.D. (1982) Variation of a muscle in hummingbirds and swifts and its systematic implications. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 95, 412–420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology and the Zoological Museum, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    ROBERT Bleiweiss

Authors
  1. ROBERT Bleiweiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bleiweiss, R. Covariation of sexual dichromatism and plumage colours in lekking and non-lekking birds: A comparative analysis. Evolutionary Ecology 11, 217–235 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018456017643

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018456017643

Search

Navigation