<iframe src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-KCV32QR" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Identification of dendritic antigen-presenting cells in the zebrafish

Edited* by Laurie H. Glimcher, Harvard University, Boston, MA, and approved June 2, 2010 (received for review January 13, 2010)
August 23, 2010
107 (36) 15850-15855

Abstract

In mammals, dendritic cells (DCs) form the key link between the innate and adaptive immune systems. DCs act as immune sentries in various tissues and, upon encountering pathogen, engulf and traffic foreign antigen to secondary lymphoid tissues, stimulating antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Although DCs are of fundamental importance in orchestrating the mammalian immune response, their presence and function in nonmammalian vertebrates is largely unknown. Because teleosts possess one of the earliest recognizable adaptive immune systems, we sought to identify antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in the zebrafish to better understand the potential origins of DCs and their evolutionary relationship to lymphocytes. Here we present the identification and characterization of a zebrafish APC subset strongly resembling mammalian DCs. Rare DCs are present in various adult tissues, and can be enriched by their affinity for the lectin peanut agglutinin (PNA). We show that PNAhi myeloid cells possess the classical morphological features of mammalian DCs as revealed by histochemical and ultrastructural analyses, phagocytose-labeled bacterial preparations in vivo, and exhibit expression of genes associated with DC function and antigen presentation, including il12, MHC class II invariant chain iclp1, and csf1r. Importantly, we show that PNAhi cells can activate T lymphocytes in an antigen-dependent manner. Together, these studies suggest that the cellular constituents responsible for antigen presentation are remarkably conserved from teleosts to mammals, and indicate that the zebrafish may serve as a unique model to study the origin of APC subsets and their evolutionary role as the link between the innate and adaptive immune systems.
In 1868, Paul Langerhans made the first description of dendritic cells (DCs) found in human skin that he regarded as “intraepidermal receptors for extracutaneous signals of the nervous system” (1). Over a century later, this DC subset bearing his name, the Langerhans cell (LC), remained an enigma to dermatologists. It was not until the 1970s that Steinman and Cohn clearly identified the DC as a distinct cell type with unique morphology, tissue distribution, cell-surface phenotype, and function (25). Seminal studies using purified DCs demonstrated their ability to induce T-cell activation and proliferation, establishing their role as “professional” APCs (6). In the interim, the role of DCs in regulating microbial infections, cancer, and autoimmune disorders is increasingly being recognized.
Since the first descriptions of DCs in humans and mice, this cell type has been identified in other mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians, but not in fish (7). In evolutionary terms, teleosts possess one of the earliest recognizable adaptive immune systems, containing B and T lymphocytes with somatically rearranged antigen receptors, the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), and immunological memory (8, 9). Therefore, the presence of DCs in bony fish would provide key information regarding the ontogeny of specific immunity in vertebrates. To date, the only evidence supporting the existence of DCs in vertebrate fish comes from the morphological description of Birbeck granules, a unique feature of mammalian LCs, in leukocytes from lymphoid tissues of salmonids and from inflammatory lesions in rainbow trout bearing microsporidial gill disease (10). Here, we have addressed the biology of DCs in the zebrafish, a small cyprinid teleost that features an immune system similar to that of mammals (11).

Results and Discussion

Identification of DCs in Zebrafish.

We previously determined that the major hematopoietic lineages of the zebrafish could be identified by light-scatter characteristics using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) (12). Here, we modified this technique to allow detection of APCs. Because a hallmark of APCs is the phagocytosis of pathogens, we performed i.p. injections of Alexa 488-labeled, heat-killed Staphylococcus aureus to identify resident phagocytes. After 16 h, we collected i.p. exudate (IPEX) and assessed phagocytosis by FACS. As shown in Fig. 1A Center, 5 ± 1.8% (n = 11) of peritoneal cells phagocytosed S. aureus (1.1 × 104 ± 962 phagocytes/fish, n = 6), and the vast majority of these phagocytes (Alexa 488+ cells) were present in the light-scatter gate previously shown to contain myelomonocytes in zebrafish (Fig. 1A Right, green gate) (12). Fluorescent phagocytes were sorted from the myelomonocyte gate and stained with Wright-Giemsa (WG) to assess cellular morphology. Most phagocytes were neutrophils (40 ± 15.5%), as distinguished by clear cytoplasm and segmented nuclei (Fig. 1B, i), and monocytes and macrophages (Mφs) (52 ± 12%), characterized by high cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios and agranular cytoplasm containing vacuoles (Fig. 1B, ii and iii). Importantly, we identified cells that morphologically resembled mammalian DCs. Over 7 ± 2.5% (n = 6) of Alexa 488+ cells displayed dendritic filaments emanating from the cell body. These dendrites varied in length, width, form, and number, resulting in stellate or elongated cell shapes. Nuclei were oval or kidney shaped, and cytoplasm was devoid of large granules (Fig. 1B, iv–vi). Together, these findings indicate that the zebrafish immune system includes phagocytes similar to those in mammals, including DC-like cells. Thus, the cellular constituents of the antigen presentation process appear to be well conserved from teleosts to higher vertebrates.
Fig. 1.
Identification of DCs in zebrafish. (A) PBS (Left) or S. aureus Alexa 488 (Center) was injected i.p., and IPEX cells were collected after 16 h. Phagocytes (black gate, Center) were detected by Alexa 488 fluorescence (5.06 ± 1.84%, n = 11) and separated according to their light-scatter characteristics (Right) as erythrocytes (red gate), lymphocytes (blue gate), myelomonocytes (green gate), or eosinophils (orange gate). (B) IPEX phagocytes within the myelomonocyte gate (green) were isolated (1.1 × 104 ± 962 phagocytes/fish) and subjected to cytospin analysis followed by WG staining. (Upper) Phagocytic myelomonocytes, including neutrophils (i, 40 ± 15%), monocytes, and Mφs (ii and iii, 52 ± 12%). (Lower) DCs (iv–vi, 7 ± 2.5%); n = 6, ± indicates SD. (Scale bar: 5 μm.)

Enrichment of Zebrafish DCs by Flow Cytometry and Lectin-Binding Affinity.

Although our in vivo phagocytosis assay allowed us to identify DCs in the zebrafish, this assay did not provide the yield of phagocytes necessary for further characterization of these rare cells. With the zebrafish being a relative newcomer to the field of immunology, there are fewer tools, such as monoclonal antibodies, available to perform prospective isolation techniques (11). Therefore, we sought alternative methods of cellular subfractionation, including differential lectin-binding affinity. Lectins are sugar-binding proteins that recognize complex carbohydrate structures on the cell surface and have been used extensively to distinguish different leukocyte populations in mice and humans (13). Peanut agglutinin (PNA) is a lectin that binds preferentially to galactosyl (β−1, 3) N-acetylgalactosamine, a carbohydrate structure present on some leukocytes, including DC subsets in humans and LCs in both mouse and guinea pigs (1416). For these reasons, we examined PNA binding on zebrafish leukocytes. We chose whole kidney marrow (WKM) as the source of leukocytes because it contains all major blood cell lineages in abundance (12). Similar to the scarcity of DCs in mammalian tissues, zebrafish DCs were rare (0.18 ± 0.1%, n = 4) within unfractionated WKM. When cells from WKM are separated based on their light-scatter characteristics by FACS, the vast majority of DC-like cells were found within the myelomonocyte fraction (Fig. 2A Left, green gate) and comprised 2.05 ± 0.2% (n = 4) of cells within this population. However, the final yield obtained by light-scatter fractionation is too low (≈2.5 × 104 myelomonocytes/WKM) after back-to-back sorting to enable the purification of high numbers of DCs. Further fractionation of the myelomonocyte population was achieved using PNA affinity. Whereas just over half of the myelomonocyte fraction (Fig. 2A Left, green gate) displayed high PNA affinity (54.3 ± 8.6% PNAhi cells; n = 26; Fig. 2A Right), sorting of the PNAhi myelomonocyte fraction yielded a higher number of total cells (≈8.5 × 104 myelomonocytes/WKM) and an approximate 6-fold enrichment of DCs when compared with purified myelomonocytes alone. Morphological analyses revealed that the majority of purified PNAhi myelomonocytes were neutrophils (60.0 ± 15%, n = 3; Fig. 2B, i), followed by monocytes (17.5 ± 7.3%, n = 3; Fig. 2B, ii) and Mφs (10.0 ± 3.5%, n = 3; Fig. 2B, iii). Importantly, 12.8 ± 2.6% (n = 6) of the PNAhi myelomonocytes displayed morphological features similar to mammalian DCs, including large veils or dendrites extending in several directions from the cell body, stellate or bipolar elongated cell shape, and kidney-shaped nuclei (Fig. 2B, iv). In addition, we observed high mobility of PNAhi DCs in culture, an important characteristic that distinguishes these cells from other leukocytes in mammals (2, 17). No DCs were found within the PNAneg myelomonocyte fraction. That DCs can be enriched 70-fold over unfractionated WKM using PNA affinity shows that combined light-scatter gating and lectin-binding affinity is useful to identify and isolate DCs from WKM and other immune-related tissues (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 2.
Enrichment of zebrafish DCs by flow cytometry and lectin-binding affinity. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from WKM and labeled with PNA. (A) Contour plot (Left) demonstrates the distribution of cells in WKM by light scatter: erythrocytes (red), lymphocytes (blue), precursors (purple), myelomonocytes (green), and eosinophils (orange). Histogram (Right) shows PNA binding (black unshaded histogram) and negative control (shaded gray histogram) within the myelomonocyte gate. (B) Cytospin analysis of PNAhi myelomonocytes purified from WKM and stained with WG: neutrophils (i), monocytes (ii), Mφs (iii), and DCs (iv). (C) DC-like cells isolated from other organs and peripheral sites based on PNA binding: skin (i), gut (ii), IPEX (iii), and gills (iv). (Scale bar: 5 μm.)

Morphological Characterization of Zebrafish DCs.

Historically, the morphology of DCs was characterized in multiple species using various histochemical stains and ultrastructural analyses (7). The ability to enrich zebrafish DCs by PNA affinity enabled us to use both approaches to further characterize this cell type. We first used histological and histochemical stains to differentiate PNAhi DCs from other leukocytes. Both monocytes and Mφs have been identified in zebrafish by shared characteristics, including high cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios and agranular, vacuolated cytoplasm (12, 18, 19). In contrast, PNAhi DCs displayed different morphologies characterized by multiple large dendrites and different body shapes, as revealed by WG and H&E stains (Fig. 3A, i and ii). In addition, PNAhi DCs contained small, acid phosphate (AP)-positive granules that localized perinuclearly, whereas Mφs exhibited larger AP-positive granules that showed a more diffuse cytoplasmic pattern (Fig. 3A, iii). In mammals, monocytes can be distinguished from granulocytes by α-naphthyl acetate esterase (NAE) staining (20). Here, PNAhi DCs cells stained weakly for NAE compared with monocytic cells, distinguished by a black precipitate throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 3A, iv). Neutrophils, eosinophils, and mast cells have been identified in zebrafish by specific staining for myeloperoxidase (MPX), periodic acid-Schiff reagent (PAS), and toluidine blue (TB), respectively (18, 19, 21). Unlike these granulocyte subsets, the cytoplasm of PNAhi DCs stained negatively for MPX, PAS, and TB (Fig. 3A, v–vii). Together, these findings suggest that zebrafish PNAhi DCs possess morphological and cytochemical characteristics different from other myeloid cells and reminiscent of those exhibited by mammalian DCs (2, 22).
Fig. 3.
Morphological characterization of zebrafish DCs. PNAhi myelomonocytes were isolated from WKM (A and B) or skin (C) by FACS. (A) Cells were stained for WG, H&E, AP (magenta precipitate), NAE (black precipitate), MPX (brown precipitate), PAS (red precipitate), and TB (purple precipitate). (Upper) Putative DCs for each stain. (Lower) Positive staining controls: Mφs (i–iii), monocyte (iv), neutrophil (v), eosinophil (vi), and mast cell (vii). (Scale bar: 5 μm.) (B) TEM was performed to examine the ultrastructure of PNAhi myelomonocytes. (Upper) DCs. (Lower) Other leukocytes: Mφ (i), neutrophil (ii), and eosinophil (iii). Denoted features include nucleus (N), apoptotic corpse (AC), cigar-shaped granules (red arrowheads), round, electron-dense granules (blue arrowheads), and mitochondria (green arrowheads). (Scale bar: 1 μm.) (C) TEM analysis of Birbeck-like granules from PNAhi DCs in skin. Magnified granule regions: vacuole (red arrowheads) and rod structure (blue arrowheads). (Scale bar: 200 nm.)
To examine the ultrastructural properties of zebrafish DCs, we performed transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on PNAhi myelomonocytes purified from WKM. TEM analyses indicated that zebrafish DCs (Fig. 3B Upper) possessed many large veils extending from the cell body (measuring 0.5–6 μm in length and 0.1–1 μm in width), some of which contained small and spherical mitochondria. Nuclei tended to be large, contorted, and refractive, with most heterochromatin arranged along the nuclear envelope. Compared with other zebrafish leukocytes (Fig. 3B Lower, i–iii), DCs display relatively electron lucent cytoplasm, one of the most reliable identifying criteria of mammalian DCs (2). Zebrafish DC cytoplasm contained mitochondria with well-developed cristae, few electron-dense granules or lysosomes, but several translucent vesicles resembling multivesicular bodies or vacuoles. These ultrastructural features match those of classical DCs in mammals (2). Furthermore, we detected the presence of membrane-encapsulated granules that displayed “tennis racket” morphologies in the cytoplasm of PNAhi DCs isolated from skin (Fig. 3C). At one end of the granule, a vacuole was often observed containing amorphous, luminal material, whereas the other end was often rod-shaped. Measurements of these granules through the rod-shaped region gave a mean diameter of 37.7 ± 8.59 nm, similar to that of Birbeck granules found in human (45 nm) and murine (43 nm) LCs (23, 24). Considering that Birbeck granules are the morphological markers of mammalian LCs, and that these cells also exhibit PNA binding (15, 16), we postulate that PNAhi DCs isolated from skin are the LC counterpart in zebrafish, supporting the existence of LCs in teleosts, as previously proposed (10).

Further Enrichment of Zebrafish DCs for Functional Analysis.

The ability to enrich DCs 70-fold by PNA affinity compared with unfractionated WKM was beneficial, but unfortunately most of these PNAhi cells were neutrophils (60 ± 15%, n = 3; Fig. 2B, i). To exclude neutrophils from our further analyses, we used transgenic animals that use the myeloperoxidase promoter to drive eGFP expression (mpx:eGFP). As shown in Fig. 4A, we subfractionated myelomonocytes into MpxPNA, MpxPNA+, and Mpx+PNA+. After 4 h of culture to recover dendrite morphology after sorting, analysis of each fraction showed that the Mpx+PNA+ fraction contained 77.8 ± 13.1% neutrophils (Fig. 4B, blue text), whereas the MpxPNA fraction contained mostly erythrocytes (78.1 ± 6.9%; Fig. 4B, black text) and erythroid precursor cells (20.2 ± 6.9%). In contrast, the MpxPNA+ population contained myeloid precursors (43.9 ± 6.2%; Fig. 4B, red text), monocytes (23.9 ± 4.1%), and very few neutrophils (7.4 ± 6.1%). Whereas DCs were not proportionally enriched over prior fractionation methods (6.3 ± 3.5%, Fig. 4B, compared with 12.8 ± 2.6%, Fig. 2B), the total numbers of phenotypic DCs collected were over 500-fold enriched vs. unfractionated WKM. Importantly for functional studies, Mφs, which are also APCs, were significantly reduced (3.9 ± 3.6%, Fig. 4B, compared with 10.0 ± 3.5%, Fig. 2B, iii). After stimulating each purified fraction with E. coli LPS, the MpxPNA+ population uniquely up-regulated il-12p40, an essential cytokine for T-helper cell differentiation and NK activation (Fig. 4C Left, red bar). In mammals, IL-12 expression can be induced in Mφs and other myeloid cells, but is mainly produced by DCs in response to antigenic stimulation, when its p40 subunit is up-regulated (25). In addition, MpxPNA+ cells up-regulated csf1r (Fig. 4C Center, red bar), an essential growth factor receptor found on mammalian DCs, as well as the MHC class II invariant chain iclp1 (Fig. 4C Right, red bar), an essential component of exogenous antigen presentation that is constitutively expressed by all APCs, including B cells, Mφs, and DCs (26), whereas the other myelomonocyte fractions were unresponsive to LPS-mediated gene induction (Fig. 4C, blue and gray bars).
Fig. 4.
Further enrichment of zebrafish DCs for functional analyses. (A) Single-cell suspensions were prepared from mpx:eGFP transgenic WKM and labeled with PNA. Myelomonocytes (green gate) were divided into mpx (black box) and mpx+ (blue box). These populations were further subdivided into mpx PNA (gray box), mpx PNA+ (red box), and mpx+ PNA+ (blue box) fractions. (B) After 4 h of culture, mpx PNA (gray), mpx PNA+ (red), and mpx+ PNA+ (blue) fractions were collected and stained with MGG to assess cell morphology. Differentials are presented as mean ± SD, n = 6. (C) mpx PNA+ (red bar), mpx+ PNA+ (blue bar), and mpx PNA (black bar) myelomonocyte fractions were cultured for 16 h with and without LPS. The abundance of il-12p40, csf1r, and iclp1 transcripts were measured by qPCR. Expression is presented as fold induction over nonstimulated controls. Asterisks denote populations with no detectable expression of the transcript. Bars represent mean, n = 3. Error bars represent SD.

Functional Characterization of DC-Enriched Populations.

As shown in Fig. 1, we detected zebrafish DCs based upon their phagocytic ability. We next asked whether this assay, in combination with PNA affinity, could be used to further characterize these cells. Following peritoneal injection of Alexa 488-labeled S. aureus, we collected IPEX and stained the cell samples with PNA for FACS analysis. Though not all myeloid PNAhi cells phagocytosed S. aureus (Fig. 5A Upper, blue gate), all phagocytes (7.5 ± 1.7%, n = 4) were PNAhi (green gate). PNA cells (Fig. 5A Upper, red gate) were not phagocytic. We subjected each purified cell population to qPCR analyses to determine the expression of the activation-induced il12p40 gene. Though expression of il-12p40 was not detectable in PNA myelomonocytes (Fig. 5A Lower, red bar), it was detected in PNAhi nonphagocytes at approximately half the levels of that in WKM (blue bar). By contrast, il-12p40 expression in PNAhi phagocytes showed an approximate 18-fold increase compared with that in WKM (Fig. 5A Lower, green bar). Cytospin analyses of these three populations revealed that DCs were twice as abundant within purified PNAhi phagocytes (9.9 ± 1.3%, n = 3) compared with the PNAhi nonphagocytic fraction (5.1 ± 0.7%, n = 3). DCs were rare within purified PNA cells (0.2 ± 0.3%, n = 3). These data confirm that PNAhi phagocytes express relatively high levels of il-12p40 transcripts, and suggest that DCs within this population may contribute to the expression of this important inflammatory cytokine.
Fig. 5.
Functional characterization of Zebrafish DC-enriched populations. (A Upper) In vivo phagocytosis by PNAhi myelomonocytes. S. aureus Alexa 488 was injected i.p., and 16 h later cells were collected from IPEX, stained with PNA, and analyzed by FACS. Cells were gated on the myelomonocyte gate and divided into the following populations: PNA (red gate and bar), PNAhi (blue gate and bar), and PNAhi phagocytes (green gate and bar). (Lower) qPCR analysis of il-12p40 transcript in these populations relative to that in WKM (black bar, arbitrary unit set at 1). Data are shown as average of fold change over WKM ± SD (n = 4). Asterisk indicates transcript not detected. (B) Illustration of the antigen-presentation assay using KLH to prime a polyclonal T-cell response, with the lck:eGFP zebrafish transgenic line as the source for naive (Tnaive) or KLH-primed (TKLH) T lymphocytes. (C) Proliferation responses as measured by dilution of PKH26 of lck+-TKLH cells stimulated with either PNAhi (Upper) or PNA (Lower) myelomonocytes loaded with KLH protein. (D) lck+-TKLH cells stimulated with PNAhi myelomonocytes loaded (Upper) or not loaded (Lower) with KLH. (E) lck+-TKLH (Upper) or lck+-Tnaive (Lower) cells stimulated with PNAhi myelomonocytes loaded with KLH. T-cell proliferation results (C–E) are representative of three independent experiments. For all proliferation assays, the APC/T-cell ratio = 5:1. Histograms show T-cell proliferation as modeled by the FlowJo proliferation tool. %DIV = percent of T cells that divided.

Zebrafish PNAhi Myelomonocytes Stimulate T Cells in an Antigen-Dependent Manner.

In mammals, DCs are widely accepted as the most potent and versatile APC due to their ability to prime naïve T cells both in vitro and in vivo (26). This reputation as professional APCs derives from early studies in which DC-enriched populations were shown to be powerful stimulators of the mixed leukocyte reaction and in a number of antigen-specific T-helper responses (6). To enable similar functional assays in the zebrafish, we sought to develop assays to test APC function. We therefore performed immunization studies in adult lck:eGFP transgenic zebrafish using keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), a well-known soluble protein that promotes a polyclonal T-cell response in both mammals and teleosts (27, 28). As previously demonstrated, the zebrafish leukocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (lck) gene promoter drives GFP expression in T lymphocytes, making this transgenic line an ideal source to isolate KLH-primed T cells (TKLH) after immunization (29). We immunized lck:eGFP animals by i.p. injection of KLH emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant to induce a general inflammatory response, followed 2 wk later by a second i.p. injection with KLH emulsified in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant to boost the T-cell response against this soluble protein (see Fig. 5B). Control animals were immunized with adjuvant alone to isolate “naive” lck+ T cells (Tnaive). Five days after boosting, lck+ TKLH and lck+ Tnaive cell subsets were isolated from the gut, spleen, and peritoneal cavity by FACS (at a purity of ≥95% based on GFP expression), and labeled with the red membrane dye PKH26 to permit detection of cell proliferation through stepwise loss of dye signal. Subsequently, each T-cell subset was cultured in the presence of purified PNAhi myelomonocytes either pulsed (loaded) or not (unloaded) with KLH. Because pure inbred zebrafish lines do not exist due to infertility resulting from successive inbreeding (11), we isolated myelomonocytes from the WKM of the same lck:eGFP animals immunized to lessen allogeneic responses. After 3 days of coculture, cells were harvested and the proliferation of lck+ T cells was measured by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 5C, primed T cells (TKLH) proliferated over 3-fold more when exposed to KLH-loaded PNAhi cells (Fig. 5C Upper) vs. KLH-loaded PNA cells (Fig. 5C Lower) isolated from the myelomonocyte fraction, supporting our conclusion that zebrafish APCs are highly enriched within the PNAhi myeloid fraction. To further examine the ability of PNAhi cells to stimulate proliferation in response to specific antigen, primed T cells were exposed to PNAhi cells loaded with KLH (Fig. 5D Upper) or not (Fig. 5D Lower). As KLH-loaded APCs led to an approximately 3-fold increase in proliferation compared with unloaded APCs, this experiment demonstrated that the T-cell proliferation was antigen specific. As expected, primed T cells (Fig. 5E Upper) proliferated more readily than naïve T cells (Fig. 5E Lower), suggesting that the marked survival and proliferation increases observed were due to prior, in vivo stimulation of KLH-responsive T-cell clones by PNAhi APCs. Together, these findings show that the PNAhi myeloid fraction of WKM contains APCs able to uptake, process, and present antigen to stimulate proliferation of T lymphocytes in an antigen-dependent manner.
In seeking to describe antigen-presenting cells in zebrafish, we have identified and characterized DCs in this animal model. Our findings suggest that DCs were present in the ancestor common to teleosts and mammals, and that this key link between the innate and adaptive immune systems has been in place for over 450 million years. These studies lay the foundation for future work aimed at understanding antigen presentation and immune responses in the zebrafish. Our findings also suggest that creation of transgenic animals harboring fluorescent reporters under control of the il-12 or mhcII promoters will be useful to specifically mark APCs to directly monitor the early immune response in living animals. Our establishment of an immunization protocol to prime a zebrafish T-cell response in vivo will enable more-refined prospective isolation approaches, APC-derived vaccinations, vaccinations against specific pathogens, and more detailed analyses of APC function. With continued efforts to generate transgenic lines specifically marking each hematopoietic lineage, our assay to test APC function will permit the identification and efficacy of each APC subset in the activation of the specific immune response in the zebrafish.

Materials and Methods

Zebrafish Stocks and Embryos.

Zebrafish were mated, staged, and raised as previously described, and maintained in accordance with University of California, San Diego, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines (12). Tg(lck:eGFP)cz1 (29) and Tg(mpx:eGFP)i114 (30) transgenic zebrafish were used.

Cell Preparation.

Single-cell suspensions of WKM were prepared from adult zebrafish as previously described (31). IPEX cells were collected after making a ventral incision and washing the peritoneal cavity with PBS (Mediatech, Inc.). Skin samples were prepared by dissociating 1 cm2 sections of skin in PBS with Liberase Blendzyme II according to manufacturer’s instructions (Roche), followed by subsequent filtration. Single-cell suspensions from other organs were prepared by manual trituration and filtration. Cells were counted with a hemocytometer (Hausser Scientific), and viability was assessed by Trypan Blue (Invitrogen) exclusion.

Flow Cytometry and Sorting.

After single-cell suspensions were prepared from WKM, they were stained with biotinylated peanut agglutinin (PNA; Vector Laboratories) and allophycocyanin-conjugated (APC) streptavidin (eBioscience). Dead cells were excluded by propidium iodide positivity. Cells were analyzed and sorted with a LSR-II and FACSAria I (both BD Biosciences), respectively. Flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar). For in vivo phagocytosis assay, 2 μg of S. aureus conjugated to Alexa 488 fluorophore (Molecular Probes) was injected i.p. (1 mg/mL). Cells were collected from the IPEX 16 h after injection for analysis.

Cytology.

After purified myelomonocyte populations were cultured (2 × 104 cells/well) in a 96-well plate (Corning Inc.) with complete media (32) for 4 h, cells were harvested and cytospins were performed as previously described (3134) using a Shandon Cytospin 4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were fixed and stained with H&E (Thermo Fisher Scientific), WG, May-Grünwald Giemsa (MGG), MPX, PAS, TB, or NAE according to the manufacturer’s instructions (all from Sigma). For in vitro induction of gene expression, purified myelomonocyte fractions were cultured for 16 h with the addition of PBS or E. coli LPS (1 μg/mL).

Microscopy.

Cytospins were imaged using a DP70 microscope (Olympus America). For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cells were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, centrifuged, and washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Cells were embedded in 12% gelatin/PBS and centrifuged to reform a pellet in a microfuge tube. The gelatin/pellets were cut out of the microfuge tubes, postfixed in buffered 1% osmium tetroxide, buffer washed, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and transitioned through propylene oxide. The samples were embedded in Embed 812/Araldite (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Thin (60 nm) sections of the pellets were cut, mounted on parlodion-coated copper slot grids, and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate for examination on a Philips CM100 electron microscope (Philips/FEI Corporation) at 80 kV. Images were documented by using a MegaView III charge-coupled device camera (Olympus America) and converted to TIF format for subsequent processing in Adobe Photoshop.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR).

RNA was obtained using RNeasy Protect (Qiagen). cDNA was prepared from RNA with random hexamer qScript Supermix (Quanta BioSciences) and controlled for contamination with separate reactions lacking reverse transcriptase. qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate with SsoFast EvaGreen Mastermix (Bio-Rad) and quantitated on the CFX96 system (Bio-Rad) using the ΔΔCt method with ef1α (35) as a reference gene. Product sizes of qPCR reactions were confirmed by gel electrophoresis. Primers were designed with Primer3 software: il-12p40 (gene id: ENSDARG00000033727) forward: GATACCCAGACTCCTGGAAC; reverse: GAGACTTTGTGTGCGGTAAG; csfr1 (gene id: ENSDARG00000007889) forward: ATGACCATACCCAACTTTCC; reverse: AGTTTGTTGGTCTGGATGTG; and iclp1 (gene id: ENSDARG00000009087) forward: AGAAGCAGCACATCAACG; reverse: AAGTGGGGTCAGAGTAATCC.

Antigen Presentation Assay.

lck:eGFP animals were immunized by i.p. injection with 2 μg of KLH (Sigma) emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA, 1 mg/mL; Sigma), followed 2 wk later by a second injection with 2 μg of KLH emulsified in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA, 1 mg/mL; Sigma). Control fish were immunized with adjuvant alone to isolate “naive” lck+-T cells (Tnaive). Five days after boosting, lck+-TKLH cells were isolated from the gut, spleen, and peritoneal cavity by FACS (at a purity of ≥95% based on GFP expression), labeled with the membrane dye PKH26 (Sigma), and cultured (5 × 104 cells/well) in a 96-well plate (Corning Inc.). T cells were then challenged with PNAhi myelomonocytes (APC/T-cell ratio = 5:1) isolated from the WKM of the same lck:eGFP animals that had been cultured with KLH protein (100 μg/mL) for 4 h, and stimulated with E. coli LPS (1 μg/mL) for an additional 6 h. After 3 d of coculture, cells were harvested, and the proliferation of lck+-T cells was measured by flow cytometry. The FlowJo proliferation tool was used to analyze the division-mediated dilution of PKH26 fluorescence in lck:eGFP+ T cells. Percentage of T cells that divided (%DIV) was calculated by FlowJo’s proliferation wizard software.

Statistics.

Data were analyzed with the two-tailed Student’s t test. Differences were deemed significant at P < 0.05.

Acknowledgments

We thank A. J. Feeney, A. W. Goldrath, D. M. Page, B. Santoso, and E. Zuñiga for critical evaluation of the manuscript, Malcolm Wood for TEM analyses, V. Wittamer (University of California, La Jolla, CA) for providing the il-12p40, csf1r, and iclp1 primers, Roger Rainville, Evie Wright, and Lisa Phelps for excellent animal care, Karen Ong for support on cell purification by FACS, and Kerstin Richter for excellent laboratory management. This work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Research Supplement Fellowship 3R01DK074482-01 (to G.L.-V.), San Diego Institutional Research and Academic Career Development Award Fellowship GMO68524 (to G.L-V.), National Research Service Award T32-HL086344 (to D.L.S.), University of California, San Diego CURE Grant 5P30CA23100-22S2 (to K.B.), the American Society of Hematology (D.T.), the Senyei Family Foundation (D.T.), and National Institutes of Health Grant R01-DK074482 (to D.T.).

References

1
S Jolles, Paul Langerhans. J Clin Pathol 55, 243 (2002).
2
RM Steinman, ZA Cohn, Identification of a novel cell type in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice. I. Morphology, quantitation, tissue distribution. J Exp Med 137, 1142–1162 (1973).
3
RM Steinman, ZA Cohn, Identification of a novel cell type in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice. II. Functional properties in vitro. J Exp Med 139, 380–397 (1974).
4
RM Steinman, DS Lustig, ZA Cohn, Identification of a novel cell type in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice. 3. Functional properties in vivo. J Exp Med 139, 1431–1445 (1974).
5
RM Steinman, JC Adams, ZA Cohn, Identification of a novel cell type in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice. IV. Identification and distribution in mouse spleen. J Exp Med 141, 804–820 (1975).
6
RM Steinman, Dendritic cells: Understanding immunogenicity. Eur J Immunol 37, S53–S60 (2007).
7
C Miranda de Carvalho, C Bonnefont-Rebeix, D Rigal, L Chabanne, Dendritic cells in different animal species: An overview. Pathol Biol (Paris) 54, 85–93 (2006).
8
L Du Pasquier, Meeting the demand for innate and adaptive immunities during evolution. Scand J Immunol 62, 39–48 (2005).
9
JH Rombout, HB Huttenhuis, S Picchietti, G Scapigliati, Phylogeny and ontogeny of fish leucocytes. Fish Shellfish Immunol 19, 441–455 (2005).
10
J Lovy, GM Wright, DJ Speare, Comparative cellular morphology suggesting the existence of resident dendritic cells within immune organs of salmonids. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 291, 456–462 (2008).
11
NS Trede, DM Langenau, D Traver, AT Look, LI Zon, The use of zebrafish to understand immunity. Immunity 20, 367–379 (2004).
12
D Traver, et al., Transplantation and in vivo imaging of multilineage engraftment in zebrafish bloodless mutants. Nat Immunol 4, 1238–1246 (2003).
13
N Sharon, Lectin receptors as lymphocyte surface markers. Adv Immunol 34, 213–298 (1983).
14
H El Sherbini, et al., Lectin ligands on human dendritic cells and identification of a peanut agglutinin positive subset in blood. Cell Immunol 200, 36–44 (2000).
15
K Nakamura, A Ishii, K Tamaki, Subpopulation of murine epidermal Langerhans cells identified by lectin-binding sites. Arch Dermatol Res 282, 253–257 (1990).
16
G Schuler, N Romani, J Linert, EM Shevach, G Stingl, Subsets of epidermal Langerhans cells as defined by lectin binding profiles. J Invest Dermatol 81, 397–402 (1983).
17
K Inaba, et al., Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Exp Med 176, 1693–1702 (1992).
18
CM Bennett, et al., Myelopoiesis in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Blood 98, 643–651 (2001).
19
GJ Lieschke, AC Oates, MO Crowhurst, AC Ward, JE Layton, Morphologic and functional characterization of granulocytes and macrophages in embryonic and adult zebrafish. Blood 98, 3087–3096 (2001).
20
LT Yam, CY Li, WH Crosby, Cytochemical identification of monocytes and granulocytes. Am J Clin Pathol 55, 283–290 (1971).
21
JT Dobson, et al., Carboxypeptidase A5 identifies a novel mast cell lineage in the zebrafish providing new insight into mast cell fate determination. Blood 112, 2969–2972 (2008).
22
AH Zarnani, et al., The efficient isolation of murine splenic dendritic cells and their cytochemical features. Histochem Cell Biol 126, 275–282 (2006).
23
F Grassi, et al., Monocyte-derived dendritic cells have a phenotype comparable to that of dermal dendritic cells and display ultrastructural granules distinct from Birbeck granules. J Leukoc Biol 64, 484–493 (1998).
24
A Pérez-Torres, M Ustarroz-Cano, Demonstration of birbeck (Langerhans cells) granules in the normal chicken epidermis. J Anat 199, 493–497 (2001).
25
L Lyakh, G Trinchieri, L Provezza, G Carra, F Gerosa, Regulation of interleukin-12/interleukin-23 production and the T-helper 17 response in humans. Immunol Rev 226, 112–131 (2008).
26
J Banchereau, et al., Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol 18, 767–811 (2000).
27
PC Marrack, JW Kappler, Antigen-specific and nonspecific mediators of T cell/B cell cooperation. I. Evidence for their production by different T cells. J Immunol 114, 1116–1125 (1975).
28
NW Miller, LW Clem, Temperature-mediated processes in teleost immunity: Differential effects of temperature on catfish in vitro antibody responses to thymus-dependent and thymus-independent antigens. J Immunol 133, 2356–2359 (1984).
29
DM Langenau, et al., In vivo tracking of T cell development, ablation, and engraftment in transgenic zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 7369–7374 (2004).
30
SA Renshaw, et al., A transgenic zebrafish model of neutrophilic inflammation. Blood 108, 3976–3978 (2006).
31
DL Stachura, D Traver Essential Zebrafish Method: Cell and Developmental Biology (Academic/Elsevier Life Sciences, San Diego, 2009).
32
DL Stachura, et al., Zebrafish kidney stromal cell lines support multilineage hematopoiesis. Blood 114, 279–289 (2009).
33
JY Bertrand, et al., Definitive hematopoiesis initiates through a committed erythromyeloid progenitor in the zebrafish embryo. Development 134, 4147–4156 (2007).
34
JY Bertrand, JL Cisson, DL Stachura, D Traver, Notch signaling distinguishes 2 waves of definitive hematopoiesis in the zebrafish embryo. Blood 115, 2777–2783 (2010).
35
JY Bertrand, AD Kim, S Teng, D Traver, CD41+ cmyb+ precursors colonize the zebrafish pronephros by a novel migration route to initiate adult hematopoiesis. Development 135, 1853–1862 (2008).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 107 | No. 36
September 7, 2010
PubMed: 20733076

Classifications

Submission history

Published online: August 23, 2010
Published in issue: September 7, 2010

Keywords

  1. dendritic cells
  2. peanut agglutinin
  3. keyhole limpet hemocyanin
  4. IL-12

Acknowledgments

We thank A. J. Feeney, A. W. Goldrath, D. M. Page, B. Santoso, and E. Zuñiga for critical evaluation of the manuscript, Malcolm Wood for TEM analyses, V. Wittamer (University of California, La Jolla, CA) for providing the il-12p40, csf1r, and iclp1 primers, Roger Rainville, Evie Wright, and Lisa Phelps for excellent animal care, Karen Ong for support on cell purification by FACS, and Kerstin Richter for excellent laboratory management. This work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Research Supplement Fellowship 3R01DK074482-01 (to G.L.-V.), San Diego Institutional Research and Academic Career Development Award Fellowship GMO68524 (to G.L-V.), National Research Service Award T32-HL086344 (to D.L.S.), University of California, San Diego CURE Grant 5P30CA23100-22S2 (to K.B.), the American Society of Hematology (D.T.), the Senyei Family Foundation (D.T.), and National Institutes of Health Grant R01-DK074482 (to D.T.).

Notes

*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.

Authors

Affiliations

Geanncarlo Lugo-Villarino1
Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093-0380;
Keir M. Balla1
Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093-0380;
David L. Stachura
Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093-0380;
Karina Bañuelos
Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093-0380;
Miriam B. F. Werneck
Division of Cellular Biology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, 22031-050, Brazil; and
David Traver2 [email protected]
Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093-0380;
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093-0380

Notes

2
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected].
Author contributions: G.L.-V., K.M.B., D.L.S., M.B.F.W., and D.T. designed research; G.L.-V., K.M.B., D.L.S., and K.B. performed research; G.L.-V., K.M.B., D.L.S., and M.B.F.W. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; G.L.-V., K.M.B., D.L.S., M.B.F.W., and D.T. analyzed data; G.L.-V., K.M.B., D.L.S., and D.T. wrote the paper.
1
G.L.-V. and K.M.B. contributed equally to this work.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements




Altmetrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Get Access

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to get full access to it.

    Single Article Purchase

    Identification of dendritic antigen-presenting cells in the zebrafish
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 107
    • No. 36
    • pp. 15659-16000

    Media

    Figures

    Tables

    Other

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media